Correlation between gene mutation status and molecular subtypes

Pheochromocytoma and Paraganglioma (Primary solid tumor)

02 April 2015 | analyses__2015_04_02

Maintainer Information

Citation Information

Maintained by TCGA GDAC Team (Broad Institute/MD Anderson Cancer Center/Harvard Medical School)

Cite as Broad Institute TCGA Genome Data Analysis Center (2015): Correlation between gene mutation status and molecular subtypes. Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard. doi:10.7908/C19G5KW8

Overview

Introduction

This pipeline computes the correlation between significantly recurrent gene mutations and molecular subtypes.

Summary

Testing the association between mutation status of 9 genes and 10 molecular subtypes across 178 patients, 32 significant findings detected with P value < 0.05 and Q value < 0.25.

HRAS mutation correlated to 'CN_CNMF', 'METHLYATION_CNMF', 'RPPA_CHIERARCHICAL', 'MRNASEQ_CNMF', 'MRNASEQ_CHIERARCHICAL', 'MIRSEQ_CNMF', 'MIRSEQ_CHIERARCHICAL', 'MIRSEQ_MATURE_CNMF', and 'MIRSEQ_MATURE_CHIERARCHICAL'.
EPAS1 mutation correlated to 'CN_CNMF', 'METHLYATION_CNMF', 'RPPA_CNMF', 'MRNASEQ_CNMF', 'MRNASEQ_CHIERARCHICAL', 'MIRSEQ_CNMF', 'MIRSEQ_CHIERARCHICAL', 'MIRSEQ_MATURE_CNMF', and 'MIRSEQ_MATURE_CHIERARCHICAL'.
NF1 mutation correlated to 'CN_CNMF', 'METHLYATION_CNMF', 'RPPA_CNMF', 'MRNASEQ_CNMF', 'MRNASEQ_CHIERARCHICAL', 'MIRSEQ_CNMF', 'MIRSEQ_CHIERARCHICAL', 'MIRSEQ_MATURE_CNMF', and 'MIRSEQ_MATURE_CHIERARCHICAL'.
RET mutation correlated to 'CN_CNMF'.
CSDE1 mutation correlated to 'MRNASEQ_CHIERARCHICAL', 'MIRSEQ_CHIERARCHICAL', 'MIRSEQ_MATURE_CNMF', and 'MIRSEQ_MATURE_CHIERARCHICAL'.

Results

Overview of the results

Table 1. Get Full Table Overview of the association between mutation status of 9 genes and 10 molecular subtypes. Shown in the table are P values (Q values). Thresholded by P value < 0.05 and Q value < 0.25, 32 significant findings detected.


		Clinical Features	CN CNMF	METHLYATION CNMF	RPPA CNMF	RPPA CHIERARCHICAL	MRNASEQ CNMF	MRNASEQ CHIERARCHICAL	MIRSEQ CNMF	MIRSEQ CHIERARCHICAL	MIRSEQ MATURE CNMF	MIRSEQ MATURE CHIERARCHICAL
	nMutated (%)	nWild-Type	Fisher's exact test	Fisher's exact test	Fisher's exact test	Fisher's exact test	Fisher's exact test	Fisher's exact test	Fisher's exact test	Fisher's exact test	Fisher's exact test	Fisher's exact test
HRAS	18 (10%)	160	1e-05 (3e-04)	6e-05 (0.00103)	0.0546 (0.149)	0.00116 (0.00746)	1e-05 (3e-04)	1e-05 (3e-04)	5e-05 (0.00103)	0.00024 (0.00216)	8e-05 (0.00103)	0.00039 (0.00292)
EPAS1	8 (4%)	170	0.0112 (0.0337)	0.0059 (0.0229)	0.00789 (0.0263)	0.355 (0.627)	0.00176 (0.0088)	0.00134 (0.00793)	0.00169 (0.0088)	0.0171 (0.0496)	0.00038 (0.00292)	0.00192 (0.00909)
NF1	15 (8%)	163	0.00016 (0.0017)	0.00062 (0.00429)	0.0422 (0.119)	0.0886 (0.217)	0.00973 (0.0306)	8e-05 (0.00103)	0.00017 (0.0017)	0.00673 (0.0242)	0.00986 (0.0306)	0.00141 (0.00793)
CSDE1	4 (2%)	174	0.283 (0.565)	0.58 (0.829)			0.489 (0.758)	0.00493 (0.0222)	0.35 (0.627)	0.00564 (0.0229)	0.00763 (0.0263)	0.00612 (0.0229)
RET	6 (3%)	172	0.0054 (0.0229)	0.486 (0.758)	0.207 (0.454)	0.324 (0.627)	0.0892 (0.217)	0.104 (0.239)	0.436 (0.728)	0.0676 (0.174)	0.258 (0.527)	0.183 (0.411)
GPR128	4 (2%)	174	1 (1.00)	0.101 (0.239)			0.89 (1.00)	0.888 (1.00)	0.545 (0.803)	0.776 (0.995)	0.527 (0.803)	0.553 (0.803)
AMMECR1	3 (2%)	175	0.788 (0.995)	1 (1.00)	0.348 (0.627)	1 (1.00)	0.244 (0.511)	0.628 (0.867)	0.796 (0.995)	1 (1.00)	0.594 (0.835)	0.79 (0.995)
SHROOM4	3 (2%)	175		1 (1.00)			0.47 (0.755)	0.538 (0.803)	1 (1.00)	0.678 (0.911)	0.723 (0.958)	0.636 (0.867)
FAM83D	3 (2%)	175	0.348 (0.627)	0.334 (0.627)			0.409 (0.708)	0.462 (0.755)	0.0579 (0.153)	0.818 (1.00)	0.227 (0.486)	0.437 (0.728)

'HRAS MUTATION STATUS' versus 'CN_CNMF'

P value = 1e-05 (Fisher's exact test), Q value = 3e-04

Table S1. Gene #1: 'HRAS MUTATION STATUS' versus Molecular Subtype #1: 'CN_CNMF'

nPatients	CLUS_1	CLUS_2	CLUS_3
ALL	60	63	38
HRAS MUTATED	14	0	1
HRAS WILD-TYPE	46	63	37

Figure S1. Get High-res Image Gene #1: 'HRAS MUTATION STATUS' versus Molecular Subtype #1: 'CN_CNMF'

'HRAS MUTATION STATUS' versus 'METHLYATION_CNMF'

P value = 6e-05 (Fisher's exact test), Q value = 0.001

Table S2. Gene #1: 'HRAS MUTATION STATUS' versus Molecular Subtype #2: 'METHLYATION_CNMF'

nPatients	CLUS_1	CLUS_2	CLUS_3
ALL	44	85	49
HRAS MUTATED	0	17	1
HRAS WILD-TYPE	44	68	48

Figure S2. Get High-res Image Gene #1: 'HRAS MUTATION STATUS' versus Molecular Subtype #2: 'METHLYATION_CNMF'

