Correlation between copy number variation genes (focal) and selected clinical features
Prostate Adenocarcinoma (Primary solid tumor)
21 April 2013  |  analyses__2013_04_21
Maintainer Information
Citation Information
Maintained by TCGA GDAC Team (Broad Institute/MD Anderson Cancer Center/Harvard Medical School)
Cite as Broad Institute TCGA Genome Data Analysis Center (2013): Prostate Adenocarcinoma (Primary solid tumor cohort) - 21 April 2013: Correlation between copy number variation genes (focal) and selected clinical features. Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard. doi:10.7908/C1DN4320
Overview
Introduction

This pipeline computes the correlation between significant copy number variation (cnv focal) genes and selected clinical features.

Summary

Testing the association between copy number variation 47 arm-level results and 5 clinical features across 154 patients, 2 significant findings detected with Q value < 0.25.

  • Amp Peak 19(Xq25) cnv correlated to 'AGE'.

  • Del Peak 8(4q28.2) cnv correlated to 'AGE'.

Results
Overview of the results

Table 1.  Get Full Table Overview of the association between significant copy number variation of 47 arm-level results and 5 clinical features. Shown in the table are P values (Q values). Thresholded by Q value < 0.25, 2 significant findings detected.

Clinical
Features
Time
to
Death
AGE RADIATIONS
RADIATION
REGIMENINDICATION
COMPLETENESS
OF
RESECTION
NUMBER
OF
LYMPH
NODES
nCNV (%) nWild-Type logrank test t-test Fisher's exact test Fisher's exact test t-test
Amp Peak 19(Xq25) 0 (0%) 151 1
(1.00)
8.85e-09
(2.08e-06)
1
(1.00)
1
(1.00)
0.00151
(0.348)
Del Peak 8(4q28 2) 0 (0%) 140 1
(1.00)
5.81e-05
(0.0136)
1
(1.00)
1
(1.00)
0.138
(1.00)
Amp Peak 1(1q21 3) 0 (0%) 144 1
(1.00)
0.606
(1.00)
1
(1.00)
0.728
(1.00)
0.521
(1.00)
Amp Peak 2(3q26 2) 0 (0%) 130 1
(1.00)
0.112
(1.00)
1
(1.00)
1
(1.00)
0.274
(1.00)
Amp Peak 3(7p15 3) 0 (0%) 123 1
(1.00)
0.413
(1.00)
0.264
(1.00)
0.0474
(1.00)
0.344
(1.00)
Amp Peak 4(7q34) 0 (0%) 126 1
(1.00)
0.13
(1.00)
1
(1.00)
0.342
(1.00)
0.61
(1.00)
Amp Peak 5(8p11 22) 0 (0%) 139 1
(1.00)
0.384
(1.00)
1
(1.00)
0.44
(1.00)
0.267
(1.00)
Amp Peak 6(8q21 13) 0 (0%) 115 1
(1.00)
0.0307
(1.00)
0.331
(1.00)
0.83
(1.00)
0.545
(1.00)
Amp Peak 7(11q13 2) 0 (0%) 146 1
(1.00)
0.628
(1.00)
1
(1.00)
0.154
(1.00)
0.288
(1.00)
Amp Peak 8(12q24 32) 0 (0%) 147 1
(1.00)
0.993
(1.00)
0.21
(1.00)
0.229
(1.00)
0.408
(1.00)
Amp Peak 9(14q21 1) 0 (0%) 146 1
(1.00)
0.00165
(0.374)
0.0219
(1.00)
0.291
(1.00)
0.676
(1.00)
Amp Peak 10(20q13 33) 0 (0%) 142 1
(1.00)
0.00537
(1.00)
0.049
(1.00)
0.0382
(1.00)
0.00149
(0.348)
Amp Peak 11(21q21 3) 0 (0%) 149 1
(1.00)
0.0238
(1.00)
1
(1.00)
0.611
(1.00)
0.535
(1.00)
Amp Peak 12(Xp22 11) 0 (0%) 149 1
(1.00)
0.697
(1.00)
1
(1.00)
1
(1.00)
0.646
(1.00)
Amp Peak 13(Xp22 11) 0 (0%) 149 1
(1.00)
0.128
(1.00)
1
(1.00)
0.604
(1.00)
0.646
