Analysis Overview for Ovarian Serous Cystadenocarcinoma
Maintained by TCGA GDAC Team (Broad Institute/Dana-Farber Cancer Institute/Harvard Medical School)
Overview
Introduction

This is the analysis overview for Firehose run "24 October 2012".

Summary

Note: These results are offered to the community as an additional reference point, enabling a wide range of cancer biologists, clinical investigators, and genome and computational scientists to easily incorporate TCGA into the backdrop of ongoing research. While every effort is made to ensure that Firehose input data and algorithms are of the highest possible quality, these analyses have not been reviewed by domain experts.

Results

- Sequence and Copy Number Analyses

- Copy number analysis (GISTIC2)
  View Report | There were 562 tumor samples used in this analysis: 31 significant arm-level results, 31 significant focal amplifications, and 39 significant focal deletions were found.

- Mutation Analysis (MutSig v2.0)
  View Report |

- Mutation Analysis (MutSig vS2N)
  View Report |

- Clustering Analyses

- Clustering of copy number data: consensus NMF
  View Report | The most robust consensus NMF clustering of 562 samples using the 70 copy number focal regions was identified for k = 3 clusters. We computed the clustering for k = 2 to k = 8 and used the cophenetic correlation coefficient to determine the best solution.

- Clustering of Methylation: consensus NMF
  View Report | The 1396 most variable methylated genes were selected based on variation. The variation cutoff are set for each tumor type empirically by fitting a bimodal distriution. For genes with multiple methylation probes, we chose the most variable one to represent the gene. Consensus NMF clustering of 557 samples and 1396 genes identified 4 subtypes with the stability of the clustering increasing for k = 2 to k = 8 and the average silhouette width calculation for selecting the robust clusters.

- Clustering of RPPA data: consensus NMF
  View Report | The most robust consensus NMF clustering of 412 samples using the 150 most variable proteins was identified for k = 3 clusters. We computed the clustering for k = 2 to k = 8 and used the cophenetic correlation coefficient to determine the best solution.

- Clustering of RPPA data: consensus hierarchical
  View Report | The 150 most variable proteins were selected. Consensus average linkage hierarchical clustering of 412 samples and 150 proteins identified 4 subtypes with the stability of the clustering increasing for k = 2 to k = 8 and the average silhouette width calculation for selecting the robust clusters.

- Clustering of mRNA expression: consensus NMF
  View Report | The most robust consensus NMF clustering of 571 samples using the 1500 most variable genes was identified for k = 3 clusters. We computed the clustering for k = 2 to k = 8 and used the cophenetic correlation coefficient to determine the best solution.

- Clustering of mRNA expression: consensus hierarchical
  View Report | The 1500 most variable genes were selected. Consensus average linkage hierarchical clustering of 571 samples and 1500 genes identified 3 subtypes with the stability of the clustering increasing for k = 2 to k = 8 and the average silhouette width calculation for selecting the robust clusters.

- Clustering of mRNAseq gene expression: consensus NMF
  View Report | The most robust consensus NMF clustering of 263 samples using the 1500 most variable genes was identified for k = 3 clusters. We computed the clustering for k = 2 to k = 8 and used the cophenetic correlation coefficient to determine the best solution.

- Clustering of mRNAseq gene expression: consensus hierarchical
  View Report | The 1500 most variable genes were selected. Consensus average linkage hierarchical clustering of 263 samples and 1500 genes identified 3 subtypes with the stability of the clustering increasing for k = 2 to k = 8 and the average silhouette width calculation for selecting the robust clusters.

- Clustering of miR expression: consensus NMF
  View Report | We filtered the data to 150 most variable miRs. Consensus NMF clustering of 570 samples and 150 miRs identified 3 subtypes with the stability of the clustering increasing for k = 2 to k = 8 and the average silhouette width calculation for selecting the robust clusters.

- Clustering of miR expression: consensus hierarchical
  View Report | We filtered the data to 150 most variable miRs. Consensus average linkage hierarchical clustering of 570 samples and 150 miRs identified 3 subtypes with the stability of the clustering increasing for k = 2 to k = 8 and the average silhouette width calculation for selecting the robust clusters.

- Clustering of miRseq expression: consensus NMF
  View Report | We filtered the data to 150 most variable miRs. Consensus NMF clustering of 454 samples and 150 miRs identified 3 subtypes with the stability of the clustering increasing for k = 2 to k = 8 and the average silhouette width calculation for selecting the robust clusters.

- Clustering of miRseq expression: consensus hierarchical
  View Report | We filtered the data to 150 most variable miRs. Consensus average linkage hierarchical clustering of 454 samples and 150 miRs identified 3 subtypes with the stability of the clustering increasing for k = 2 to k = 8 and the average silhouette width calculation for selecting the robust clusters.

