Analysis Overview
Rectum Adenocarcinoma (Primary solid tumor)
22 February 2013 | analyses__2013_02_22
Maintainer Information
Citation Information
doi:10.7908/C1VH5M27
Maintained by TCGA GDAC Team (Broad Institute/MD Anderson Cancer Center/Harvard Medical School)
Cite as Broad Institute TCGA Genome Data Analysis Center (2013): Analysis Overview for Rectum Adenocarcinoma (Primary solid tumor cohort) - 22 February 2013. Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard. doi:10.7908/C1VH5M27
Overview
Introduction

This is an overview of Rectum Adenocarcinoma analysis pipelines from Firehose run "22 February 2013".

Summary

Note: These results are offered to the community as an additional reference point, enabling a wide range of cancer biologists, clinical investigators, and genome and computational scientists to easily incorporate TCGA into the backdrop of ongoing research. While every effort is made to ensure that Firehose input data and algorithms are of the highest possible quality, these analyses have not been reviewed by domain experts.

Results

- Sequence and Copy Number Analyses

- Copy number analysis (GISTIC2)
  View Report | There were 162 tumor samples used in this analysis: 19 significant arm-level results, 25 significant focal amplifications, and 36 significant focal deletions were found.

- Mutation Analysis (MutSig v2.0)
  View Report |

- Mutation Analysis (MutSig vS2N)
  View Report |

- Mutation Analysis (MutSigCV v0.6)
  View Report |

- Correlations to Clinical Parameters

- Correlation between copy number variation genes (focal) and selected clinical features
  View Report | Testing the association between subtypes identified by 62 different clustering approaches and 9 clinical features across 162 patients, one significant finding detected with Q value < 0.25.

- Correlation between copy number variations of arm-level result and selected clinical features
  View Report | Testing the association between subtypes identified by 75 different clustering approaches and 9 clinical features across 162 patients, one significant finding detected with Q value < 0.25.

- Correlation between gene methylation status and clinical features
  View Report | Testing the association between 17011 genes and 2 clinical features across 6 samples, statistically thresholded by Q value < 0.05, no clinical feature related to at least one genes.

- Correlation between gene mutation status and selected clinical features
  View Report | Testing the association between mutation status of 16 genes and 8 clinical features across 69 patients, no significant finding detected with Q value < 0.25.

- Correlation between miRseq expression and clinical features
  View Report | Testing the association between 427 genes and 9 clinical features across 143 samples, statistically thresholded by Q value < 0.05, 1 clinical feature related to at least one genes.

- Correlation between mRNA expression and clinical features
  View Report | Testing the association between 17814 genes and 8 clinical features across 69 samples, statistically thresholded by Q value < 0.05, 2 clinical features related to at least one genes.

- Correlation between mRNAseq expression and clinical features
  View Report | Testing the association between 17926 genes and 8 clinical features across 72 samples, statistically thresholded by Q value < 0.05, 3 clinical features related to at least one genes.

- Correlation between RPPA expression and clinical features
  View Report | Testing the association between 171 genes and 9 clinical features across 130 samples, statistically thresholded by Q value < 0.05, 1 clinical feature related to at least one genes.

- Clustering Analyses

- Clustering of copy number data: consensus NMF
  View Report | The most robust consensus NMF clustering of 162 samples using the 62 copy number focal regions was identified for k = 5 clusters. We computed the clustering for k = 2 to k = 8 and used the cophenetic correlation coefficient to determine the best solution.

- Clustering of Methylation: consensus NMF
  View Report | The 6672 most variable methylated genes were selected based on variation. The variation cutoff are set for each tumor type empirically by fitting a bimodal distriution. For genes with multiple methylation probes, we chose the most variable one to represent the gene. Consensus NMF clustering of 95 samples and 6672 genes identified 3 subtypes with the stability of the clustering increasing for k = 2 to k = 8 and the average silhouette width calculation for selecting the robust clusters.

- Clustering of miRseq expression: consensus hierarchical
  View Report | We filtered the data to 150 most variable miRs. Consensus average linkage hierarchical clustering of 143 samples and 150 miRs identified 3 subtypes with the stability of the clustering increasing for k = 2 to k = 8 and the average silhouette width calculation for selecting the robust clusters.

- Clustering of miRseq expression: consensus NMF
  View Report | We filtered the data to 150 most variable miRs. Consensus NMF clustering of 143 samples and 150 miRs identified 5 subtypes with the stability of the clustering increasing for k = 2 to k = 8 and the average silhouette width calculation for selecting the robust clusters.

- Clustering of mRNA expression: consensus hierarchical
  View Report | The 1500 most variable genes were selected. Consensus average linkage hierarchical clustering of 69 samples and 1500 genes identified 3 subtypes with the stability of the clustering increasing for k = 2 to k = 8 and the average silhouette width calculation for selecting the robust clusters.

