Mutation Assessor
Kidney Renal Papillary Cell Carcinoma (Primary solid tumor)
23 September 2013  |  analyses__2013_09_23
Maintainer Information
Citation Information
Maintained by David Heiman (Broad Institute)
Cite as Broad Institute TCGA Genome Data Analysis Center (2013): Mutation Assessor. Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard. doi:10.7908/C16Q1VJ2
Overview
Introduction

This report serves to summarize the functional impact of missense mutations in each gene as determined by Mutation Assessor[1].

Summary
  • High Functional Impact Missense Mutations: 327

  • Medium Functional Impact Missense Mutations: 1507

  • Low Functional Impact Missense Mutations: 1537

  • Neutral Functional Impact Mutations: 1239

Results
Functional Impact by Gene

Table 1.  Get Full Table A gene-level breakdown of missense mutation functional impact, ordered by MutSig rank. Includes missense mutation counts broken down by level of functional impact (high, medium, low, neutral), median functional impact score and level, and most common level(s) of functional impact (mode) per gene.

Gene MutSig
Rank
High
Functional Impact
Count
Medium
Functional Impact
Count
Low
Functional Impact
Count
Neutral
Functional Impact
Count
Median
Functional Impact
Score
Median
Functional Impact
Level
Mode
Functional Impact
Level
PCDHGC5 6 3 4 2 3 1.9950 medium medium
MET 7 0 5 0 4 1.9350 medium medium
PLAC4 8 0 0 0 1 0.0000 neutral neutral
PCF11 9 0 0 6 2 0.9350 low low
LGI4 10 0 2 2 0 1.8925 low medium/low
ELF3 11 0 1 0 0 2.8200 medium medium
PCDHAC2 12 0 4 0 1 2.0300 medium medium
ACSBG2 15 0 0 0 3 -0.4050 neutral neutral
BHMT 17 0 2 0 0 2.7450 medium medium
NFE2L2 22 0 3 0 0 2.8650 medium medium
Methods & Data
Input
  1. KIRP-TP.maf.annotated

  2. KIRP-TP.sig_genes.txt

  3. Mutation Assessor Scores Release 2:

A lookup is done against the relevant Mutation Assessor Scores table for each missense mutation in a given MAF file, and available functional impact score and level are appended as two new columns to generate KIRP-TP.maf.annotated. These are summarized in Table 1, sorted by MutSig rank.

Download Results

In addition to the links below, the full results of the analysis summarized in this report can also be downloaded programmatically using firehose_get, or interactively from either the Broad GDAC website or TCGA Data Coordination Center Portal.

References
[1] Boris Reva, Yevgeniy Antipin, and Chris Sander, Predicting the functional impact of protein mutations: application to cancer genomics, Nucl. Acids Res. 39(17):e118 (2011)