This pipeline computes the correlation between significant arm-level copy number variations (cnvs) and selected clinical features.
Testing the association between subtypes identified by 22 different clustering approaches and 3 clinical features across 146 patients, no significant finding detected with Q value < 0.25.
-
2 subtypes identified in current cancer cohort by '1q gain mutation analysis'. These subtypes do not correlate to any clinical features.
-
2 subtypes identified in current cancer cohort by '3p gain mutation analysis'. These subtypes do not correlate to any clinical features.
-
2 subtypes identified in current cancer cohort by '3q gain mutation analysis'. These subtypes do not correlate to any clinical features.
-
2 subtypes identified in current cancer cohort by '7p gain mutation analysis'. These subtypes do not correlate to any clinical features.
-
2 subtypes identified in current cancer cohort by '7q gain mutation analysis'. These subtypes do not correlate to any clinical features.
-
2 subtypes identified in current cancer cohort by '8p gain mutation analysis'. These subtypes do not correlate to any clinical features.
-
2 subtypes identified in current cancer cohort by '8q gain mutation analysis'. These subtypes do not correlate to any clinical features.
-
2 subtypes identified in current cancer cohort by '9q gain mutation analysis'. These subtypes do not correlate to any clinical features.
-
2 subtypes identified in current cancer cohort by '5q loss mutation analysis'. These subtypes do not correlate to any clinical features.
-
2 subtypes identified in current cancer cohort by '6q loss mutation analysis'. These subtypes do not correlate to any clinical features.
-
2 subtypes identified in current cancer cohort by '8p loss mutation analysis'. These subtypes do not correlate to any clinical features.
-
2 subtypes identified in current cancer cohort by '8q loss mutation analysis'. These subtypes do not correlate to any clinical features.
-
2 subtypes identified in current cancer cohort by '10p loss mutation analysis'. These subtypes do not correlate to any clinical features.
-
2 subtypes identified in current cancer cohort by '10q loss mutation analysis'. These subtypes do not correlate to any clinical features.
-
2 subtypes identified in current cancer cohort by '12p loss mutation analysis'. These subtypes do not correlate to any clinical features.
-
2 subtypes identified in current cancer cohort by '13q loss mutation analysis'. These subtypes do not correlate to any clinical features.
-
2 subtypes identified in current cancer cohort by '16q loss mutation analysis'. These subtypes do not correlate to any clinical features.
-
2 subtypes identified in current cancer cohort by '17p loss mutation analysis'. These subtypes do not correlate to any clinical features.
-
2 subtypes identified in current cancer cohort by '18p loss mutation analysis'. These subtypes do not correlate to any clinical features.
-
2 subtypes identified in current cancer cohort by '18q loss mutation analysis'. These subtypes do not correlate to any clinical features.
-
2 subtypes identified in current cancer cohort by '20p loss mutation analysis'. These subtypes do not correlate to any clinical features.
-
2 subtypes identified in current cancer cohort by '22q loss mutation analysis'. These subtypes do not correlate to any clinical features.
Clinical Features |
Time to Death |
AGE |
RADIATIONS RADIATION REGIMENINDICATION |
Statistical Tests | logrank test | t-test | Fisher's exact test |
1q gain |
1 (1.00) |
0.299 (1.00) |
1 (1.00) |
3p gain |
1 (1.00) |
0.646 (1.00) |
1 (1.00) |
3q gain |
1 (1.00) |
0.329 (1.00) |
1 (1.00) |
7p gain |
1 (1.00) |
0.0153 (1.00) |
1 (1.00) |
7q gain |
1 (1.00) |
0.0682 (1.00) |
1 (1.00) |
8p gain |
1 (1.00) |
0.537 (1.00) |
1 (1.00) |
8q gain |
1 (1.00) |
0.603 (1.00) |
1 (1.00) |
9q gain |
1 (1.00) |
0.276 (1.00) |
1 (1.00) |
5q loss |
1 (1.00) |
0.214 (1.00) |
1 (1.00) |
6q loss |
1 (1.00) |
0.258 (1.00) |
1 (1.00) |
8p loss |
1 (1.00) |
0.0476 (1.00) |
0.327 (1.00) |
8q loss |