'HRAS MUTATION STATUS' versus 'RPPA_CNMF'

P value = 0.0546 (Fisher's exact test), Q value = 0.15

Table S3. Gene #1: 'HRAS MUTATION STATUS' versus Molecular Subtype #3: 'RPPA_CNMF'

nPatients	CLUS_1	CLUS_2	CLUS_3	CLUS_4	CLUS_5	CLUS_6
ALL	14	9	20	6	17	13
HRAS MUTATED	3	2	5	0	0	0
HRAS WILD-TYPE	11	7	15	6	17	13

'HRAS MUTATION STATUS' versus 'RPPA_CHIERARCHICAL'

P value = 0.00116 (Fisher's exact test), Q value = 0.0075

Table S4. Gene #1: 'HRAS MUTATION STATUS' versus Molecular Subtype #4: 'RPPA_CHIERARCHICAL'

nPatients	CLUS_1	CLUS_2	CLUS_3
ALL	33	18	28
HRAS MUTATED	1	7	2
HRAS WILD-TYPE	32	11	26

Figure S3. Get High-res Image Gene #1: 'HRAS MUTATION STATUS' versus Molecular Subtype #4: 'RPPA_CHIERARCHICAL'

'HRAS MUTATION STATUS' versus 'MRNASEQ_CNMF'

P value = 1e-05 (Fisher's exact test), Q value = 3e-04

Table S5. Gene #1: 'HRAS MUTATION STATUS' versus Molecular Subtype #5: 'MRNASEQ_CNMF'

nPatients	CLUS_1	CLUS_2	CLUS_3	CLUS_4
ALL	39	69	49	21
HRAS MUTATED	0	18	0	0
HRAS WILD-TYPE	39	51	49	21

Figure S4. Get High-res Image Gene #1: 'HRAS MUTATION STATUS' versus Molecular Subtype #5: 'MRNASEQ_CNMF'

'HRAS MUTATION STATUS' versus 'MRNASEQ_CHIERARCHICAL'

P value = 1e-05 (Fisher's exact test), Q value = 3e-04

Table S6. Gene #1: 'HRAS MUTATION STATUS' versus Molecular Subtype #6: 'MRNASEQ_CHIERARCHICAL'

nPatients	CLUS_1	CLUS_2	CLUS_3	CLUS_4
ALL	38	71	48	21
HRAS MUTATED	0	18	0	0
HRAS WILD-TYPE	38	53	48	21

Figure S5. Get High-res Image Gene #1: 'HRAS MUTATION STATUS' versus Molecular Subtype #6: 'MRNASEQ_CHIERARCHICAL'

'HRAS MUTATION STATUS' versus 'MIRSEQ_CNMF'

P value = 5e-05 (Fisher's exact test), Q value = 0.001

Table S7. Gene #1: 'HRAS MUTATION STATUS' versus Molecular Subtype #7: 'MIRSEQ_CNMF'

nPatients	CLUS_1	CLUS_2	CLUS_3
ALL	74	65	39
HRAS MUTATED	1	15	2
HRAS WILD-TYPE	73	50	37

Figure S6. Get High-res Image Gene #1: 'HRAS MUTATION STATUS' versus Molecular Subtype #7: 'MIRSEQ_CNMF'

'HRAS MUTATION STATUS' versus 'MIRSEQ_CHIERARCHICAL'

P value = 0.00024 (Fisher's exact test), Q value = 0.0022

Table S8. Gene #1: 'HRAS MUTATION STATUS' versus Molecular Subtype #8: 'MIRSEQ_CHIERARCHICAL'

nPatients	CLUS_1	CLUS_2	CLUS_3	CLUS_4
ALL	76	59	18	25
HRAS MUTATED	1	14	1	2
HRAS WILD-TYPE	75	45	17	23

Figure S7. Get High-res Image Gene #1: 'HRAS MUTATION STATUS' versus Molecular Subtype #8: 'MIRSEQ_CHIERARCHICAL'

'HRAS MUTATION STATUS' versus 'MIRSEQ_MATURE_CNMF'

P value = 8e-05 (Fisher's exact test), Q value = 0.001

Table S9. Gene #1: 'HRAS MUTATION STATUS' versus Molecular Subtype #9: 'MIRSEQ_MATURE_CNMF'

nPatients	CLUS_1	CLUS_2	CLUS_3	CLUS_4	CLUS_5
ALL	36	64	12	41	24
HRAS MUTATED	1	15	2	0	0
HRAS WILD-TYPE	35	49	10	41	24

Figure S8. Get High-res Image Gene #1: 'HRAS MUTATION STATUS' versus Molecular Subtype #9: 'MIRSEQ_MATURE_CNMF'

'HRAS MUTATION STATUS' versus 'MIRSEQ_MATURE_CHIERARCHICAL'

P value = 0.00039 (Fisher's exact test), Q value = 0.0029

Table S10. Gene #1: 'HRAS MUTATION STATUS' versus Molecular Subtype #10: 'MIRSEQ_MATURE_CHIERARCHICAL'

nPatients	CLUS_1	CLUS_2	CLUS_3	CLUS_4
ALL	80	60	18	19
HRAS MUTATED	16	0	1	1
HRAS WILD-TYPE	64	60	17	18

Figure S9. Get High-res Image Gene #1: 'HRAS MUTATION STATUS' versus Molecular Subtype #10: 'MIRSEQ_MATURE_CHIERARCHICAL'

'EPAS1 MUTATION STATUS' versus 'CN_CNMF'

P value = 0.0112 (Fisher's exact test), Q value = 0.034

Table S11. Gene #2: 'EPAS1 MUTATION STATUS' versus Molecular Subtype #1: 'CN_CNMF'

nPatients	CLUS_1	CLUS_2	CLUS_3
ALL	60	63	38
EPAS1 MUTATED	0	7	1
EPAS1 WILD-TYPE	60	56	37

Figure S10. Get High-res Image Gene #2: 'EPAS1 MUTATION STATUS' versus Molecular Subtype #1: 'CN_CNMF'

'EPAS1 MUTATION STATUS' versus 'METHLYATION_CNMF'

P value = 0.0059 (Fisher's exact test), Q value = 0.023

Table S12. Gene #2: 'EPAS1 MUTATION STATUS' versus Molecular Subtype #2: 'METHLYATION_CNMF'

nPatients	CLUS_1	CLUS_2	CLUS_3
ALL	44	85	49
EPAS1 MUTATED	4	0	4
EPAS1 WILD-TYPE	40	85	45

Figure S11. Get High-res Image Gene #2: 'EPAS1 MUTATION STATUS' versus Molecular Subtype #2: 'METHLYATION_CNMF'

'EPAS1 MUTATION STATUS' versus 'RPPA_CNMF'

