This pipeline computes the correlation between significant arm-level copy number variations (cnvs) and selected clinical features.
Testing the association between subtypes identified by 22 different clustering approaches and 3 clinical features across 191 patients, 4 significant findings detected with Q value < 0.25.
-
2 subtypes identified in current cancer cohort by '1p gain mutation analysis'. These subtypes do not correlate to any clinical features.
-
2 subtypes identified in current cancer cohort by '4p gain mutation analysis'. These subtypes do not correlate to any clinical features.
-
2 subtypes identified in current cancer cohort by '4q gain mutation analysis'. These subtypes do not correlate to any clinical features.
-
2 subtypes identified in current cancer cohort by '8p gain mutation analysis'. These subtypes do not correlate to any clinical features.
-
2 subtypes identified in current cancer cohort by '8q gain mutation analysis'. These subtypes do not correlate to any clinical features.
-
2 subtypes identified in current cancer cohort by '10q gain mutation analysis'. These subtypes do not correlate to any clinical features.
-
2 subtypes identified in current cancer cohort by '11p gain mutation analysis'. These subtypes do not correlate to any clinical features.
-
2 subtypes identified in current cancer cohort by '11q gain mutation analysis'. These subtypes do not correlate to any clinical features.
-
2 subtypes identified in current cancer cohort by '13q gain mutation analysis'. These subtypes do not correlate to any clinical features.
-
2 subtypes identified in current cancer cohort by '17q gain mutation analysis'. These subtypes do not correlate to any clinical features.
-
2 subtypes identified in current cancer cohort by '19p gain mutation analysis'. These subtypes do not correlate to any clinical features.
-
2 subtypes identified in current cancer cohort by '19q gain mutation analysis'. These subtypes do not correlate to any clinical features.
-
2 subtypes identified in current cancer cohort by '21q gain mutation analysis'. These subtypes do not correlate to any clinical features.
-
2 subtypes identified in current cancer cohort by '22q gain mutation analysis'. These subtypes do not correlate to any clinical features.
-
2 subtypes identified in current cancer cohort by '5q loss mutation analysis'. These subtypes correlate to 'Time to Death'.
-
2 subtypes identified in current cancer cohort by '7p loss mutation analysis'. These subtypes do not correlate to any clinical features.
-
2 subtypes identified in current cancer cohort by '7q loss mutation analysis'. These subtypes correlate to 'Time to Death'.
-
2 subtypes identified in current cancer cohort by '12p loss mutation analysis'. These subtypes do not correlate to any clinical features.
-
2 subtypes identified in current cancer cohort by '17p loss mutation analysis'. These subtypes do not correlate to any clinical features.
-
2 subtypes identified in current cancer cohort by '17q loss mutation analysis'. These subtypes do not correlate to any clinical features.
-
2 subtypes identified in current cancer cohort by '18p loss mutation analysis'. These subtypes correlate to 'Time to Death'.
-
2 subtypes identified in current cancer cohort by '18q loss mutation analysis'. These subtypes correlate to 'Time to Death'.
Clinical Features |
Time to Death |
AGE | GENDER |
Statistical Tests | logrank test | t-test | Fisher's exact test |
1p gain |
0.0913 (1.00) |
0.592 (1.00) |
|
4p gain |
0.587 (1.00) |
0.425 (1.00) |
0.627 (1.00) |
4q gain |
0.587 (1.00) |
0.425 (1.00) |
0.627 (1.00) |
8p gain |
0.48 (1.00) |
0.119 (1.00) |
0.0597 (1.00) |
8q gain |
0.529 (1.00) |
0.168 (1.00) |
0.0382 (1.00) |
10q gain |
0.947 (1.00) |
0.252 (1.00) |
|
11p gain |
0.188 (1.00) |
1 (1.00) |
|
11q gain |
0.57 (1.00) |
0.0154 (0.834) |
1 (1.00) |
13q gain |
0.511 (1.00) |
0.592 (1.00) |
|
17q gain |
0.729 (1.00) |
0.29 (1.00) |
1 (1.00) |
19p gain |
0.347 (1.00) |
0.789 (1.00) |
0.0642 (1.00) |
19q gain |
0.347 (1.00) |
0.789 (1.00) |
0.0642 (1.00) |
21q gain |
0.0186 (0.966) |
0.616 (1.00) |
0.0732 (1.00) |
22q gain |
0.887 (1.00) |
0.00598 (0.341) |
0.73 (1.00) |
5q loss |
0.00073 (0.0438) |
0.0601 (1.00) |
0.0325 (1.00) |
7p loss |
0.00716 (0.401) |
0.325 (1.00) |
1 (1.00) |
7q loss |
0.00315 (0.183) |
0.325 (1.00) |
0.805 (1.00) |
12p loss |
0.514 (1.00) |
1 (1.00) |
|
17p loss |
0.376 (1.00) |
0.308 (1.00) |
0.114 (1.00) |
17q loss |
0.0166 (0.882) |
0.0075 (0.412) |
0.378 (1.00) |
18p loss |
0.00202 (0.119) |
0.355 (1.00) |
0.0642 (1.00) |
18q loss |
0.000113 (0.00689) |
0.0297 (1.00) |
