Correlation between mRNA expression and clinical features
Lung Squamous Cell Carcinoma (Primary solid tumor)
23 May 2013  |  analyses__2013_05_23
Maintainer Information
Citation Information
Maintained by TCGA GDAC Team (Broad Institute/MD Anderson Cancer Center/Harvard Medical School)
Cite as Broad Institute TCGA Genome Data Analysis Center (2013): Correlation between mRNA expression and clinical features. Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard. doi:10.7908/C17H1GN3
Overview
Introduction

This pipeline uses various statistical tests to identify mRNAs whose expression levels correlated to selected clinical features.

Summary

Testing the association between 17814 genes and 11 clinical features across 154 samples, statistically thresholded by Q value < 0.05, 4 clinical features related to at least one genes.

  • 13 genes correlated to 'GENDER'.

    • RPS4Y1 ,  RPS4Y2 ,  DDX3Y ,  EIF1AY ,  CYORF15A ,  ...

  • 13 genes correlated to 'HISTOLOGICAL.TYPE'.

    • FAM5B ,  NUT ,  A2BP1 ,  SPINK7 ,  CAPZA3 ,  ...

  • 20 genes correlated to 'DISTANT.METASTASIS'.

    • P2RY6 ,  OPRL1 ,  BIRC8 ,  MAGEH1 ,  ACTR3 ,  ...

  • 2 genes correlated to 'COMPLETENESS.OF.RESECTION'.

    • ANKRD33 ,  TINAG

  • No genes correlated to 'Time to Death', 'AGE', 'KARNOFSKY.PERFORMANCE.SCORE', 'NUMBERPACKYEARSSMOKED', 'YEAROFTOBACCOSMOKINGONSET', 'LYMPH.NODE.METASTASIS', and 'NEOPLASM.DISEASESTAGE'.

Results
Overview of the results

Complete statistical result table is provided in Supplement Table 1

Table 1.  Get Full Table This table shows the clinical features, statistical methods used, and the number of genes that are significantly associated with each clinical feature at Q value < 0.05.

Clinical feature Statistical test Significant genes Associated with                 Associated with
Time to Death Cox regression test   N=0        
AGE Spearman correlation test   N=0        
GENDER t test N=13 male N=13 female N=0
KARNOFSKY PERFORMANCE SCORE Spearman correlation test   N=0        
HISTOLOGICAL TYPE ANOVA test N=13        
NUMBERPACKYEARSSMOKED Spearman correlation test   N=0        
YEAROFTOBACCOSMOKINGONSET Spearman correlation test   N=0        
DISTANT METASTASIS t test N=20 m1 N=4 m0 N=16
LYMPH NODE METASTASIS ANOVA test   N=0        
COMPLETENESS OF RESECTION ANOVA test N=2        
NEOPLASM DISEASESTAGE ANOVA test   N=0        
Clinical variable #1: 'Time to Death'

No gene related to 'Time to Death'.

Table S1.  Basic characteristics of clinical feature: 'Time to Death'

Time to Death Duration (Months) 0.4-173.8 (median=17.5)
  censored N = 86
  death N = 62
     
  Significant markers N = 0
Clinical variable #2: 'AGE'

No gene related to 'AGE'.

Table S2.  Basic characteristics of clinical feature: 'AGE'

AGE Mean (SD) 66.53 (8.6)
  Significant markers N = 0
Clinical variable #3: 'GENDER'

13 genes related to 'GENDER'.

Table S3.  Basic characteristics of clinical feature: 'GENDER'

GENDER Labels N
  FEMALE 44
  MALE 110
     
  Significant markers N = 13
  Higher in MALE 13
  Higher in FEMALE 0
List of top 10 genes differentially expressed by 'GENDER'

Table S4.  Get Full Table List of top 10 genes differentially expressed by 'GENDER'

T(pos if higher in 'MALE') ttestP Q AUC
RPS4Y1 41.46 2.767e-80 4.93e-76 1
RPS4Y2 33.72 2.902e-70 5.17e-66 1
DDX3Y 27.62 5.344e-58 9.52e-54 0.9998
EIF1AY 25.39 2.236e-53 3.98e-49 0.9977
CYORF15A 19.08 5.911e-37 1.05e-32 0.9909
UTY 16.63 3.88e-35 6.91e-31 0.9684
JARID1D 17.26 1.435e-31 2.55e-27 0.9824
ZFY 13.63 9.37e-27 1.67e-22 0.937
TTTY14 12.54 5.239e-25 9.33e-21 0.9529
CYORF15B 13.66 5.684e-24 1.01e-19 0.9467

Figure S1.  Get High-res Image As an example, this figure shows the association of RPS4Y1 to 'GENDER'. P value = 2.77e-80 with T-test analysis.

