Mutation Analysis (MutSig 2CV v3.1 hg38 beta)
Overview
Introduction

This report serves to describe the mutational landscape and properties of a given cohort, as well as rank genes and genesets according to mutational significance. MutSig 2CV v3.1 hg38 beta was used to generate the results found in this report.

  • Working with cohort: CPTAC3-LSCC-v3beta

  • Number of patients in cohort: 108

**Please note that in this beta version for hg38 MAFs only the burden test (MutSigCV) is utilized. Beta version does not support positional or functional clustering tests (MutSigCL/MutSigFN, respectively). These tests currently only work in the hg19 compatible release.**

Input

The input for this pipeline is an annotated .maf file describing the mutations called for each individual in the given cancer cohort, and their properties.

Summary
Results
Breakdown of Mutation Rates by Category Type

Table 1.  Get Full Table A breakdown of mutation rates per category discovered for this cohort.

left from change right n N rate ci_low ci_high relrate autoname name type
ACGT C ts G 5666 1122557010 5e-06 4.9e-06 5.2e-06 4.6 ACGT[C->ts]G *CpG->(A/T) point
ACGT C ts ACT 15333 9314426106 1.6e-06 1.6e-06 1.7e-06 1.5 ACGT[C->ts]ACT *Cp(A/C/T)->(A/T) point
ACGT C f ACGT 5326 5218491558 1e-06 9.9e-07 1e-06 0.93 ACGT[C->f]ACGT C->G point
ACGT A tf ACGT 6614 10095147086 6.6e-07 6.4e-07 6.7e-07 0.59 ACGT[A->tf]ACGT A->(G/T) point
ACGT A s ACGT 1008 5047573543 2e-07 1.9e-07 2.1e-07 0.18 ACGT[A->s]ACGT A->C point
Lego Plots

The mutation spectrum is depicted in the lego plots below in which the 96 possible mutation types are subdivided into six large blocks, color-coded to reflect the base substitution type. Each large block is further subdivided into the 16 possible pairs of 5' and 3' neighbors, as listed in the 4x4 trinucleotide context legend. The height of each block corresponds to the mutation frequency for that kind of mutation (counts of mutations normalized by the base coverage in a given bin). The shape of the spectrum is a signature for dominant mutational mechanisms in different tumor types.

Figure 1.  Get High-res Image SNV Mutation rate lego plot for entire cohort. Each bin is normalized by base coverage for that bin. Colors represent the six SNV types on the upper right. The three-base context for each mutation is labeled in the 4x4 legend on the lower right. The fractional breakdown of SNV counts is shown in the pie chart on the upper left. If this figure is blank, not enough information was provided in the MAF to generate it.

Figure 2.  Get High-res Image SNV Mutation rate lego plots for 4 slices of mutation allele fraction (0<=AF<0.1, 0.1<=AF<0.25, 0.25<=AF<0.5, & 0.5<=AF) . The color code and three-base context legends are the same as the previous figure. If this figure is blank, not enough information was provided in the MAF to generate it.

CoMut Plot

Figure 3.  Get High-res Image The matrix in the center of the figure represents individual mutations in patient samples, color-coded by type of mutation, for the significantly mutated genes. The rate of synonymous and non-synonymous mutations is displayed at the top of the matrix. The barplot on the left of the matrix shows the number of mutations in each gene. The percentages represent the fraction of tumors with at least one mutation in the specified gene. The barplot to the right of the matrix displays the q-values for the most significantly mutated genes. The purple boxplots below the matrix (only displayed if required columns are present in the provided MAF) represent the distributions of allelic fractions observed in each sample. The plot at the bottom represents the base substitution distribution of individual samples, using the same categories that were used to calculate significance.

Significantly Mutated Genes

Column Descriptions:

  • codelen = the gene's coding length

  • nncd = number of noncoding mutations in this gene across the cohort

  • nsil = number of silent mutations in this gene across the cohort

  • nmis = number of missense mutations in this gene across the cohort

  • nstp = number of readthrough mutations in this gene across the cohort

  • nspl = number of splice site mutations in this gene across the cohort

  • nind = number of indels in this gene across the cohort

  • nnon = number of (nonsilent) mutations in this gene across the cohort

  • npat = number of patients (individuals) with at least one nonsilent mutation

  • nsite = number of unique sites having a non-silent mutation

  • Abundance (pCV) = Probability that the gene's overall nonsilent mutation rate exceeds its inferred background mutation rate (BMR), which is computed based on the gene's own silent mutation rate plus silent mutation rates of genes with similar covariates. BMR calculations are normalized with respect to patient-specific and sequence context-specific mutation rates.

  • Clustering (pCL) = Probability that recurrently mutated loci in this gene have more mutations than expected by chance. While pCV assesses the gene's overall mutation burden, pCL assesses the burden of specific sites within the gene. This allows MutSig to differentiate between genes with uniformly distributed mutations and genes with localized hotspots.

  • Conservation (pFN) = Probability that mutations within this gene occur disproportionately at evolutionarily conserved sites. Sites highly conserved across vertebrates are assumed to have greater functional impact than weakly conserved sites.

