Cervical Squamous Cell Carcinoma: Correlation between copy number variations of arm-level result and selected clinical features
(primary solid tumor cohort)
Maintained by TCGA GDAC Team (Broad Institute/MD Anderson Cancer Center/Harvard Medical School)
Overview
Introduction

This pipeline computes the correlation between significant arm-level copy number variations (cnvs) and selected clinical features.

Summary

Testing the association between copy number variation 44 arm-level results and 10 clinical features across 34 patients, 2 significant findings detected with Q value < 0.25.

  • 15q gain cnv correlated to 'TOBACCOSMOKINGHISTORYINDICATOR'.

  • 19q gain cnv correlated to 'RADIATIONS.RADIATION.REGIMENINDICATION'.

Results
Overview of the results

Table 1.  Get Full Table Overview of the association between significant copy number variation of 44 arm-level results and 10 clinical features. Shown in the table are P values (Q values). Thresholded by Q value < 0.25, 2 significant findings detected.

Clinical
Features
Time
to
Death
AGE HISTOLOGICAL
TYPE
RADIATIONS
RADIATION
REGIMENINDICATION
NUMBERPACKYEARSSMOKED TOBACCOSMOKINGHISTORYINDICATOR DISTANT
METASTASIS
LYMPH
NODE
METASTASIS
NUMBER
OF
LYMPH
NODES
TUMOR
STAGECODE
nCNV (%) nWild-Type logrank test t-test Fisher's exact test Fisher's exact test t-test t-test Fisher's exact test Fisher's exact test t-test t-test
15q gain 3 (9%) 31 0.745
(1.00)
0.771
(1.00)
0.511
(1.00)
0.535
(1.00)
9.97e-05
(0.0363)
1
(1.00)
0.279
(1.00)
0.00565
(1.00)
19q gain 6 (18%) 28 0.104
(1.00)
0.87
(1.00)
1
(1.00)
0.000344
(0.125)
0.985
(1.00)
0.439
(1.00)
1
(1.00)
0.611
(1.00)
0.914
(1.00)
1p gain 7 (21%) 27 0.814
(1.00)
0.0637
(1.00)
0.19
(1.00)
1
(1.00)
0.528
(1.00)
0.339
(1.00)
1
(1.00)
0.917
(1.00)
1q gain 15 (44%) 19 0.553
(1.00)
0.129
(1.00)
0.264
(1.00)
0.151
(1.00)
0.969
(1.00)
0.862
(1.00)
0.106
(1.00)
1
(1.00)
0.463
(1.00)
2p gain 3 (9%) 31 0.0598
(1.00)
0.717
(1.00)
0.511
(1.00)
0.239
(1.00)
0.769
(1.00)
0.532
(1.00)
1
(1.00)
3p gain 3 (9%) 31 0.688
(1.00)
0.791
(1.00)
0.159
(1.00)
1
(1.00)
0.589
(1.00)
0.22
(1.00)
0.537
(1.00)
0.414
(1.00)
3q gain 21 (62%) 13 0.113
(1.00)
0.132
(1.00)
0.359
(1.00)
0.709
(1.00)
0.268
(1.00)
0.404
(1.00)
1
(1.00)
0.696
(1.00)
0.565
(1.00)
5p gain 8 (24%) 26 0.667
(1.00)
0.452
(1.00)
0.707
(1.00)
1
(1.00)
0.888
(1.00)
0.339
(1.00)
0.641
(1.00)
0.241
(1.00)
6p gain 6 (18%) 28 0.221
(1.00)
0.191
(1.00)
0.64
(1.00)
0.363
(1.00)
0.235
(1.00)
0.633
(1.00)
1
(1.00)
0.8
(1.00)
7q gain 4 (12%) 30 0.268
(1.00)
0.273
(1.00)
0.243
(1.00)
0.0889
(1.00)
0.321
(1.00)
0.568
(1.00)
0.611
(1.00)
0.556
(1.00)
8p gain 4 (12%) 30 0.747
(1.00)
0.294
(1.00)
1
(1.00)
1
(1.00)
0.888
(1.00)
0.28
(1.00)
1
(1.00)
0.443
(1.00)
8q gain 7 (21%) 27 0.547
(1.00)
0.357
(1.00)
0.67
(1.00)
1
(1.00)
0.645
(1.00)
1
(1.00)
1
(1.00)
0.704
(1.00)
10p gain 3 (9%) 31 0.283
(1.00)
0.459
(1.00)
0.511
(1.00)
0.535
(1.00)
0.294
(1.00)
1
(1.00)
0.537
(1.00)
0.414
(1.00)
12p gain 6 (18%) 28 0.418
(1.00)
0.366
(1.00)
0.0422
(1.00)
1
(1.00)
0.218
(1.00)
0.0559
(1.00)
1
(1.00)
0.917
(1.00)
12q gain 4 (12%) 30 0.469
(1.00)
0.575
(1.00)
0.243
(1.00)
0.58
(1.00)
0.321
(1.00)
0.076
(1.00)
0.611
(1.00)
0.556
(1.00)
14q gain 3 (9%) 31 0.158
(1.00)
0.82
(1.00)
0.511
(1.00)
1
(1.00)
0.339
(1.00)
1
(1.00)
0.537
(1.00)
0.593
(1.00)
16p gain 4 (12%) 30 0.745
(1.00)
0.818
(1.00)
0.243
(1.00)
1
(1.00)
0.769
(1.00)
1
(1.00)
