Correlation between miRseq expression and clinical features
Kidney Chromophobe (Primary solid tumor)
17 October 2014  |  analyses__2014_10_17
Maintainer Information
Citation Information
Maintained by Juok Cho (Broad Institute)
Cite as Broad Institute TCGA Genome Data Analysis Center (2014): Correlation between miRseq expression and clinical features. Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard. doi:10.7908/C10G3J13
Overview
Introduction

This pipeline uses various statistical tests to identify miRs whose log2 expression levels correlated to selected clinical features.

Summary

Testing the association between 469 miRs and 10 clinical features across 66 samples, statistically thresholded by P value < 0.05 and Q value < 0.3, 5 clinical features related to at least one miRs.

  • 2 miRs correlated to 'NEOPLASM.DISEASESTAGE'.

    • HSA-MIR-10A ,  HSA-MIR-181B-1

  • 4 miRs correlated to 'PATHOLOGY.T.STAGE'.

    • HSA-MIR-181B-1 ,  HSA-MIR-181A-1 ,  HSA-MIR-200A ,  HSA-MIR-429

  • 1 miR correlated to 'GENDER'.

    • HSA-MIR-219-1

  • 2 miRs correlated to 'KARNOFSKY.PERFORMANCE.SCORE'.

    • HSA-MIR-7-1 ,  HSA-MIR-181D

  • 1 miR correlated to 'RACE'.

    • HSA-MIR-410

  • No miRs correlated to 'AGE', 'PATHOLOGY.N.STAGE', 'PATHOLOGY.M.STAGE', 'NUMBERPACKYEARSSMOKED', and 'ETHNICITY'.

Results
Overview of the results

Complete statistical result table is provided in Supplement Table 1

Table 1.  Get Full Table This table shows the clinical features, statistical methods used, and the number of miRs that are significantly associated with each clinical feature at P value < 0.05 and Q value < 0.3.

Clinical feature Statistical test Significant miRs Associated with                 Associated with
AGE Spearman correlation test   N=0        
NEOPLASM DISEASESTAGE Kruskal-Wallis test N=2        
PATHOLOGY T STAGE Spearman correlation test N=4 higher stage N=2 lower stage N=2
PATHOLOGY N STAGE Spearman correlation test   N=0        
PATHOLOGY M STAGE Kruskal-Wallis test   N=0        
GENDER Wilcoxon test N=1 male N=1 female N=0
KARNOFSKY PERFORMANCE SCORE Spearman correlation test N=2 higher score N=1 lower score N=1
NUMBERPACKYEARSSMOKED Spearman correlation test   N=0        
RACE Kruskal-Wallis test N=1        
ETHNICITY Wilcoxon test   N=0        
Clinical variable #1: 'AGE'

No miR related to 'AGE'.

Table S1.  Basic characteristics of clinical feature: 'AGE'

AGE Mean (SD) 51.52 (14)
  Significant markers N = 0
Clinical variable #2: 'NEOPLASM.DISEASESTAGE'

2 miRs related to 'NEOPLASM.DISEASESTAGE'.

Table S2.  Basic characteristics of clinical feature: 'NEOPLASM.DISEASESTAGE'

NEOPLASM.DISEASESTAGE Labels N
  STAGE I 21
  STAGE II 25
  STAGE III 14
  STAGE IV 6
     
  Significant markers N = 2
List of 2 miRs differentially expressed by 'NEOPLASM.DISEASESTAGE'

Table S3.  Get Full Table List of 2 miRs differentially expressed by 'NEOPLASM.DISEASESTAGE'

ANOVA_P Q
HSA-MIR-10A 0.0004293 0.201
HSA-MIR-181B-1 0.0004795 0.224
Clinical variable #3: 'PATHOLOGY.T.STAGE'

4 miRs related to 'PATHOLOGY.T.STAGE'.

Table S4.  Basic characteristics of clinical feature: 'PATHOLOGY.T.STAGE'

PATHOLOGY.T.STAGE Mean (SD) 2.02 (0.85)
  N
  1 21
  2 25
  3 18
  4 2
     
  Significant markers N = 4
  pos. correlated 2
  neg. correlated 2
List of 4 miRs differentially expressed by 'PATHOLOGY.T.STAGE'

Table S5.  Get Full Table List of 4 miRs significantly correlated to 'PATHOLOGY.T.STAGE' by Spearman correlation test

SpearmanCorr corrP Q
HSA-MIR-181B-1 0.505 1.53e-05 0.00717
HSA-MIR-181A-1 0.445 0.0001813 0.0848
HSA-MIR-200A -0.4362 0.0002511 0.117
HSA-MIR-429 -0.4218 0.0004198 0.196
Clinical variable #4: 'PATHOLOGY.N.STAGE'

No miR related to 'PATHOLOGY.N.STAGE'.