0.252 (1.00) |
Cluster Labels | 1P GAIN MUTATED | 1P GAIN WILD-TYPE |
---|---|---|
Number of samples | 3 | 188 |
Cluster Labels | 4P GAIN MUTATED | 4P GAIN WILD-TYPE |
---|---|---|
Number of samples | 4 | 187 |
Cluster Labels | 4Q GAIN MUTATED | 4Q GAIN WILD-TYPE |
---|---|---|
Number of samples | 4 | 187 |
Cluster Labels | 8P GAIN MUTATED | 8P GAIN WILD-TYPE |
---|---|---|
Number of samples | 20 | 171 |
Cluster Labels | 8Q GAIN MUTATED | 8Q GAIN WILD-TYPE |
---|---|---|
Number of samples | 21 | 170 |
Cluster Labels | 10Q GAIN MUTATED | 10Q GAIN WILD-TYPE |
---|---|---|
Number of samples | 3 | 188 |
Cluster Labels | 11P GAIN MUTATED | 11P GAIN WILD-TYPE |
---|---|---|
Number of samples | 4 | 187 |
Cluster Labels | 11Q GAIN MUTATED | 11Q GAIN WILD-TYPE |
---|---|---|
Number of samples | 7 | 184 |
Cluster Labels | 13Q GAIN MUTATED | 13Q GAIN WILD-TYPE |
---|---|---|
Number of samples | 3 | 188 |
Cluster Labels | 17Q GAIN MUTATED | 17Q GAIN WILD-TYPE |
---|---|---|
Number of samples | 3 | 188 |
Cluster Labels | 19P GAIN MUTATED | 19P GAIN WILD-TYPE |
---|---|---|
Number of samples | 5 | 186 |
Cluster Labels | 19Q GAIN MUTATED | 19Q GAIN WILD-TYPE |
---|---|---|
Number of samples | 5 | 186 |
Cluster Labels | 21Q GAIN MUTATED | 21Q GAIN WILD-TYPE |
---|---|---|
Number of samples | 8 | 183 |
Cluster Labels | 22Q GAIN MUTATED | 22Q GAIN WILD-TYPE |
---|---|---|
Number of samples | 8 | 183 |
Cluster Labels | 5Q LOSS MUTATED | 5Q LOSS WILD-TYPE |
---|---|---|
Number of samples | 6 | 185 |
P value = 0.00073 (logrank test), Q value = 0.044
nPatients | nDeath | Duration Range (Median), Month | |
---|---|---|---|
ALL | 168 | 106 | 0.9 - 94.1 (12.0) |
5Q LOSS MUTATED | 6 | 6 | 1.0 - 12.0 (7.0) |
5Q LOSS WILD-TYPE | 162 | 100 | 0.9 - 94.1 (12.5) |
Cluster Labels | 7P LOSS MUTATED | 7P LOSS WILD-TYPE |
---|---|---|
Number of samples | 15 | 176 |
Cluster Labels | 7Q LOSS MUTATED | 7Q LOSS WILD-TYPE |
---|---|---|
Number of samples | 18 | 173 |
P value = 0.00315 (logrank test), Q value = 0.18
nPatients | nDeath | Duration Range (Median), Month | |
---|---|---|---|
ALL | 168 | 106 | 0.9 - 94.1 (12.0) |
7Q LOSS MUTATED | 15 | 13 | 1.0 - 40.0 (9.0) |
7Q LOSS WILD-TYPE | 153 | 93 | 0.9 - 94.1 (13.9) |
Cluster Labels | 12P LOSS MUTATED | 12P LOSS WILD-TYPE |
---|---|---|
Number of samples | 3 | 188 |
Cluster Labels | 17P LOSS MUTATED | 17P LOSS WILD-TYPE |
---|---|---|
Number of samples | 10 | 181 |
Cluster Labels | 17Q LOSS MUTATED | 17Q LOSS WILD-TYPE |
---|---|---|
Number of samples | 5 | 186 |
Cluster Labels | 18P LOSS MUTATED | 18P LOSS WILD-TYPE |
---|---|---|
Number of samples | 5 | 186 |
P value = 0.00202 (logrank test), Q value = 0.12
nPatients | nDeath | Duration Range (Median), Month | |
---|---|---|---|
ALL | 168 | 106 | 0.9 - 94.1 (12.0) |
18P LOSS MUTATED | 5 | 5 | 1.0 - 12.0 (7.0) |
18P LOSS WILD-TYPE | 163 | 101 | 0.9 - 94.1 (12.0) |
Cluster Labels | 18Q LOSS MUTATED | 18Q LOSS WILD-TYPE |
---|---|---|
Number of samples | 3 | 188 |
P value = 0.000113 (logrank test), Q value = 0.0069
nPatients | nDeath | Duration Range (Median), Month | |
---|---|---|---|
ALL | 168 | 106 | 0.9 - 94.1 (12.0) |
18Q LOSS MUTATED | 3 | 3 | 1.0 - 7.0 (2.0) |
18Q LOSS WILD-TYPE | 165 | 103 | 0.9 - 94.1 (12.0) |
-
Cluster data file = broad_values_by_arm.mutsig.cluster.txt
-
Clinical data file = LAML-TB.clin.merged.picked.txt
-
Number of patients = 191
-
Number of clustering approaches = 22
-
Number of selected clinical features = 3
-
Exclude small clusters that include fewer than K patients, K = 3
For survival clinical features, the Kaplan-Meier survival curves of tumors with and without gene mutations were plotted and the statistical significance P values were estimated by logrank test (Bland and Altman 2004) using the 'survdiff' function in R
For continuous numerical clinical features, two-tailed Student's t test with unequal variance (Lehmann and Romano 2005) was applied to compare the clinical values between two tumor subtypes using 't.test' function in R
For binary clinical features, two-tailed Fisher's exact tests (Fisher 1922) were used to estimate the P values using the 'fisher.test' function in R
For multiple hypothesis correction, Q value is the False Discovery Rate (FDR) analogue of the P value (Benjamini and Hochberg 1995), defined as the minimum FDR at which the test may be called significant. We used the 'Benjamini and Hochberg' method of 'p.adjust' function in R to convert P values into Q values.
This is an experimental feature. The full results of the analysis summarized in this report can be downloaded from the TCGA Data Coordination Center.