P value = 0.00789 (Fisher's exact test), Q value = 0.026

Table S13. Gene #2: 'EPAS1 MUTATION STATUS' versus Molecular Subtype #3: 'RPPA_CNMF'

nPatients	CLUS_1	CLUS_2	CLUS_3	CLUS_4	CLUS_5	CLUS_6
ALL	14	9	20	6	17	13
EPAS1 MUTATED	1	0	0	0	0	4
EPAS1 WILD-TYPE	13	9	20	6	17	9

Figure S12. Get High-res Image Gene #2: 'EPAS1 MUTATION STATUS' versus Molecular Subtype #3: 'RPPA_CNMF'

'EPAS1 MUTATION STATUS' versus 'RPPA_CHIERARCHICAL'

P value = 0.355 (Fisher's exact test), Q value = 0.63

Table S14. Gene #2: 'EPAS1 MUTATION STATUS' versus Molecular Subtype #4: 'RPPA_CHIERARCHICAL'

nPatients	CLUS_1	CLUS_2	CLUS_3
ALL	33	18	28
EPAS1 MUTATED	2	0	3
EPAS1 WILD-TYPE	31	18	25

'EPAS1 MUTATION STATUS' versus 'MRNASEQ_CNMF'

P value = 0.00176 (Fisher's exact test), Q value = 0.0088

Table S15. Gene #2: 'EPAS1 MUTATION STATUS' versus Molecular Subtype #5: 'MRNASEQ_CNMF'

nPatients	CLUS_1	CLUS_2	CLUS_3	CLUS_4
ALL	39	69	49	21
EPAS1 MUTATED	1	0	7	0
EPAS1 WILD-TYPE	38	69	42	21

Figure S13. Get High-res Image Gene #2: 'EPAS1 MUTATION STATUS' versus Molecular Subtype #5: 'MRNASEQ_CNMF'

'EPAS1 MUTATION STATUS' versus 'MRNASEQ_CHIERARCHICAL'

P value = 0.00134 (Fisher's exact test), Q value = 0.0079

Table S16. Gene #2: 'EPAS1 MUTATION STATUS' versus Molecular Subtype #6: 'MRNASEQ_CHIERARCHICAL'

nPatients	CLUS_1	CLUS_2	CLUS_3	CLUS_4
ALL	38	71	48	21
EPAS1 MUTATED	1	0	7	0
EPAS1 WILD-TYPE	37	71	41	21

Figure S14. Get High-res Image Gene #2: 'EPAS1 MUTATION STATUS' versus Molecular Subtype #6: 'MRNASEQ_CHIERARCHICAL'

'EPAS1 MUTATION STATUS' versus 'MIRSEQ_CNMF'

P value = 0.00169 (Fisher's exact test), Q value = 0.0088

Table S17. Gene #2: 'EPAS1 MUTATION STATUS' versus Molecular Subtype #7: 'MIRSEQ_CNMF'

nPatients	CLUS_1	CLUS_2	CLUS_3
ALL	74	65	39
EPAS1 MUTATED	8	0	0
EPAS1 WILD-TYPE	66	65	39

Figure S15. Get High-res Image Gene #2: 'EPAS1 MUTATION STATUS' versus Molecular Subtype #7: 'MIRSEQ_CNMF'

'EPAS1 MUTATION STATUS' versus 'MIRSEQ_CHIERARCHICAL'

P value = 0.0171 (Fisher's exact test), Q value = 0.05

Table S18. Gene #2: 'EPAS1 MUTATION STATUS' versus Molecular Subtype #8: 'MIRSEQ_CHIERARCHICAL'

nPatients	CLUS_1	CLUS_2	CLUS_3	CLUS_4
ALL	76	59	18	25
EPAS1 MUTATED	8	0	0	0
EPAS1 WILD-TYPE	68	59	18	25

Figure S16. Get High-res Image Gene #2: 'EPAS1 MUTATION STATUS' versus Molecular Subtype #8: 'MIRSEQ_CHIERARCHICAL'

'EPAS1 MUTATION STATUS' versus 'MIRSEQ_MATURE_CNMF'

P value = 0.00038 (Fisher's exact test), Q value = 0.0029

Table S19. Gene #2: 'EPAS1 MUTATION STATUS' versus Molecular Subtype #9: 'MIRSEQ_MATURE_CNMF'

nPatients	CLUS_1	CLUS_2	CLUS_3	CLUS_4	CLUS_5
ALL	36	64	12	41	24
EPAS1 MUTATED	0	0	1	7	0
EPAS1 WILD-TYPE	36	64	11	34	24

Figure S17. Get High-res Image Gene #2: 'EPAS1 MUTATION STATUS' versus Molecular Subtype #9: 'MIRSEQ_MATURE_CNMF'

'EPAS1 MUTATION STATUS' versus 'MIRSEQ_MATURE_CHIERARCHICAL'

P value = 0.00192 (Fisher's exact test), Q value = 0.0091

Table S20. Gene #2: 'EPAS1 MUTATION STATUS' versus Molecular Subtype #10: 'MIRSEQ_MATURE_CHIERARCHICAL'

nPatients	CLUS_1	CLUS_2	CLUS_3	CLUS_4
ALL	80	60	18	19
EPAS1 MUTATED	0	8	0	0
EPAS1 WILD-TYPE	80	52	18	19

Figure S18. Get High-res Image Gene #2: 'EPAS1 MUTATION STATUS' versus Molecular Subtype #10: 'MIRSEQ_MATURE_CHIERARCHICAL'

'NF1 MUTATION STATUS' versus 'CN_CNMF'

P value = 0.00016 (Fisher's exact test), Q value = 0.0017

Table S21. Gene #3: 'NF1 MUTATION STATUS' versus Molecular Subtype #1: 'CN_CNMF'

nPatients	CLUS_1	CLUS_2	CLUS_3
ALL	60	63	38
NF1 MUTATED	3	1	10
NF1 WILD-TYPE	57	62	28

Figure S19. Get High-res Image Gene #3: 'NF1 MUTATION STATUS' versus Molecular Subtype #1: 'CN_CNMF'

'NF1 MUTATION STATUS' versus 'METHLYATION_CNMF'

P value = 0.00062 (Fisher's exact test), Q value = 0.0043

Table S22. Gene #3: 'NF1 MUTATION STATUS' versus Molecular Subtype #2: 'METHLYATION_CNMF'

nPatients	CLUS_1	CLUS_2	CLUS_3
ALL	44	85	49
NF1 MUTATED	0	14	1
NF1 WILD-TYPE	44	71	48

Figure S20. Get High-res Image Gene #3: 'NF1 MUTATION STATUS' versus Molecular Subtype #2: 'METHLYATION_CNMF'

'NF1 MUTATION STATUS' versus 'RPPA_CNMF'

