Correlation between mutation rate and clinical features
Liver Hepatocellular Carcinoma (Primary solid tumor)
28 January 2016  |  analyses__2016_01_28
Maintainer Information
Citation Information
Maintained by Juok Cho (Broad Institute)
Cite as Broad Institute TCGA Genome Data Analysis Center (2016): Correlation between mutation rate and clinical features. Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard. doi:10.7908/C1BR8RMZ
Overview
Introduction

This pipeline uses various statistical tests to identify selected clinical features related to mutation rate.

Summary

Testing the association between 2 variables and 13 clinical features across 372 samples, statistically thresholded by P value < 0.05 and Q value < 0.3, 5 clinical features related to at least one variables.

  • 2 variables correlated to 'DAYS_TO_DEATH_OR_LAST_FUP'.

    • MUTATIONRATE_SILENT ,  MUTATIONRATE_NONSYNONYMOUS

  • 2 variables correlated to 'AGE'.

    • MUTATIONRATE_SILENT ,  MUTATIONRATE_NONSYNONYMOUS

  • 2 variables correlated to 'PATHOLOGY_N_STAGE'.

    • MUTATIONRATE_SILENT ,  MUTATIONRATE_NONSYNONYMOUS

  • 2 variables correlated to 'GENDER'.

    • MUTATIONRATE_NONSYNONYMOUS ,  MUTATIONRATE_SILENT

  • 2 variables correlated to 'HISTOLOGICAL_TYPE'.

    • MUTATIONRATE_NONSYNONYMOUS ,  MUTATIONRATE_SILENT

  • No variables correlated to 'AGE_mutation.rate', 'PATHOLOGIC_STAGE', 'PATHOLOGY_T_STAGE', 'PATHOLOGY_M_STAGE', 'RADIATION_THERAPY', 'RESIDUAL_TUMOR', 'RACE', and 'ETHNICITY'.

Results
Overview of the results

Complete statistical result table is provided in Supplement Table 1

Table 1.  Get Full Table This table shows the clinical features, statistical methods used, and the number of variables that are significantly associated with each clinical feature at P value < 0.05 and Q value < 0.3.

Clinical feature Statistical test Significant variables Associated with                 Associated with
DAYS_TO_DEATH_OR_LAST_FUP Cox regression test N=2   N=NA   N=NA
AGE Spearman correlation test N=2 older N=2 younger N=0
AGE Linear Regression Analysis   N=0        
PATHOLOGIC_STAGE Kruskal-Wallis test   N=0        
PATHOLOGY_T_STAGE Spearman correlation test   N=0        
PATHOLOGY_N_STAGE Wilcoxon test N=2 n1 N=2 n0 N=0
PATHOLOGY_M_STAGE Wilcoxon test   N=0        
GENDER Wilcoxon test N=2 male N=2 female N=0
RADIATION_THERAPY Wilcoxon test   N=0        
HISTOLOGICAL_TYPE Kruskal-Wallis test N=2        
RESIDUAL_TUMOR Kruskal-Wallis test   N=0        
RACE Kruskal-Wallis test   N=0        
ETHNICITY Wilcoxon test   N=0        
Clinical variable #1: 'DAYS_TO_DEATH_OR_LAST_FUP'

2 variables related to 'DAYS_TO_DEATH_OR_LAST_FUP'.

Table S1.  Basic characteristics of clinical feature: 'DAYS_TO_DEATH_OR_LAST_FUP'

DAYS_TO_DEATH_OR_LAST_FUP Duration (Months) 0-120.8 (median=19.8)
  censored N = 243
  death N = 128
     
  Significant variables N = 2
  associated with shorter survival NA
  associated with longer survival NA
List of 2 variables associated with 'DAYS_TO_DEATH_OR_LAST_FUP'

Table S2.  Get Full Table List of 2 variables significantly associated with 'Time to Death' by Cox regression test. For the survival curves, it compared quantile intervals at c(0, 0.25, 0.50, 0.75, 1) and did not try survival analysis if there is only one interval.

logrank_P Q C_index
MUTATIONRATE_SILENT 0.006 0.0095 0.589
MUTATIONRATE_NONSYNONYMOUS 0.00949 0.0095 0.584
Clinical variable #2: 'AGE'

2 variables related to 'AGE'.