1 (1.00) |
0.635 (1.00) |
1 (1.00) |
10p loss |
1 (1.00) |
0.91 (1.00) |
1 (1.00) |
10q loss |
1 (1.00) |
0.396 (1.00) |
1 (1.00) |
12p loss |
1 (1.00) |
0.674 (1.00) |
1 (1.00) |
13q loss |
1 (1.00) |
0.82 (1.00) |
1 (1.00) |
16q loss |
1 (1.00) |
0.146 (1.00) |
1 (1.00) |
17p loss |
1 (1.00) |
0.529 (1.00) |
1 (1.00) |
18p loss |
1 (1.00) |
0.621 (1.00) |
1 (1.00) |
18q loss |
1 (1.00) |
0.3 (1.00) |
1 (1.00) |
20p loss |
1 (1.00) |
0.451 (1.00) |
0.131 (1.00) |
22q loss |
1 (1.00) |
0.274 (1.00) |
0.162 (1.00) |
Cluster Labels | 1Q GAIN MUTATED | 1Q GAIN WILD-TYPE |
---|---|---|
Number of samples | 4 | 142 |
Cluster Labels | 3P GAIN MUTATED | 3P GAIN WILD-TYPE |
---|---|---|
Number of samples | 4 | 142 |
Cluster Labels | 3Q GAIN MUTATED | 3Q GAIN WILD-TYPE |
---|---|---|
Number of samples | 6 | 140 |
Cluster Labels | 7P GAIN MUTATED | 7P GAIN WILD-TYPE |
---|---|---|
Number of samples | 15 | 131 |
Cluster Labels | 7Q GAIN MUTATED | 7Q GAIN WILD-TYPE |
---|---|---|
Number of samples | 12 | 134 |
Cluster Labels | 8P GAIN MUTATED | 8P GAIN WILD-TYPE |
---|---|---|
Number of samples | 6 | 140 |
Cluster Labels | 8Q GAIN MUTATED | 8Q GAIN WILD-TYPE |
---|---|---|
Number of samples | 13 | 133 |
Cluster Labels | 9Q GAIN MUTATED | 9Q GAIN WILD-TYPE |
---|---|---|
Number of samples | 3 | 143 |
Cluster Labels | 5Q LOSS MUTATED | 5Q LOSS WILD-TYPE |
---|---|---|
Number of samples | 3 | 143 |
Cluster Labels | 6Q LOSS MUTATED | 6Q LOSS WILD-TYPE |
---|---|---|
Number of samples | 7 | 139 |
Cluster Labels | 8P LOSS MUTATED | 8P LOSS WILD-TYPE |
---|---|---|
Number of samples | 38 | 108 |
Cluster Labels | 8Q LOSS MUTATED | 8Q LOSS WILD-TYPE |
---|---|---|
Number of samples | 4 | 142 |
Cluster Labels | 10P LOSS MUTATED | 10P LOSS WILD-TYPE |
---|---|---|
Number of samples | 5 | 141 |
Cluster Labels | 10Q LOSS MUTATED | 10Q LOSS WILD-TYPE |
---|---|---|
Number of samples | 4 | 142 |
Cluster Labels | 12P LOSS MUTATED | 12P LOSS WILD-TYPE |
---|---|---|
Number of samples | 7 | 139 |
Cluster Labels | 13Q LOSS MUTATED | 13Q LOSS WILD-TYPE |
---|---|---|
Number of samples | 11 | 135 |
Cluster Labels | 16Q LOSS MUTATED | 16Q LOSS WILD-TYPE |
---|---|---|
Number of samples | 18 | 128 |
Cluster Labels | 17P LOSS MUTATED | 17P LOSS WILD-TYPE |
---|---|---|
Number of samples | 17 | 129 |
Cluster Labels | 18P LOSS MUTATED | 18P LOSS WILD-TYPE |
---|---|---|
Number of samples | 14 | 132 |
Cluster Labels | 18Q LOSS MUTATED | 18Q LOSS WILD-TYPE |
---|---|---|
Number of samples | 19 | 127 |
Cluster Labels | 20P LOSS MUTATED | 20P LOSS WILD-TYPE |
---|---|---|
Number of samples | 4 | 142 |
Cluster Labels | 22Q LOSS MUTATED | 22Q LOSS WILD-TYPE |
---|---|---|
Number of samples | 5 | 141 |
-
Cluster data file = broad_values_by_arm.mutsig.cluster.txt
-
Clinical data file = PRAD-TP.clin.merged.picked.txt
-
Number of patients = 146
-
Number of clustering approaches = 22
-
Number of selected clinical features = 3
-
Exclude small clusters that include fewer than K patients, K = 3
For survival clinical features, the Kaplan-Meier survival curves of tumors with and without gene mutations were plotted and the statistical significance P values were estimated by logrank test (Bland and Altman 2004) using the 'survdiff' function in R
For continuous numerical clinical features, two-tailed Student's t test with unequal variance (Lehmann and Romano 2005) was applied to compare the clinical values between two tumor subtypes using 't.test' function in R
For binary clinical features, two-tailed Fisher's exact tests (Fisher 1922) were used to estimate the P values using the 'fisher.test' function in R
For multiple hypothesis correction, Q value is the False Discovery Rate (FDR) analogue of the P value (Benjamini and Hochberg 1995), defined as the minimum FDR at which the test may be called significant. We used the 'Benjamini and Hochberg' method of 'p.adjust' function in R to convert P values into Q values.
This is an experimental feature. The full results of the analysis summarized in this report can be downloaded from the TCGA Data Coordination Center.