P value = 0.0422 (Fisher's exact test), Q value = 0.12

Table S23. Gene #3: 'NF1 MUTATION STATUS' versus Molecular Subtype #3: 'RPPA_CNMF'

nPatients	CLUS_1	CLUS_2	CLUS_3	CLUS_4	CLUS_5	CLUS_6
ALL	14	9	20	6	17	13
NF1 MUTATED	2	1	6	0	0	0
NF1 WILD-TYPE	12	8	14	6	17	13

Figure S21. Get High-res Image Gene #3: 'NF1 MUTATION STATUS' versus Molecular Subtype #3: 'RPPA_CNMF'

'NF1 MUTATION STATUS' versus 'RPPA_CHIERARCHICAL'

P value = 0.0886 (Fisher's exact test), Q value = 0.22

Table S24. Gene #3: 'NF1 MUTATION STATUS' versus Molecular Subtype #4: 'RPPA_CHIERARCHICAL'

nPatients	CLUS_1	CLUS_2	CLUS_3
ALL	33	18	28
NF1 MUTATED	1	4	4
NF1 WILD-TYPE	32	14	24

'NF1 MUTATION STATUS' versus 'MRNASEQ_CNMF'

P value = 0.00973 (Fisher's exact test), Q value = 0.031

Table S25. Gene #3: 'NF1 MUTATION STATUS' versus Molecular Subtype #5: 'MRNASEQ_CNMF'

nPatients	CLUS_1	CLUS_2	CLUS_3	CLUS_4
ALL	39	69	49	21
NF1 MUTATED	3	11	0	1
NF1 WILD-TYPE	36	58	49	20

Figure S22. Get High-res Image Gene #3: 'NF1 MUTATION STATUS' versus Molecular Subtype #5: 'MRNASEQ_CNMF'

'NF1 MUTATION STATUS' versus 'MRNASEQ_CHIERARCHICAL'

P value = 8e-05 (Fisher's exact test), Q value = 0.001

Table S26. Gene #3: 'NF1 MUTATION STATUS' versus Molecular Subtype #6: 'MRNASEQ_CHIERARCHICAL'

nPatients	CLUS_1	CLUS_2	CLUS_3	CLUS_4
ALL	38	71	48	21
NF1 MUTATED	0	14	0	1
NF1 WILD-TYPE	38	57	48	20

Figure S23. Get High-res Image Gene #3: 'NF1 MUTATION STATUS' versus Molecular Subtype #6: 'MRNASEQ_CHIERARCHICAL'

'NF1 MUTATION STATUS' versus 'MIRSEQ_CNMF'

P value = 0.00017 (Fisher's exact test), Q value = 0.0017

Table S27. Gene #3: 'NF1 MUTATION STATUS' versus Molecular Subtype #7: 'MIRSEQ_CNMF'

nPatients	CLUS_1	CLUS_2	CLUS_3
ALL	74	65	39
NF1 MUTATED	1	13	1
NF1 WILD-TYPE	73	52	38

Figure S24. Get High-res Image Gene #3: 'NF1 MUTATION STATUS' versus Molecular Subtype #7: 'MIRSEQ_CNMF'

'NF1 MUTATION STATUS' versus 'MIRSEQ_CHIERARCHICAL'

P value = 0.00673 (Fisher's exact test), Q value = 0.024

Table S28. Gene #3: 'NF1 MUTATION STATUS' versus Molecular Subtype #8: 'MIRSEQ_CHIERARCHICAL'

nPatients	CLUS_1	CLUS_2	CLUS_3	CLUS_4
ALL	76	59	18	25
NF1 MUTATED	2	11	0	2
NF1 WILD-TYPE	74	48	18	23

Figure S25. Get High-res Image Gene #3: 'NF1 MUTATION STATUS' versus Molecular Subtype #8: 'MIRSEQ_CHIERARCHICAL'

'NF1 MUTATION STATUS' versus 'MIRSEQ_MATURE_CNMF'

P value = 0.00986 (Fisher's exact test), Q value = 0.031

Table S29. Gene #3: 'NF1 MUTATION STATUS' versus Molecular Subtype #9: 'MIRSEQ_MATURE_CNMF'

nPatients	CLUS_1	CLUS_2	CLUS_3	CLUS_4	CLUS_5
ALL	36	64	12	41	24
NF1 MUTATED	3	10	2	0	0
NF1 WILD-TYPE	33	54	10	41	24

Figure S26. Get High-res Image Gene #3: 'NF1 MUTATION STATUS' versus Molecular Subtype #9: 'MIRSEQ_MATURE_CNMF'

'NF1 MUTATION STATUS' versus 'MIRSEQ_MATURE_CHIERARCHICAL'

P value = 0.00141 (Fisher's exact test), Q value = 0.0079

Table S30. Gene #3: 'NF1 MUTATION STATUS' versus Molecular Subtype #10: 'MIRSEQ_MATURE_CHIERARCHICAL'

nPatients	CLUS_1	CLUS_2	CLUS_3	CLUS_4
ALL	80	60	18	19
NF1 MUTATED	13	0	0	2
NF1 WILD-TYPE	67	60	18	17

Figure S27. Get High-res Image Gene #3: 'NF1 MUTATION STATUS' versus Molecular Subtype #10: 'MIRSEQ_MATURE_CHIERARCHICAL'

'RET MUTATION STATUS' versus 'CN_CNMF'

P value = 0.0054 (Fisher's exact test), Q value = 0.023

Table S31. Gene #4: 'RET MUTATION STATUS' versus Molecular Subtype #1: 'CN_CNMF'

nPatients	CLUS_1	CLUS_2	CLUS_3
ALL	60	63	38
RET MUTATED	6	0	0
RET WILD-TYPE	54	63	38

Figure S28. Get High-res Image Gene #4: 'RET MUTATION STATUS' versus Molecular Subtype #1: 'CN_CNMF'

'RET MUTATION STATUS' versus 'METHLYATION_CNMF'

P value = 0.486 (Fisher's exact test), Q value = 0.76

Table S32. Gene #4: 'RET MUTATION STATUS' versus Molecular Subtype #2: 'METHLYATION_CNMF'

nPatients	CLUS_1	CLUS_2	CLUS_3
ALL	44	85	49
RET MUTATED	0	4	2
RET WILD-TYPE	44	81	47

'RET MUTATION STATUS' versus 'RPPA_CNMF'

P value = 0.207 (Fisher's exact test), Q value = 0.45

Table S33. Gene #4: 'RET MUTATION STATUS' versus Molecular Subtype #3: 'RPPA_CNMF'

nPatients	CLUS_1	CLUS_2	CLUS_3	CLUS_4	CLUS_5	CLUS_6
ALL	14	9	20	6	17	13
RET MUTATED	0	0	3	0	0	0
RET WILD-TYPE	14	9	17	6	17	13