0.537
(1.00)
0.414
(1.00)
16q gain 3 (9%) 31 0.205
(1.00)
0.159
(1.00)
1
(1.00)
1
(1.00)
1
(1.00)
18p gain 3 (9%) 31 0.355
(1.00)
0.304
(1.00)
0.159
(1.00)
0.239
(1.00)
0.401
(1.00)
1
(1.00)
0.537
(1.00)
0.593
(1.00)
20p gain 11 (32%) 23 0.119
(1.00)
0.993
(1.00)
0.207
(1.00)
1
(1.00)
0.0279
(1.00)
0.72
(1.00)
0.675
(1.00)
0.425
(1.00)
0.519
(1.00)
20q gain 12 (35%) 22 0.00689
(1.00)
0.332
(1.00)
0.456
(1.00)
1
(1.00)
0.0279
(1.00)
0.517
(1.00)
0.675
(1.00)
1
(1.00)
0.872
(1.00)
21q gain 3 (9%) 31 0.158
(1.00)
0.0898
(1.00)
0.511
(1.00)
0.239
(1.00)
0.589
(1.00)
1
(1.00)
0.537
(1.00)
0.593
(1.00)
22q gain 5 (15%) 29 0.355
(1.00)
0.167
(1.00)
0.331
(1.00)
1
(1.00)
0.671
(1.00)
1
(1.00)
0.611
(1.00)
0.556
(1.00)
3p loss 9 (26%) 25 0.403
(1.00)
0.23
(1.00)
1
(1.00)
1
(1.00)
0.193
(1.00)
0.805
(1.00)
1
(1.00)
0.372
(1.00)
0.247
(1.00)
4p loss 14 (41%) 20 0.808
(1.00)
0.317
(1.00)
1
(1.00)
1
(1.00)
0.265
(1.00)
0.883
(1.00)
0.226
(1.00)
1
(1.00)
0.269
(1.00)
4q loss 5 (15%) 29 0.221
(1.00)
0.796
(1.00)
1
(1.00)
0.3
(1.00)
0.937
(1.00)
0.943
(1.00)
0.568
(1.00)
0.126
(1.00)
0.181
(1.00)
5q loss 11 (32%) 23 0.277
(1.00)
0.113
(1.00)
0.754
(1.00)
0.271
(1.00)
0.646
(1.00)
0.744
(1.00)
0.675
(1.00)
1
(1.00)
0.721
(1.00)
7p loss 4 (12%) 30 0.838
(1.00)
0.116
(1.00)
1
(1.00)
0.0889
(1.00)
0.977
(1.00)
0.502
(1.00)
0.568
(1.00)
0.611
(1.00)
0.411
(1.00)
7q loss 4 (12%) 30 0.00503
(1.00)
0.391
(1.00)
1
(1.00)
0.0889
(1.00)
0.907
(1.00)
0.222
(1.00)
0.532
(1.00)
0.537
(1.00)
0.383
(1.00)
8p loss 10 (29%) 24 0.272
(1.00)
0.708
(1.00)
0.746
(1.00)
0.692
(1.00)
0.387
(1.00)
1
(1.00)
1
(1.00)
0.704
(1.00)
9p loss 4 (12%) 30 0.0398
(1.00)
0.742
(1.00)
1
(1.00)
0.58
(1.00)
0.345
(1.00)
0.532
(1.00)
1
(1.00)
0.718
(1.00)
9q loss 3 (9%) 31 0.0487
(1.00)
0.353
(1.00)
1
(1.00)
1
(1.00)
0.248
(1.00)
0.532
(1.00)
1
(1.00)
0.718
(1.00)
10p loss 7 (21%) 27 0.118
(1.00)
0.553
(1.00)
1
(1.00)
0.178
(1.00)
0.52
(1.00)
0.167
(1.00)
0.076
(1.00)
0.0472
(1.00)
0.175
(1.00)
10q loss 6 (18%) 28 0.0684
(1.00)
0.704
(1.00)
1
(1.00)
0.363
(1.00)
0.77
(1.00)
0.0717
(1.00)
0.287
(1.00)
0.0156
(1.00)
0.111
(1.00)
11p loss 7 (21%) 27 0.418
(1.00)
0.535
(1.00)
1
(1.00)
0.656
(1.00)
0.119
(1.00)
0.158
(1.00)
1
(1.00)
0.277
(1.00)
11q loss 7 (21%) 27 0.838
(1.00)
0.767
(1.00)
1
(1.00)
0.178
(1.00)
0.977
(1.00)
0.666
(1.00)
0.339
(1.00)
0.641
(1.00)
0.241
(1.00)
12p loss 6 (18%) 28 0.439
(1.00)
0.0155
(1.00)
0.64
(1.00)
0.638
(1.00)
0.524
(1.00)
1
(1.00)
0.626
(1.00)
0.261
(1.00)
13q loss 8 (24%) 26 0.317
(1.00)
0.911
(1.00)
0.707
(1.00)
1
(1.00)
0.723
(1.00)
0.642
(1.00)
1
(1.00)
0.277
(1.00)
17p loss 10 (29%) 24 0.219
(1.00)
0.249
(1.00)
0.746
(1.00)
0.692
(1.00)
0.568
(1.00)
0.662
(1.00)
1
(1.00)
1
(1.00)
0.322
(1.00)
17q loss 3 (9%) 31 0.825
(1.00)
0.529
(1.00)
1
(1.00)
1
(1.00)
0.861
(1.00)
0.532
(1.00)
1
(1.00)
0.718
(1.00)
18p loss 6 (18%) 28 0.74
(1.00)
0.478
(1.00)
0.146
(1.00)
0.0703
(1.00)
0.0279
(1.00)
0.235
(1.00)
1
(1.00)
0.626
(1.00)
0.261
(1.00)
18q loss 7 (21%) 27 0.875
(1.00)
0.653
(1.00)
0.124
(1.00)
0.178
(1.00)
0.0279
(1.00)
0.119
(1.00)
0.633
(1.00)
0.372
(1.00)
0.154
(1.00)
19p loss 4 (12%) 30 0.34
(1.00)
0.457
(1.00)
1
(1.00)
0.0889
(1.00)
0.693
(1.00)
1
(1.00)
1
(1.00)
21q loss 6 (18%) 28 0.376
(1.00)
0.966
(1.00)
1
(1.00)
0.145
(1.00)
0.0676
(1.00)
1
(1.00)
0.372
(1.00)
0.672
(1.00)
'15q gain mutation analysis' versus 'TOBACCOSMOKINGHISTORYINDICATOR'