Table S3.  Basic characteristics of clinical feature: 'AGE'

AGE Mean (SD) 59.16 (13)
  Significant variables N = 2
  pos. correlated 2
  neg. correlated 0
List of 2 variables associated with 'AGE'

Table S4.  Get Full Table List of 2 variables significantly correlated to 'AGE' by Spearman correlation test

SpearmanCorr corrP Q
MUTATIONRATE_SILENT 0.2493 1.284e-06 2.57e-06
MUTATIONRATE_NONSYNONYMOUS 0.2412 2.854e-06 2.85e-06
Clinical variable #3: 'AGE'

No variable related to 'AGE'.

Table S5.  Basic characteristics of clinical feature: 'AGE'

AGE Mean (SD) 59.16 (13)
  Significant variables N = 0
Clinical variable #4: 'PATHOLOGIC_STAGE'

No variable related to 'PATHOLOGIC_STAGE'.

Table S6.  Basic characteristics of clinical feature: 'PATHOLOGIC_STAGE'

PATHOLOGIC_STAGE Labels N
  STAGE I 174
  STAGE II 86
  STAGE III 3
  STAGE IIIA 64
  STAGE IIIB 9
  STAGE IIIC 9
  STAGE IV 1
  STAGE IVA 1
  STAGE IVB 2
     
  Significant variables N = 0
Clinical variable #5: 'PATHOLOGY_T_STAGE'

No variable related to 'PATHOLOGY_T_STAGE'.

Table S7.  Basic characteristics of clinical feature: 'PATHOLOGY_T_STAGE'

PATHOLOGY_T_STAGE Mean (SD) 1.78 (0.9)
  N
  T1 184
  T2 94
  T3 78
  T4 13
     
  Significant variables N = 0
Clinical variable #6: 'PATHOLOGY_N_STAGE'

2 variables related to 'PATHOLOGY_N_STAGE'.

Table S8.  Basic characteristics of clinical feature: 'PATHOLOGY_N_STAGE'

PATHOLOGY_N_STAGE Labels N
  N0 253
  N1 4
     
  Significant variables N = 2
  Higher in N1 2
  Higher in N0 0
List of 2 variables associated with 'PATHOLOGY_N_STAGE'

Table S9.  Get Full Table List of 2 variables differentially expressed by 'PATHOLOGY_N_STAGE'

W(pos if higher in 'N1') wilcoxontestP Q AUC
MUTATIONRATE_SILENT 121 0.009143 0.0145 0.8804
MUTATIONRATE_NONSYNONYMOUS 145 0.01453 0.0145 0.8567
Clinical variable #7: 'PATHOLOGY_M_STAGE'

No variable related to 'PATHOLOGY_M_STAGE'.

Table S10.  Basic characteristics of clinical feature: 'PATHOLOGY_M_STAGE'

PATHOLOGY_M_STAGE Labels N
  class0 269
  class1 3
     
  Significant variables N = 0
Clinical variable #8: 'GENDER'

2 variables related to 'GENDER'.

Table S11.  Basic characteristics of clinical feature: 'GENDER'

GENDER Labels N
  FEMALE 121
  MALE 251
     
  Significant variables N = 2
  Higher in MALE 2
  Higher in FEMALE 0
List of 2 variables associated with 'GENDER'

Table S12.  Get Full Table List of 2 variables differentially expressed by 'GENDER'. 0 significant gene(s) located in sex chromosomes is(are) filtered out.

W(pos if higher in 'MALE') wilcoxontestP Q AUC
MUTATIONRATE_NONSYNONYMOUS 17938 0.00462 0.00924 0.5906
MUTATIONRATE_SILENT 17652.5 0.01113 0.0111 0.5812
Clinical variable #9: 'RADIATION_THERAPY'

No variable related to 'RADIATION_THERAPY'.

Table S13.  Basic characteristics of clinical feature: 'RADIATION_THERAPY'

RADIATION_THERAPY Labels N
  NO 341
  YES 9
     
  Significant variables N = 0
Clinical variable #10: 'HISTOLOGICAL_TYPE'

2 variables related to 'HISTOLOGICAL_TYPE'.

Table S14.  Basic characteristics of clinical feature: 'HISTOLOGICAL_TYPE'

HISTOLOGICAL_TYPE Labels N
  FIBROLAMELLAR CARCINOMA 3
  HEPATOCELLULAR CARCINOMA 362
  HEPATOCHOLANGIOCARCINOMA (MIXED) 7
     
  Significant variables N = 2
List of 2 variables associated with 'HISTOLOGICAL_TYPE'

Table S15.  Get Full Table List of 2 variables differentially expressed by 'HISTOLOGICAL_TYPE'

kruskal_wallis_P Q
MUTATIONRATE_NONSYNONYMOUS 0.003492 0.00698
MUTATIONRATE_SILENT 0.01721 0.0172
Clinical variable #11: 'RESIDUAL_TUMOR'

No variable related to 'RESIDUAL_TUMOR'.

