Correlation between copy number variations of arm-level result and molecular subtypes
Adrenocortical Carcinoma (Primary solid tumor)
16 April 2014  |  analyses__2014_04_16
Maintainer Information
Citation Information
Maintained by TCGA GDAC Team (Broad Institute/MD Anderson Cancer Center/Harvard Medical School)
Cite as Broad Institute TCGA Genome Data Analysis Center (2014): Correlation between copy number variations of arm-level result and molecular subtypes. Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard. doi:10.7908/C1RF5SMV
Overview
Introduction

This pipeline computes the correlation between significant arm-level copy number variations (cnvs) and molecular subtypes.

Summary

Testing the association between copy number variation 80 arm-level events and 8 molecular subtypes across 90 patients, 48 significant findings detected with P value < 0.05 and Q value < 0.25.

  • 2p gain cnv correlated to 'CN_CNMF' and 'MRNASEQ_CHIERARCHICAL'.

  • 4p gain cnv correlated to 'CN_CNMF',  'MRNASEQ_CNMF', and 'MRNASEQ_CHIERARCHICAL'.

  • 4q gain cnv correlated to 'CN_CNMF',  'MRNASEQ_CNMF', and 'MRNASEQ_CHIERARCHICAL'.

  • 5p gain cnv correlated to 'CN_CNMF' and 'MRNASEQ_CHIERARCHICAL'.

  • 5q gain cnv correlated to 'CN_CNMF' and 'MRNASEQ_CHIERARCHICAL'.

  • 7p gain cnv correlated to 'MRNASEQ_CNMF'.

  • 7q gain cnv correlated to 'CN_CNMF',  'MRNASEQ_CNMF', and 'MRNASEQ_CHIERARCHICAL'.

  • 9p gain cnv correlated to 'CN_CNMF'.

  • 9q gain cnv correlated to 'CN_CNMF' and 'MRNASEQ_CHIERARCHICAL'.

  • 10p gain cnv correlated to 'MRNASEQ_CNMF'.

  • 10q gain cnv correlated to 'CN_CNMF' and 'MRNASEQ_CNMF'.

  • 12p gain cnv correlated to 'CN_CNMF' and 'MRNASEQ_CNMF'.

  • 12q gain cnv correlated to 'CN_CNMF'.

  • 14q gain cnv correlated to 'MRNASEQ_CHIERARCHICAL',  'MIRSEQ_CNMF',  'MIRSEQ_CHIERARCHICAL',  'MIRSEQ_MATURE_CNMF', and 'MIRSEQ_MATURE_CHIERARCHICAL'.

  • 16p gain cnv correlated to 'CN_CNMF',  'MRNASEQ_CNMF', and 'MRNASEQ_CHIERARCHICAL'.

  • 16q gain cnv correlated to 'CN_CNMF',  'MRNASEQ_CNMF', and 'MRNASEQ_CHIERARCHICAL'.

  • 19q gain cnv correlated to 'MRNASEQ_CNMF'.

  • 20p gain cnv correlated to 'CN_CNMF',  'MRNASEQ_CNMF', and 'MIRSEQ_MATURE_CNMF'.

  • 20q gain cnv correlated to 'CN_CNMF' and 'MRNASEQ_CNMF'.

  • xq gain cnv correlated to 'CN_CNMF'.

  • 2q loss cnv correlated to 'CN_CNMF'.

  • 9p loss cnv correlated to 'MRNASEQ_CNMF'.

  • 11q loss cnv correlated to 'CN_CNMF'.

  • 17p loss cnv correlated to 'METHLYATION_CNMF'.

  • 17q loss cnv correlated to 'CN_CNMF'.

Results
Overview of the results

Table 1.  Get Full Table Overview of the association between significant copy number variation of 80 arm-level events and 8 molecular subtypes. Shown in the table are P values (Q values). Thresholded by P value < 0.05 and Q value < 0.25, 48 significant findings detected.

