Correlation between copy number variations of arm-level result and selected clinical features
Uveal Melanoma (Primary solid tumor)
21 August 2015  |  analyses__2015_08_21
Maintainer Information
Citation Information
Maintained by TCGA GDAC Team (Broad Institute/MD Anderson Cancer Center/Harvard Medical School)
Cite as Broad Institute TCGA Genome Data Analysis Center (2015): Correlation between copy number variations of arm-level result and selected clinical features. Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard. doi:10.7908/C1JM28ZV
Overview
Introduction

This pipeline computes the correlation between significant arm-level copy number variations (cnvs) and selected clinical features.

Summary

Testing the association between copy number variation 51 arm-level events and 7 clinical features across 80 patients, 4 significant findings detected with Q value < 0.25.

  • 3p loss cnv correlated to 'Time to Death'.

  • 3q loss cnv correlated to 'Time to Death'.

  • 9p loss cnv correlated to 'YEARS_TO_BIRTH'.

  • 11p loss cnv correlated to 'Time to Death'.

Results
Overview of the results

Table 1.  Get Full Table Overview of the association between significant copy number variation of 51 arm-level events and 7 clinical features. Shown in the table are P values (Q values). Thresholded by Q value < 0.25, 4 significant findings detected.

Clinical
Features
Time
to
Death
YEARS
TO
BIRTH
PATHOLOGIC
STAGE
PATHOLOGY
T
STAGE
PATHOLOGY
M
STAGE
GENDER RADIATION
THERAPY
nCNV (%) nWild-Type logrank test Wilcoxon-test Fisher's exact test Fisher's exact test Fisher's exact test Fisher's exact test Fisher's exact test
3p loss 43 (54%) 37 0.000766
(0.137)
0.322
(1.00)
0.0583
(1.00)
0.266
(1.00)
0.117
(1.00)
1
(1.00)
1
(1.00)
3q loss 43 (54%) 37 0.000766
(0.137)
0.322
(1.00)
0.0586
(1.00)
0.269
(1.00)
0.117
(1.00)
1
(1.00)
1
(1.00)
9p loss 8 (10%) 72 0.0159
(0.517)
0.0019
(0.205)
0.605
(1.00)
0.889
(1.00)
1
(1.00)
0.724
(1.00)
0.277
(1.00)
11p loss 3 (4%) 77 0.0023
(0.205)
0.305
(1.00)
1
(1.00)
0.139
(1.00)
1
(1.00)
0.578
(1.00)
1
(1.00)
1q gain 8 (10%) 72 0.222
(1.00)
0.34
(1.00)
0.366
(1.00)
0.492
(1.00)
0.477
(1.00)
0.288
(1.00)
1
(1.00)
2p gain 10 (12%) 70 0.359
(1.00)
0.344
(1.00)
0.36
(1.00)
0.667
(1.00)
1
(1.00)
0.32
(1.00)
0.337
(1.00)
2q gain 8 (10%) 72 0.818
(1.00)
0.11
(1.00)
