(primary solid tumor cohort)
This report serves to describe the mutational landscape and properties of a given individual set, as well as rank genes and genesets according to mutational significance. MutSig vS2N was used to generate the results found in this report.
-
Working with individual set: BRCA-TP
The input for this pipeline is a set of individuals with the following files associated for each:
-
An annotated .maf file describing the mutations called for the respective individual, and their properties.
-
A .wig file that contains information about the coverage of the sample.
-
MAF used for this analysis:BRCA-TP.final_analysis_set.maf
-
Significantly mutated genes (q ≤ 0.1): 75
Column Descriptions:
-
N = number of sequenced bases in this gene across the individual set
-
nnon = number of (nonsilent) mutations in this gene across the individual set
-
nnull = number of (nonsilent) null mutations in this gene across the individual set
-
nflank = number of noncoding mutations from this gene's flanking region, across the individual set
-
nsil = number of silent mutations in this gene across the individual set
-
p = p-value (overall)
-
q = q-value, False Discovery Rate (Benjamini-Hochberg procedure)
Table 1. Get Full Table A Ranked List of Significantly Mutated Genes. Number of significant genes found: 75. Number of genes displayed: 35. Click on a gene name to display its stick figure depicting the distribution of mutations and mutation types across the chosen gene (this feature may not be available for all significant genes).
| gene | N | nflank | nsil | nnon | nnull | p | q |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PIK3CA | 214718 | 0 | 3 | 196 | 8 | 0 | 0 |
| ZNF841 | 1064 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| ANKRD30B | 964 | 0 | 3 | 6 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| GATA3 | 58646 | 0 | 1 | 58 | 53 | 0 | 0 |
| TP53 | 64260 | 0 | 3 | 190 | 74 | 0 | 0 |
| PTEN | 82086 | 0 | 0 | 18 | 13 | 0 | 0 |
| CDH1 | 148920 | 0 | 1 | 33 | 29 | 3.4e-168 | 9.1e-165 |
| RUNX1 | 52534 | 0 | 1 | 18 | 12 | 3.4e-141 | 8e-138 |
| TBL1XR1 | 79548 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 8 | 2.8e-119 | 5.9e-116 |
| MAP3K1 | 236648 | 0 | 3 | 64 | 55 | 1.8e-117 | 3.3e-114 |
| MAP2K4 | 71404 | 0 | 0 | 20 | 12 | 5.8e-81 | 9.9e-78 |
| ZNF90 | 832 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 1 | 3.3e-67 | 5.2e-64 |
| DNAH6 | 82146 | 0 | 3 | 11 | 1 | 1.3e-47 | 1.8e-44 |
| FAM75C1 | 1340 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 0 | 4.3e-44 | 5.9e-41 |
| MLL3 | 824694 | 0 | 1 | 37 | 23 | 7.4e-39 | 9.3e-36 |
| RGPD3 | 1676 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 1 | 6.1e-36 | 7.2e-33 |
| EYS | 114754 | 0 | 0 | 11 | 1 | 1.9e-31 | 2.1e-28 |
| CDKN1B | 30604 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5 | 8e-30 | 8.4e-27 |
| NCOR1 | 402398 | 0 | 1 | 18 | 15 | 4.1e-28 | 4.1e-25 |
| TBX3 | 73938 | 0 | 0 | 13 | 10 | 1.9e-27 | 1.8e-24 |
| CBFB | 28568 | 0 | 1 | 8 | 3 | 4e-21 | 3.6e-18 |
| SF3B1 | 231544 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 1 | 3.8e-19 | 3.3e-16 |
| RTL1 | 27250 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 1.8e-18 | 1.5e-15 |
| PTPN22 | 160144 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 0 | 5.7e-18 | 4.5e-15 |
| DNAH12 | 88748 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 0 | 9.6e-17 | 7.3e-14 |
| PIK3R1 | 150454 | 0 | 1 | 14 | 9 | 1.8e-16 | 1.3e-13 |
| CTCF | 129540 | 0 | 2 | 13 | 7 | 6.1e-13 | 4.3e-10 |
| GPS2 | 58140 | 0 | 1 | 6 | 6 | 2.8e-09 | 1.9e-06 |
| ANK3 | 804278 | 0 | 0 | 12 | 0 | 4.5e-09 | 2.9e-06 |
| WNK3 | 310052 | 0 | 1 | 8 | 0 | 1e-08 | 6.3e-06 |
| RB1 | 248390 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 8 | 2.2e-08 | 0.000013 |
| SRGAP1 | 205522 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 0 | 3.5e-08 | 0.000021 |
| FAM47C | 144310 | 0 | 1 | 10 | 0 | 1.1e-07 | 0.000064 |
| ATN1 | 122898 | 0 | 1 | 8 | 4 | 1.9e-07 | 0.00011 |
| AKT1 | 84664 | 0 | 1 | 12 | 0 | 2.7e-07 | 0.00014 |
In brief, we tabulate the number of mutations and the number of covered bases for each gene. The counts are broken down by mutation context category: four context categories that are discovered by MutSig, and one for indel and 'null' mutations, which include indels, nonsense mutations, splice-site mutations, and non-stop (read-through) mutations. For each gene, we calculate the probability of seeing the observed constellation of mutations, i.e. the product P1 x P2 x ... x Pm, or a more extreme one, given the background mutation rates calculated across the dataset. [1]
This is an experimental feature. The full results of the analysis summarized in this report can be downloaded from the TCGA Data Coordination Center.