Clinical
Features
CN
CNMF
METHLYATION
CNMF
MRNASEQ
CNMF
MRNASEQ
CHIERARCHICAL
MIRSEQ
CNMF
MIRSEQ
CHIERARCHICAL
MIRSEQ
MATURE
CNMF
MIRSEQ
MATURE
CHIERARCHICAL
nCNV (%) nWild-Type Chi-square test Chi-square test Fisher's exact test Fisher's exact test Fisher's exact test Fisher's exact test Fisher's exact test Fisher's exact test
14q gain 21 (23%) 69 0.00718
(1.00)
0.0562
(1.00)
0.000508
(0.278)
0.000113
(0.0638)
9.9e-06
(0.00583)
1.31e-05
(0.00768)
9.64e-06
(0.00569)
3.57e-06
(0.00211)
4p gain 37 (41%) 53 7.8e-05
(0.0444)
0.0432
(1.00)
4.79e-05
(0.0276)
0.00035
(0.193)
0.272
(1.00)
0.394
(1.00)
0.635
(1.00)
0.572
(1.00)
4q gain 33 (37%) 57 0.000236
(0.132)
0.042
(1.00)
1.76e-05
(0.0103)
7.26e-05
(0.0415)
0.528
(1.00)
0.657
(1.00)
0.566
(1.00)
0.771
(1.00)
7q gain 48 (53%) 42 6.72e-05
(0.0385)
0.113
(1.00)
3.54e-06
(0.0021)
0.000192
(0.108)
0.865
(1.00)
0.474
(1.00)
1
(1.00)
0.31
(1.00)
16p gain 49 (54%) 41 9.86e-08
(5.9e-05)
0.0124
(1.00)
8.74e-06
(0.00517)
1.01e-05
(0.00595)
0.0468
(1.00)
0.25
(1.00)
0.0111
(1.00)
0.531
(1.00)
16q gain 47 (52%) 43 2.98e-07
(0.000178)
0.0093
(1.00)
0.000115
(0.065)
3.05e-05
(0.0177)
0.024
(1.00)
0.25
(1.00)
0.0111
(1.00)
0.531
(1.00)
20p gain 46 (51%) 44 1.95e-06
(0.00116)
0.226
(1.00)
0.00012
(0.0676)
0.00738
(1.00)
0.0049
(1.00)
0.00264
(1.00)
0.000147
(0.0825)
0.0128
(1.00)
2p gain 13 (14%) 77 0.000224
(0.125)
0.00127
(0.686)
0.0119
(1.00)
0.000281
(0.156)
0.373
(1.00)
0.121
(1.00)
0.0803
(1.00)
0.0598
(1.00)
5p gain 57 (63%) 33 3.25e-06
(0.00193)
0.031
(1.00)
0.000603
(0.329)
5.59e-05
(0.0321)
0.237
(1.00)
0.376
(1.00)
0.0653
(1.00)
0.385
(1.00)
5q gain 53 (59%) 37 2.9e-05
(0.0168)
0.00943
(1.00)
0.000687
(0.374)
1.34e-05
(0.00787)
0.328
(1.00)
0.202
(1.00)
0.346
(1.00)
0.21
(1.00)
9q gain 29 (32%) 61 0.000186
(0.105)
0.00407
(1.00)
0.0266
(1.00)
0.000264
(0.147)
0.0331
(1.00)
0.279
(1.00)
0.0188
(1.00)
0.183
(1.00)
10q gain 26 (29%) 64 0.000352
(0.194)
0.0763
(1.00)
3.39e-05
(0.0196)
0.00111
(0.6)
0.0195
(1.00)
0.919
(1.00)
0.0704
(1.00)
0.88
(1.00)
12p gain 64 (71%) 26 1.66e-05
(0.00972)
0.199
(1.00)
0.000214
(0.12)
0.00476
(1.00)
0.235
(1.00)
0.471
(1.00)
0.0704
(1.00)
0.532
(1.00)
20q gain 49 (54%) 41 1.99e-05
(0.0116)
0.0627
(1.00)
7.02e-05
(0.0402)
0.00301
(1.00)
0.0186
(1.00)
0.0162
(1.00)
0.000824
(0.447)
0.0225
(1.00)
7p gain 48 (53%) 42 0.000544
(0.297)
0.113
(1.00)
0.000144
(0.0813)
0.00231
(1.00)
0.865
(1.00)
0.685
(1.00)
0.859
(1.00)
0.457
(1.00)
9p gain 20 (22%) 70 2.38e-05
(0.0138)
0.00402
(1.00)
0.0102
(1.00)
0.00161
(0.857)
0.375
(1.00)
0.427
(1.00)
0.233
(1.00)
0.336
(1.00)
10p gain 25 (28%) 65 0.000467
(0.257)
0.0632
(1.00)
4.69e-05
(0.027)
0.000483
(0.265)
0.0331
(1.00)
0.643
(1.00)
0.104
(1.00)
0.532
(1.00)
12q gain 64 (71%) 26 1.58e-06
(0.000939)
0.298
(1.00)
0.000713
(0.387)
0.0129
(1.00)
0.226
(1.00)
0.802
(1.00)
0.0389
(1.00)
0.918
(1.00)
19q gain 52 (58%) 38 0.00202
(1.00)
0.0524
(1.00)
0.000378
(0.208)
0.00236
(1.00)
0.141
(1.00)
0.431
(1.00)
0.0956
(1.00)
0.185
(1.00)
xq gain 40 (44%) 50 1.51e-05
(0.00881)
0.167
(1.00)
0.00164
(0.873)
0.0148
(1.00)
0.784
(1.00)
0.354
(1.00)
0.617
(1.00)
0.237
(1.00)
2q loss 15 (17%) 75 7.75e-05
(0.0442)
0.0024
(1.00)
0.115
(1.00)
0.0875
(1.00)
0.0283
(1.00)
0.17
(1.00)
0.115
(1.00)
0.275
(1.00)
9p loss 20 (22%) 70 0.000929
(0.502)
0.038
(1.00)
9.39e-05
(0.0533)
0.00231
(1.00)
0.00872
(1.00)
0.532
(1.00)
0.0594
(1.00)
0.512
(1.00)
11q loss 23 (26%) 67 4.81e-05
(0.0276)
0.00266
(1.00)
0.143
(1.00)
0.352
(1.00)
0.0975
(1.00)
0.392
(1.00)
0.208
(1.00)
0.447
(1.00)
17p loss 32 (36%) 58 0.00141
(0.753)
0.000305
(0.169)
0.0119
(1.00)
0.02
(1.00)
0.0735
(1.00)
0.0922
(1.00)
0.0514
(1.00)
0.0437
(1.00)
17q loss 24 (27%) 66 0.000199
(0.111)
0.00447
(1.00)
0.119
(1.00)
0.0372
(1.00)
0.0667
(1.00)
0.118
(1.00)
0.0777
(1.00)
0.0631
(1.00)
1p gain 4 (4%) 86 0.0853
(1.00)
1q gain 8 (9%) 82 0.157
(1.00)
0.508
(1.00)
0.0461
(1.00)
0.167
(1.00)
0.0645
(1.00)
0.855
(1.00)
0.299
(1.00)
0.851
(1.00)
2q gain 12 (13%) 78 0.00376
(1.00)
0.00156
(0.834)
0.0183
(1.00)
0.00415
(1.00)
0.0553
(1.00)
0.031
(1.00)
0.019
(1.00)
0.028
(1.00)
3p gain 13 (14%) 77 0.0606
(1.00)
0.112
(1.00)
0.331
(1.00)
0.274
(1.00)
0.407
(1.00)
0.139
(1.00)
0.311
(1.00)
0.227
(1.00)
3q gain 15 (17%) 75 0.0539
(1.00)
0.0862
(1.00)
0.0528
(1.00)
0.623
(1.00)
0.653
(1.00)
0.545
(1.00)
0.558
(1.00)
0.56
(1.00)
6p gain 18 (20%) 72 0.0583
(1.00)
0.653
(1.00)
0.0686
(1.00)
0.937
(1.00)
0.149
(1.00)
0.102
(1.00)
0.197
(1.00)
0.257
(1.00)
6q gain 16 (18%) 74 0.00189
(1.00)
0.453
(1.00)
0.192
(1.00)
0.527
(1.00)
0.289
(1.00)
0.225
(1.00)
0.259
(1.00)
0.501
(1.00)
8p gain 32 (36%) 58 0.00226
(1.00)
0.137
(1.00)
0.165
(1.00)
0.246
(1.00)
0.117
(1.00)
0.307
(1.00)
0.0267
(1.00)
0.515
(1.00)
8q gain 38 (42%) 52 0.0191
(1.00)
0.286
(1.00)
0.401
(1.00)
0.502
(1.00)
0.471
(1.00)
0.552
(1.00)
0.0857
(1.00)
0.778
(1.00)
11p gain 5 (6%) 85 0.0478
(1.00)
11q gain 6 (7%) 84 0.126
(1.00)
0.126
(1.00)
0.0446
(1.00)
0.172
(1.00)
0.187
(1.00)
1
(1.00)
0.445
(1.00)
0.808
(1.00)
13q gain 6 (7%) 84 0.919
(1.00)
0.478
(1.00)
0.0392
(1.00)
0.363
(1.00)
