Correlation between gene mutation status and molecular subtypes
Kidney Renal Papillary Cell Carcinoma (Primary solid tumor)
23 September 2013  |  analyses__2013_09_23
Maintainer Information
Citation Information
Maintained by TCGA GDAC Team (Broad Institute/MD Anderson Cancer Center/Harvard Medical School)
Cite as Broad Institute TCGA Genome Data Analysis Center (2013): Correlation between gene mutation status and molecular subtypes. Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard. doi:10.7908/C1057D80
Overview
Introduction

This pipeline computes the correlation between significantly recurrent gene mutations and molecular subtypes.

Summary

Testing the association between mutation status of 4 genes and 8 molecular subtypes across 112 patients, no significant finding detected with P value < 0.05 and Q value < 0.25.

  • No gene mutations related to molecuar subtypes.

Results
Overview of the results

Table 1.  Get Full Table Overview of the association between mutation status of 4 genes and 8 molecular subtypes. Shown in the table are P values (Q values). Thresholded by P value < 0.05 and Q value < 0.25, no significant finding detected.

Clinical
Features
CN
CNMF
METHLYATION
CNMF
MRNASEQ
CNMF
MRNASEQ
CHIERARCHICAL
MIRSEQ
CNMF
MIRSEQ
CHIERARCHICAL
MIRSEQ
MATURE
CNMF
MIRSEQ
MATURE
CHIERARCHICAL
nMutated (%) nWild-Type Fisher's exact test Fisher's exact test Fisher's exact test Fisher's exact test Fisher's exact test Fisher's exact test Fisher's exact test Fisher's exact test
CDC27 4 (4%) 108 0.517
(1.00)
0.555
(1.00)
1
(1.00)
1
(1.00)
0.469
(1.00)
0.355
(1.00)
1
(1.00)
1
(1.00)
IL32 4 (4%) 108 1
(1.00)
0.299
(1.00)
0.589
(1.00)
0.311
(1.00)
0.83
(1.00)
NF2 7 (6%) 105 0.0123
(0.307)
0.0669
(1.00)
0.234
(1.00)
0.261
(1.00)
0.53
(1.00)
0.787
(1.00)
1
(1.00)
1
(1.00)
PPARGC1B 3 (3%) 109 0.0703
(1.00)
0.197
(1.00)
0.304
(1.00)
0.38
(1.00)
0.0114
(0.297)
Methods & Data
Input
  • Mutation data file = KIRP-TP.mutsig.cluster.txt

  • Molecular subtypes file = KIRP-TP.transferedmergedcluster.txt

  • Number of patients = 112

  • Number of significantly mutated genes = 4

  • Number of Molecular subtypes = 8

  • Exclude genes that fewer than K tumors have mutations, K = 3

Fisher's exact test

For binary or multi-class clinical features (nominal or ordinal), two-tailed Fisher's exact tests (Fisher 1922) were used to estimate the P values using the 'fisher.test' function in R

Q value calculation

For multiple hypothesis correction, Q value is the False Discovery Rate (FDR) analogue of the P value (Benjamini and Hochberg 1995), defined as the minimum FDR at which the test may be called significant. We used the 'Benjamini and Hochberg' method of 'p.adjust' function in R to convert P values into Q values.

Download Results

In addition to the links below, the full results of the analysis summarized in this report can also be downloaded programmatically using firehose_get, or interactively from either the Broad GDAC website or TCGA Data Coordination Center Portal.

References
[1] Fisher, R.A., On the interpretation of chi-square from contingency tables, and the calculation of P, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society 85(1):87-94 (1922)
[2] Benjamini and Hochberg, Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B 59:289-300 (1995)