Table S16.  Basic characteristics of clinical feature: 'RESIDUAL_TUMOR'

RESIDUAL_TUMOR Labels N
  R0 327
  R1 16
  RX 22
     
  Significant variables N = 0
Clinical variable #12: 'RACE'

No variable related to 'RACE'.

Table S17.  Basic characteristics of clinical feature: 'RACE'

RACE Labels N
  AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE 2
  ASIAN 159
  BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN 17
  WHITE 184
     
  Significant variables N = 0
Clinical variable #13: 'ETHNICITY'

No variable related to 'ETHNICITY'.

Table S18.  Basic characteristics of clinical feature: 'ETHNICITY'

ETHNICITY Labels N
  HISPANIC OR LATINO 18
  NOT HISPANIC OR LATINO 336
     
  Significant variables N = 0
Methods & Data
Input
  • Expresson data file = LIHC-TP.patients.counts_and_rates.txt

  • Clinical data file = LIHC-TP.merged_data.txt

  • Number of patients = 372

  • Number of variables = 2

  • Number of clinical features = 13

Selected clinical features
  • Further details on clinical features selected for this analysis, please find a documentation on selected CDEs (Clinical Data Elements). The first column of the file is a formula to convert values and the second column is a clinical parameter name.

  • Survival time data

    • Survival time data is a combined value of days_to_death and days_to_last_followup. For each patient, it creates a combined value 'days_to_death_or_last_fup' using conversion process below.

      • if 'vital_status'==1(dead), 'days_to_last_followup' is always NA. Thus, uses 'days_to_death' value for 'days_to_death_or_fup'

      • if 'vital_status'==0(alive),

        • if 'days_to_death'==NA & 'days_to_last_followup'!=NA, uses 'days_to_last_followup' value for 'days_to_death_or_fup'

        • if 'days_to_death'!=NA, excludes this case in survival analysis and report the case.

      • if 'vital_status'==NA,excludes this case in survival analysis and report the case.

    • cf. In certain diesase types such as SKCM, days_to_death parameter is replaced with time_from_specimen_dx or time_from_specimen_procurement_to_death .

  • This analysis excluded clinical variables that has only NA values.

Survival analysis

For survival clinical features, logrank test in univariate Cox regression analysis with proportional hazards model (Andersen and Gill 1982) was used to estimate the P values comparing quantile intervals using the 'coxph' function in R. Kaplan-Meier survival curves were plotted using quantile intervals at c(0, 0.25, 0.50, 0.75, 1). If there is only one interval group, it will not try survival analysis.

Correlation analysis

For continuous numerical clinical features, Spearman's rank correlation coefficients (Spearman 1904) and two-tailed P values were estimated using 'cor.test' function in R

Wilcoxon rank sum test (Mann-Whitney U test)

For two groups (mutant or wild-type) of continuous type of clinical data, wilcoxon rank sum test (Mann and Whitney, 1947) was applied to compare their mean difference using 'wilcox.test(continuous.clinical ~ as.factor(group), exact=FALSE)' function in R. This test is equivalent to the Mann-Whitney test.

Q value calculation

For multiple hypothesis correction, Q value is the False Discovery Rate (FDR) analogue of the P value (Benjamini and Hochberg 1995), defined as the minimum FDR at which the test may be called significant. We used the 'Benjamini and Hochberg' method of 'p.adjust' function in R to convert P values into Q values.

Download Results

In addition to the links below, the full results of the analysis summarized in this report can also be downloaded programmatically using firehose_get, or interactively from either the Broad GDAC website or TCGA Data Coordination Center Portal.

References
[1] Andersen and Gill, Cox's regression model for counting processes, a large sample study, Annals of Statistics 10(4):1100-1120 (1982)
[2] Spearman, C, The proof and measurement of association between two things, Amer. J. Psychol 15:72-101 (1904)
[3] Mann and Whitney, On a Test of Whether one of Two Random Variables is Stochastically Larger than the Other, Annals of Mathematical Statistics 18 (1), 50-60 (1947)
[4] Benjamini and Hochberg, Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B 59:289-300 (1995)