0.141
(1.00)
0.855
(1.00)
0.299
(1.00)
0.851
(1.00)
15q gain 11 (12%) 79 0.221
(1.00)
0.0563
(1.00)
0.0106
(1.00)
0.0116
(1.00)
0.362
(1.00)
0.163
(1.00)
0.248
(1.00)
0.114
(1.00)
17p gain 5 (6%) 85 0.113
(1.00)
0.509
(1.00)
0.687
(1.00)
0.113
(1.00)
0.208
(1.00)
0.375
(1.00)
0.14
(1.00)
0.14
(1.00)
17q gain 7 (8%) 83 0.00981
(1.00)
0.509
(1.00)
0.687
(1.00)
0.113
(1.00)
0.208
(1.00)
0.375
(1.00)
0.14
(1.00)
0.14
(1.00)
18p gain 6 (7%) 84 0.422
(1.00)
18q gain 5 (6%) 85 0.598
(1.00)
19p gain 56 (62%) 34 0.0118
(1.00)
0.0496
(1.00)
0.00129
(0.691)
0.00128
(0.687)
0.438
(1.00)
0.729
(1.00)
0.366
(1.00)
0.393
(1.00)
21q gain 31 (34%) 59 0.0331
(1.00)
0.00842
(1.00)
0.0203
(1.00)
0.00137
(0.733)
0.0122
(1.00)
0.0557
(1.00)
0.0264
(1.00)
0.0327
(1.00)
22q gain 3 (3%) 87 0.496
(1.00)
1p loss 29 (32%) 61 0.215
(1.00)
0.168
(1.00)
0.414
(1.00)
0.0904
(1.00)
0.471
(1.00)
0.501
(1.00)
0.717
(1.00)
0.677
(1.00)
1q loss 20 (22%) 70 0.546
(1.00)
0.0989
(1.00)
0.944
(1.00)
0.798
(1.00)
0.364
(1.00)
0.271
(1.00)
0.58
(1.00)
0.363
(1.00)
2p loss 17 (19%) 73 0.000508
(0.278)
0.0255
(1.00)
0.588
(1.00)
0.468
(1.00)
0.0357
(1.00)
0.275
(1.00)
0.127
(1.00)
0.336
(1.00)
3p loss 20 (22%) 70 0.0363
(1.00)
0.109
(1.00)
0.115
(1.00)
0.214
(1.00)
0.484
(1.00)
0.36
(1.00)
0.204
(1.00)
0.229
(1.00)
3q loss 20 (22%) 70 0.0117
(1.00)
0.127
(1.00)
0.0241
(1.00)
0.0655
(1.00)
0.197
(1.00)
0.118
(1.00)
0.04
(1.00)
0.0724
(1.00)
4p loss 10 (11%) 80 0.0345
(1.00)
0.181
(1.00)
0.0232
(1.00)
0.0537
(1.00)
0.308
(1.00)
0.547
(1.00)
0.423
(1.00)
0.556
(1.00)
4q loss 11 (12%) 79 0.0916
(1.00)
0.0612
(1.00)
0.00728
(1.00)
0.0187
(1.00)
0.25
(1.00)
0.642
(1.00)
0.38
(1.00)
0.466
(1.00)
5p loss 8 (9%) 82 0.168
(1.00)
0.0597
(1.00)
0.229
(1.00)
0.00181
(0.959)
0.772
(1.00)
1
(1.00)
0.454
(1.00)
1
(1.00)
5q loss 7 (8%) 83 0.621
(1.00)
0.508
(1.00)
0.276
(1.00)
0.167
(1.00)
0.658
(1.00)
0.597
(1.00)
0.862
(1.00)
0.614
(1.00)
6p loss 19 (21%) 71 0.0438
(1.00)
0.833
(1.00)
0.594
(1.00)
0.39
(1.00)
0.607
(1.00)
0.737
(1.00)
0.816
(1.00)
0.586
(1.00)
6q loss 22 (24%) 68 0.0116
(1.00)
0.881
(1.00)
0.607
(1.00)
0.615
(1.00)
0.72
(1.00)
0.852
(1.00)
0.724
(1.00)
0.682
(1.00)
7p loss 5 (6%) 85 0.394
(1.00)
0.517
(1.00)
0.91
(1.00)
0.815
(1.00)
0.816
(1.00)
0.072
(1.00)
0.681
(1.00)
0.0865
(1.00)
7q loss 6 (7%) 84 0.287
(1.00)
0.254
(1.00)
0.62
(1.00)
0.442
(1.00)
1
(1.00)
0.0538
(1.00)
0.593
(1.00)
0.0647
(1.00)
8p loss 16 (18%) 74 0.00963
(1.00)
0.206
(1.00)
0.18
(1.00)
0.0702
(1.00)
0.192
(1.00)
0.0561
(1.00)
0.0175
(1.00)
0.0309
(1.00)
8q loss 12 (13%) 78 0.00206
(1.00)
0.0829
(1.00)
0.033
(1.00)
0.0283
(1.00)
0.0777
(1.00)
0.068
(1.00)
0.034
(1.00)
0.0344
(1.00)
9q loss 11 (12%) 79 0.135
(1.00)
0.932
(1.00)
0.0807
(1.00)
0.432
(1.00)
0.558
(1.00)
1
(1.00)
0.83
(1.00)
0.899
(1.00)
10p loss 12 (13%) 78 0.82
(1.00)
0.418
(1.00)
0.265
(1.00)
0.822
(1.00)
0.683
(1.00)
0.642
(1.00)
0.616
(1.00)
0.466
(1.00)
10q loss 10 (11%) 80 0.484
(1.00)
0.567
(1.00)
0.536
(1.00)
0.9
(1.00)
1
(1.00)
0.518
(1.00)
0.891
(1.00)
0.528
(1.00)
11p loss 24 (27%) 66 0.00129
(0.692)
0.0149
(1.00)
0.223
(1.00)
0.548
(1.00)
0.277
(1.00)
0.567
(1.00)
0.419
(1.00)
0.585
(1.00)
12p loss 5 (6%) 85 0.189
(1.00)
0.262
(1.00)
0.62
(1.00)
1
(1.00)
0.103
(1.00)
1
(1.00)
0.0107
(1.00)
1
(1.00)
12q loss 4 (4%) 86 0.108
(1.00)
0.0982
(1.00)
0.441
(1.00)
0.557
(1.00)
0.331
(1.00)
0.791
(1.00)
0.0427
(1.00)
1
(1.00)
13q loss 39 (43%) 51 0.0104
(1.00)
0.0838
(1.00)
0.6
(1.00)
0.768
(1.00)
0.761
(1.00)
0.9
(1.00)
0.915
(1.00)
0.766
(1.00)
14q loss 18 (20%) 72 0.0232
(1.00)
0.447
(1.00)
0.0184
(1.00)
0.00406
(1.00)
0.377
(1.00)
0.332
(1.00)
0.277
(1.00)
0.174
(1.00)
15q loss 21 (23%) 69 0.0299
(1.00)
0.36
(1.00)
0.11
(1.00)
0.172
(1.00)
0.571
(1.00)
0.843
(1.00)
0.331
(1.00)
0.912
(1.00)
16p loss 6 (7%) 84 0.126
(1.00)
0.0575
(1.00)
0.00215
(1.00)
0.0801
(1.00)
0.0128
(1.00)
0.258
(1.00)
0.0315
(1.00)
0.226
(1.00)
16q loss 5 (6%) 85 0.272
(1.00)
0.0356
(1.00)
0.0575
(1.00)
0.0214
(1.00)
0.169
(1.00)
1
(1.00)
0.36
(1.00)
1
(1.00)
18p loss 37 (41%) 53 0.0264
(1.00)
0.242
(1.00)
0.771
(1.00)
0.756
(1.00)
0.684
(1.00)
0.492
(1.00)
0.85
(1.00)
0.593
(1.00)
18q loss 35 (39%) 55 0.0444
(1.00)
0.399
(1.00)
0.811
(1.00)
0.927
(1.00)
0.471
(1.00)
0.472
(1.00)
0.732
(1.00)
0.63
(1.00)
19p loss 5 (6%) 85 0.0478
(1.00)
0.356
(1.00)
0.157
(1.00)
0.779
(1.00)
0.139
(1.00)
0.706
(1.00)
0.215
(1.00)
0.723
(1.00)
19q loss 4 (4%) 86 0.108
(1.00)
0.673
(1.00)
0.774
(1.00)
0.474
(1.00)
0.785
(1.00)
1
(1.00)
0.215
(1.00)
1
(1.00)
20p loss 9 (10%) 81 0.00774
(1.00)
0.282
(1.00)
0.213
(1.00)
0.028
(1.00)
0.0678
(1.00)
0.639
(1.00)
0.169
(1.00)
0.645
(1.00)
20q loss 3 (3%) 87 0.551
(1.00)
21q loss 15 (17%) 75 0.0147
(1.00)
0.366
(1.00)
0.256
(1.00)
0.234
(1.00)
0.224
(1.00)
0.245
(1.00)
0.233
(1.00)
0.107
(1.00)
22q loss 48 (53%) 42 0.0781
(1.00)
0.0753
(1.00)
0.604
(1.00)
0.584
(1.00)
0.859
(1.00)
0.725
(1.00)
0.794
(1.00)
0.68
(1.00)
xq loss 17 (19%) 73 0.00216
(1.00)
0.255
(1.00)
0.0335
(1.00)
0.0207
(1.00)
0.707
(1.00)
0.851
(1.00)
0.138
(1.00)
0.672
(1.00)
'2p gain' versus 'CN_CNMF'

