This pipeline uses various statistical tests to identify RPPAs whose expression levels correlated to selected clinical features.
Testing the association between 189 genes and 5 clinical features across 137 samples, statistically thresholded by Q value < 0.05, 1 clinical feature related to at least one genes.
-
3 genes correlated to 'PATHOLOGY.T.STAGE'.
-
EIF4G1|EIF4G-R-C , DVL3|DVL3-R-V , EEF2K|EEF2K-R-V
-
No genes correlated to 'AGE', 'PATHOLOGY.N.STAGE', 'COMPLETENESS.OF.RESECTION', and 'NUMBER.OF.LYMPH.NODES'.
Complete statistical result table is provided in Supplement Table 1
Clinical feature | Statistical test | Significant genes | Associated with | Associated with | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AGE | Spearman correlation test | N=0 | ||||
PATHOLOGY T STAGE | Spearman correlation test | N=3 | higher stage | N=3 | lower stage | N=0 |
PATHOLOGY N STAGE | t test | N=0 | ||||
COMPLETENESS OF RESECTION | ANOVA test | N=0 | ||||
NUMBER OF LYMPH NODES | Spearman correlation test | N=0 |
AGE | Mean (SD) | 60.23 (7.1) |
Significant markers | N = 0 |
PATHOLOGY.T.STAGE | Mean (SD) | 2.65 (0.55) |
N | ||
2 | 53 | |
3 | 79 | |
4 | 5 | |
Significant markers | N = 3 | |
pos. correlated | 3 | |
neg. correlated | 0 |
SpearmanCorr | corrP | Q | |
---|---|---|---|
EIF4G1|EIF4G-R-C | 0.3464 | 3.38e-05 | 0.00639 |
DVL3|DVL3-R-V | 0.3391 | 5.053e-05 | 0.0095 |
EEF2K|EEF2K-R-V | 0.3255 | 0.0001041 | 0.0195 |
PATHOLOGY.N.STAGE | Labels | N |
class0 | 109 | |
class1 | 13 | |
Significant markers | N = 0 |
COMPLETENESS.OF.RESECTION | Labels | N |
R0 | 100 | |
R1 | 27 | |
RX | 3 | |
Significant markers | N = 0 |
-
Expresson data file = PRAD-TP.rppa.txt
-
Clinical data file = PRAD-TP.clin.merged.picked.txt
-
Number of patients = 137
-
Number of genes = 189
-
Number of clinical features = 5
For continuous numerical clinical features, Spearman's rank correlation coefficients (Spearman 1904) and two-tailed P values were estimated using 'cor.test' function in R
For two-class clinical features, two-tailed Student's t test with unequal variance (Lehmann and Romano 2005) was applied to compare the log2-expression levels between the two clinical classes using 't.test' function in R
For multi-class clinical features (ordinal or nominal), one-way analysis of variance (Howell 2002) was applied to compare the log2-expression levels between different clinical classes using 'anova' function in R
For multiple hypothesis correction, Q value is the False Discovery Rate (FDR) analogue of the P value (Benjamini and Hochberg 1995), defined as the minimum FDR at which the test may be called significant. We used the 'Benjamini and Hochberg' method of 'p.adjust' function in R to convert P values into Q values.
In addition to the links below, the full results of the analysis summarized in this report can also be downloaded programmatically using firehose_get, or interactively from either the Broad GDAC website or TCGA Data Coordination Center Portal.