This is an overview of Acute Myeloid Leukemia analysis pipelines from Firehose run "28 January 2016".
Note: These results are offered to the community as an additional reference point, enabling a wide range of cancer biologists, clinical investigators, and genome and computational scientists to easily incorporate TCGA into the backdrop of ongoing research. While every effort is made to ensure that Firehose input data and algorithms are of the highest possible quality, these analyses have not been reviewed by domain experts.
-
Sequence and Copy Number Analyses
-
Analysis of mutagenesis by APOBEC cytidine deaminases (P-MACD).
View Report | There are 193 tumor samples in this analysis. The Benjamini-Hochberg-corrected p-value for enrichment of the APOBEC mutation signature in 0 samples is <=0.05. Out of these, 0 have enrichment values >2, which implies that in such samples at least 50% of APOBEC signature mutations have been in fact made by APOBEC enzyme(s). -
CHASM 1.0.5 (Cancer-Specific High-throughput Annotation of Somatic Mutations)
View Report | There are 1334 mutations identified by MuTect and 303 mutations with significant functional impact at BHFDR <= 0.25. -
Mutation Analysis (MutSig 2CV v3.1)
View Report | -
Mutation Analysis (MutSigCV v0.9)
View Report | -
Mutation Assessor
View Report | -
SNP6 Copy number analysis (GISTIC2)
View Report | There were 191 tumor samples used in this analysis: 14 significant arm-level results, 4 significant focal amplifications, and 12 significant focal deletions were found. -
Correlations to Clinical Parameters
-
Correlation between aggregated molecular cancer subtypes and selected clinical features
View Report | Testing the association between subtypes identified by 6 different clustering approaches and 5 clinical features across 200 patients, 7 significant findings detected with P value < 0.05 and Q value < 0.25. -
Correlation between copy number variation genes (focal events) and selected clinical features
View Report | Testing the association between copy number variation 16 focal events and 5 clinical features across 191 patients, 10 significant findings detected with Q value < 0.25. -
Correlation between copy number variations of arm-level result and selected clinical features
View Report | Testing the association between copy number variation 32 arm-level events and 5 clinical features across 191 patients, 8 significant findings detected with Q value < 0.25. -
Correlation between gene methylation status and clinical features
View Report | Testing the association between 11414 genes and 4 clinical features across 194 samples, statistically thresholded by P value < 0.05 and Q value < 0.3, 4 clinical features related to at least one genes. -
Correlation between gene mutation status and selected clinical features
View Report | Testing the association between mutation status of 23 genes and 5 clinical features across 193 patients, 7 significant findings detected with Q value < 0.25. -
Correlation between miRseq expression and clinical features
View Report | Testing the association between 354 miRs and 4 clinical features across 188 samples, statistically thresholded by P value < 0.05 and Q value < 0.3, 4 clinical features related to at least one miRs. -
Correlation between mRNAseq expression and clinical features
View Report | Testing the association between 17276 genes and 4 clinical features across 173 samples, statistically thresholded by P value < 0.05 and Q value < 0.3, 3 clinical features related to at least one genes. -
Clustering Analyses
-
Clustering of copy number data by focal peak region with absolute value: consensus NMF
View Report | The most robust consensus NMF clustering of 191 samples using the 16 copy number focal regions was identified for k = 4 clusters. We computed the clustering for k = 2 to k = 8 and used the cophenetic correlation coefficient to determine the best solution. -
Clustering of copy number data by peak region with threshold value: consensus NMF
View Report | The most robust consensus NMF clustering of 191 samples using the 16 copy number focal regions was identified for k = 4 clusters. We computed the clustering for k = 2 to k = 8 and used the cophenetic correlation coefficient to determine the best solution. -
Clustering of Methylation: consensus NMF
View Report | The most robust consensus NMF clustering of 194 samples using the 2000 most variable genes was identified for k = 5 clusters. We computed the clustering for k = 2 to k = 10 and uused the cophenetic correlation coefficient and the average silhouette width calculation to determine the robust clusters. -
Clustering of miRseq precursor expression: consensus hierarchical
View Report | Median absolute deviation (MAD) was used to select 88 most variable miRs. Consensus ward linkage hierarchical clustering of 188 samples and 88 miRs identified 3 subtypes with the stability of the clustering increasing for k = 2 to k = 10. -
Clustering of miRseq precursor expression: consensus NMF
View Report | The most robust consensus NMF clustering of 188 samples using the 150 most variable miRs was identified for k = 5 clusters. We computed the clustering for k = 2 to k = 10 and uused the cophenetic correlation coefficient and the average silhouette width calculation to determine the robust clusters. -
Clustering of mRNAseq gene expression: consensus hierarchical
View Report | Median absolute deviation (MAD) was used to select 1500 most variable genes. Consensus ward linkage hierarchical clustering of 173 samples and 1500 genes identified 6 subtypes with the stability of the clustering increasing for k = 2 to k = 10. -
Clustering of mRNAseq gene expression: consensus NMF
View Report | The most robust consensus NMF clustering of 173 samples using the 1500 most variable genes was identified for k = 3 clusters. We computed the clustering for k = 2 to k = 10 and uused the cophenetic correlation coefficient and the average silhouette width calculation to determine the robust clusters. -
Other Analyses
-
Aggregate Analysis Features
View Report | 200 samples and 265 features are included in this feature table. The figures below show which genomic pair events are co-occurring and which are mutually-exclusive. -
Pathway Analyses
-
GSEA Class2: Canonical Pathways enriched in each subtypes of mRNAseq_cNMF in LAML-TB
View Report | basic data info -
PARADIGM pathway analysis of mRNASeq expression and copy number data
View Report | There were 59 significant pathways identified in this analysis. -
PARADIGM pathway analysis of mRNASeq expression data
View Report | There were 75 significant pathways identified in this analysis. -
Significant over-representation of pathway gene sets for a given gene list
View Report | For a given gene list, a hypergeometric test was tried to find significant overlapping canonical pathways using 1320 gene sets. In terms of FDR adjusted p.values, top 5 significant overlapping gene sets are listed as below. -
Other Correlation Analyses
-
Correlation between copy number variation genes (focal events) and molecular subtypes
View Report | Testing the association between copy number variation 16 focal events and 6 molecular subtypes across 191 patients, 47 significant findings detected with P value < 0.05 and Q value < 0.25. -
Correlation between copy number variations of arm-level result and molecular subtypes
View Report | Testing the association between copy number variation 32 arm-level events and 6 molecular subtypes across 191 patients, 58 significant findings detected with P value < 0.05 and Q value < 0.25. -
Correlation between gene mutation status and molecular subtypes
View Report | Testing the association between mutation status of 23 genes and 6 molecular subtypes across 193 patients, 36 significant findings detected with P value < 0.05 and Q value < 0.25. -
Correlation between mRNA expression and DNA methylation
View Report | The top 25 correlated methylation probes per gene are displayed. Total number of matched samples = 170. Number of gene expression samples = 173. Number of methylation samples = 194. -
Correlations between copy number and mRNAseq expression
View Report | The correlation coefficients in 10, 20, 30, 40, 50, 60, 70, 80, 90 percentiles are 454, 1226, 1772.5, 2110, 2412, 2740, 3105, 3553, 4256.5, respectively.
-
Summary Report Date = Thu Apr 7 17:25:07 2016
-
Protection = FALSE