P value = 9.97e-05 (t-test), Q value = 0.036

Table S1.  Gene #15: '15q gain mutation analysis' versus Clinical Feature #6: 'TOBACCOSMOKINGHISTORYINDICATOR'

nPatients Mean (Std.Dev)
ALL 33 1.8 (1.1)
15Q GAIN MUTATED 3 1.0 (0.0)
15Q GAIN WILD-TYPE 30 1.9 (1.1)

Figure S1.  Get High-res Image Gene #15: '15q gain mutation analysis' versus Clinical Feature #6: 'TOBACCOSMOKINGHISTORYINDICATOR'

'19q gain mutation analysis' versus 'RADIATIONS.RADIATION.REGIMENINDICATION'

P value = 0.000344 (Fisher's exact test), Q value = 0.12

Table S2.  Gene #19: '19q gain mutation analysis' versus Clinical Feature #4: 'RADIATIONS.RADIATION.REGIMENINDICATION'

nPatients NO YES
ALL 11 23
19Q GAIN MUTATED 6 0
19Q GAIN WILD-TYPE 5 23

Figure S2.  Get High-res Image Gene #19: '19q gain mutation analysis' versus Clinical Feature #4: 'RADIATIONS.RADIATION.REGIMENINDICATION'

Methods & Data
Input
  • Mutation data file = broad_values_by_arm.mutsig.cluster.txt

  • Clinical data file = CESC-TP.clin.merged.picked.txt

  • Number of patients = 34

  • Number of significantly arm-level cnvs = 44

  • Number of selected clinical features = 10

  • Exclude genes that fewer than K tumors have mutations, K = 3

Survival analysis

For survival clinical features, the Kaplan-Meier survival curves of tumors with and without gene mutations were plotted and the statistical significance P values were estimated by logrank test (Bland and Altman 2004) using the 'survdiff' function in R

Student's t-test analysis

For continuous numerical clinical features, two-tailed Student's t test with unequal variance (Lehmann and Romano 2005) was applied to compare the clinical values between tumors with and without gene mutations using 't.test' function in R

Fisher's exact test

For binary or multi-class clinical features (nominal or ordinal), two-tailed Fisher's exact tests (Fisher 1922) were used to estimate the P values using the 'fisher.test' function in R

Q value calculation

For multiple hypothesis correction, Q value is the False Discovery Rate (FDR) analogue of the P value (Benjamini and Hochberg 1995), defined as the minimum FDR at which the test may be called significant. We used the 'Benjamini and Hochberg' method of 'p.adjust' function in R to convert P values into Q values.

Download Results

This is an experimental feature. The full results of the analysis summarized in this report can be downloaded from the TCGA Data Coordination Center.

References
[1] Bland and Altman, Statistics notes: The logrank test, BMJ 328(7447):1073 (2004)
[2] Lehmann and Romano, Testing Statistical Hypotheses (3E ed.), New York: Springer. ISBN 0387988645 (2005)
[3] Fisher, R.A., On the interpretation of chi-square from contingency tables, and the calculation of P, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society 85(1):87-94 (1922)
[4] Benjamini and Hochberg, Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B 59:289-300 (1995)