Correlation between gene mutation status and selected clinical features
Acute Myeloid Leukemia (Primary blood derived cancer - Peripheral blood)
02 April 2015  |  analyses__2015_04_02
Maintainer Information
Citation Information
Maintained by TCGA GDAC Team (Broad Institute/MD Anderson Cancer Center/Harvard Medical School)
Cite as Broad Institute TCGA Genome Data Analysis Center (2015): Correlation between gene mutation status and selected clinical features. Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard. doi:10.7908/C1RB73NR
Overview
Introduction

This pipeline computes the correlation between significantly recurrent gene mutations and selected clinical features.

Summary

Testing the association between mutation status of 25 genes and 5 clinical features across 195 patients, 6 significant findings detected with Q value < 0.25.

  • DNMT3A mutation correlated to 'Time to Death'.

  • IDH2 mutation correlated to 'YEARS_TO_BIRTH'.

  • U2AF1 mutation correlated to 'YEARS_TO_BIRTH'.

  • TP53 mutation correlated to 'Time to Death' and 'YEARS_TO_BIRTH'.

  • CEBPA mutation correlated to 'YEARS_TO_BIRTH'.

Results
Overview of the results

Table 1.  Get Full Table Overview of the association between mutation status of 25 genes and 5 clinical features. Shown in the table are P values (Q values). Thresholded by Q value < 0.25, 6 significant findings detected.

Clinical
Features
Time
to
Death
YEARS
TO
BIRTH
GENDER RACE ETHNICITY
nMutated (%) nWild-Type logrank test Wilcoxon-test Fisher's exact test Fisher's exact test Fisher's exact test
TP53 15 (8%) 180 6.22e-06
(0.000778)
0.00204
(0.0638)
0.177
(0.761)
1
(1.00)
1
(1.00)
DNMT3A 49 (25%) 146 0.00185
(0.0638)
0.266
(0.844)
0.188
(0.785)
0.389
(0.952)
0.161
(0.75)
IDH2 20 (10%) 175 0.724
(1.00)
0.0016
(0.0638)
0.815
(1.00)
0.355
(0.888)
0.282
(0.844)
U2AF1 8 (4%) 187 0.496
(1.00)
0.00419
(0.105)
0.0695
(0.595)
1
(1.00)
1
(1.00)
CEBPA 13 (7%) 182 0.737
(1.00)
0.0116
(0.242)
0.58
(1.00)
1
(1.00)
1
(1.00)
FLT3 53 (27%) 142 0.135
(0.75)
0.328
(0.844)
0.52
(1.00)
0.0713
(0.595)
0.562
(1.00)
NPM1 52 (27%) 143 0.044
(0.527)
0.774
(1.00)
0.145
(0.75)
0.231
(0.827)
0.564
(1.00)
IDH1 18 (9%) 177 0.609
(1.00)
0.322
(0.844)
0.466
(1.00)
0.7
(1.00)
1
(1.00)
RUNX1 18 (9%) 177 0.0714
(0.595)
0.0168
(0.288)
0.622
(1.00)
1
(1.00)
1
(1.00)
TET2 17 (9%) 178 0.805
(1.00)
0.128
(0.75)
0.319
(0.844)
1
(1.00)
1
(1.00)
NRAS 15 (8%) 180 0.637
(1.00)
0.257
(0.844)
1
(1.00)
0.674
(1.00)
1
(1.00)
WT1 12 (6%) 183 0.55
(1.00)
0.168
(0.75)
0.774
(1.00)
1
(1.00)
0.163
(0.75)
PHF6 6 (3%) 189 0.998
(1.00)
0.158
(0.75)
0.0309
(0.429)
1
(1.00)
1
(1.00)
KRAS 8 (4%) 187 0.319
(0.844)
0.101
(0.745)
0.149
(0.75)
1
(1.00)
0.12
(0.75)
SMC3 7 (4%) 188 0.129
(0.75)
0.782
(1.00)
0.707
(1.00)
1
(1.00)
1
(1.00)
KIT 8 (4%) 187 0.468
(1.00)
0.68
(1.00)
0.477
(1.00)
1
(1.00)
1
(1.00)
RAD21 5 (3%) 190 0.869
(1.00)
0.231
(0.827)
1
(1.00)
0.0184
(0.288)
1
(1.00)
EZH2 3 (2%) 192 0.214
(0.825)
1
(1.00)
1
(1.00)
1
(1.00)
STAG2 6 (3%) 189 0.331
(0.844)
0.214
(0.825)
0.42
(1.00)
0.128
(0.75)
1
(1.00)
PTPN11 9 (5%) 186 0.582
(1.00)
0.294
(0.844)
1
(1.00)
0.571
(1.00)
1
(1.00)
ASXL1 5 (3%) 190 0.281
(0.844)
0.0653
(0.595)
0.666
(1.00)
1
(1.00)
0.0765
(0.598)
SUZ12 3 (2%) 192 0.897
(1.00)
0.947
(1.00)
0.249
(0.844)
1
(1.00)
PHACTR1 3 (2%) 192 0.316
(0.844)
0.963
(1.00)
0.599
(1.00)
1
(1.00)
0.0464
(0.527)
SMC1A 6 (3%) 189 0.321
(0.844)
0.265
(0.844)
0.218
(0.825)
0.43
(1.00)
1
(1.00)
KDM6A 3 (2%) 192 0.793
(1.00)
0.893
(1.00)
1
(1.00)
1
(1.00)
1
(1.00)
'DNMT3A MUTATION STATUS' versus 'Time to Death'