Clinical variable #4: 'KARNOFSKY.PERFORMANCE.SCORE'

No gene related to 'KARNOFSKY.PERFORMANCE.SCORE'.

Table S5.  Basic characteristics of clinical feature: 'KARNOFSKY.PERFORMANCE.SCORE'

KARNOFSKY.PERFORMANCE.SCORE Mean (SD) 24.23 (38)
  Score N
  0 18
  50 2
  70 1
  90 4
  100 1
     
  Significant markers N = 0
Clinical variable #5: 'HISTOLOGICAL.TYPE'

13 genes related to 'HISTOLOGICAL.TYPE'.

Table S6.  Basic characteristics of clinical feature: 'HISTOLOGICAL.TYPE'

HISTOLOGICAL.TYPE Labels N
  LUNG BASALOID SQUAMOUS CELL CARCINOMA 5
  LUNG PAPILLARY SQUAMOUS CELL CARICNOMA 1
  LUNG SQUAMOUS CELL CARCINOMA- NOT OTHERWISE SPECIFIED (NOS) 148
     
  Significant markers N = 13
List of top 10 genes differentially expressed by 'HISTOLOGICAL.TYPE'

Table S7.  Get Full Table List of top 10 genes differentially expressed by 'HISTOLOGICAL.TYPE'

ANOVA_P Q
FAM5B 1.9e-10 3.38e-06
NUT 2.209e-10 3.93e-06
A2BP1 6.605e-09 0.000118
SPINK7 1.946e-07 0.00347
CAPZA3 2.047e-07 0.00365
UGT2B10 2.803e-07 0.00499
GABRA4 4.203e-07 0.00748
DCD 4.586e-07 0.00817
PDS5B 6.666e-07 0.0119
MGC21881 8.832e-07 0.0157

Figure S2.  Get High-res Image As an example, this figure shows the association of FAM5B to 'HISTOLOGICAL.TYPE'. P value = 1.9e-10 with ANOVA analysis.

Clinical variable #6: 'NUMBERPACKYEARSSMOKED'

No gene related to 'NUMBERPACKYEARSSMOKED'.

Table S8.  Basic characteristics of clinical feature: 'NUMBERPACKYEARSSMOKED'

NUMBERPACKYEARSSMOKED Mean (SD) 54.83 (36)
  Significant markers N = 0
Clinical variable #7: 'YEAROFTOBACCOSMOKINGONSET'

No gene related to 'YEAROFTOBACCOSMOKINGONSET'.

Table S9.  Basic characteristics of clinical feature: 'YEAROFTOBACCOSMOKINGONSET'

YEAROFTOBACCOSMOKINGONSET Mean (SD) 1958.02 (11)
  Significant markers N = 0
Clinical variable #8: 'DISTANT.METASTASIS'

20 genes related to 'DISTANT.METASTASIS'.

Table S10.  Basic characteristics of clinical feature: 'DISTANT.METASTASIS'

DISTANT.METASTASIS Labels N
  M0 146
  M1 4
     
  Significant markers N = 20
  Higher in M1 4
  Higher in M0 16
List of top 10 genes differentially expressed by 'DISTANT.METASTASIS'

Table S11.  Get Full Table List of top 10 genes differentially expressed by 'DISTANT.METASTASIS'

T(pos if higher in 'M1') ttestP Q AUC
P2RY6 -8.15 1.779e-10 3.17e-06 0.8099
OPRL1 8.8 1.345e-09 2.4e-05 0.8305
BIRC8 -7.19 4.357e-09 7.76e-05 0.851
MAGEH1 6.26 8.788e-09 0.000157 0.714
ACTR3 -8.5 2.431e-08 0.000433 0.8271
NSD1 -9.3 2.835e-08 0.000505 0.8408
RGPD5 -10.94 3.638e-08 0.000648 0.8973
PTPRD -6.32 5.655e-08 0.00101 0.6661
KRT24 -6.03 6.075e-08 0.00108 0.6045
LCE3E -6.94 1.357e-07 0.00242 0.7217

Figure S3.  Get High-res Image As an example, this figure shows the association of P2RY6 to 'DISTANT.METASTASIS'. P value = 1.78e-10 with T-test analysis.

