This is the analysis overview for Firehose run "21 December 2012".
Note: These results are offered to the community as an additional reference point, enabling a wide range of cancer biologists, clinical investigators, and genome and computational scientists to easily incorporate TCGA into the backdrop of ongoing research. While every effort is made to ensure that Firehose input data and algorithms are of the highest possible quality, these analyses have not been reviewed by domain experts.
-
Sequence and Copy Number Analyses
-
Copy number analysis (GISTIC2)
View Report | There were 413 tumor samples used in this analysis: 23 significant arm-level results, 24 significant focal amplifications, and 44 significant focal deletions were found. -
Mutation Analysis (MutSig v2.0)
View Report | -
Mutation Analysis (MutSig vS2N)
View Report | -
Clustering Analyses
-
Clustering of copy number data: consensus NMF
View Report | The most robust consensus NMF clustering of 413 samples using the 68 copy number focal regions was identified for k = 4 clusters. We computed the clustering for k = 2 to k = 8 and used the cophenetic correlation coefficient to determine the best solution. -
Clustering of Methylation: consensus NMF
View Report | The 6192 most variable methylated genes were selected based on variation. The variation cutoff are set for each tumor type empirically by fitting a bimodal distriution. For genes with multiple methylation probes, we chose the most variable one to represent the gene. Consensus NMF clustering of 255 samples and 6192 genes identified 3 subtypes with the stability of the clustering increasing for k = 2 to k = 8 and the average silhouette width calculation for selecting the robust clusters. -
Clustering of RPPA data: consensus NMF
View Report | The most robust consensus NMF clustering of 269 samples using the 150 most variable proteins was identified for k = 4 clusters. We computed the clustering for k = 2 to k = 8 and used the cophenetic correlation coefficient to determine the best solution. -
Clustering of RPPA data: consensus hierarchical
View Report | The 150 most variable proteins were selected. Consensus average linkage hierarchical clustering of 269 samples and 150 proteins identified 4 subtypes with the stability of the clustering increasing for k = 2 to k = 8 and the average silhouette width calculation for selecting the robust clusters. -
Clustering of mRNA expression: consensus NMF
View Report | The most robust consensus NMF clustering of 155 samples using the 1500 most variable genes was identified for k = 4 clusters. We computed the clustering for k = 2 to k = 8 and used the cophenetic correlation coefficient to determine the best solution. -
Clustering of mRNA expression: consensus hierarchical
View Report | The 1500 most variable genes were selected. Consensus average linkage hierarchical clustering of 155 samples and 1500 genes identified 4 subtypes with the stability of the clustering increasing for k = 2 to k = 8 and the average silhouette width calculation for selecting the robust clusters. -
Clustering of mRNAseq gene expression: consensus NMF
View Report | The most robust consensus NMF clustering of 192 samples using the 1500 most variable genes was identified for k = 4 clusters. We computed the clustering for k = 2 to k = 8 and used the cophenetic correlation coefficient to determine the best solution. -
Clustering of mRNAseq gene expression: consensus hierarchical
View Report | The 1500 most variable genes were selected. Consensus average linkage hierarchical clustering of 192 samples and 1500 genes identified 3 subtypes with the stability of the clustering increasing for k = 2 to k = 8 and the average silhouette width calculation for selecting the robust clusters. -
Clustering of miRseq expression: consensus NMF
View Report | We filtered the data to 150 most variable miRs. Consensus NMF clustering of 408 samples and 150 miRs identified 3 subtypes with the stability of the clustering increasing for k = 2 to k = 8 and the average silhouette width calculation for selecting the robust clusters. -
Clustering of miRseq expression: consensus hierarchical
View Report | We filtered the data to 150 most variable miRs. Consensus average linkage hierarchical clustering of 408 samples and 150 miRs identified 3 subtypes with the stability of the clustering increasing for k = 2 to k = 8 and the average silhouette width calculation for selecting the robust clusters. -
Correlation Analyses
-
Correlation between copy number variations of arm-level result and selected clinical features
View Report | Testing the association between copy number variation 76 arm-level results and 9 clinical features across 413 patients, 19 significant findings detected with Q value < 0.25. -
Correlation between copy number variation genes and selected clinical features
View Report | Testing the association between copy number variation of 68 peak regions and 9 clinical features across 413 patients, 35 significant findings detected with Q value < 0.25. -
Correlation between gene methylation status and clinical features
View Report | Testing the association between 16938 genes and 7 clinical features across 29 samples, statistically thresholded by Q value < 0.05, 2 clinical features related to at least one genes. -
Correlation between molecular cancer subtypes and selected clinical features
View Report | Testing the association between subtypes identified by 10 different clustering approaches and 9 clinical features across 422 patients, 24 significant findings detected with P value < 0.05. -
Correlation between gene mutation status and selected clinical features
View Report | Testing the association between mutation status of 207 genes and 8 clinical features across 155 patients, 4 significant findings detected with Q value < 0.25. -
Correlation between RPPA expression and clinical features
View Report | Testing the association between 171 genes and 9 clinical features across 269 samples, statistically thresholded by Q value < 0.05, 4 clinical features related to at least one genes. -
Correlation between mRNA expression and clinical features
View Report | Testing the association between 17814 genes and 8 clinical features across 155 samples, statistically thresholded by Q value < 0.05, 4 clinical features related to at least one genes. -
Correlation between mRNAseq expression and clinical features
View Report | Testing the association between 17848 genes and 8 clinical features across 192 samples, statistically thresholded by Q value < 0.05, 4 clinical features related to at least one genes. -
Correlation between miRseq expression and clinical features
View Report | Testing the association between 417 genes and 9 clinical features across 407 samples, statistically thresholded by Q value < 0.05, 5 clinical features related to at least one genes. -
Correlations between copy number and mRNA expression
View Report | The correlation coefficients in 10, 20, 30, 40, 50, 60, 70, 80, 90 percentiles are -0.0474, 0.0154, 0.0723, 0.1326, 0.2034, 0.2758, 0.3497, 0.4281, 0.5197, respectively. -
Correlations between copy number and mRNAseq expression
View Report | The correlation coefficients in 10, 20, 30, 40, 50, 60, 70, 80, 90 percentiles are 809.1, 1659.2, 2184, 2680, 3163, 3664, 4165.7, 4737.8, 5498.9, respectively. -
Correlation between mRNA expression and DNA methylation
View Report | The top 25 correlated methylation probes per gene are displayed. Total number of matched samples = 31. Number of gene expression samples = 192. Number of methylation samples = 31. -
Other Analyses
-
PARADIGM pathway analysis of mRNA expression data
View Report | There were 47 significant pathways identified in this analysis. -
PARADIGM pathway analysis of mRNA expression and copy number data
View Report | There were 31 significant pathways identified in this analysis. -
PARADIGM pathway analysis of mRNASeq expression data
View Report | There were 44 significant pathways identified in this analysis. -
PARADIGM pathway analysis of mRNASeq expression and copy number data
View Report | There were 32 significant pathways identified in this analysis. -
The boxplot mRNA array based expression data
View Report
-
Run Prefix = analyses__2012_12_21
-
Summary Report Date = Fri Jan 25 11:22:25 2013
-
Protection = FALSE