(1.00)
Amp Peak 14(Xp21 1) 0 (0%) 150 1
(1.00)
0.126
(1.00)
1
(1.00)
1
(1.00)
0.875
(1.00)
Amp Peak 15(Xq12) 0 (0%) 151 1
(1.00)
0.647
(1.00)
1
(1.00)
0.519
(1.00)
0.00151
(0.348)
Amp Peak 16(Xq21 1) 0 (0%) 147 1
(1.00)
0.737
(1.00)
1
(1.00)
0.405
(1.00)
0.787
(1.00)
Amp Peak 17(Xq21 1) 0 (0%) 149 1
(1.00)
0.336
(1.00)
1
(1.00)
0.611
(1.00)
0.352
(1.00)
Amp Peak 18(Xq21 31) 0 (0%) 149 1
(1.00)
0.237
(1.00)
1
(1.00)
0.611
(1.00)
0.00151
(0.348)
Amp Peak 20(Xq25) 0 (0%) 148 1
(1.00)
0.72
(1.00)
1
(1.00)
0.399
(1.00)
0.819
(1.00)
Amp Peak 21(Xq27 1) 0 (0%) 145 1
(1.00)
0.298
(1.00)
1
(1.00)
1
(1.00)
0.0015
(0.348)
Del Peak 1(1p31 3) 0 (0%) 135 1
(1.00)
0.795
(1.00)
1
(1.00)
0.652
(1.00)
0.816
(1.00)
Del Peak 2(1p21 3) 0 (0%) 142 1
(1.00)
0.827
(1.00)
1
(1.00)
0.501
(1.00)
0.283
(1.00)
Del Peak 3(1q23 1) 0 (0%) 147 1
(1.00)
0.614
(1.00)
1
(1.00)
1
(1.00)
0.0015
(0.348)
Del Peak 4(1q42 13) 0 (0%) 140 1
(1.00)
0.159
(1.00)
1
(1.00)
1
(1.00)
0.71
(1.00)
Del Peak 5(2q22 1) 0 (0%) 135 1
(1.00)
0.0969
(1.00)
1
(1.00)
0.817
(1.00)
0.567
(1.00)
Del Peak 6(3p13) 0 (0%) 128 1
(1.00)
0.316
(1.00)
0.0342
(1.00)
0.728
(1.00)
0.741
(1.00)
Del Peak 7(3q29) 0 (0%) 144 1
(1.00)
0.238
(1.00)
1
(1.00)
1
(1.00)
0.97
(1.00)
Del Peak 9(5q11 2) 0 (0%) 131 1
(1.00)
0.243
(1.00)
1
(1.00)
1
(1.00)
0.0749
(1.00)
Del Peak 10(5q21 1) 0 (0%) 128 1
(1.00)
0.0201
(1.00)
0.59
(1.00)
0.485
(1.00)
0.292
(1.00)
Del Peak 11(6q15) 0 (0%) 104 1
(1.00)
0.0552
(1.00)
0.175
(1.00)
0.587
(1.00)
0.0278
(1.00)
Del Peak 12(7q36 1) 0 (0%) 147 1
(1.00)
0.336
(1.00)
1
(1.00)
1
(1.00)
0.416
(1.00)
Del Peak 13(8p21 3) 0 (0%) 62 1
(1.00)
0.277
(1.00)
1
(1.00)
0.864
(1.00)
0.0102
(1.00)
Del Peak 14(8p11 21) 0 (0%) 103 1
(1.00)
0.148
(1.00)
0.171
(1.00)
0.0433
(1.00)
0.585
(1.00)
Del Peak 15(9p22 3) 0 (0%) 140 1
(1.00)
0.233
(1.00)
0.383
(1.00)
0.774
(1.00)
0.1
(1.00)
Del Peak 16(10q23 31) 0 (0%) 97 1
(1.00)
0.944
(1.00)
0.652
(1.00)
0.889
(1.00)
0.332
(1.00)
Del Peak 17(11q23 2) 0 (0%) 136 1
(1.00)
0.584
(1.00)
1
(1.00)
0.805
(1.00)
0.0728
(1.00)
Del Peak 18(12p13 2) 0 (0%) 122 1
(1.00)
0.788
(1.00)
1
(1.00)
0.719
(1.00)
0.499
(1.00)
Del Peak 19(13q14 13) 0 (0%) 84 1
(1.00)
0.0106
(1.00)
0.178
(1.00)
0.497
(1.00)
0.254
(1.00)
Del Peak 20(16q24 1) 0 (0%) 91 1
(1.00)
0.178
(1.00)
0.649
(1.00)
0.51
(1.00)
0.148
(1.00)
Del Peak 21(17p13 1) 0 (0%) 115 1
(1.00)
0.424
(1.00)
1
(1.00)
0.863
(1.00)
0.26
(1.00)
Del Peak 22(17q21 31) 0 (0%) 125 1
(1.00)
0.628
(1.00)
1
(1.00)
0.317
(1.00)
0.36
(1.00)
Del Peak 23(18q22 1) 0 (0%) 114 1
(1.00)
0.858
(1.00)
1
(1.00)
0.773
(1.00)
0.595
(1.00)
Del Peak 24(18q23) 0 (0%) 108 1
(1.00)
0.153
(1.00)
0.635
(1.00)
0.495
(1.00)
0.171
(1.00)
Del Peak 25(21q22 2) 0 (0%) 102 1
(1.00)
0.866
(1.00)
0.336
(1.00)
0.504
(1.00)
0.149
(1.00)
Del Peak 26(21q22 3) 0 (0%) 104 1
(1.00)
0.698
(1.00)
0.33
(1.00)
0.543
(1.00)
0.115
(1.00)
'Amp Peak 19(Xq25)' versus 'AGE'