P value = 0.000224 (Chi-square test), Q value = 0.12

Table S1.  Gene #3: '2p gain' versus Molecular Subtype #1: 'CN_CNMF'

nPatients CLUS_1 CLUS_2 CLUS_3 CLUS_4 CLUS_5
ALL 32 24 15 10 9
2P GAIN MUTATED 12 0 1 0 0
2P GAIN WILD-TYPE 20 24 14 10 9

Figure S1.  Get High-res Image Gene #3: '2p gain' versus Molecular Subtype #1: 'CN_CNMF'

'2p gain' versus 'MRNASEQ_CHIERARCHICAL'

P value = 0.000281 (Fisher's exact test), Q value = 0.16

Table S2.  Gene #3: '2p gain' versus Molecular Subtype #4: 'MRNASEQ_CHIERARCHICAL'

nPatients CLUS_1 CLUS_2 CLUS_3
ALL 23 32 22
2P GAIN MUTATED 8 1 0
2P GAIN WILD-TYPE 15 31 22

Figure S2.  Get High-res Image Gene #3: '2p gain' versus Molecular Subtype #4: 'MRNASEQ_CHIERARCHICAL'

'4p gain' versus 'CN_CNMF'

P value = 7.8e-05 (Chi-square test), Q value = 0.044

Table S3.  Gene #7: '4p gain' versus Molecular Subtype #1: 'CN_CNMF'

nPatients CLUS_1 CLUS_2 CLUS_3 CLUS_4 CLUS_5
ALL 32 24 15 10 9
4P GAIN MUTATED 3 13 10 4 7
4P GAIN WILD-TYPE 29 11 5 6 2

Figure S3.  Get High-res Image Gene #7: '4p gain' versus Molecular Subtype #1: 'CN_CNMF'

'4p gain' versus 'MRNASEQ_CNMF'

P value = 4.79e-05 (Fisher's exact test), Q value = 0.028

Table S4.  Gene #7: '4p gain' versus Molecular Subtype #3: 'MRNASEQ_CNMF'

nPatients CLUS_1 CLUS_2 CLUS_3 CLUS_4
ALL 24 13 17 23
4P GAIN MUTATED 1 8 11 10
4P GAIN WILD-TYPE 23 5 6 13

Figure S4.  Get High-res Image Gene #7: '4p gain' versus Molecular Subtype #3: 'MRNASEQ_CNMF'

'4p gain' versus 'MRNASEQ_CHIERARCHICAL'

P value = 0.00035 (Fisher's exact test), Q value = 0.19

Table S5.  Gene #7: '4p gain' versus Molecular Subtype #4: 'MRNASEQ_CHIERARCHICAL'

nPatients CLUS_1 CLUS_2 CLUS_3
ALL 23 32 22
4P GAIN MUTATED 2 14 14
4P GAIN WILD-TYPE 21 18 8

Figure S5.  Get High-res Image Gene #7: '4p gain' versus Molecular Subtype #4: 'MRNASEQ_CHIERARCHICAL'

'4q gain' versus 'CN_CNMF'

P value = 0.000236 (Chi-square test), Q value = 0.13

Table S6.  Gene #8: '4q gain' versus Molecular Subtype #1: 'CN_CNMF'

nPatients CLUS_1 CLUS_2 CLUS_3 CLUS_4 CLUS_5
ALL 32 24 15 10 9
4Q GAIN MUTATED 2 12 9 4 6
4Q GAIN WILD-TYPE 30 12 6 6 3

Figure S6.  Get High-res Image Gene #8: '4q gain' versus Molecular Subtype #1: 'CN_CNMF'

'4q gain' versus 'MRNASEQ_CNMF'

