Correlation between mRNA expression and clinical features
Uterine Corpus Endometrioid Carcinoma (Primary solid tumor)
23 September 2013  |  analyses__2013_09_23
Maintainer Information
Citation Information
Maintained by TCGA GDAC Team (Broad Institute/MD Anderson Cancer Center/Harvard Medical School)
Cite as Broad Institute TCGA Genome Data Analysis Center (2013): Correlation between mRNA expression and clinical features. Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard. doi:10.7908/C1W37TQ5
Overview
Introduction

This pipeline uses various statistical tests to identify mRNAs whose expression levels correlated to selected clinical features.

Summary

Testing the association between 17814 genes and 5 clinical features across 54 samples, statistically thresholded by Q value < 0.05, 3 clinical features related to at least one genes.

  • 3 genes correlated to 'AGE'.

    • NPTX1 ,  TMEM79 ,  IL20RB

  • 150 genes correlated to 'HISTOLOGICAL.TYPE'.

    • KLHL34 ,  OR4S2 ,  C19ORF12 ,  TSP50 ,  KIAA1324 ,  ...

  • 28 genes correlated to 'COMPLETENESS.OF.RESECTION'.

    • RHOXF1 ,  GALNTL5 ,  AGTR1 ,  LBP ,  ABHD9 ,  ...

  • No genes correlated to 'Time to Death', and 'RADIATIONS.RADIATION.REGIMENINDICATION'.

Results
Overview of the results

Complete statistical result table is provided in Supplement Table 1

Table 1.  Get Full Table This table shows the clinical features, statistical methods used, and the number of genes that are significantly associated with each clinical feature at Q value < 0.05.

Clinical feature Statistical test Significant genes Associated with                 Associated with
Time to Death Cox regression test   N=0        
AGE Spearman correlation test N=3 older N=2 younger N=1
HISTOLOGICAL TYPE ANOVA test N=150        
RADIATIONS RADIATION REGIMENINDICATION t test   N=0        
COMPLETENESS OF RESECTION ANOVA test N=28        
Clinical variable #1: 'Time to Death'

No gene related to 'Time to Death'.

Table S1.  Basic characteristics of clinical feature: 'Time to Death'

Time to Death Duration (Months) 6-149.5 (median=37.4)
  censored N = 45
  death N = 9
     
  Significant markers N = 0
Clinical variable #2: 'AGE'

3 genes related to 'AGE'.

Table S2.  Basic characteristics of clinical feature: 'AGE'

AGE Mean (SD) 62.94 (12)
  Significant markers N = 3
  pos. correlated 2
  neg. correlated 1
List of 3 genes significantly correlated to 'AGE' by Spearman correlation test

Table S3.  Get Full Table List of 3 genes significantly correlated to 'AGE' by Spearman correlation test

SpearmanCorr corrP Q
NPTX1 -0.6007 1.566e-06 0.0279
TMEM79 0.5976 1.832e-06 0.0326
IL20RB 0.5914 2.484e-06 0.0443

Figure S1.  Get High-res Image As an example, this figure shows the association of NPTX1 to 'AGE'. P value = 1.57e-06 with Spearman correlation analysis. The straight line presents the best linear regression.

Clinical variable #3: 'HISTOLOGICAL.TYPE'

150 genes related to 'HISTOLOGICAL.TYPE'.

Table S4.  Basic characteristics of clinical feature: 'HISTOLOGICAL.TYPE'

HISTOLOGICAL.TYPE Labels N
  ENDOMETRIOID ENDOMETRIAL ADENOCARCINOMA 41
  MIXED SEROUS AND ENDOMETRIOID 1
  SEROUS ENDOMETRIAL ADENOCARCINOMA 12
     
  Significant markers N = 150
List of top 10 genes differentially expressed by 'HISTOLOGICAL.TYPE'

Table S5.  Get Full Table List of top 10 genes differentially expressed by 'HISTOLOGICAL.TYPE'

ANOVA_P Q
KLHL34 3.401e-17 6.06e-13
OR4S2 1.774e-14 3.16e-10
C19ORF12 2.167e-13 3.86e-09
TSP50 3.379e-13 6.02e-09
KIAA1324 4.24e-13 7.55e-09
PNOC 6.89e-13 1.23e-08
FOXA2 2.187e-12 3.9e-08
CDH6 4.379e-12 7.8e-08
CLDN6 9.875e-12 1.76e-07
SLC6A12 6.547e-11 1.17e-06

Figure S2.  Get High-res Image As an example, this figure shows the association of KLHL34 to 'HISTOLOGICAL.TYPE'. P value = 3.4e-17 with ANOVA analysis.

