Analysis Overview - Uveal Melanoma (Primary solid tumor)

Analysis Overview

Uveal Melanoma (Primary solid tumor)

17 October 2014 | analyses__2014_10_17

Maintainer Information

Citation Information

Maintained by TCGA GDAC Team (Broad Institute/MD Anderson Cancer Center/Harvard Medical School)

Cite as Broad Institute TCGA Genome Data Analysis Center (2014): Analysis Overview for Uveal Melanoma (Primary solid tumor cohort) - 17 October 2014. Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard. doi:10.7908/C1H99454

Overview

Introduction

This is an overview of Uveal Melanoma analysis pipelines from Firehose run "17 October 2014".

Summary

Note: These results are offered to the community as an additional reference point, enabling a wide range of cancer biologists, clinical investigators, and genome and computational scientists to easily incorporate TCGA into the backdrop of ongoing research. While every effort is made to ensure that Firehose input data and algorithms are of the highest possible quality, these analyses have not been reviewed by domain experts.

Results

Sequence and Copy Number Analyses

SNP6 Copy number analysis (GISTIC2)
View Report | There were 80 tumor samples used in this analysis: 23 significant arm-level results, 3 significant focal amplifications, and 19 significant focal deletions were found.

Clustering Analyses

Clustering of copy number data by focal peak region with log2 ratio: consensus NMF
View Report | The most robust consensus NMF clustering of 80 samples using the 22 copy number focal regions was identified for k = 3 clusters. We computed the clustering for k = 2 to k = 8 and used the cophenetic correlation coefficient to determine the best solution.
Clustering of copy number data by peak region with threshold value: consensus NMF
View Report | The most robust consensus NMF clustering of 80 samples using the 22 copy number focal regions was identified for k = 3 clusters. We computed the clustering for k = 2 to k = 8 and used the cophenetic correlation coefficient to determine the best solution.
Clustering of Methylation: consensus NMF
View Report | The 7972 most variable methylated genes were selected based on variation. The variation cutoff are set for each tumor type empirically by fitting a bimodal distriution. For genes with multiple methylation probes, we chose the most variable one to represent the gene. Consensus NMF clustering of 80 samples and 7972 genes identified 3 subtypes with the stability of the clustering increasing for k = 2 to k = 8 and the average silhouette width calculation for selecting the robust clusters.
Clustering of miRseq mature expression: consensus hierarchical
View Report | Median absolute deviation (MAD) was used to select 647 most variable miRs. Consensus ward linkage hierarchical clustering of 73 samples and 647 miRs identified 4 subtypes with the stability of the clustering increasing for k = 2 to k = 10.
Clustering of miRseq mature expression: consensus NMF
View Report | We filtered the data to 647 most variable miRs. Consensus NMF clustering of 73 samples and 647 miRs identified 3 subtypes with the stability of the clustering increasing for k = 2 to k = 8 and the average silhouette width calculation for selecting the robust clusters.
Clustering of miRseq precursor expression: consensus hierarchical
View Report | Median absolute deviation (MAD) was used to select 133 most variable miRs. Consensus ward linkage hierarchical clustering of 79 samples and 133 miRs identified 6 subtypes with the stability of the clustering increasing for k = 2 to k = 10.
Clustering of miRseq precursor expression: consensus NMF
View Report | We filtered the data to 150 most variable miRs. Consensus NMF clustering of 79 samples and 150 miRs identified 3 subtypes with the stability of the clustering increasing for k = 2 to k = 8 and the average silhouette width calculation for selecting the robust clusters.
Clustering of mRNAseq gene expression: consensus hierarchical
View Report | Median absolute deviation (MAD) was used to select 1500 most variable genes. Consensus ward linkage hierarchical clustering of 80 samples and 1500 genes identified 3 subtypes with the stability of the clustering increasing for k = 2 to k = 10.
Clustering of mRNAseq gene expression: consensus NMF
View Report | The most robust consensus NMF clustering of 80 samples using the 1500 most variable genes was identified for k = 3 clusters. We computed the clustering for k = 2 to k = 8 and used the cophenetic correlation coefficient to determine the best solution.

Pathway Analyses

PARADIGM pathway analysis of mRNASeq expression and copy number data
View Report | There were 61 significant pathways identified in this analysis.
PARADIGM pathway analysis of mRNASeq expression data
View Report | There were 40 significant pathways identified in this analysis.

Other Correlation Analyses

Correlation between copy number variation genes (focal events) and molecular subtypes
View Report | Testing the association between copy number variation 20 focal events and 8 molecular subtypes across 80 patients, 76 significant findings detected with P value < 0.05 and Q value < 0.25.
Correlation between copy number variations of arm-level result and molecular subtypes
View Report | Testing the association between copy number variation 49 arm-level events and 8 molecular subtypes across 80 patients, 34 significant findings detected with P value < 0.05 and Q value < 0.25.
Correlation between mRNA expression and DNA methylation
View Report | The top 25 correlated methylation probes per gene are displayed. Total number of matched samples = 80. Number of gene expression samples = 80. Number of methylation samples = 80.
Correlations between copy number and mRNAseq expression
View Report | The correlation coefficients in 10, 20, 30, 40, 50, 60, 70, 80, 90 percentiles are 671.3, 1709.6, 2248, 2749, 3215.5, 3741.8, 4360.1, 5073.4, 5948.7, respectively.

Methods & Data

Input

Summary Report Date = Wed Jan 21 18:05:58 2015
Protection = FALSE

Made with Nozzle