P value = 1.76e-05 (Fisher's exact test), Q value = 0.01

Table S7.  Gene #8: '4q gain' versus Molecular Subtype #3: 'MRNASEQ_CNMF'

nPatients CLUS_1 CLUS_2 CLUS_3 CLUS_4
ALL 24 13 17 23
4Q GAIN MUTATED 0 8 9 10
4Q GAIN WILD-TYPE 24 5 8 13

Figure S7.  Get High-res Image Gene #8: '4q gain' versus Molecular Subtype #3: 'MRNASEQ_CNMF'

'4q gain' versus 'MRNASEQ_CHIERARCHICAL'

P value = 7.26e-05 (Fisher's exact test), Q value = 0.041

Table S8.  Gene #8: '4q gain' versus Molecular Subtype #4: 'MRNASEQ_CHIERARCHICAL'

nPatients CLUS_1 CLUS_2 CLUS_3
ALL 23 32 22
4Q GAIN MUTATED 1 12 14
4Q GAIN WILD-TYPE 22 20 8

Figure S8.  Get High-res Image Gene #8: '4q gain' versus Molecular Subtype #4: 'MRNASEQ_CHIERARCHICAL'

'5p gain' versus 'CN_CNMF'

P value = 3.25e-06 (Chi-square test), Q value = 0.0019

Table S9.  Gene #9: '5p gain' versus Molecular Subtype #1: 'CN_CNMF'

nPatients CLUS_1 CLUS_2 CLUS_3 CLUS_4 CLUS_5
ALL 32 24 15 10 9
5P GAIN MUTATED 10 22 13 4 8
5P GAIN WILD-TYPE 22 2 2 6 1

Figure S9.  Get High-res Image Gene #9: '5p gain' versus Molecular Subtype #1: 'CN_CNMF'

'5p gain' versus 'MRNASEQ_CHIERARCHICAL'

P value = 5.59e-05 (Fisher's exact test), Q value = 0.032

Table S10.  Gene #9: '5p gain' versus Molecular Subtype #4: 'MRNASEQ_CHIERARCHICAL'

nPatients CLUS_1 CLUS_2 CLUS_3
ALL 23 32 22
5P GAIN MUTATED 6 26 17
5P GAIN WILD-TYPE 17 6 5

Figure S10.  Get High-res Image Gene #9: '5p gain' versus Molecular Subtype #4: 'MRNASEQ_CHIERARCHICAL'

'5q gain' versus 'CN_CNMF'

P value = 2.9e-05 (Chi-square test), Q value = 0.017

Table S11.  Gene #10: '5q gain' versus Molecular Subtype #1: 'CN_CNMF'

nPatients CLUS_1 CLUS_2 CLUS_3 CLUS_4 CLUS_5
ALL 32 24 15 10 9
5Q GAIN MUTATED 9 19 13 4 8
5Q GAIN WILD-TYPE 23 5 2 6 1

Figure S11.  Get High-res Image Gene #10: '5q gain' versus Molecular Subtype #1: 'CN_CNMF'

'5q gain' versus 'MRNASEQ_CHIERARCHICAL'

P value = 1.34e-05 (Fisher's exact test), Q value = 0.0079

Table S12.  Gene #10: '5q gain' versus Molecular Subtype #4: 'MRNASEQ_CHIERARCHICAL'

nPatients CLUS_1 CLUS_2 CLUS_3
ALL 23 32 22
5Q GAIN MUTATED 5 23 19
5Q GAIN WILD-TYPE 18 9 3

Figure S12.  Get High-res Image Gene #10: '5q gain' versus Molecular Subtype #4: 'MRNASEQ_CHIERARCHICAL'

'7p gain' versus 'MRNASEQ_CNMF'

P value = 0.000144 (Fisher's exact test), Q value = 0.081

Table S13.  Gene #13: '7p gain' versus Molecular Subtype #3: 'MRNASEQ_CNMF'

nPatients CLUS_1 CLUS_2 CLUS_3 CLUS_4
ALL 24 13 17 23
7P GAIN MUTATED 6 12 13 11
7P GAIN WILD-TYPE 18 1 4 12

Figure S13.  Get High-res Image Gene #13: '7p gain' versus Molecular Subtype #3: 'MRNASEQ_CNMF'

'7q gain' versus 'CN_CNMF'

P value = 6.72e-05 (Chi-square test), Q value = 0.038

Table S14.  Gene #14: '7q gain' versus Molecular Subtype #1: 'CN_CNMF'

nPatients CLUS_1 CLUS_2 CLUS_3 CLUS_4 CLUS_5
ALL 32 24 15 10 9
7Q GAIN MUTATED 8 18 13 3 6
7Q GAIN WILD-TYPE 24 6 2 7 3

Figure S14.  Get High-res Image Gene #14: '7q gain' versus Molecular Subtype #1: 'CN_CNMF'

'7q gain' versus 'MRNASEQ_CNMF'

P value = 3.54e-06 (Fisher's exact test), Q value = 0.0021

Table S15.  Gene #14: '7q gain' versus Molecular Subtype #3: 'MRNASEQ_CNMF'

nPatients CLUS_1 CLUS_2 CLUS_3 CLUS_4
ALL 24 13 17 23
7Q GAIN MUTATED 5 13 13 11
7Q GAIN WILD-TYPE 19 0 4 12

Figure S15.  Get High-res Image Gene #14: '7q gain' versus Molecular Subtype #3: 'MRNASEQ_CNMF'

'7q gain' versus 'MRNASEQ_CHIERARCHICAL'

P value = 0.000192 (Fisher's exact test), Q value = 0.11

Table S16.  Gene #14: '7q gain' versus Molecular Subtype #4: 'MRNASEQ_CHIERARCHICAL'

nPatients CLUS_1 CLUS_2 CLUS_3
ALL 23 32 22
7Q GAIN MUTATED 6 17 19
7Q GAIN WILD-TYPE 17 15 3

Figure S16.  Get High-res Image Gene #14: '7q gain' versus Molecular Subtype #4: 'MRNASEQ_CHIERARCHICAL'

'9p gain' versus 'CN_CNMF'

P value = 2.38e-05 (Chi-square test), Q value = 0.014

Table S17.  Gene #17: '9p gain' versus Molecular Subtype #1: 'CN_CNMF'

nPatients CLUS_1 CLUS_2 CLUS_3 CLUS_4 CLUS_5
ALL 32 24 15 10 9
9P GAIN MUTATED 2 3 10 1 4
9P GAIN WILD-TYPE 30 21 5 9 5

Figure S17.  Get High-res Image Gene #17: '9p gain' versus Molecular Subtype #1: 'CN_CNMF'

'9q gain' versus 'CN_CNMF'