Clinical variable #4: 'RADIATIONS.RADIATION.REGIMENINDICATION'

No gene related to 'RADIATIONS.RADIATION.REGIMENINDICATION'.

Table S6.  Basic characteristics of clinical feature: 'RADIATIONS.RADIATION.REGIMENINDICATION'

RADIATIONS.RADIATION.REGIMENINDICATION Labels N
  NO 25
  YES 29
     
  Significant markers N = 0
Clinical variable #5: 'COMPLETENESS.OF.RESECTION'

28 genes related to 'COMPLETENESS.OF.RESECTION'.

Table S7.  Basic characteristics of clinical feature: 'COMPLETENESS.OF.RESECTION'

COMPLETENESS.OF.RESECTION Labels N
  R0 39
  R1 6
  R2 2
  RX 1
     
  Significant markers N = 28
List of top 10 genes differentially expressed by 'COMPLETENESS.OF.RESECTION'

Table S8.  Get Full Table List of top 10 genes differentially expressed by 'COMPLETENESS.OF.RESECTION'

ANOVA_P Q
RHOXF1 1.699e-13 3.03e-09
GALNTL5 9.385e-11 1.67e-06
AGTR1 6.718e-10 1.2e-05
LBP 9.917e-10 1.77e-05
ABHD9 1.207e-08 0.000215
C12ORF59 1.389e-08 0.000247
ANKS1A 1.618e-08 0.000288
KCNV1 2.125e-08 0.000378
PAGE1 3.932e-08 7e-04
SSX7 4.549e-08 0.00081

Figure S3.  Get High-res Image As an example, this figure shows the association of RHOXF1 to 'COMPLETENESS.OF.RESECTION'. P value = 1.7e-13 with ANOVA analysis.

Methods & Data
Input
  • Expresson data file = UCEC-TP.medianexp.txt

  • Clinical data file = UCEC-TP.clin.merged.picked.txt

  • Number of patients = 54

  • Number of genes = 17814

  • Number of clinical features = 5

Survival analysis

For survival clinical features, Wald's test in univariate Cox regression analysis with proportional hazards model (Andersen and Gill 1982) was used to estimate the P values using the 'coxph' function in R. Kaplan-Meier survival curves were plot using the four quartile subgroups of patients based on expression levels

Correlation analysis

For continuous numerical clinical features, Spearman's rank correlation coefficients (Spearman 1904) and two-tailed P values were estimated using 'cor.test' function in R

ANOVA analysis

For multi-class clinical features (ordinal or nominal), one-way analysis of variance (Howell 2002) was applied to compare the log2-expression levels between different clinical classes using 'anova' function in R

Student's t-test analysis

For two-class clinical features, two-tailed Student's t test with unequal variance (Lehmann and Romano 2005) was applied to compare the log2-expression levels between the two clinical classes using 't.test' function in R

Q value calculation

For multiple hypothesis correction, Q value is the False Discovery Rate (FDR) analogue of the P value (Benjamini and Hochberg 1995), defined as the minimum FDR at which the test may be called significant. We used the 'Benjamini and Hochberg' method of 'p.adjust' function in R to convert P values into Q values.

Download Results

In addition to the links below, the full results of the analysis summarized in this report can also be downloaded programmatically using firehose_get, or interactively from either the Broad GDAC website or TCGA Data Coordination Center Portal.

References
[1] Andersen and Gill, Cox's regression model for counting processes, a large sample study, Annals of Statistics 10(4):1100-1120 (1982)
[2] Spearman, C, The proof and measurement of association between two things, Amer. J. Psychol 15:72-101 (1904)
[3] Howell, D, Statistical Methods for Psychology. (5th ed.), Duxbury Press:324-5 (2002)
[4] Lehmann and Romano, Testing Statistical Hypotheses (3E ed.), New York: Springer. ISBN 0387988645 (2005)
[5] Benjamini and Hochberg, Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B 59:289-300 (1995)