Correlation between mRNA expression and clinical features
Brain Lower Grade Glioma (Primary solid tumor)
28 January 2016  |  analyses__2016_01_28
Maintainer Information
Citation Information
Maintained by TCGA GDAC Team (Broad Institute/MD Anderson Cancer Center/Harvard Medical School)
Cite as Broad Institute TCGA Genome Data Analysis Center (2016): Correlation between mRNA expression and clinical features. Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard. doi:10.7908/C11J996Q
Overview
Introduction

This pipeline uses various statistical tests to identify mRNAs whose log2 expression levels correlated to selected clinical features. The input file "LGG-TP.medianexp.txt" is generated in the pipeline mRNA_Preprocess_Median in the stddata run.

Summary

Testing the association between 17814 genes and 6 clinical features across 27 samples, statistically thresholded by P value < 0.05 and Q value < 0.3, 3 clinical features related to at least one genes.

  • 30 genes correlated to 'DAYS_TO_DEATH_OR_LAST_FUP'.

    • H2AFV ,  ZNF461 ,  ZFP41 ,  PCMTD1 ,  CCT6A ,  ...

  • 5 genes correlated to 'GENDER'.

    • JARID1D ,  CYORF15A ,  CYORF15B ,  FKBP11 ,  NINJ1

  • 30 genes correlated to 'HISTOLOGICAL_TYPE'.

    • PCDHA5 ,  DNAH2 ,  SPPL2A ,  GDAP2 ,  FDX1 ,  ...

  • No genes correlated to 'YEARS_TO_BIRTH', 'RADIATION_THERAPY', and 'KARNOFSKY_PERFORMANCE_SCORE'.

Results
Overview of the results

Complete statistical result table is provided in Supplement Table 1

Table 1.  Get Full Table This table shows the clinical features, statistical methods used, and the number of genes that are significantly associated with each clinical feature at P value < 0.05 and Q value < 0.3.

Clinical feature Statistical test Significant genes Associated with                 Associated with
DAYS_TO_DEATH_OR_LAST_FUP Cox regression test N=30   N=NA   N=NA
YEARS_TO_BIRTH Spearman correlation test   N=0        
GENDER Wilcoxon test N=5 male N=5 female N=0
RADIATION_THERAPY Wilcoxon test   N=0        
KARNOFSKY_PERFORMANCE_SCORE Spearman correlation test   N=0        
HISTOLOGICAL_TYPE Kruskal-Wallis test N=30        
Clinical variable #1: 'DAYS_TO_DEATH_OR_LAST_FUP'

30 genes related to 'DAYS_TO_DEATH_OR_LAST_FUP'.

Table S1.  Basic characteristics of clinical feature: 'DAYS_TO_DEATH_OR_LAST_FUP'

DAYS_TO_DEATH_OR_LAST_FUP Duration (Months) 0.3-134.3 (median=53.6)
  censored N = 14
  death N = 12
     
  Significant markers N = 30
  associated with shorter survival NA
  associated with longer survival NA
List of top 10 genes differentially expressed by 'DAYS_TO_DEATH_OR_LAST_FUP'

Table S2.  Get Full Table List of top 10 genes significantly associated with 'Time to Death' by Cox regression test. For the survival curves, it compared quantile intervals at c(0, 0.25, 0.50, 0.75, 1) and did not try survival analysis if there is only one interval.

logrank_P Q C_index
H2AFV 2.48e-07 0.0044 0.825
ZNF461 6.09e-07 0.0054 0.881
ZFP41 2.23e-06 0.0072 0.825
PCMTD1 2.26e-06 0.0072 0.448
CCT6A 3.12e-06 0.0072 0.776
HMGB1 3.38e-06 0.0072 0.888
U2AF2 3.61e-06 0.0072 0.818
ZNF545 3.64e-06 0.0072 0.853
RFC2 3.65e-06 0.0072 0.832
BRD7 4.71e-06 0.0077 0.867
Clinical variable #2: 'YEARS_TO_BIRTH'

No gene related to 'YEARS_TO_BIRTH'.

Table S3.  Basic characteristics of clinical feature: 'YEARS_TO_BIRTH'

YEARS_TO_BIRTH Mean (SD) 39.33 (9.1)
  Significant markers N = 0
Clinical variable #3: 'GENDER'

5 genes related to 'GENDER'.

Table S4.  Basic characteristics of clinical feature: 'GENDER'

GENDER Labels N
  FEMALE 9
  MALE 18
     
  Significant markers N = 5
  Higher in MALE 5
  Higher in FEMALE 0
List of 5 genes differentially expressed by 'GENDER'

Table S5.  Get Full Table List of 5 genes differentially expressed by 'GENDER'. 11 significant gene(s) located in sex chromosomes is(are) filtered out.

W(pos if higher in 'MALE') wilcoxontestP Q AUC
JARID1D 162 3.466e-05 0.0857 1
CYORF15A 161 4.332e-05 0.0857 0.9938
CYORF15B 159 6.715e-05 0.12 0.9815
FKBP11 7 0.0001566 0.199 0.9568
NINJ1 153 0.0002355 0.262 0.9444
Clinical variable #4: 'RADIATION_THERAPY'

No gene related to 'RADIATION_THERAPY'.