P value = 0.000186 (Chi-square test), Q value = 0.1

Table S18.  Gene #18: '9q gain' versus Molecular Subtype #1: 'CN_CNMF'

nPatients CLUS_1 CLUS_2 CLUS_3 CLUS_4 CLUS_5
ALL 32 24 15 10 9
9Q GAIN MUTATED 7 3 12 3 4
9Q GAIN WILD-TYPE 25 21 3 7 5

Figure S18.  Get High-res Image Gene #18: '9q gain' versus Molecular Subtype #1: 'CN_CNMF'

'9q gain' versus 'MRNASEQ_CHIERARCHICAL'

P value = 0.000264 (Fisher's exact test), Q value = 0.15

Table S19.  Gene #18: '9q gain' versus Molecular Subtype #4: 'MRNASEQ_CHIERARCHICAL'

nPatients CLUS_1 CLUS_2 CLUS_3
ALL 23 32 22
9Q GAIN MUTATED 8 2 12
9Q GAIN WILD-TYPE 15 30 10

Figure S19.  Get High-res Image Gene #18: '9q gain' versus Molecular Subtype #4: 'MRNASEQ_CHIERARCHICAL'

'10p gain' versus 'MRNASEQ_CNMF'

P value = 4.69e-05 (Fisher's exact test), Q value = 0.027

Table S20.  Gene #19: '10p gain' versus Molecular Subtype #3: 'MRNASEQ_CNMF'

nPatients CLUS_1 CLUS_2 CLUS_3 CLUS_4
ALL 24 13 17 23
10P GAIN MUTATED 6 11 4 2
10P GAIN WILD-TYPE 18 2 13 21

Figure S20.  Get High-res Image Gene #19: '10p gain' versus Molecular Subtype #3: 'MRNASEQ_CNMF'

'10q gain' versus 'CN_CNMF'

P value = 0.000352 (Chi-square test), Q value = 0.19

Table S21.  Gene #20: '10q gain' versus Molecular Subtype #1: 'CN_CNMF'

nPatients CLUS_1 CLUS_2 CLUS_3 CLUS_4 CLUS_5
ALL 32 24 15 10 9
10Q GAIN MUTATED 10 3 11 1 1
10Q GAIN WILD-TYPE 22 21 4 9 8

Figure S21.  Get High-res Image Gene #20: '10q gain' versus Molecular Subtype #1: 'CN_CNMF'

'10q gain' versus 'MRNASEQ_CNMF'

P value = 3.39e-05 (Fisher's exact test), Q value = 0.02

Table S22.  Gene #20: '10q gain' versus Molecular Subtype #3: 'MRNASEQ_CNMF'

nPatients CLUS_1 CLUS_2 CLUS_3 CLUS_4
ALL 24 13 17 23
10Q GAIN MUTATED 7 11 3 2
10Q GAIN WILD-TYPE 17 2 14 21

Figure S22.  Get High-res Image Gene #20: '10q gain' versus Molecular Subtype #3: 'MRNASEQ_CNMF'

'12p gain' versus 'CN_CNMF'

P value = 1.66e-05 (Chi-square test), Q value = 0.0097

Table S23.  Gene #23: '12p gain' versus Molecular Subtype #1: 'CN_CNMF'

nPatients CLUS_1 CLUS_2 CLUS_3 CLUS_4 CLUS_5
ALL 32 24 15 10 9
12P GAIN MUTATED 14 24 14 5 7
12P GAIN WILD-TYPE 18 0 1 5 2

Figure S23.  Get High-res Image Gene #23: '12p gain' versus Molecular Subtype #1: 'CN_CNMF'

'12p gain' versus 'MRNASEQ_CNMF'

P value = 0.000214 (Fisher's exact test), Q value = 0.12

Table S24.  Gene #23: '12p gain' versus Molecular Subtype #3: 'MRNASEQ_CNMF'

nPatients CLUS_1 CLUS_2 CLUS_3 CLUS_4
ALL 24 13 17 23
12P GAIN MUTATED 9 13 14 18
12P GAIN WILD-TYPE 15 0 3 5

Figure S24.  Get High-res Image Gene #23: '12p gain' versus Molecular Subtype #3: 'MRNASEQ_CNMF'

'12q gain' versus 'CN_CNMF'

P value = 1.58e-06 (Chi-square test), Q value = 0.00094

Table S25.  Gene #24: '12q gain' versus Molecular Subtype #1: 'CN_CNMF'

nPatients CLUS_1 CLUS_2 CLUS_3 CLUS_4 CLUS_5
ALL 32 24 15 10 9
12Q GAIN MUTATED 14 24 15 4 7
12Q GAIN WILD-TYPE 18 0 0 6 2

Figure S25.  Get High-res Image Gene #24: '12q gain' versus Molecular Subtype #1: 'CN_CNMF'

'14q gain' versus 'MRNASEQ_CHIERARCHICAL'

P value = 0.000113 (Fisher's exact test), Q value = 0.064

Table S26.  Gene #26: '14q gain' versus Molecular Subtype #4: 'MRNASEQ_CHIERARCHICAL'

nPatients CLUS_1 CLUS_2 CLUS_3
ALL 23 32 22
14Q GAIN MUTATED 3 2 12
14Q GAIN WILD-TYPE 20 30 10

Figure S26.  Get High-res Image Gene #26: '14q gain' versus Molecular Subtype #4: 'MRNASEQ_CHIERARCHICAL'

'14q gain' versus 'MIRSEQ_CNMF'

P value = 9.9e-06 (Fisher's exact test), Q value = 0.0058

Table S27.  Gene #26: '14q gain' versus Molecular Subtype #5: 'MIRSEQ_CNMF'

nPatients CLUS_1 CLUS_2 CLUS_3
ALL 36 16 26
14Q GAIN MUTATED 17 0 1
14Q GAIN WILD-TYPE 19 16 25

Figure S27.  Get High-res Image Gene #26: '14q gain' versus Molecular Subtype #5: 'MIRSEQ_CNMF'

'14q gain' versus 'MIRSEQ_CHIERARCHICAL'

P value = 1.31e-05 (Fisher's exact test), Q value = 0.0077

Table S28.  Gene #26: '14q gain' versus Molecular Subtype #6: 'MIRSEQ_CHIERARCHICAL'

nPatients CLUS_1 CLUS_2 CLUS_3
ALL 26 10 42
14Q GAIN MUTATED 0 0 18
14Q GAIN WILD-TYPE 26 10 24

Figure S28.  Get High-res Image Gene #26: '14q gain' versus Molecular Subtype #6: 'MIRSEQ_CHIERARCHICAL'

'14q gain' versus 'MIRSEQ_MATURE_CNMF'

P value = 9.64e-06 (Fisher's exact test), Q value = 0.0057

Table S29.  Gene #26: '14q gain' versus Molecular Subtype #7: 'MIRSEQ_MATURE_CNMF'

nPatients CLUS_1 CLUS_2 CLUS_3
ALL 37 18 23
14Q GAIN MUTATED 17 1 0
14Q GAIN WILD-TYPE 20 17 23

Figure S29.  Get High-res Image Gene #26: '14q gain' versus Molecular Subtype #7: 'MIRSEQ_MATURE_CNMF'

