Mutation Analysis (MutSigCV v0.9)
Colon Adenocarcinoma (Primary solid tumor)
02 April 2015  |  analyses__2015_04_02
Maintainer Information
Citation Information
Maintained by David Heiman (Broad Institute)
Cite as Broad Institute TCGA Genome Data Analysis Center (2015): Mutation Analysis (MutSigCV v0.9). Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard. doi:10.7908/C1VD6XF7
Overview
Introduction

This report serves to describe the mutational landscape and properties of a given individual set, as well as rank genes and genesets according to mutational significance. MutSigCV v0.9 was used to generate the results found in this report.

  • Working with individual set: COAD-TP

  • Number of patients in set: 367

Input

The input for this pipeline is a set of individuals with the following files associated for each:

  1. An annotated .maf file describing the mutations called for the respective individual, and their properties.

  2. A .wig file that contains information about the coverage of the sample.

Summary
  • MAF used for this analysis:COAD-TP.final_analysis_set.maf

  • Blacklist used for this analysis: pancan_mutation_blacklist.v14.hg19.txt

  • Significantly mutated genes (q ≤ 0.1): 356

Results
Target Coverage for Each Individual

The x axis represents the samples. The y axis represents the exons, one row per exon, and they are sorted by average coverage across samples. For exons with exactly the same average coverage, they are sorted next by the %GC of the exon. (The secondary sort is especially useful for the zero-coverage exons at the bottom). If the figure is unpopulated, then full coverage is assumed (e.g. MutSig CV doesn't use WIGs and assumes full coverage).

Figure 1. 

Distribution of Mutation Counts, Coverage, and Mutation Rates Across Samples

Figure 2.  Patients counts and rates file used to generate this plot: COAD-TP.patients.counts_and_rates.txt

Lego Plots

The mutation spectrum is depicted in the lego plots below in which the 96 possible mutation types are subdivided into six large blocks, color-coded to reflect the base substitution type. Each large block is further subdivided into the 16 possible pairs of 5' and 3' neighbors, as listed in the 4x4 trinucleotide context legend. The height of each block corresponds to the mutation frequency for that kind of mutation (counts of mutations normalized by the base coverage in a given bin). The shape of the spectrum is a signature for dominant mutational mechanisms in different tumor types.

Figure 3.  Get High-res Image SNV Mutation rate lego plot for entire set. Each bin is normalized by base coverage for that bin. Colors represent the six SNV types on the upper right. The three-base context for each mutation is labeled in the 4x4 legend on the lower right. The fractional breakdown of SNV counts is shown in the pie chart on the upper left. If this figure is blank, not enough information was provided in the MAF to generate it.

Figure 4.  Get High-res Image SNV Mutation rate lego plots for 4 slices of mutation allele fraction (0<=AF<0.1, 0.1<=AF<0.25, 0.25<=AF<0.5, & 0.5<=AF) . The color code and three-base context legends are the same as the previous figure. If this figure is blank, not enough information was provided in the MAF to generate it.

CoMut Plot

Figure 5.  Get High-res Image The matrix in the center of the figure represents individual mutations in patient samples, color-coded by type of mutation, for the significantly mutated genes. The rate of synonymous and non-synonymous mutations is displayed at the top of the matrix. The barplot on the left of the matrix shows the number of mutations in each gene. The percentages represent the fraction of tumors with at least one mutation in the specified gene. The barplot to the right of the matrix displays the q-values for the most significantly mutated genes. The purple boxplots below the matrix (only displayed if required columns are present in the provided MAF) represent the distributions of allelic fractions observed in each sample. The plot at the bottom represents the base substitution distribution of individual samples, using the same categories that were used to calculate significance.

Significantly Mutated Genes

Column Descriptions:

  • nnon = number of (nonsilent) mutations in this gene across the individual set

  • npat = number of patients (individuals) with at least one nonsilent mutation

  • nsite = number of unique sites having a non-silent mutation

  • nflank = number of noncoding mutations from this gene's flanking region, across the individual set

  • nsil = number of silent mutations in this gene across the individual set

  • p = p-value (overall)

  • q = q-value, False Discovery Rate (Benjamini-Hochberg procedure)

Table 1.  Get Full Table A Ranked List of Significantly Mutated Genes. Number of significant genes found: 356. Number of genes displayed: 35. Click on a gene name to display its stick figure depicting the distribution of mutations and mutation types across the chosen gene (this feature may not be available for all significant genes).