'RET MUTATION STATUS' versus 'RPPA_CHIERARCHICAL'

P value = 0.324 (Fisher's exact test), Q value = 0.63

Table S34. Gene #4: 'RET MUTATION STATUS' versus Molecular Subtype #4: 'RPPA_CHIERARCHICAL'

nPatients	CLUS_1	CLUS_2	CLUS_3
ALL	33	18	28
RET MUTATED	0	1	2
RET WILD-TYPE	33	17	26

'RET MUTATION STATUS' versus 'MRNASEQ_CNMF'

P value = 0.0892 (Fisher's exact test), Q value = 0.22

Table S35. Gene #4: 'RET MUTATION STATUS' versus Molecular Subtype #5: 'MRNASEQ_CNMF'

nPatients	CLUS_1	CLUS_2	CLUS_3	CLUS_4
ALL	39	69	49	21
RET MUTATED	0	5	0	1
RET WILD-TYPE	39	64	49	20

'RET MUTATION STATUS' versus 'MRNASEQ_CHIERARCHICAL'

P value = 0.104 (Fisher's exact test), Q value = 0.24

Table S36. Gene #4: 'RET MUTATION STATUS' versus Molecular Subtype #6: 'MRNASEQ_CHIERARCHICAL'

nPatients	CLUS_1	CLUS_2	CLUS_3	CLUS_4
ALL	38	71	48	21
RET MUTATED	0	5	0	1
RET WILD-TYPE	38	66	48	20

'RET MUTATION STATUS' versus 'MIRSEQ_CNMF'

P value = 0.436 (Fisher's exact test), Q value = 0.73

Table S37. Gene #4: 'RET MUTATION STATUS' versus Molecular Subtype #7: 'MIRSEQ_CNMF'

nPatients	CLUS_1	CLUS_2	CLUS_3
ALL	74	65	39
RET MUTATED	1	3	2
RET WILD-TYPE	73	62	37

'RET MUTATION STATUS' versus 'MIRSEQ_CHIERARCHICAL'

P value = 0.0676 (Fisher's exact test), Q value = 0.17

Table S38. Gene #4: 'RET MUTATION STATUS' versus Molecular Subtype #8: 'MIRSEQ_CHIERARCHICAL'

nPatients	CLUS_1	CLUS_2	CLUS_3	CLUS_4
ALL	76	59	18	25
RET MUTATED	0	4	1	1
RET WILD-TYPE	76	55	17	24

'RET MUTATION STATUS' versus 'MIRSEQ_MATURE_CNMF'

P value = 0.258 (Fisher's exact test), Q value = 0.53

Table S39. Gene #4: 'RET MUTATION STATUS' versus Molecular Subtype #9: 'MIRSEQ_MATURE_CNMF'

nPatients	CLUS_1	CLUS_2	CLUS_3	CLUS_4	CLUS_5
ALL	36	64	12	41	24
RET MUTATED	1	4	1	0	0
RET WILD-TYPE	35	60	11	41	24

'RET MUTATION STATUS' versus 'MIRSEQ_MATURE_CHIERARCHICAL'

P value = 0.183 (Fisher's exact test), Q value = 0.41

Table S40. Gene #4: 'RET MUTATION STATUS' versus Molecular Subtype #10: 'MIRSEQ_MATURE_CHIERARCHICAL'

nPatients	CLUS_1	CLUS_2	CLUS_3	CLUS_4
ALL	80	60	18	19
RET MUTATED	4	0	1	1
RET WILD-TYPE	76	60	17	18

'CSDE1 MUTATION STATUS' versus 'CN_CNMF'

P value = 0.283 (Fisher's exact test), Q value = 0.57

Table S41. Gene #5: 'CSDE1 MUTATION STATUS' versus Molecular Subtype #1: 'CN_CNMF'

nPatients	CLUS_1	CLUS_2	CLUS_3
ALL	60	63	38
CSDE1 MUTATED	0	3	1
CSDE1 WILD-TYPE	60	60	37

'CSDE1 MUTATION STATUS' versus 'METHLYATION_CNMF'

P value = 0.58 (Fisher's exact test), Q value = 0.83

Table S42. Gene #5: 'CSDE1 MUTATION STATUS' versus Molecular Subtype #2: 'METHLYATION_CNMF'

nPatients	CLUS_1	CLUS_2	CLUS_3
ALL	44	85	49
CSDE1 MUTATED	1	3	0
CSDE1 WILD-TYPE	43	82	49

'CSDE1 MUTATION STATUS' versus 'MRNASEQ_CNMF'

P value = 0.489 (Fisher's exact test), Q value = 0.76

Table S43. Gene #5: 'CSDE1 MUTATION STATUS' versus Molecular Subtype #5: 'MRNASEQ_CNMF'

nPatients	CLUS_1	CLUS_2	CLUS_3	CLUS_4
ALL	39	69	49	21
CSDE1 MUTATED	1	3	0	0
CSDE1 WILD-TYPE	38	66	49	21

'CSDE1 MUTATION STATUS' versus 'MRNASEQ_CHIERARCHICAL'

P value = 0.00493 (Fisher's exact test), Q value = 0.022

Table S44. Gene #5: 'CSDE1 MUTATION STATUS' versus Molecular Subtype #6: 'MRNASEQ_CHIERARCHICAL'

nPatients	CLUS_1	CLUS_2	CLUS_3	CLUS_4
ALL	38	71	48	21
CSDE1 MUTATED	4	0	0	0
CSDE1 WILD-TYPE	34	71	48	21

Figure S29. Get High-res Image Gene #5: 'CSDE1 MUTATION STATUS' versus Molecular Subtype #6: 'MRNASEQ_CHIERARCHICAL'

'CSDE1 MUTATION STATUS' versus 'MIRSEQ_CNMF'

P value = 0.35 (Fisher's exact test), Q value = 0.63

Table S45. Gene #5: 'CSDE1 MUTATION STATUS' versus Molecular Subtype #7: 'MIRSEQ_CNMF'

nPatients	CLUS_1	CLUS_2	CLUS_3
ALL	74	65	39
CSDE1 MUTATED	1	3	0
CSDE1 WILD-TYPE	73	62	39

'CSDE1 MUTATION STATUS' versus 'MIRSEQ_CHIERARCHICAL'

P value = 0.00564 (Fisher's exact test), Q value = 0.023

Table S46. Gene #5: 'CSDE1 MUTATION STATUS' versus Molecular Subtype #8: 'MIRSEQ_CHIERARCHICAL'

nPatients	CLUS_1	CLUS_2	CLUS_3	CLUS_4
ALL	76	59	18	25
CSDE1 MUTATED	1	0	3	0
CSDE1 WILD-TYPE	75	59	15	25

Figure S30. Get High-res Image Gene #5: 'CSDE1 MUTATION STATUS' versus Molecular Subtype #8: 'MIRSEQ_CHIERARCHICAL'

