Correlation between gene mutation status and selected clinical features
Kidney Chromophobe (Primary solid tumor)
23 September 2013  |  analyses__2013_09_23
Maintainer Information
Citation Information
Maintained by TCGA GDAC Team (Broad Institute/MD Anderson Cancer Center/Harvard Medical School)
Cite as Broad Institute TCGA Genome Data Analysis Center (2013): Correlation between gene mutation status and selected clinical features. Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard. doi:10.7908/C1P55KTP
Overview
Introduction

This pipeline computes the correlation between significantly recurrent gene mutations and selected clinical features.

Summary

Testing the association between mutation status of 2 genes and 10 clinical features across 64 patients, 2 significant findings detected with Q value < 0.25.

  • TP53 mutation correlated to 'Time to Death'.

  • PTEN mutation correlated to 'Time to Death'.

Results
Overview of the results

Table 1.  Get Full Table Overview of the association between mutation status of 2 genes and 10 clinical features. Shown in the table are P values (Q values). Thresholded by Q value < 0.25, 2 significant findings detected.

Clinical
Features
Time
to
Death
AGE NEOPLASM
DISEASESTAGE
PATHOLOGY
T
STAGE
PATHOLOGY
N
STAGE
PATHOLOGY
M
STAGE
GENDER KARNOFSKY
PERFORMANCE
SCORE
NUMBERPACKYEARSSMOKED YEAROFTOBACCOSMOKINGONSET
nMutated (%) nWild-Type logrank test t-test Fisher's exact test Fisher's exact test Fisher's exact test Fisher's exact test Fisher's exact test t-test t-test t-test
TP53 21 (33%) 43 0.00124
(0.0198)
0.973
(1.00)
0.29
(1.00)
0.359
(1.00)
0.036
(0.504)
0.126
(1.00)
1
(1.00)
0.146
(1.00)
0.777
(1.00)
PTEN 6 (9%) 58 0.00338
(0.0508)
0.402
(1.00)
0.0594
(0.719)
0.0553
(0.719)
0.0874
(0.962)
0.664
(1.00)
0.199
(1.00)
'TP53 MUTATION STATUS' versus 'Time to Death'

P value = 0.00124 (logrank test), Q value = 0.02

Table S1.  Gene #1: 'TP53 MUTATION STATUS' versus Clinical Feature #1: 'Time to Death'

nPatients nDeath Duration Range (Median), Month
ALL 63 7 0.6 - 151.9 (63.9)
TP53 MUTATED 21 6 10.7 - 114.2 (44.8)
TP53 WILD-TYPE 42 1 0.6 - 151.9 (70.3)

Figure S1.  Get High-res Image Gene #1: 'TP53 MUTATION STATUS' versus Clinical Feature #1: 'Time to Death'

'PTEN MUTATION STATUS' versus 'Time to Death'

P value = 0.00338 (logrank test), Q value = 0.051

Table S2.  Gene #2: 'PTEN MUTATION STATUS' versus Clinical Feature #1: 'Time to Death'

nPatients nDeath Duration Range (Median), Month
ALL 63 7 0.6 - 151.9 (63.9)
PTEN MUTATED 6 3 16.7 - 90.5 (46.4)
PTEN WILD-TYPE 57 4 0.6 - 151.9 (66.5)

Figure S2.  Get High-res Image Gene #2: 'PTEN MUTATION STATUS' versus Clinical Feature #1: 'Time to Death'

Methods & Data
Input
  • Mutation data file = KICH-TP.mutsig.cluster.txt

  • Clinical data file = KICH-TP.clin.merged.picked.txt

  • Number of patients = 64

  • Number of significantly mutated genes = 2

  • Number of selected clinical features = 10

  • Exclude genes that fewer than K tumors have mutations, K = 3

Survival analysis

For survival clinical features, the Kaplan-Meier survival curves of tumors with and without gene mutations were plotted and the statistical significance P values were estimated by logrank test (Bland and Altman 2004) using the 'survdiff' function in R

Student's t-test analysis

For continuous numerical clinical features, two-tailed Student's t test with unequal variance (Lehmann and Romano 2005) was applied to compare the clinical values between tumors with and without gene mutations using 't.test' function in R

Fisher's exact test

For binary or multi-class clinical features (nominal or ordinal), two-tailed Fisher's exact tests (Fisher 1922) were used to estimate the P values using the 'fisher.test' function in R

Q value calculation

For multiple hypothesis correction, Q value is the False Discovery Rate (FDR) analogue of the P value (Benjamini and Hochberg 1995), defined as the minimum FDR at which the test may be called significant. We used the 'Benjamini and Hochberg' method of 'p.adjust' function in R to convert P values into Q values.

Download Results

In addition to the links below, the full results of the analysis summarized in this report can also be downloaded programmatically using firehose_get, or interactively from either the Broad GDAC website or TCGA Data Coordination Center Portal.

References
[1] Bland and Altman, Statistics notes: The logrank test, BMJ 328(7447):1073 (2004)
[2] Lehmann and Romano, Testing Statistical Hypotheses (3E ed.), New York: Springer. ISBN 0387988645 (2005)
[3] Fisher, R.A., On the interpretation of chi-square from contingency tables, and the calculation of P, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society 85(1):87-94 (1922)
[4] Benjamini and Hochberg, Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B 59:289-300 (1995)