0.62
(1.00)
0.554
(1.00)
1
(1.00)
0.288
(1.00)
1
(1.00)
4p gain 7 (9%) 73 0.523
(1.00)
0.17
(1.00)
0.0325
(0.848)
0.291
(1.00)
0.379
(1.00)
1
(1.00)
0.246
(1.00)
4q gain 4 (5%) 76 0.932
(1.00)
0.0849
(1.00)
0.00506
(0.361)
0.0976
(1.00)
0.267
(1.00)
0.314
(1.00)
1
(1.00)
5p gain 3 (4%) 77 0.828
(1.00)
0.447
(1.00)
0.887
(1.00)
1
(1.00)
1
(1.00)
0.578
(1.00)
1
(1.00)
5q gain 3 (4%) 77 0.828
(1.00)
0.447
(1.00)
0.889
(1.00)
1
(1.00)
1
(1.00)
0.578
(1.00)
1
(1.00)
6p gain 39 (49%) 41 0.204
(1.00)
0.256
(1.00)
0.892
(1.00)
0.873
(1.00)
0.624
(1.00)
0.822
(1.00)
0.615
(1.00)
6q gain 16 (20%) 64 0.0445
(0.993)
0.279
(1.00)
0.474
(1.00)
0.301
(1.00)
1
(1.00)
0.587
(1.00)
0.498
(1.00)
7p gain 9 (11%) 71 0.125
(1.00)
0.415
(1.00)
0.519
(1.00)
0.427
(1.00)
0.325
(1.00)
1
(1.00)
1
(1.00)
7q gain 8 (10%) 72 0.0506
(1.00)
0.217
(1.00)
0.392
(1.00)
0.49
(1.00)
0.267
(1.00)
0.724
(1.00)
1
(1.00)
8p gain 33 (41%) 47 0.0333
(0.848)
0.725
(1.00)
0.428
(1.00)
0.571
(1.00)
0.307
(1.00)
1
(1.00)
0.0627
(1.00)
8q gain 53 (66%) 27 0.0114
(0.517)
0.768
(1.00)
0.911
(1.00)
0.779
(1.00)
1
(1.00)
1
(1.00)
0.547
(1.00)
9p gain 6 (8%) 74 0.723
(1.00)
0.136
(1.00)
0.763
(1.00)
0.221
(1.00)
1
(1.00)
0.0811
(1.00)
1
(1.00)
9q gain 5 (6%) 75 0.313
(1.00)
0.249
(1.00)
0.575
(1.00)
0.322
(1.00)
1
(1.00)
0.162
(1.00)
1
(1.00)
11p gain 9 (11%) 71 0.505
(1.00)
0.26
(1.00)
0.779
(1.00)
0.723
(1.00)
1
(1.00)
0.494
(1.00)
1
(1.00)
11q gain 10 (12%) 70 0.426
(1.00)
0.436
(1.00)
0.776
(1.00)
0.741
(1.00)
1
(1.00)
0.741
(1.00)
1
(1.00)
12p gain 3 (4%) 77 0.828
(1.00)
0.56
(1.00)
1
(1.00)
0.782
(1.00)
1
(1.00)
0.578
(1.00)
1
(1.00)
12q gain 3 (4%) 77 0.828
(1.00)
0.56
(1.00)
1
(1.00)
0.778
(1.00)
1
(1.00)
0.578
(1.00)
1
(1.00)
13q gain 6 (8%) 74 0.994
(1.00)
0.165
(1.00)
0.79
(1.00)
1
(1.00)
1
(1.00)
1
(1.00)
0.213
(1.00)
14q gain 3 (4%) 77 0.465
(1.00)
0.603
(1.00)
0.89
(1.00)
1
(1.00)
1
(1.00)
0.252
(1.00)
1
(1.00)
16p gain 4 (5%) 76 0.543
(1.00)
0.707
(1.00)
0.795
(1.00)
1
(1.00)
1
(1.00)
1
(1.00)
1
(1.00)
17p gain 8 (10%) 72 0.752
(1.00)
0.365
(1.00)
0.969
(1.00)
0.889
(1.00)
1
(1.00)
0.724
(1.00)
1
(1.00)
17q gain 9 (11%) 71 0.874
(1.00)
0.772
(1.00)
0.87
(1.00)
0.643
(1.00)
1
(1.00)
0.494
(1.00)
1
(1.00)
20p gain 8 (10%) 72 0.581
(1.00)
0.332
(1.00)
0.698
(1.00)
0.491
(1.00)
1
(1.00)
1
(1.00)
1
(1.00)