'CSDE1 MUTATION STATUS' versus 'MIRSEQ_MATURE_CNMF'

P value = 0.00763 (Fisher's exact test), Q value = 0.026

Table S47. Gene #5: 'CSDE1 MUTATION STATUS' versus Molecular Subtype #9: 'MIRSEQ_MATURE_CNMF'

nPatients	CLUS_1	CLUS_2	CLUS_3	CLUS_4	CLUS_5
ALL	36	64	12	41	24
CSDE1 MUTATED	4	0	0	0	0
CSDE1 WILD-TYPE	32	64	12	41	24

Figure S31. Get High-res Image Gene #5: 'CSDE1 MUTATION STATUS' versus Molecular Subtype #9: 'MIRSEQ_MATURE_CNMF'

'CSDE1 MUTATION STATUS' versus 'MIRSEQ_MATURE_CHIERARCHICAL'

P value = 0.00612 (Fisher's exact test), Q value = 0.023

Table S48. Gene #5: 'CSDE1 MUTATION STATUS' versus Molecular Subtype #10: 'MIRSEQ_MATURE_CHIERARCHICAL'

nPatients	CLUS_1	CLUS_2	CLUS_3	CLUS_4
ALL	80	60	18	19
CSDE1 MUTATED	1	0	3	0
CSDE1 WILD-TYPE	79	60	15	19

Figure S32. Get High-res Image Gene #5: 'CSDE1 MUTATION STATUS' versus Molecular Subtype #10: 'MIRSEQ_MATURE_CHIERARCHICAL'

'GPR128 MUTATION STATUS' versus 'CN_CNMF'

P value = 1 (Fisher's exact test), Q value = 1

Table S49. Gene #6: 'GPR128 MUTATION STATUS' versus Molecular Subtype #1: 'CN_CNMF'

nPatients	CLUS_1	CLUS_2	CLUS_3
ALL	60	63	38
GPR128 MUTATED	1	1	1
GPR128 WILD-TYPE	59	62	37

'GPR128 MUTATION STATUS' versus 'METHLYATION_CNMF'

P value = 0.101 (Fisher's exact test), Q value = 0.24

Table S50. Gene #6: 'GPR128 MUTATION STATUS' versus Molecular Subtype #2: 'METHLYATION_CNMF'

nPatients	CLUS_1	CLUS_2	CLUS_3
ALL	44	85	49
GPR128 MUTATED	3	1	0
GPR128 WILD-TYPE	41	84	49

'GPR128 MUTATION STATUS' versus 'MRNASEQ_CNMF'

P value = 0.89 (Fisher's exact test), Q value = 1

Table S51. Gene #6: 'GPR128 MUTATION STATUS' versus Molecular Subtype #5: 'MRNASEQ_CNMF'

nPatients	CLUS_1	CLUS_2	CLUS_3	CLUS_4
ALL	39	69	49	21
GPR128 MUTATED	1	1	2	0
GPR128 WILD-TYPE	38	68	47	21

'GPR128 MUTATION STATUS' versus 'MRNASEQ_CHIERARCHICAL'

P value = 0.888 (Fisher's exact test), Q value = 1

Table S52. Gene #6: 'GPR128 MUTATION STATUS' versus Molecular Subtype #6: 'MRNASEQ_CHIERARCHICAL'

nPatients	CLUS_1	CLUS_2	CLUS_3	CLUS_4
ALL	38	71	48	21
GPR128 MUTATED	1	1	2	0
GPR128 WILD-TYPE	37	70	46	21

'GPR128 MUTATION STATUS' versus 'MIRSEQ_CNMF'

P value = 0.545 (Fisher's exact test), Q value = 0.8

Table S53. Gene #6: 'GPR128 MUTATION STATUS' versus Molecular Subtype #7: 'MIRSEQ_CNMF'

nPatients	CLUS_1	CLUS_2	CLUS_3
ALL	74	65	39
GPR128 MUTATED	3	1	0
GPR128 WILD-TYPE	71	64	39

'GPR128 MUTATION STATUS' versus 'MIRSEQ_CHIERARCHICAL'

P value = 0.776 (Fisher's exact test), Q value = 1

Table S54. Gene #6: 'GPR128 MUTATION STATUS' versus Molecular Subtype #8: 'MIRSEQ_CHIERARCHICAL'

nPatients	CLUS_1	CLUS_2	CLUS_3	CLUS_4
ALL	76	59	18	25
GPR128 MUTATED	3	1	0	0
GPR128 WILD-TYPE	73	58	18	25

'GPR128 MUTATION STATUS' versus 'MIRSEQ_MATURE_CNMF'

P value = 0.527 (Fisher's exact test), Q value = 0.8

Table S55. Gene #6: 'GPR128 MUTATION STATUS' versus Molecular Subtype #9: 'MIRSEQ_MATURE_CNMF'

nPatients	CLUS_1	CLUS_2	CLUS_3	CLUS_4	CLUS_5
ALL	36	64	12	41	24
GPR128 MUTATED	0	1	0	2	1
GPR128 WILD-TYPE	36	63	12	39	23

'GPR128 MUTATION STATUS' versus 'MIRSEQ_MATURE_CHIERARCHICAL'

P value = 0.553 (Fisher's exact test), Q value = 0.8

Table S56. Gene #6: 'GPR128 MUTATION STATUS' versus Molecular Subtype #10: 'MIRSEQ_MATURE_CHIERARCHICAL'

nPatients	CLUS_1	CLUS_2	CLUS_3	CLUS_4
ALL	80	60	18	19
GPR128 MUTATED	1	3	0	0
GPR128 WILD-TYPE	79	57	18	19

'AMMECR1 MUTATION STATUS' versus 'CN_CNMF'

P value = 0.788 (Fisher's exact test), Q value = 1

Table S57. Gene #7: 'AMMECR1 MUTATION STATUS' versus Molecular Subtype #1: 'CN_CNMF'

nPatients	CLUS_1	CLUS_2	CLUS_3
ALL	60	63	38
AMMECR1 MUTATED	1	2	0
AMMECR1 WILD-TYPE	59	61	38

'AMMECR1 MUTATION STATUS' versus 'METHLYATION_CNMF'

P value = 1 (Fisher's exact test), Q value = 1

Table S58. Gene #7: 'AMMECR1 MUTATION STATUS' versus Molecular Subtype #2: 'METHLYATION_CNMF'

nPatients	CLUS_1	CLUS_2	CLUS_3
ALL	44	85	49
AMMECR1 MUTATED	1	1	1
AMMECR1 WILD-TYPE	43	84	48

'AMMECR1 MUTATION STATUS' versus 'RPPA_CNMF'