gene Nnon Nsil Nflank nnon npat nsite nsil nflank nnei fMLE p score time q
DDHD1 697300 196345 0 39 39 3 1 0 20 1.2 0 200 0.39 0
ESRRA 386084 130652 0 26 25 4 3 0 20 0.86 0 130 0.4 0
IFI27 67528 25690 0 15 15 2 0 0 3 0.35 0 85 0.39 0
KRTAP5-2 151938 43673 0 22 22 3 0 0 20 0.84 0 130 0.39 0
MUC2 1382122 400397 0 68 59 30 13 0 20 1.1 0 240 0.39 0
PIK3CA 953833 244055 0 288 175 143 115 0 20 3 0 350 0.4 0
TP53 346815 101292 0 333 231 188 73 0 4 9.4 2.2e-16 580 0.4 5.8e-13
RNF145 600412 167719 0 53 44 19 3 0 20 0.94 7.8e-16 180 0.39 1.8e-12
TCF7L2 544995 153773 0 45 41 32 5 0 20 1 1.1e-15 160 0.39 2.3e-12
NEFH 612156 169187 0 91 89 20 2 0 20 0.71 1.4e-15 470 0.4 2.4e-12
DEFB126 96154 27892 0 32 30 3 0 0 20 1.4 1.6e-15 180 0.4 2.4e-12
GPRIN2 345347 117440 0 27 27 5 2 0 20 0.85 1.6e-15 140 0.39 2.4e-12
TFAM 195611 46976 0 25 24 4 1 0 20 1.2 1.9e-15 130 0.4 2.5e-12
KRTAP4-1 111201 30094 0 35 33 3 0 0 20 1.2 2e-15 190 0.39 2.5e-12
APC 2448624 686290 0 670 296 374 167 0 4 8.5 2.2e-15 960 0.4 2.5e-12
RPL22 110834 26791 0 24 24 5 1 0 20 1.1 2.3e-15 130 0.39 2.5e-12
FBXW7 712714 195611 0 119 103 72 43 0 20 2.7 2.6e-15 290 0.4 2.5e-12
CDH1 717118 213227 0 88 74 65 19 0 20 1.6 2.8e-15 210 0.4 2.5e-12
MYL1 176160 48077 0 36 35 5 5 0 20 1.3 2.8e-15 190 0.4 2.5e-12
ACVR2A 456548 120376 0 66 58 21 3 0 10 0.86 2.9e-15 270 0.39 2.5e-12
HLA-DQA1 206988 62023 0 31 23 6 0 0 20 0.89 2.9e-15 130 0.39 2.5e-12
MUC4 1670584 541692 0 209 124 78 26 0 2 2.1 3.1e-15 490 0.39 2.6e-12
ARID1A 1639389 482972 0 84 73 64 17 0 2 1.2 3.4e-15 220 0.44 2.6e-12
NF2 470127 118541 0 76 62 59 24 0 20 1 3.4e-15 220 0.4 2.6e-12
TNFAIP6 248459 63858 0 50 50 5 2 0 9 1 3.8e-15 270 0.4 2.6e-12
OR6C76 260937 80006 0 48 47 5 0 0 20 1.6 3.9e-15 250 0.4 2.6e-12
PTEN 357458 85878 0 294 154 183 118 0 20 3.7 3.9e-15 400 0.39 2.6e-12
KRTAP5-1 231210 71932 0 29 29 7 0 0 20 0.83 4e-15 160 0.39 2.6e-12
SOX9 345714 101659 0 40 36 37 0 0 20 1.2 4.2e-15 180 0.39 2.6e-12
RB1 1045216 275617 0 132 88 86 41 0 20 1.4 4.4e-15 230 0.39 2.6e-12
SMAD4 485908 135423 0 169 120 108 54 0 20 2 4.4e-15 310 0.39 2.6e-12
CASP5 375441 99824 0 48 47 13 3 0 20 2.4 4.9e-15 200 0.4 2.6e-12
C17orf97 259469 73400 0 34 34 6 4 0 20 1.3 5e-15 170 0.39 2.6e-12
TCERG1 953833 267543 0 45 37 22 5 0 20 0.59 5e-15 140 0.39 2.6e-12
CRIPAK 361128 120009 0 53 40 21 5 0 20 0.88 5.1e-15 200 0.4 2.6e-12
Methods & Data
Methods

In brief, we tabulate the number of mutations and the number of covered bases for each gene. The counts are broken down by mutation context category: four context categories that are discovered by MutSig, and one for indel and 'null' mutations, which include indels, nonsense mutations, splice-site mutations, and non-stop (read-through) mutations. For each gene, we calculate the probability of seeing the observed constellation of mutations, i.e. the product P1 x P2 x ... x Pm, or a more extreme one, given the background mutation rates calculated across the dataset. [1]

Download Results

In addition to the links below, the full results of the analysis summarized in this report can also be downloaded programmatically using firehose_get, or interactively from either the Broad GDAC website or TCGA Data Coordination Center Portal.

References
[1] TCGA, Integrated genomic analyses of ovarian carcinoma, Nature 474:609 - 615 (2011)