20q gain 9 (11%) 71 0.177
(1.00)
0.19
(1.00)
0.6
(1.00)
0.381
(1.00)
1
(1.00)
1
(1.00)
1
(1.00)
21q gain 14 (18%) 66 0.061
(1.00)
0.115
(1.00)
0.78
(1.00)
0.634
(1.00)
0.477
(1.00)
0.375
(1.00)
1
(1.00)
22q gain 6 (8%) 74 0.535
(1.00)
0.168
(1.00)
0.882
(1.00)
0.401
(1.00)
1
(1.00)
0.0811
(1.00)
1
(1.00)
xp gain 10 (12%) 70 0.326
(1.00)
0.158
(1.00)
0.963
(1.00)
0.668
(1.00)
1
(1.00)
0.0949
(1.00)
1
(1.00)
xq gain 9 (11%) 71 0.401
(1.00)
0.209
(1.00)
0.977
(1.00)
0.809
(1.00)
1
(1.00)
0.169
(1.00)
1
(1.00)
1p loss 19 (24%) 61 0.189
(1.00)
0.0503
(1.00)
0.915
(1.00)
0.83
(1.00)
1
(1.00)
0.433
(1.00)
0.567
(1.00)
1q loss 3 (4%) 77 0.338
(1.00)
0.494
(1.00)
1
(1.00)
0.136
(1.00)
1
(1.00)
0.578
(1.00)
1
(1.00)
4q loss 3 (4%) 77 0.531
(1.00)
0.939
(1.00)
0.6
(1.00)
0.295
(1.00)
1
(1.00)
1
(1.00)
0.111
(1.00)
5q loss 3 (4%) 77 0.487
(1.00)
0.462
(1.00)
0.457
(1.00)
0.576
(1.00)
1
(1.00)
0.0797
(1.00)
1
(1.00)
6q loss 17 (21%) 63 0.108
(1.00)
0.167
(1.00)
0.0679
(1.00)
0.0367
(0.874)
0.298
(1.00)
0.583
(1.00)
0.522
(1.00)
8p loss 9 (11%) 71 0.82
(1.00)
0.61
(1.00)
0.169
(1.00)
0.199
(1.00)
0.379
(1.00)
1
(1.00)
1
(1.00)
8q loss 3 (4%) 77 0.472
(1.00)
0.751
(1.00)
0.302
(1.00)
1
(1.00)
0.141
(1.00)
1
(1.00)
1
(1.00)
9q loss 7 (9%) 73 0.0145
(0.517)
0.00729
(0.434)
0.376
(1.00)
0.445
(1.00)
1
(1.00)
1
(1.00)
0.246
(1.00)
12p loss 3 (4%) 77 0.492
(1.00)
0.761
(1.00)
0.338
(1.00)
0.138
(1.00)
1
(1.00)
0.578
(1.00)
1
(1.00)
13q loss 3 (4%) 77 0.421
(1.00)
0.761
(1.00)
1
(1.00)
0.138
(1.00)
1
(1.00)
0.0797
(1.00)
1
(1.00)
15q loss 4 (5%) 76 0.472
(1.00)
0.208
(1.00)
0.796
(1.00)
0.396
(1.00)
1
(1.00)
1
(1.00)
1
(1.00)
16p loss 3 (4%) 77 0.246
(1.00)
0.254
(1.00)
0.0884
(1.00)
0.214
(1.00)
0.206
(1.00)
0.578
(1.00)
1
(1.00)
16q loss 16 (20%) 64 0.0134
(0.517)
0.125
(1.00)
0.168
(1.00)
0.376
(1.00)
0.204
(1.00)
0.779
(1.00)
0.0907
(1.00)
19p loss 3 (4%) 77 0.561
(1.00)
0.879
(1.00)
0.416
(1.00)
0.394
(1.00)
1
(1.00)
1
(1.00)
0.111
(1.00)
19q loss 3 (4%) 77 0.561
(1.00)
0.879
(1.00)
0.416
(1.00)
0.388
(1.00)
1
(1.00)
1
(1.00)
0.111
(1.00)
xp loss 12 (15%) 68 0.456
(1.00)
0.0119
(0.517)
0.172
(1.00)
0.225
(1.00)
0.522
(1.00)
0.349
(1.00)
0.394
(1.00)
xq loss 13 (16%) 67 0.647
(1.00)
0.0248
(0.738)
0.398
(1.00)
0.202
(1.00)
0.563
(1.00)
0.223
(1.00)
0.421
(1.00)
'3p loss' versus 'Time to Death'