Clinical variable #9: 'LYMPH.NODE.METASTASIS'

No gene related to 'LYMPH.NODE.METASTASIS'.

Table S12.  Basic characteristics of clinical feature: 'LYMPH.NODE.METASTASIS'

LYMPH.NODE.METASTASIS Labels N
  N0 96
  N1 40
  N2 13
  N3 5
     
  Significant markers N = 0
Clinical variable #10: 'COMPLETENESS.OF.RESECTION'

2 genes related to 'COMPLETENESS.OF.RESECTION'.

Table S13.  Basic characteristics of clinical feature: 'COMPLETENESS.OF.RESECTION'

COMPLETENESS.OF.RESECTION Labels N
  R0 139
  R1 3
  R2 2
  RX 5
     
  Significant markers N = 2
List of 2 genes differentially expressed by 'COMPLETENESS.OF.RESECTION'

Table S14.  Get Full Table List of 2 genes differentially expressed by 'COMPLETENESS.OF.RESECTION'

ANOVA_P Q
ANKRD33 1.353e-06 0.0241
TINAG 2.046e-06 0.0364

Figure S4.  Get High-res Image As an example, this figure shows the association of ANKRD33 to 'COMPLETENESS.OF.RESECTION'. P value = 1.35e-06 with ANOVA analysis.

Clinical variable #11: 'NEOPLASM.DISEASESTAGE'

No gene related to 'NEOPLASM.DISEASESTAGE'.

Table S15.  Basic characteristics of clinical feature: 'NEOPLASM.DISEASESTAGE'

NEOPLASM.DISEASESTAGE Labels N
  STAGE IA 20
  STAGE IB 61
  STAGE IIA 7
  STAGE IIB 27
  STAGE IIIA 19
  STAGE IIIB 15
  STAGE IV 4
     
  Significant markers N = 0
Methods & Data
Input
  • Expresson data file = LUSC-TP.medianexp.txt

  • Clinical data file = LUSC-TP.clin.merged.picked.txt

  • Number of patients = 154

  • Number of genes = 17814

  • Number of clinical features = 11

Survival analysis

For survival clinical features, Wald's test in univariate Cox regression analysis with proportional hazards model (Andersen and Gill 1982) was used to estimate the P values using the 'coxph' function in R. Kaplan-Meier survival curves were plot using the four quartile subgroups of patients based on expression levels

Correlation analysis

For continuous numerical clinical features, Spearman's rank correlation coefficients (Spearman 1904) and two-tailed P values were estimated using 'cor.test' function in R

Student's t-test analysis

For two-class clinical features, two-tailed Student's t test with unequal variance (Lehmann and Romano 2005) was applied to compare the log2-expression levels between the two clinical classes using 't.test' function in R

ANOVA analysis

For multi-class clinical features (ordinal or nominal), one-way analysis of variance (Howell 2002) was applied to compare the log2-expression levels between different clinical classes using 'anova' function in R

Q value calculation

For multiple hypothesis correction, Q value is the False Discovery Rate (FDR) analogue of the P value (Benjamini and Hochberg 1995), defined as the minimum FDR at which the test may be called significant. We used the 'Benjamini and Hochberg' method of 'p.adjust' function in R to convert P values into Q values.

Download Results

This is an experimental feature. The full results of the analysis summarized in this report can be downloaded from the TCGA Data Coordination Center.

References
[1] Andersen and Gill, Cox's regression model for counting processes, a large sample study, Annals of Statistics 10(4):1100-1120 (1982)
[2] Spearman, C, The proof and measurement of association between two things, Amer. J. Psychol 15:72-101 (1904)
[3] Lehmann and Romano, Testing Statistical Hypotheses (3E ed.), New York: Springer. ISBN 0387988645 (2005)
[4] Howell, D, Statistical Methods for Psychology. (5th ed.), Duxbury Press:324-5 (2002)
[5] Benjamini and Hochberg, Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B 59:289-300 (1995)