P value = 0.348 (Fisher's exact test), Q value = 0.63

Table S59. Gene #7: 'AMMECR1 MUTATION STATUS' versus Molecular Subtype #3: 'RPPA_CNMF'

nPatients	CLUS_1	CLUS_2	CLUS_3	CLUS_4	CLUS_5	CLUS_6
ALL	14	9	20	6	17	13
AMMECR1 MUTATED	0	0	1	1	0	1
AMMECR1 WILD-TYPE	14	9	19	5	17	12

'AMMECR1 MUTATION STATUS' versus 'RPPA_CHIERARCHICAL'

P value = 1 (Fisher's exact test), Q value = 1

Table S60. Gene #7: 'AMMECR1 MUTATION STATUS' versus Molecular Subtype #4: 'RPPA_CHIERARCHICAL'

nPatients	CLUS_1	CLUS_2	CLUS_3
ALL	33	18	28
AMMECR1 MUTATED	1	1	1
AMMECR1 WILD-TYPE	32	17	27

'AMMECR1 MUTATION STATUS' versus 'MRNASEQ_CNMF'

P value = 0.244 (Fisher's exact test), Q value = 0.51

Table S61. Gene #7: 'AMMECR1 MUTATION STATUS' versus Molecular Subtype #5: 'MRNASEQ_CNMF'

nPatients	CLUS_1	CLUS_2	CLUS_3	CLUS_4
ALL	39	69	49	21
AMMECR1 MUTATED	1	0	2	0
AMMECR1 WILD-TYPE	38	69	47	21

'AMMECR1 MUTATION STATUS' versus 'MRNASEQ_CHIERARCHICAL'

P value = 0.628 (Fisher's exact test), Q value = 0.87

Table S62. Gene #7: 'AMMECR1 MUTATION STATUS' versus Molecular Subtype #6: 'MRNASEQ_CHIERARCHICAL'

nPatients	CLUS_1	CLUS_2	CLUS_3	CLUS_4
ALL	38	71	48	21
AMMECR1 MUTATED	0	1	2	0
AMMECR1 WILD-TYPE	38	70	46	21

'AMMECR1 MUTATION STATUS' versus 'MIRSEQ_CNMF'

P value = 0.796 (Fisher's exact test), Q value = 1

Table S63. Gene #7: 'AMMECR1 MUTATION STATUS' versus Molecular Subtype #7: 'MIRSEQ_CNMF'

nPatients	CLUS_1	CLUS_2	CLUS_3
ALL	74	65	39
AMMECR1 MUTATED	2	1	0
AMMECR1 WILD-TYPE	72	64	39

'AMMECR1 MUTATION STATUS' versus 'MIRSEQ_CHIERARCHICAL'

P value = 1 (Fisher's exact test), Q value = 1

Table S64. Gene #7: 'AMMECR1 MUTATION STATUS' versus Molecular Subtype #8: 'MIRSEQ_CHIERARCHICAL'

nPatients	CLUS_1	CLUS_2	CLUS_3	CLUS_4
ALL	76	59	18	25
AMMECR1 MUTATED	2	1	0	0
AMMECR1 WILD-TYPE	74	58	18	25

'AMMECR1 MUTATION STATUS' versus 'MIRSEQ_MATURE_CNMF'

P value = 0.594 (Fisher's exact test), Q value = 0.84

Table S65. Gene #7: 'AMMECR1 MUTATION STATUS' versus Molecular Subtype #9: 'MIRSEQ_MATURE_CNMF'

nPatients	CLUS_1	CLUS_2	CLUS_3	CLUS_4	CLUS_5
ALL	36	64	12	41	24
AMMECR1 MUTATED	0	1	0	2	0
AMMECR1 WILD-TYPE	36	63	12	39	24

'AMMECR1 MUTATION STATUS' versus 'MIRSEQ_MATURE_CHIERARCHICAL'

P value = 0.79 (Fisher's exact test), Q value = 1

Table S66. Gene #7: 'AMMECR1 MUTATION STATUS' versus Molecular Subtype #10: 'MIRSEQ_MATURE_CHIERARCHICAL'

nPatients	CLUS_1	CLUS_2	CLUS_3	CLUS_4
ALL	80	60	18	19
AMMECR1 MUTATED	1	2	0	0
AMMECR1 WILD-TYPE	79	58	18	19

'SHROOM4 MUTATION STATUS' versus 'METHLYATION_CNMF'

P value = 1 (Fisher's exact test), Q value = 1

Table S67. Gene #8: 'SHROOM4 MUTATION STATUS' versus Molecular Subtype #2: 'METHLYATION_CNMF'

nPatients	CLUS_1	CLUS_2	CLUS_3
ALL	44	85	49
SHROOM4 MUTATED	1	1	1
SHROOM4 WILD-TYPE	43	84	48

'SHROOM4 MUTATION STATUS' versus 'MRNASEQ_CNMF'

P value = 0.47 (Fisher's exact test), Q value = 0.76

Table S68. Gene #8: 'SHROOM4 MUTATION STATUS' versus Molecular Subtype #5: 'MRNASEQ_CNMF'

nPatients	CLUS_1	CLUS_2	CLUS_3	CLUS_4
ALL	39	69	49	21
SHROOM4 MUTATED	1	1	0	1
SHROOM4 WILD-TYPE	38	68	49	20

'SHROOM4 MUTATION STATUS' versus 'MRNASEQ_CHIERARCHICAL'

P value = 0.538 (Fisher's exact test), Q value = 0.8

Table S69. Gene #8: 'SHROOM4 MUTATION STATUS' versus Molecular Subtype #6: 'MRNASEQ_CHIERARCHICAL'

nPatients	CLUS_1	CLUS_2	CLUS_3	CLUS_4
ALL	38	71	48	21
SHROOM4 MUTATED	0	1	1	1
SHROOM4 WILD-TYPE	38	70	47	20

'SHROOM4 MUTATION STATUS' versus 'MIRSEQ_CNMF'

P value = 1 (Fisher's exact test), Q value = 1

Table S70. Gene #8: 'SHROOM4 MUTATION STATUS' versus Molecular Subtype #7: 'MIRSEQ_CNMF'

nPatients	CLUS_1	CLUS_2	CLUS_3
ALL	74	65	39
SHROOM4 MUTATED	1	1	1
SHROOM4 WILD-TYPE	73	64	38

'SHROOM4 MUTATION STATUS' versus 'MIRSEQ_CHIERARCHICAL'

P value = 0.678 (Fisher's exact test), Q value = 0.91

Table S71. Gene #8: 'SHROOM4 MUTATION STATUS' versus Molecular Subtype #8: 'MIRSEQ_CHIERARCHICAL'

nPatients	CLUS_1	CLUS_2	CLUS_3	CLUS_4
ALL	76	59	18	25
SHROOM4 MUTATED	1	1	0	1
SHROOM4 WILD-TYPE	75	58	18	24

'SHROOM4 MUTATION STATUS' versus 'MIRSEQ_MATURE_CNMF'

