Correlation between miRseq expression and clinical features
Sarcoma (Primary solid tumor)
02 April 2015  |  analyses__2015_04_02
Maintainer Information
Citation Information
Maintained by Juok Cho (Broad Institute)
Cite as Broad Institute TCGA Genome Data Analysis Center (2015): Correlation between miRseq expression and clinical features. Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard. doi:10.7908/C1639NVF
Overview
Introduction

This pipeline uses various statistical tests to identify miRs whose log2 expression levels correlated to selected clinical features.

Summary

Testing the association between 508 miRs and 5 clinical features across 248 samples, statistically thresholded by P value < 0.05 and Q value < 0.3, 3 clinical features related to at least one miRs.

  • 30 miRs correlated to 'DAYS_TO_DEATH_OR_LAST_FUP'.

    • HSA-MIR-3677 ,  HSA-MIR-520B ,  HSA-MIR-3680 ,  HSA-MIR-512-1 ,  HSA-MIR-92A-2 ,  ...

  • 30 miRs correlated to 'YEARS_TO_BIRTH'.

    • HSA-MIR-1245 ,  HSA-MIR-511-1 ,  HSA-MIR-21 ,  HSA-MIR-22 ,  HSA-MIR-155 ,  ...

  • 27 miRs correlated to 'GENDER'.

    • HSA-MIR-22 ,  HSA-MIR-887 ,  HSA-MIR-488 ,  HSA-MIR-106A ,  HSA-MIR-187 ,  ...

  • No miRs correlated to 'RACE', and 'ETHNICITY'.

Results
Overview of the results

Complete statistical result table is provided in Supplement Table 1

Table 1.  Get Full Table This table shows the clinical features, statistical methods used, and the number of miRs that are significantly associated with each clinical feature at P value < 0.05 and Q value < 0.3.

Clinical feature Statistical test Significant miRs Associated with                 Associated with
DAYS_TO_DEATH_OR_LAST_FUP Cox regression test N=30 shorter survival N=30 longer survival N=0
YEARS_TO_BIRTH Spearman correlation test N=30 older N=28 younger N=2
GENDER Wilcoxon test N=27 male N=27 female N=0
RACE Kruskal-Wallis test   N=0        
ETHNICITY Wilcoxon test   N=0        
Clinical variable #1: 'DAYS_TO_DEATH_OR_LAST_FUP'

30 miRs related to 'DAYS_TO_DEATH_OR_LAST_FUP'.

Table S1.  Basic characteristics of clinical feature: 'DAYS_TO_DEATH_OR_LAST_FUP'

DAYS_TO_DEATH_OR_LAST_FUP Duration (Months) 0.1-188.2 (median=23.1)
  censored N = 164
  death N = 83
     
  Significant markers N = 30
  associated with shorter survival 30
  associated with longer survival 0
List of top 10 miRs differentially expressed by 'DAYS_TO_DEATH_OR_LAST_FUP'

Table S2.  Get Full Table List of top 10 miRs significantly associated with 'Time to Death' by Cox regression test

HazardRatio Wald_P Q C_index
HSA-MIR-3677 1.49 1.87e-05 0.0065 0.649
HSA-MIR-520B 1.34 2.566e-05 0.0065 0.689
HSA-MIR-3680 1.72 4.619e-05 0.0073 0.678
HSA-MIR-512-1 1.36 5.741e-05 0.0073 0.65
HSA-MIR-92A-2 1.49 0.0001314 0.012 0.641
HSA-MIR-301B 1.28 0.0001461 0.012 0.627
HSA-MIR-17 1.47 0.0001964 0.013 0.625
HSA-MIR-3605 1.4 0.0002089 0.013 0.653
HSA-MIR-361 1.64 0.0002966 0.014 0.621
HSA-MIR-301A 1.37 0.0003013 0.014 0.635
Clinical variable #2: 'YEARS_TO_BIRTH'

30 miRs related to 'YEARS_TO_BIRTH'.

Table S3.  Basic characteristics of clinical feature: 'YEARS_TO_BIRTH'

YEARS_TO_BIRTH Mean (SD) 61.33 (14)
  Significant markers N = 30
  pos. correlated 28
  neg. correlated 2
List of top 10 miRs differentially expressed by 'YEARS_TO_BIRTH'

Table S4.  Get Full Table List of top 10 miRs significantly correlated to 'YEARS_TO_BIRTH' by Spearman correlation test

SpearmanCorr corrP Q
HSA-MIR-1245 0.3272 2.712e-07 0.000138
HSA-MIR-511-1 0.2858 6.842e-06 0.00154
HSA-MIR-21 0.2782 9.067e-06 0.00154
HSA-MIR-22 0.2665 2.194e-05 0.00279
HSA-MIR-155 0.2612 3.241e-05 0.00329
HSA-MIR-589 0.254 5.376e-05 0.00455
HSA-MIR-511-2 0.248 0.0001032 0.00749
HSA-MIR-339 0.2323 0.00023 0.0146
HSA-MIR-424 0.2281 0.0003011 0.017
HSA-MIR-616 0.221 0.0005212 0.0265
Clinical variable #3: 'GENDER'

27 miRs related to 'GENDER'.