P value = 0.00185 (logrank test), Q value = 0.064

Table S1.  Gene #3: 'DNMT3A MUTATION STATUS' versus Clinical Feature #1: 'Time to Death'

nPatients nDeath Duration Range (Median), Month
ALL 181 117 0.0 - 94.1 (12.0)
DNMT3A MUTATED 45 35 0.0 - 34.0 (9.0)
DNMT3A WILD-TYPE 136 82 0.0 - 94.1 (12.5)

Figure S1.  Get High-res Image Gene #3: 'DNMT3A MUTATION STATUS' versus Clinical Feature #1: 'Time to Death'

'IDH2 MUTATION STATUS' versus 'YEARS_TO_BIRTH'

P value = 0.0016 (Wilcoxon-test), Q value = 0.064

Table S2.  Gene #4: 'IDH2 MUTATION STATUS' versus Clinical Feature #2: 'YEARS_TO_BIRTH'

nPatients Mean (Std.Dev)
ALL 195 54.9 (16.1)
IDH2 MUTATED 20 64.9 (8.0)
IDH2 WILD-TYPE 175 53.8 (16.5)

Figure S2.  Get High-res Image Gene #4: 'IDH2 MUTATION STATUS' versus Clinical Feature #2: 'YEARS_TO_BIRTH'

'U2AF1 MUTATION STATUS' versus 'YEARS_TO_BIRTH'

P value = 0.00419 (Wilcoxon-test), Q value = 0.1

Table S3.  Gene #10: 'U2AF1 MUTATION STATUS' versus Clinical Feature #2: 'YEARS_TO_BIRTH'

nPatients Mean (Std.Dev)
ALL 195 54.9 (16.1)
U2AF1 MUTATED 8 69.9 (9.0)
U2AF1 WILD-TYPE 187 54.3 (16.1)

Figure S3.  Get High-res Image Gene #10: 'U2AF1 MUTATION STATUS' versus Clinical Feature #2: 'YEARS_TO_BIRTH'

'TP53 MUTATION STATUS' versus 'Time to Death'

P value = 6.22e-06 (logrank test), Q value = 0.00078

Table S4.  Gene #11: 'TP53 MUTATION STATUS' versus Clinical Feature #1: 'Time to Death'

nPatients nDeath Duration Range (Median), Month
ALL 181 117 0.0 - 94.1 (12.0)
TP53 MUTATED 14 14 0.0 - 17.0 (6.0)
TP53 WILD-TYPE 167 103 0.0 - 94.1 (12.0)

Figure S4.  Get High-res Image Gene #11: 'TP53 MUTATION STATUS' versus Clinical Feature #1: 'Time to Death'

'TP53 MUTATION STATUS' versus 'YEARS_TO_BIRTH'

P value = 0.00204 (Wilcoxon-test), Q value = 0.064

Table S5.  Gene #11: 'TP53 MUTATION STATUS' versus Clinical Feature #2: 'YEARS_TO_BIRTH'

nPatients Mean (Std.Dev)
ALL 195 54.9 (16.1)
TP53 MUTATED 15 66.9 (10.7)
TP53 WILD-TYPE 180 53.9 (16.1)

Figure S5.  Get High-res Image Gene #11: 'TP53 MUTATION STATUS' versus Clinical Feature #2: 'YEARS_TO_BIRTH'

'CEBPA MUTATION STATUS' versus 'YEARS_TO_BIRTH'

P value = 0.0116 (Wilcoxon-test), Q value = 0.24

Table S6.  Gene #12: 'CEBPA MUTATION STATUS' versus Clinical Feature #2: 'YEARS_TO_BIRTH'

nPatients Mean (Std.Dev)
ALL 195 54.9 (16.1)
CEBPA MUTATED 13 42.7 (17.6)
CEBPA WILD-TYPE 182 55.8 (15.7)

Figure S6.  Get High-res Image Gene #12: 'CEBPA MUTATION STATUS' versus Clinical Feature #2: 'YEARS_TO_BIRTH'

Methods & Data
Input
  • Mutation data file = sample_sig_gene_table.txt from Mutsig_2CV pipeline

  • Processed Mutation data file = /xchip/cga/gdac-prod/tcga-gdac/jobResults/GDAC_Correlate_Genomic_Events_Preprocess/LAML-TB/15166008/transformed.cor.cli.txt

  • Clinical data file = /xchip/cga/gdac-prod/tcga-gdac/jobResults/Append_Data/LAML-TB/15082450/LAML-TB.merged_data.txt

  • Number of patients = 195

  • Number of significantly mutated genes = 25

  • Number of selected clinical features = 5

  • Exclude genes that fewer than K tumors have mutations, K = 3

Survival analysis

For survival clinical features, the Kaplan-Meier survival curves of tumors with and without gene mutations were plotted and the statistical significance P values were estimated by logrank test (Bland and Altman 2004) using the 'survdiff' function in R

Fisher's exact test

For binary or multi-class clinical features (nominal or ordinal), two-tailed Fisher's exact tests (Fisher 1922) were used to estimate the P values using the 'fisher.test' function in R

Q value calculation

For multiple hypothesis correction, Q value is the False Discovery Rate (FDR) analogue of the P value (Benjamini and Hochberg 1995), defined as the minimum FDR at which the test may be called significant. We used the 'Benjamini and Hochberg' method of 'p.adjust' function in R to convert P values into Q values.

Download Results

In addition to the links below, the full results of the analysis summarized in this report can also be downloaded programmatically using firehose_get, or interactively from either the Broad GDAC website or TCGA Data Coordination Center Portal.

References
[1] Bland and Altman, Statistics notes: The logrank test, BMJ 328(7447):1073 (2004)
[2] Fisher, R.A., On the interpretation of chi-square from contingency tables, and the calculation of P, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society 85(1):87-94 (1922)
[3] Benjamini and Hochberg, Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B 59:289-300 (1995)