P value = 0.723 (Fisher's exact test), Q value = 0.96

Table S72. Gene #8: 'SHROOM4 MUTATION STATUS' versus Molecular Subtype #9: 'MIRSEQ_MATURE_CNMF'

nPatients	CLUS_1	CLUS_2	CLUS_3	CLUS_4	CLUS_5
ALL	36	64	12	41	24
SHROOM4 MUTATED	0	1	0	1	1
SHROOM4 WILD-TYPE	36	63	12	40	23

'SHROOM4 MUTATION STATUS' versus 'MIRSEQ_MATURE_CHIERARCHICAL'

P value = 0.636 (Fisher's exact test), Q value = 0.87

Table S73. Gene #8: 'SHROOM4 MUTATION STATUS' versus Molecular Subtype #10: 'MIRSEQ_MATURE_CHIERARCHICAL'

nPatients	CLUS_1	CLUS_2	CLUS_3	CLUS_4
ALL	80	60	18	19
SHROOM4 MUTATED	1	1	0	1
SHROOM4 WILD-TYPE	79	59	18	18

'FAM83D MUTATION STATUS' versus 'CN_CNMF'

P value = 0.348 (Fisher's exact test), Q value = 0.63

Table S74. Gene #9: 'FAM83D MUTATION STATUS' versus Molecular Subtype #1: 'CN_CNMF'

nPatients	CLUS_1	CLUS_2	CLUS_3
ALL	60	63	38
FAM83D MUTATED	2	0	1
FAM83D WILD-TYPE	58	63	37

'FAM83D MUTATION STATUS' versus 'METHLYATION_CNMF'

P value = 0.334 (Fisher's exact test), Q value = 0.63

Table S75. Gene #9: 'FAM83D MUTATION STATUS' versus Molecular Subtype #2: 'METHLYATION_CNMF'

nPatients	CLUS_1	CLUS_2	CLUS_3
ALL	44	85	49
FAM83D MUTATED	0	3	0
FAM83D WILD-TYPE	44	82	49

'FAM83D MUTATION STATUS' versus 'MRNASEQ_CNMF'

P value = 0.409 (Fisher's exact test), Q value = 0.71

Table S76. Gene #9: 'FAM83D MUTATION STATUS' versus Molecular Subtype #5: 'MRNASEQ_CNMF'

nPatients	CLUS_1	CLUS_2	CLUS_3	CLUS_4
ALL	39	69	49	21
FAM83D MUTATED	0	3	0	0
FAM83D WILD-TYPE	39	66	49	21

'FAM83D MUTATION STATUS' versus 'MRNASEQ_CHIERARCHICAL'

P value = 0.462 (Fisher's exact test), Q value = 0.76

Table S77. Gene #9: 'FAM83D MUTATION STATUS' versus Molecular Subtype #6: 'MRNASEQ_CHIERARCHICAL'

nPatients	CLUS_1	CLUS_2	CLUS_3	CLUS_4
ALL	38	71	48	21
FAM83D MUTATED	0	3	0	0
FAM83D WILD-TYPE	38	68	48	21

'FAM83D MUTATION STATUS' versus 'MIRSEQ_CNMF'

P value = 0.0579 (Fisher's exact test), Q value = 0.15

Table S78. Gene #9: 'FAM83D MUTATION STATUS' versus Molecular Subtype #7: 'MIRSEQ_CNMF'

nPatients	CLUS_1	CLUS_2	CLUS_3
ALL	74	65	39
FAM83D MUTATED	0	3	0
FAM83D WILD-TYPE	74	62	39

'FAM83D MUTATION STATUS' versus 'MIRSEQ_CHIERARCHICAL'

P value = 0.818 (Fisher's exact test), Q value = 1

Table S79. Gene #9: 'FAM83D MUTATION STATUS' versus Molecular Subtype #8: 'MIRSEQ_CHIERARCHICAL'

nPatients	CLUS_1	CLUS_2	CLUS_3	CLUS_4
ALL	76	59	18	25
FAM83D MUTATED	1	2	0	0
FAM83D WILD-TYPE	75	57	18	25

'FAM83D MUTATION STATUS' versus 'MIRSEQ_MATURE_CNMF'

P value = 0.227 (Fisher's exact test), Q value = 0.49

Table S80. Gene #9: 'FAM83D MUTATION STATUS' versus Molecular Subtype #9: 'MIRSEQ_MATURE_CNMF'

nPatients	CLUS_1	CLUS_2	CLUS_3	CLUS_4	CLUS_5
ALL	36	64	12	41	24
FAM83D MUTATED	0	2	1	0	0
FAM83D WILD-TYPE	36	62	11	41	24

'FAM83D MUTATION STATUS' versus 'MIRSEQ_MATURE_CHIERARCHICAL'

P value = 0.437 (Fisher's exact test), Q value = 0.73

Table S81. Gene #9: 'FAM83D MUTATION STATUS' versus Molecular Subtype #10: 'MIRSEQ_MATURE_CHIERARCHICAL'

nPatients	CLUS_1	CLUS_2	CLUS_3	CLUS_4
ALL	80	60	18	19
FAM83D MUTATED	3	0	0	0
FAM83D WILD-TYPE	77	60	18	19

Methods & Data

Input

Mutation data file = sample_sig_gene_table.txt from Mutsig_2CV pipeline
Processed Mutation data file = /xchip/cga/gdac-prod/tcga-gdac/jobResults/GDAC_Correlate_Genomic_Events_Preprocess/PCPG-TP/15165019/transformed.cor.cli.txt
Molecular subtypes file = /xchip/cga/gdac-prod/tcga-gdac/jobResults/GDAC_mergedClustering/PCPG-TP/15107813/PCPG-TP.transferedmergedcluster.txt
Number of patients = 178
Number of significantly mutated genes = 9
Number of Molecular subtypes = 10
Exclude genes that fewer than K tumors have mutations, K = 3

Fisher's exact test

For binary or multi-class clinical features (nominal or ordinal), two-tailed Fisher's exact tests (Fisher 1922) were used to estimate the P values using the 'fisher.test' function in R

Q value calculation

For multiple hypothesis correction, Q value is the False Discovery Rate (FDR) analogue of the P value (Benjamini and Hochberg 1995), defined as the minimum FDR at which the test may be called significant. We used the 'Benjamini and Hochberg' method of 'p.adjust' function in R to convert P values into Q values.

Download Results

In addition to the links below, the full results of the analysis summarized in this report can also be downloaded programmatically using firehose_get, or interactively from either the Broad GDAC website or TCGA Data Coordination Center Portal.

References

[1] Fisher, R.A., On the interpretation of chi-square from contingency tables, and the calculation of P, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society 85(1):87-94 (1922)

[2] Benjamini and Hochberg, Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B 59:289-300 (1995)

Made with Nozzle