P value = 0.000766 (logrank test), Q value = 0.14

Table S1.  Gene #33: '3p loss' versus Clinical Feature #1: 'Time to Death'

nPatients nDeath Duration Range (Median), Month
ALL 80 14 0.1 - 85.5 (19.1)
3P LOSS MUTATED 43 13 0.1 - 52.6 (15.4)
3P LOSS WILD-TYPE 37 1 0.1 - 85.5 (20.2)

Figure S1.  Get High-res Image Gene #33: '3p loss' versus Clinical Feature #1: 'Time to Death'

'3q loss' versus 'Time to Death'

P value = 0.000766 (logrank test), Q value = 0.14

Table S2.  Gene #34: '3q loss' versus Clinical Feature #1: 'Time to Death'

nPatients nDeath Duration Range (Median), Month
ALL 80 14 0.1 - 85.5 (19.1)
3Q LOSS MUTATED 43 13 0.1 - 52.6 (15.4)
3Q LOSS WILD-TYPE 37 1 0.1 - 85.5 (20.2)

Figure S2.  Get High-res Image Gene #34: '3q loss' versus Clinical Feature #1: 'Time to Death'

'9p loss' versus 'YEARS_TO_BIRTH'

P value = 0.0019 (Wilcoxon-test), Q value = 0.21

Table S3.  Gene #40: '9p loss' versus Clinical Feature #2: 'YEARS_TO_BIRTH'

nPatients Mean (Std.Dev)
ALL 80 61.6 (13.9)
9P LOSS MUTATED 8 75.4 (9.6)
9P LOSS WILD-TYPE 72 60.1 (13.6)

Figure S3.  Get High-res Image Gene #40: '9p loss' versus Clinical Feature #2: 'YEARS_TO_BIRTH'

'11p loss' versus 'Time to Death'

P value = 0.0023 (logrank test), Q value = 0.21

Table S4.  Gene #42: '11p loss' versus Clinical Feature #1: 'Time to Death'

nPatients nDeath Duration Range (Median), Month
ALL 80 14 0.1 - 85.5 (19.1)
11P LOSS MUTATED 3 3 7.9 - 45.9 (13.1)
11P LOSS WILD-TYPE 77 11 0.1 - 85.5 (19.5)

Figure S4.  Get High-res Image Gene #42: '11p loss' versus Clinical Feature #1: 'Time to Death'

Methods & Data
Input
  • Copy number data file = broad_values_by_arm.txt from GISTIC pipeline

  • Processed Copy number data file = /xchip/cga/gdac-prod/tcga-gdac/jobResults/GDAC_Correlate_Genomic_Events_Preprocess/UVM-TP/19783310/transformed.cor.cli.txt

  • Clinical data file = /xchip/cga/gdac-prod/tcga-gdac/jobResults/Append_Data/UVM-TP/19775655/UVM-TP.merged_data.txt

  • Number of patients = 80

  • Number of significantly arm-level cnvs = 51

  • Number of selected clinical features = 7

  • Exclude regions that fewer than K tumors have mutations, K = 3

Survival analysis

For survival clinical features, the Kaplan-Meier survival curves of tumors with and without gene mutations were plotted and the statistical significance P values were estimated by logrank test (Bland and Altman 2004) using the 'survdiff' function in R

Fisher's exact test

For binary or multi-class clinical features (nominal or ordinal), two-tailed Fisher's exact tests (Fisher 1922) were used to estimate the P values using the 'fisher.test' function in R

Q value calculation

For multiple hypothesis correction, Q value is the False Discovery Rate (FDR) analogue of the P value (Benjamini and Hochberg 1995), defined as the minimum FDR at which the test may be called significant. We used the 'Benjamini and Hochberg' method of 'p.adjust' function in R to convert P values into Q values.

Download Results

In addition to the links below, the full results of the analysis summarized in this report can also be downloaded programmatically using firehose_get, or interactively from either the Broad GDAC website or TCGA Data Coordination Center Portal.

References
[1] Bland and Altman, Statistics notes: The logrank test, BMJ 328(7447):1073 (2004)
[2] Fisher, R.A., On the interpretation of chi-square from contingency tables, and the calculation of P, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society 85(1):87-94 (1922)
[3] Benjamini and Hochberg, Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B 59:289-300 (1995)