'14q gain' versus 'MIRSEQ_MATURE_CHIERARCHICAL'

P value = 3.57e-06 (Fisher's exact test), Q value = 0.0021

Table S30.  Gene #26: '14q gain' versus Molecular Subtype #8: 'MIRSEQ_MATURE_CHIERARCHICAL'

nPatients CLUS_1 CLUS_2 CLUS_3
ALL 40 11 27
14Q GAIN MUTATED 18 0 0
14Q GAIN WILD-TYPE 22 11 27

Figure S30.  Get High-res Image Gene #26: '14q gain' versus Molecular Subtype #8: 'MIRSEQ_MATURE_CHIERARCHICAL'

'16p gain' versus 'CN_CNMF'

P value = 9.86e-08 (Chi-square test), Q value = 5.9e-05

Table S31.  Gene #28: '16p gain' versus Molecular Subtype #1: 'CN_CNMF'

nPatients CLUS_1 CLUS_2 CLUS_3 CLUS_4 CLUS_5
ALL 32 24 15 10 9
16P GAIN MUTATED 6 24 10 4 5
16P GAIN WILD-TYPE 26 0 5 6 4

Figure S31.  Get High-res Image Gene #28: '16p gain' versus Molecular Subtype #1: 'CN_CNMF'

'16p gain' versus 'MRNASEQ_CNMF'

P value = 8.74e-06 (Fisher's exact test), Q value = 0.0052

Table S32.  Gene #28: '16p gain' versus Molecular Subtype #3: 'MRNASEQ_CNMF'

nPatients CLUS_1 CLUS_2 CLUS_3 CLUS_4
ALL 24 13 17 23
16P GAIN MUTATED 3 10 13 16
16P GAIN WILD-TYPE 21 3 4 7

Figure S32.  Get High-res Image Gene #28: '16p gain' versus Molecular Subtype #3: 'MRNASEQ_CNMF'

'16p gain' versus 'MRNASEQ_CHIERARCHICAL'

P value = 1.01e-05 (Fisher's exact test), Q value = 0.0059

Table S33.  Gene #28: '16p gain' versus Molecular Subtype #4: 'MRNASEQ_CHIERARCHICAL'

nPatients CLUS_1 CLUS_2 CLUS_3
ALL 23 32 22
16P GAIN MUTATED 4 19 19
16P GAIN WILD-TYPE 19 13 3

Figure S33.  Get High-res Image Gene #28: '16p gain' versus Molecular Subtype #4: 'MRNASEQ_CHIERARCHICAL'

'16q gain' versus 'CN_CNMF'

P value = 2.98e-07 (Chi-square test), Q value = 0.00018

Table S34.  Gene #29: '16q gain' versus Molecular Subtype #1: 'CN_CNMF'

nPatients CLUS_1 CLUS_2 CLUS_3 CLUS_4 CLUS_5
ALL 32 24 15 10 9
16Q GAIN MUTATED 6 23 10 3 5
16Q GAIN WILD-TYPE 26 1 5 7 4

Figure S34.  Get High-res Image Gene #29: '16q gain' versus Molecular Subtype #1: 'CN_CNMF'

'16q gain' versus 'MRNASEQ_CNMF'

P value = 0.000115 (Fisher's exact test), Q value = 0.065

Table S35.  Gene #29: '16q gain' versus Molecular Subtype #3: 'MRNASEQ_CNMF'

nPatients CLUS_1 CLUS_2 CLUS_3 CLUS_4
ALL 24 13 17 23
16Q GAIN MUTATED 4 9 13 16
16Q GAIN WILD-TYPE 20 4 4 7

Figure S35.  Get High-res Image Gene #29: '16q gain' versus Molecular Subtype #3: 'MRNASEQ_CNMF'

'16q gain' versus 'MRNASEQ_CHIERARCHICAL'

P value = 3.05e-05 (Fisher's exact test), Q value = 0.018

Table S36.  Gene #29: '16q gain' versus Molecular Subtype #4: 'MRNASEQ_CHIERARCHICAL'

nPatients CLUS_1 CLUS_2 CLUS_3
ALL 23 32 22
16Q GAIN MUTATED 4 20 18
16Q GAIN WILD-TYPE 19 12 4

Figure S36.  Get High-res Image Gene #29: '16q gain' versus Molecular Subtype #4: 'MRNASEQ_CHIERARCHICAL'

'19q gain' versus 'MRNASEQ_CNMF'

P value = 0.000378 (Fisher's exact test), Q value = 0.21

Table S37.  Gene #35: '19q gain' versus Molecular Subtype #3: 'MRNASEQ_CNMF'

nPatients CLUS_1 CLUS_2 CLUS_3 CLUS_4
ALL 24 13 17 23
19Q GAIN MUTATED 10 13 12 9
19Q GAIN WILD-TYPE 14 0 5 14

Figure S37.  Get High-res Image Gene #35: '19q gain' versus Molecular Subtype #3: 'MRNASEQ_CNMF'

'20p gain' versus 'CN_CNMF'

P value = 1.95e-06 (Chi-square test), Q value = 0.0012

Table S38.  Gene #36: '20p gain' versus Molecular Subtype #1: 'CN_CNMF'

nPatients CLUS_1 CLUS_2 CLUS_3 CLUS_4 CLUS_5
ALL 32 24 15 10 9
20P GAIN MUTATED 7 22 9 2 6
20P GAIN WILD-TYPE 25 2 6 8 3

Figure S38.  Get High-res Image Gene #36: '20p gain' versus Molecular Subtype #1: 'CN_CNMF'

'20p gain' versus 'MRNASEQ_CNMF'

P value = 0.00012 (Fisher's exact test), Q value = 0.068

Table S39.  Gene #36: '20p gain' versus Molecular Subtype #3: 'MRNASEQ_CNMF'

nPatients CLUS_1 CLUS_2 CLUS_3 CLUS_4
ALL 24 13 17 23
20P GAIN MUTATED 4 9 8 18
20P GAIN WILD-TYPE 20 4 9 5

Figure S39.  Get High-res Image Gene #36: '20p gain' versus Molecular Subtype #3: 'MRNASEQ_CNMF'

'20p gain' versus 'MIRSEQ_MATURE_CNMF'