Table S6.  Basic characteristics of clinical feature: 'RADIATION_THERAPY'

RADIATION_THERAPY Labels N
  NO 5
  YES 21
     
  Significant markers N = 0
Clinical variable #5: 'KARNOFSKY_PERFORMANCE_SCORE'

No gene related to 'KARNOFSKY_PERFORMANCE_SCORE'.

Table S7.  Basic characteristics of clinical feature: 'KARNOFSKY_PERFORMANCE_SCORE'

KARNOFSKY_PERFORMANCE_SCORE Mean (SD) 87.65 (13)
  Score N
  50 1
  70 1
  80 4
  90 5
  100 6
     
  Significant markers N = 0
Clinical variable #6: 'HISTOLOGICAL_TYPE'

30 genes related to 'HISTOLOGICAL_TYPE'.

Table S8.  Basic characteristics of clinical feature: 'HISTOLOGICAL_TYPE'

HISTOLOGICAL_TYPE Labels N
  ASTROCYTOMA 10
  OLIGOASTROCYTOMA 9
  OLIGODENDROGLIOMA 8
     
  Significant markers N = 30
List of top 10 genes differentially expressed by 'HISTOLOGICAL_TYPE'

Table S9.  Get Full Table List of top 10 genes differentially expressed by 'HISTOLOGICAL_TYPE'

kruskal_wallis_P Q
PCDHA5 0.0001588 0.295
DNAH2 0.0001932 0.295
SPPL2A 0.0002051 0.295
GDAP2 0.0002726 0.295
FDX1 0.0003216 0.295
YBX1 0.0003617 0.295
CSH1 0.0003873 0.295
NSUN4 0.0004267 0.295
SH3BGRL3 0.0004527 0.295
HECTD3 0.0005127 0.295
Methods & Data
Input
  • Expresson data file = LGG-TP.medianexp.txt

  • Clinical data file = LGG-TP.merged_data.txt

  • Number of patients = 27

  • Number of genes = 17814

  • Number of clinical features = 6

Selected clinical features
  • Further details on clinical features selected for this analysis, please find a documentation on selected CDEs (Clinical Data Elements). The first column of the file is a formula to convert values and the second column is a clinical parameter name.

  • Survival time data

    • Survival time data is a combined value of days_to_death and days_to_last_followup. For each patient, it creates a combined value 'days_to_death_or_last_fup' using conversion process below.

      • if 'vital_status'==1(dead), 'days_to_last_followup' is always NA. Thus, uses 'days_to_death' value for 'days_to_death_or_fup'

      • if 'vital_status'==0(alive),

        • if 'days_to_death'==NA & 'days_to_last_followup'!=NA, uses 'days_to_last_followup' value for 'days_to_death_or_fup'

        • if 'days_to_death'!=NA, excludes this case in survival analysis and report the case.

      • if 'vital_status'==NA,excludes this case in survival analysis and report the case.

    • cf. In certain diesase types such as SKCM, days_to_death parameter is replaced with time_from_specimen_dx or time_from_specimen_procurement_to_death .

  • This analysis excluded clinical variables that has only NA values.

Survival analysis

For survival clinical features, logrank test in univariate Cox regression analysis with proportional hazards model (Andersen and Gill 1982) was used to estimate the P values comparing quantile intervals using the 'coxph' function in R. Kaplan-Meier survival curves were plotted using quantile intervals at c(0, 0.25, 0.50, 0.75, 1). If there is only one interval group, it will not try survival analysis.

Correlation analysis

For continuous numerical clinical features, Spearman's rank correlation coefficients (Spearman 1904) and two-tailed P values were estimated using 'cor.test' function in R

Wilcoxon rank sum test (Mann-Whitney U test)

For two groups (mutant or wild-type) of continuous type of clinical data, wilcoxon rank sum test (Mann and Whitney, 1947) was applied to compare their mean difference using 'wilcox.test(continuous.clinical ~ as.factor(group), exact=FALSE)' function in R. This test is equivalent to the Mann-Whitney test.

Q value calculation

For multiple hypothesis correction, Q value is the False Discovery Rate (FDR) analogue of the P value (Benjamini and Hochberg 1995), defined as the minimum FDR at which the test may be called significant. We used the 'Benjamini and Hochberg' method of 'p.adjust' function in R to convert P values into Q values.

Download Results

In addition to the links below, the full results of the analysis summarized in this report can also be downloaded programmatically using firehose_get, or interactively from either the Broad GDAC website or TCGA Data Coordination Center Portal.

References
[1] Andersen and Gill, Cox's regression model for counting processes, a large sample study, Annals of Statistics 10(4):1100-1120 (1982)
[2] Spearman, C, The proof and measurement of association between two things, Amer. J. Psychol 15:72-101 (1904)
[3] Mann and Whitney, On a Test of Whether one of Two Random Variables is Stochastically Larger than the Other, Annals of Mathematical Statistics 18 (1), 50-60 (1947)
[4] Benjamini and Hochberg, Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B 59:289-300 (1995)