Table S6.  Basic characteristics of clinical feature: 'PATHOLOGY.N.STAGE'

PATHOLOGY.N.STAGE Mean (SD) 0.16 (0.47)
  N
  0 40
  1 3
  2 2
     
  Significant markers N = 0
Clinical variable #5: 'PATHOLOGY.M.STAGE'

No miR related to 'PATHOLOGY.M.STAGE'.

Table S7.  Basic characteristics of clinical feature: 'PATHOLOGY.M.STAGE'

PATHOLOGY.M.STAGE Labels N
  M0 34
  M1 2
  MX 9
     
  Significant markers N = 0
Clinical variable #6: 'GENDER'

One miR related to 'GENDER'.

Table S8.  Basic characteristics of clinical feature: 'GENDER'

GENDER Labels N
  FEMALE 27
  MALE 39
     
  Significant markers N = 1
  Higher in MALE 1
  Higher in FEMALE 0
List of one miR differentially expressed by 'GENDER'

Table S9.  Get Full Table List of one miR differentially expressed by 'GENDER'. 0 significant gene(s) located in sex chromosomes is(are) filtered out.

W(pos if higher in 'MALE') wilcoxontestP Q AUC
HSA-MIR-219-1 638 0.0005136 0.241 0.7705
Clinical variable #7: 'KARNOFSKY.PERFORMANCE.SCORE'

2 miRs related to 'KARNOFSKY.PERFORMANCE.SCORE'.

Table S10.  Basic characteristics of clinical feature: 'KARNOFSKY.PERFORMANCE.SCORE'

KARNOFSKY.PERFORMANCE.SCORE Mean (SD) 89.09 (9.4)
  Score N
  70 1
  80 2
  90 5
  100 3
     
  Significant markers N = 2
  pos. correlated 1
  neg. correlated 1
List of 2 miRs differentially expressed by 'KARNOFSKY.PERFORMANCE.SCORE'

Table S11.  Get Full Table List of 2 miRs significantly correlated to 'KARNOFSKY.PERFORMANCE.SCORE' by Spearman correlation test

SpearmanCorr corrP Q
HSA-MIR-7-1 0.9028 0.0001411 0.0645
HSA-MIR-181D -0.8642 0.0006005 0.274
Clinical variable #8: 'NUMBERPACKYEARSSMOKED'

No miR related to 'NUMBERPACKYEARSSMOKED'.

Table S12.  Basic characteristics of clinical feature: 'NUMBERPACKYEARSSMOKED'

NUMBERPACKYEARSSMOKED Mean (SD) 25.09 (22)
  Significant markers N = 0
Clinical variable #9: 'RACE'

One miR related to 'RACE'.

Table S13.  Basic characteristics of clinical feature: 'RACE'

RACE Labels N
  ASIAN 2
  BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN 4
  WHITE 58
     
  Significant markers N = 1
List of one miR differentially expressed by 'RACE'

Table S14.  Get Full Table List of one miR differentially expressed by 'RACE'

ANOVA_P Q
HSA-MIR-410 0.0004995 0.229
Clinical variable #10: 'ETHNICITY'

No miR related to 'ETHNICITY'.

Table S15.  Basic characteristics of clinical feature: 'ETHNICITY'

ETHNICITY Labels N
  HISPANIC OR LATINO 4
  NOT HISPANIC OR LATINO 32
     
  Significant markers N = 0
Methods & Data
Input
  • Expresson data file = KICH-TP.miRseq_RPKM_log2.txt

  • Clinical data file = KICH-TP.merged_data.txt

  • Number of patients = 66

  • Number of miRs = 469

  • Number of clinical features = 10

Correlation analysis

For continuous numerical clinical features, Spearman's rank correlation coefficients (Spearman 1904) and two-tailed P values were estimated using 'cor.test' function in R

ANOVA analysis

For multi-class clinical features (ordinal or nominal), one-way analysis of variance (Howell 2002) was applied to compare the log2-expression levels between different clinical classes using 'anova' function in R

Student's t-test analysis

For two-class clinical features, two-tailed Student's t test with unequal variance (Lehmann and Romano 2005) was applied to compare the log2-expression levels between the two clinical classes using 't.test' function in R

Q value calculation

For multiple hypothesis correction, Q value is the False Discovery Rate (FDR) analogue of the P value (Benjamini and Hochberg 1995), defined as the minimum FDR at which the test may be called significant. We used the 'Benjamini and Hochberg' method of 'p.adjust' function in R to convert P values into Q values.

Download Results

In addition to the links below, the full results of the analysis summarized in this report can also be downloaded programmatically using firehose_get, or interactively from either the Broad GDAC website or TCGA Data Coordination Center Portal.

References
[1] Spearman, C, The proof and measurement of association between two things, Amer. J. Psychol 15:72-101 (1904)
[2] Howell, D, Statistical Methods for Psychology. (5th ed.), Duxbury Press:324-5 (2002)
[3] Lehmann and Romano, Testing Statistical Hypotheses (3E ed.), New York: Springer. ISBN 0387988645 (2005)
[4] Benjamini and Hochberg, Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B 59:289-300 (1995)