P value = 0.000147 (Fisher's exact test), Q value = 0.083

Table S40.  Gene #36: '20p gain' versus Molecular Subtype #7: 'MIRSEQ_MATURE_CNMF'

nPatients CLUS_1 CLUS_2 CLUS_3
ALL 37 18 23
20P GAIN MUTATED 13 7 20
20P GAIN WILD-TYPE 24 11 3

Figure S40.  Get High-res Image Gene #36: '20p gain' versus Molecular Subtype #7: 'MIRSEQ_MATURE_CNMF'

'20q gain' versus 'CN_CNMF'

P value = 1.99e-05 (Chi-square test), Q value = 0.012

Table S41.  Gene #37: '20q gain' versus Molecular Subtype #1: 'CN_CNMF'

nPatients CLUS_1 CLUS_2 CLUS_3 CLUS_4 CLUS_5
ALL 32 24 15 10 9
20Q GAIN MUTATED 9 21 11 2 6
20Q GAIN WILD-TYPE 23 3 4 8 3

Figure S41.  Get High-res Image Gene #37: '20q gain' versus Molecular Subtype #1: 'CN_CNMF'

'20q gain' versus 'MRNASEQ_CNMF'

P value = 7.02e-05 (Fisher's exact test), Q value = 0.04

Table S42.  Gene #37: '20q gain' versus Molecular Subtype #3: 'MRNASEQ_CNMF'

nPatients CLUS_1 CLUS_2 CLUS_3 CLUS_4
ALL 24 13 17 23
20Q GAIN MUTATED 5 11 8 18
20Q GAIN WILD-TYPE 19 2 9 5

Figure S42.  Get High-res Image Gene #37: '20q gain' versus Molecular Subtype #3: 'MRNASEQ_CNMF'

'xq gain' versus 'CN_CNMF'

P value = 1.51e-05 (Chi-square test), Q value = 0.0088

Table S43.  Gene #40: 'xq gain' versus Molecular Subtype #1: 'CN_CNMF'

nPatients CLUS_1 CLUS_2 CLUS_3 CLUS_4 CLUS_5
ALL 32 24 15 10 9
XQ GAIN MUTATED 6 20 9 2 3
XQ GAIN WILD-TYPE 26 4 6 8 6

Figure S43.  Get High-res Image Gene #40: 'xq gain' versus Molecular Subtype #1: 'CN_CNMF'

'2q loss' versus 'CN_CNMF'

P value = 7.75e-05 (Chi-square test), Q value = 0.044

Table S44.  Gene #44: '2q loss' versus Molecular Subtype #1: 'CN_CNMF'

nPatients CLUS_1 CLUS_2 CLUS_3 CLUS_4 CLUS_5
ALL 32 24 15 10 9
2Q LOSS MUTATED 1 2 2 6 4
2Q LOSS WILD-TYPE 31 22 13 4 5

Figure S44.  Get High-res Image Gene #44: '2q loss' versus Molecular Subtype #1: 'CN_CNMF'

'9p loss' versus 'MRNASEQ_CNMF'

P value = 9.39e-05 (Fisher's exact test), Q value = 0.053

Table S45.  Gene #57: '9p loss' versus Molecular Subtype #3: 'MRNASEQ_CNMF'

nPatients CLUS_1 CLUS_2 CLUS_3 CLUS_4
ALL 24 13 17 23
9P LOSS MUTATED 14 1 3 1
9P LOSS WILD-TYPE 10 12 14 22

Figure S45.  Get High-res Image Gene #57: '9p loss' versus Molecular Subtype #3: 'MRNASEQ_CNMF'

'11q loss' versus 'CN_CNMF'

P value = 4.81e-05 (Chi-square test), Q value = 0.028

Table S46.  Gene #62: '11q loss' versus Molecular Subtype #1: 'CN_CNMF'

nPatients CLUS_1 CLUS_2 CLUS_3 CLUS_4 CLUS_5
ALL 32 24 15 10 9
11Q LOSS MUTATED 4 3 3 8 5
11Q LOSS WILD-TYPE 28 21 12 2 4

Figure S46.  Get High-res Image Gene #62: '11q loss' versus Molecular Subtype #1: 'CN_CNMF'

'17p loss' versus 'METHLYATION_CNMF'

P value = 0.000305 (Chi-square test), Q value = 0.17

Table S47.  Gene #70: '17p loss' versus Molecular Subtype #2: 'METHLYATION_CNMF'

nPatients CLUS_1 CLUS_2 CLUS_3 CLUS_4 CLUS_5
ALL 18 11 20 18 11
17P LOSS MUTATED 11 0 12 4 1
17P LOSS WILD-TYPE 7 11 8 14 10

Figure S47.  Get High-res Image Gene #70: '17p loss' versus Molecular Subtype #2: 'METHLYATION_CNMF'

'17q loss' versus 'CN_CNMF'

P value = 0.000199 (Chi-square test), Q value = 0.11

Table S48.  Gene #71: '17q loss' versus Molecular Subtype #1: 'CN_CNMF'

nPatients CLUS_1 CLUS_2 CLUS_3 CLUS_4 CLUS_5
ALL 32 24 15 10 9
17Q LOSS MUTATED 7 3 6 8 0
17Q LOSS WILD-TYPE 25 21 9 2 9

Figure S48.  Get High-res Image Gene #71: '17q loss' versus Molecular Subtype #1: 'CN_CNMF'

Methods & Data
Input
  • Copy number data file = transformed.cor.cli.txt

  • Molecular subtypes file = ACC-TP.transferedmergedcluster.txt

  • Number of patients = 90

  • Number of significantly arm-level cnvs = 80

  • Number of molecular subtypes = 8

  • Exclude genes that fewer than K tumors have mutations, K = 3

Chi-square test

For multi-class clinical features (nominal or ordinal), Chi-square tests (Greenwood and Nikulin 1996) were used to estimate the P values using the 'chisq.test' function in R

Fisher's exact test

For binary or multi-class clinical features (nominal or ordinal), two-tailed Fisher's exact tests (Fisher 1922) were used to estimate the P values using the 'fisher.test' function in R

Q value calculation

For multiple hypothesis correction, Q value is the False Discovery Rate (FDR) analogue of the P value (Benjamini and Hochberg 1995), defined as the minimum FDR at which the test may be called significant. We used the 'Benjamini and Hochberg' method of 'p.adjust' function in R to convert P values into Q values.

Download Results

In addition to the links below, the full results of the analysis summarized in this report can also be downloaded programmatically using firehose_get, or interactively from either the Broad GDAC website or TCGA Data Coordination Center Portal.

References
[1] Greenwood and Nikulin, A guide to chi-squared testing, Wiley, New York. ISBN 047155779X (1996)
[2] Fisher, R.A., On the interpretation of chi-square from contingency tables, and the calculation of P, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society 85(1):87-94 (1922)
[3] Benjamini and Hochberg, Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B 59:289-300 (1995)