- Clustering of mRNA expression: consensus NMF
  View Report | The most robust consensus NMF clustering of 69 samples using the 1500 most variable genes was identified for k = 3 clusters. We computed the clustering for k = 2 to k = 8 and used the cophenetic correlation coefficient to determine the best solution.

- Clustering of mRNAseq gene expression: consensus hierarchical
  View Report | The 1500 most variable genes were selected. Consensus average linkage hierarchical clustering of 72 samples and 1500 genes identified 3 subtypes with the stability of the clustering increasing for k = 2 to k = 8 and the average silhouette width calculation for selecting the robust clusters.

- Clustering of mRNAseq gene expression: consensus NMF
  View Report | The most robust consensus NMF clustering of 72 samples using the 1500 most variable genes was identified for k = 4 clusters. We computed the clustering for k = 2 to k = 8 and used the cophenetic correlation coefficient to determine the best solution.

- Clustering of RPPA data: consensus hierarchical
  View Report | The 150 most variable proteins were selected. Consensus average linkage hierarchical clustering of 130 samples and 150 proteins identified 5 subtypes with the stability of the clustering increasing for k = 2 to k = 8 and the average silhouette width calculation for selecting the robust clusters.

- Clustering of RPPA data: consensus NMF
  View Report | The most robust consensus NMF clustering of 130 samples using the 150 most variable proteins was identified for k = 3 clusters. We computed the clustering for k = 2 to k = 8 and used the cophenetic correlation coefficient to determine the best solution.

- Other Analyses

- Correlate_Clinical_vs_Molecular_Signatures
  View Report | Testing the association between subtypes identified by 10 different clustering approaches and 9 clinical features across 166 patients, 3 significant findings detected with P value < 0.05 and Q value < 0.25.

- Pathway Analyses

- Association of mutation, copy number alteration, and subtype markers with pathways
  View Report | There are 9 genes with significant mutation (Q value <= 0.1) and 638 genes with significant copy number alteration (Q value <= 0.25). The identified marker genes (Q value <= 0.01 or within top 2000) are 1088 for subtype 1, 1088 for subtype 2, 1088 for subtype 3. Pathways significantly enriched with these genes (Q value <= 0.01) are identified :

- HotNet pathway analysis of mutation and copy number data
  View Report | There were 61 significant subnetworks identified in HotNet analysis.

- PARADIGM pathway analysis of mRNA expression and copy number data
  View Report | There were 19 significant pathways identified in this analysis.

- PARADIGM pathway analysis of mRNA expression data
  View Report | There were 32 significant pathways identified in this analysis.

- PARADIGM pathway analysis of mRNASeq expression and copy number data
  View Report | There were 26 significant pathways identified in this analysis.

- PARADIGM pathway analysis of mRNASeq expression data
  View Report | There were 36 significant pathways identified in this analysis.

- Other Correlation Analyses

- Correlation between copy number variation genes and molecular subtypes
  View Report | Testing the association between copy number variation of 62 peak regions and 10 molecular subtypes across 162 patients, 20 significant findings detected with Q value < 0.25.

- Correlation between copy number variations of arm-level result and molecular subtypes
  View Report | Testing the association between copy number variation 75 arm-level results and 10 molecular subtypes across 162 patients, 11 significant findings detected with Q value < 0.25.

- Correlation between gene mutation status and molecular subtypes
  View Report | Testing the association between mutation status of 16 genes and 9 molecular subtypes across 69 patients, 3 significant findings detected with P value < 0.05 and Q value < 0.25.

- Correlation between mRNA expression and DNA methylation
  View Report | The top 25 correlated methylation probes per gene are displayed. Total number of matched samples = 6. Number of gene expression samples = 72. Number of methylation samples = 6.

- Correlations between copy number and mRNA expression
  View Report | The correlation coefficients in 10, 20, 30, 40, 50, 60, 70, 80, 90 percentiles are -0.0724, 0.0072, 0.073, 0.1396, 0.2038, 0.273, 0.33907, 0.4189, 0.51298, respectively.

- Correlations between copy number and mRNAseq expression
  View Report | The correlation coefficients in 10, 20, 30, 40, 50, 60, 70, 80, 90 percentiles are 925.9, 2005, 2652, 3228, 3805, 4393.4, 4991, 5628, 6432.1, respectively.

Methods & Data
Input

- Summary Report Date = Mon Aug 5 20:41:59 2013

- Protection = FALSE

Copyright © 2013 Broad Institute TCGA GDAC as part of the TCGA Research Network. All rights reserved.
Made with Nozzle