- Correlation Analyses

- Correlation between copy number variations of arm-level result and selected clinical features
  View Report | Testing the association between copy number variation 80 arm-level results and 7 clinical features across 554 patients, 8 significant findings detected with Q value < 0.25.

- Correlation between copy number variation genes and selected clinical features
  View Report | Testing the association between copy number variation of 70 peak regions and 7 clinical features across 554 patients, 12 significant findings detected with Q value < 0.25.

- Correlation between gene methylation status and clinical features
  View Report | Testing the association between 12114 genes and 5 clinical features across 262 samples, statistically thresholded by Q value < 0.05, 2 clinical features related to at least one genes.

- Correlation between molecular cancer subtypes and selected clinical features
  View Report | Testing the association between subtypes identified by 12 different clustering approaches and 7 clinical features across 569 patients, 15 significant findings detected with P value < 0.05.

- Correlation between gene mutation status and selected clinical features
  View Report | Testing the association between mutation status of 9 genes and 5 clinical features across 316 patients, no significant finding detected with Q value < 0.25.

- Correlation between RPPA expression and clinical features
  View Report | Testing the association between 165 genes and 6 clinical features across 407 samples, statistically thresholded by Q value < 0.05, 3 clinical features related to at least one genes.

- Correlation between mRNA expression and clinical features
  View Report | Testing the association between 18632 genes and 7 clinical features across 564 samples, statistically thresholded by Q value < 0.05, 6 clinical features related to at least one genes.

- Correlation between mRNAseq expression and clinical features
  View Report | Testing the association between 18566 genes and 5 clinical features across 263 samples, statistically thresholded by Q value < 0.05, 3 clinical features related to at least one genes.

- Correlation between miR expression and clinical features
  View Report | Testing the association between 817 miRs and 7 clinical features across 562 samples, statistically thresholded by Q value < 0.05, 3 clinical features related to at least one miRs.

- Correlation between miRseq expression and clinical features
  View Report | Testing the association between 415 genes and 7 clinical features across 454 samples, statistically thresholded by Q value < 0.05, 2 clinical features related to at least one genes.

- Correlations between copy number and mRNA expression
  View Report | The correlation coefficients in 10, 20, 30, 40, 50, 60, 70, 80, 90 percentiles are 0.0065, 0.0591, 0.11576, 0.19628, 0.2846, 0.3728, 0.4426, 0.5098, 0.57934, respectively.

- Correlations between copy number and mRNAseq expression
  View Report | The correlation coefficients in 10, 20, 30, 40, 50, 60, 70, 80, 90 percentiles are 1088, 1798, 2429, 3137, 3916, 4709.6, 5473.7, 6146.8, 6818, respectively.

- Correlations between copy number and miR expression
  View Report | The correlation coefficients in 10, 20, 30, 40, 50, 60, 70, 80, 90 percentiles are -0.0375, -0.01632, -0.00062, 0.0204, 0.0452, 0.09282, 0.18876, 0.27792, 0.37196, respectively.

- Correlation between mRNA expression and DNA methylation
  View Report | The top 25 correlated methylation probes per gene are displayed. Total number of matched samples = 262. Number of gene expression samples = 263. Number of methylation samples = 262.

- Other Analyses

- Association of mutation, copy number alteration, and subtype markers with pathways
  View Report | There are 7 genes with significant mutation (Q value <= 0.1) and 222 genes with significant copy number alteration (Q value <= 0.25). The identified marker genes (Q value <= 0.01 or within top 2000) are 2000 for subtype 1, 2000 for subtype 2, 2000 for subtype 3. Pathways significantly enriched with these genes (Q value <= 0.01) are identified :

- PARADIGM pathway analysis of mRNA expression data
  View Report | There were 74 significant pathways identified in this analysis.

- PARADIGM pathway analysis of mRNA expression and copy number data
  View Report | There were 107 significant pathways identified in this analysis.

- Identification of putative miR direct targets
  View Report | This pipeline use a relevance network approach to infer putative miR:mRNA regulatory connections. All miR:mRNA pairs that have correlations < -0.3 and have predicted interactions in three sequence prediction databases (Miranda, Pictar, Targetscan) define the final network.

Methods & Data
Input

- Run Prefix = analyses__2012_10_24

- Summary Report Date = Fri Nov 16 16:13:00 2012

- Protection = FALSE

Copyright © 2012 Broad Institute TCGA GDAC as part of the TCGA Research Network. All rights reserved.
Made with Nozzle