Table S5.  Basic characteristics of clinical feature: 'GENDER'

GENDER Labels N
  FEMALE 133
  MALE 115
     
  Significant markers N = 27
  Higher in MALE 27
  Higher in FEMALE 0
List of top 10 miRs differentially expressed by 'GENDER'

Table S6.  Get Full Table List of top 10 miRs differentially expressed by 'GENDER'. 0 significant gene(s) located in sex chromosomes is(are) filtered out.

W(pos if higher in 'MALE') wilcoxontestP Q AUC
HSA-MIR-22 9911 5.895e-05 0.0299 0.648
HSA-MIR-887 5509 0.0001476 0.0375 0.6398
HSA-MIR-488 1080 0.0006126 0.0989 0.6851
HSA-MIR-106A 5782 0.0009313 0.0989 0.622
HSA-MIR-187 2706 0.001008 0.0989 0.6454
HSA-MIR-301A 5824 0.001212 0.0989 0.6192
HSA-MIR-374A 9428 0.00158 0.0989 0.6164
HSA-MIR-26A-2 9417 0.001689 0.0989 0.6157
HSA-MIR-454 5884 0.001751 0.0989 0.6153
HSA-MIR-205 1752 0.002133 0.108 0.65
Clinical variable #4: 'RACE'

No miR related to 'RACE'.

Table S7.  Basic characteristics of clinical feature: 'RACE'

RACE Labels N
  ASIAN 6
  BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN 18
  WHITE 197
     
  Significant markers N = 0
Clinical variable #5: 'ETHNICITY'

No miR related to 'ETHNICITY'.

Table S8.  Basic characteristics of clinical feature: 'ETHNICITY'

ETHNICITY Labels N
  HISPANIC OR LATINO 5
  NOT HISPANIC OR LATINO 193
     
  Significant markers N = 0
Methods & Data
Input
  • Expresson data file = SARC-TP.miRseq_RPKM_log2.txt

  • Clinical data file = SARC-TP.merged_data.txt

  • Number of patients = 248

  • Number of miRs = 508

  • Number of clinical features = 5

Selected clinical features
  • For clinical features selected for this analysis and their value conozzle.versions, please find a documentation on selected CDEs .

  • Survival time data

    • Survival time data is a combined value of days_to_death and days_to_last_followup. For each patient, it creates a combined value 'days_to_death_or_last_fup' using conversion process below.

      • if 'vital_status'==1(dead), 'days_to_last_followup' is always NA. Thus, uses 'days_to_death' value for 'days_to_death_or_fup'

      • if 'vital_status'==0(alive),

        • if 'days_to_death'==NA & 'days_to_last_followup'!=NA, uses 'days_to_last_followup' value for 'days_to_death_or_fup'

        • if 'days_to_death'!=NA, excludes this case in survival analysis and report the case.

      • if 'vital_status'==NA,excludes this case in survival analysis and report the case.

    • cf. In certain diesase types such as SKCM, days_to_death parameter is replaced with time_from_specimen_dx or time_from_specimen_procurement_to_death .

  • This analysis excluded clinical variables that has only NA values.

Survival analysis

For survival clinical features, Wald's test in univariate Cox regression analysis with proportional hazards model (Andersen and Gill 1982) was used to estimate the P values using the 'coxph' function in R. Kaplan-Meier survival curves were plot using the four quartile subgroups of patients based on expression levels

Correlation analysis

For continuous numerical clinical features, Spearman's rank correlation coefficients (Spearman 1904) and two-tailed P values were estimated using 'cor.test' function in R

Wilcoxon rank sum test (Mann-Whitney U test)

For two groups (mutant or wild-type) of continuous type of clinical data, wilcoxon rank sum test (Mann and Whitney, 1947) was applied to compare their mean difference using 'wilcox.test(continuous.clinical ~ as.factor(group), exact=FALSE)' function in R. This test is equivalent to the Mann-Whitney test.

Q value calculation

For multiple hypothesis correction, Q value is the False Discovery Rate (FDR) analogue of the P value (Benjamini and Hochberg 1995), defined as the minimum FDR at which the test may be called significant. We used the 'Benjamini and Hochberg' method of 'p.adjust' function in R to convert P values into Q values.

Download Results

In addition to the links below, the full results of the analysis summarized in this report can also be downloaded programmatically using firehose_get, or interactively from either the Broad GDAC website or TCGA Data Coordination Center Portal.

References
[1] Andersen and Gill, Cox's regression model for counting processes, a large sample study, Annals of Statistics 10(4):1100-1120 (1982)
[2] Spearman, C, The proof and measurement of association between two things, Amer. J. Psychol 15:72-101 (1904)
[3] Mann and Whitney, On a Test of Whether one of Two Random Variables is Stochastically Larger than the Other, Annals of Mathematical Statistics 18 (1), 50-60 (1947)
[4] Benjamini and Hochberg, Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B 59:289-300 (1995)