P value = 8.85e-09 (t-test), Q value = 2.1e-06

Table S1.  Gene #19: 'Amp Peak 19(Xq25)' versus Clinical Feature #2: 'AGE'

nPatients Mean (Std.Dev)
ALL 153 60.4 (6.9)
AMP PEAK 19(XQ25) CNV 3 65.7 (0.6)
AMP PEAK 19(XQ25) WILD-TYPE 150 60.3 (6.9)

Figure S1.  Get High-res Image Gene #19: 'Amp Peak 19(Xq25)' versus Clinical Feature #2: 'AGE'

'Del Peak 8(4q28.2)' versus 'AGE'

P value = 5.81e-05 (t-test), Q value = 0.014

Table S2.  Gene #29: 'Del Peak 8(4q28.2)' versus Clinical Feature #2: 'AGE'

nPatients Mean (Std.Dev)
ALL 153 60.4 (6.9)
DEL PEAK 8(4Q28.2) CNV 14 65.2 (3.5)
DEL PEAK 8(4Q28.2) WILD-TYPE 139 59.9 (6.9)

Figure S2.  Get High-res Image Gene #29: 'Del Peak 8(4q28.2)' versus Clinical Feature #2: 'AGE'

Methods & Data
Input
  • Mutation data file = all_lesions.conf_99.cnv.cluster.txt

  • Clinical data file = PRAD-TP.clin.merged.picked.txt

  • Number of patients = 154

  • Number of significantly arm-level cnvs = 47

  • Number of selected clinical features = 5

  • Exclude genes that fewer than K tumors have mutations, K = 3

Survival analysis

For survival clinical features, the Kaplan-Meier survival curves of tumors with and without gene mutations were plotted and the statistical significance P values were estimated by logrank test (Bland and Altman 2004) using the 'survdiff' function in R

Student's t-test analysis

For continuous numerical clinical features, two-tailed Student's t test with unequal variance (Lehmann and Romano 2005) was applied to compare the clinical values between tumors with and without gene mutations using 't.test' function in R

Fisher's exact test

For binary or multi-class clinical features (nominal or ordinal), two-tailed Fisher's exact tests (Fisher 1922) were used to estimate the P values using the 'fisher.test' function in R

Q value calculation

For multiple hypothesis correction, Q value is the False Discovery Rate (FDR) analogue of the P value (Benjamini and Hochberg 1995), defined as the minimum FDR at which the test may be called significant. We used the 'Benjamini and Hochberg' method of 'p.adjust' function in R to convert P values into Q values.

Download Results

This is an experimental feature. The full results of the analysis summarized in this report can be downloaded from the TCGA Data Coordination Center.

References
[1] Bland and Altman, Statistics notes: The logrank test, BMJ 328(7447):1073 (2004)
[2] Lehmann and Romano, Testing Statistical Hypotheses (3E ed.), New York: Springer. ISBN 0387988645 (2005)
[3] Fisher, R.A., On the interpretation of chi-square from contingency tables, and the calculation of P, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society 85(1):87-94 (1922)
[4] Benjamini and Hochberg, Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B 59:289-300 (1995)