  • p = p-value (overall)

  • q = q-value, False Discovery Rate (Benjamini-Hochberg procedure)

Table 2.  Get Full Table A Ranked List of Significantly Mutated Genes. Number of significant genes found: 11. Number of genes displayed: 35. Click on a gene name to display its stick figure depicting the distribution of mutations and mutation types across the chosen gene (this feature may not be available for all significant genes).

rank gene codelen nnei nncd nsil nmis nstp nspl nind nnon npat nsite pCV pCL pFN p q
1 TP53 1613 224 0 0 64 22 7 19 112 103 85 1e-16 NA NA 1e-16 7.1e-14
2 PTEN 1407 117 0 0 3 5 0 4 12 12 12 2.1e-14 NA NA 2.1e-14 7.4e-12
3 CDKN2A 984 339 0 0 4 4 2 7 17 17 15 6.1e-14 NA NA 6.1e-14 1.4e-11
4 KMT2D 17250 23 0 3 8 6 7 8 29 28 29 4.7e-12 NA NA 4.7e-12 8.4e-10
5 NFE2L2 1968 16 0 0 13 0 0 1 14 13 11 1e-05 NA NA 1e-05 0.0014
6 ARID1A 7104 3 0 2 8 0 1 7 16 14 16 0.000085 NA NA 0.000085 0.01
7 CUL3 2535 20 0 2 2 3 2 1 8 8 7 0.00024 NA NA 0.00024 0.024
8 BRCA2 10629 0 0 0 1 1 1 3 6 5 6 0.00072 NA NA 0.00072 0.06
9 KEAP1 1959 16 0 1 15 0 0 0 15 13 15 0.00076 NA NA 0.00076 0.06
10 SUZ12 2424 4 0 0 2 0 1 1 4 4 4 0.0013 NA NA 0.0013 0.092
11 NF1 9208 2 0 3 5 5 0 4 14 12 14 0.0015 NA NA 0.0015 0.097
12 KRAS 832 12 0 0 5 0 0 0 5 5 3 0.0018 NA NA 0.0018 0.1
13 EGFR 4409 1 0 1 4 1 0 3 8 7 7 0.0037 NA NA 0.0037 0.2
14 PIK3CA 3465 49 0 1 10 1 0 0 11 11 9 0.0045 NA NA 0.0045 0.22
15 NOTCH1 8076 2 0 6 7 3 5 1 16 15 16 0.0059 NA NA 0.0059 0.26
16 RANBP2 10023 1 0 1 2 2 0 2 6 6 6 0.006 NA NA 0.006 0.26
17 BCORL1 5310 99 0 3 7 0 0 2 9 9 9 0.0066 NA NA 0.0066 0.27
18 ATM 10053 2 0 0 4 2 2 2 10 10 10 0.0069 NA NA 0.0069 0.27
19 RNF43 2822 32 0 0 1 1 1 0 3 3 3 0.01 NA NA 0.01 0.35
20 KDM6A 4732 7 0 0 2 1 2 0 5 5 5 0.01 NA NA 0.01 0.35
21 SMARCD1 1784 25 0 0 0 1 1 0 2 2 2 0.011 NA NA 0.011 0.35
22 FAT1 14103 0 0 2 3 2 3 4 12 12 12 0.011 NA NA 0.011 0.35
23 PCBP1 1083 16 0 1 4 0 0 0 4 4 4 0.012 NA NA 0.012 0.35
24 MUC4 16539 20 0 5 20 4 1 1 26 17 26 0.012 NA NA 0.012 0.35
25 KDR 4431 7 0 0 5 1 0 1 7 7 7 0.014 NA NA 0.014 0.36
26 GPC5 1815 88 0 0 5 0 0 0 5 5 5 0.014 NA NA 0.014 0.36
27 RB1 3111 134 0 1 1 2 1 1 5 5 5 0.014 NA NA 0.014 0.36
28 NFKBIE 1575 73 0 0 3 1 0 0 4 4 4 0.014 NA NA 0.014 0.36
29 NSD1 8493 2 0 0 2 2 1 0 5 5 5 0.015 NA NA 0.015 0.36
30 FH 1653 43 0 0 4 1 1 0 6 5 6 0.016 NA NA 0.016 0.37
31 AFF3 4080 18 0 1 10 0 0 0 10 10 10 0.016 NA NA 0.016 0.37
32 PIK3R1 2555 6 0 1 2 0 1 2 5 5 5 0.018 NA NA 0.018 0.4
33 FLI1 1542 4 0 0 5 0 0 0 5 5 5 0.023 NA NA 0.023 0.5
34 DAXX 2334 15 0 0 4 0 0 0 4 4 4 0.027 NA NA 0.027 0.56
35 P2RY8 1116 14 0 1 6 1 0 0 7 7 7 0.028 NA NA 0.028 0.57
TP53

Figure S1.  Get High-res Image This figure depicts the distribution of mutations and mutation types across the TP53 significant gene.

PTEN

Figure S2.  Get High-res Image This figure depicts the distribution of mutations and mutation types across the PTEN significant gene.

CDKN2A

Figure S3.  Get High-res Image This figure depicts the distribution of mutations and mutation types across the CDKN2A significant gene.

KMT2D

Figure S4.  Get High-res Image This figure depicts the distribution of mutations and mutation types across the KMT2D significant gene.

NFE2L2

Figure S5.  Get High-res Image This figure depicts the distribution of mutations and mutation types across the NFE2L2 significant gene.

ARID1A

Figure S6.  Get High-res Image This figure depicts the distribution of mutations and mutation types across the ARID1A significant gene.

CUL3

Figure S7.  Get High-res Image This figure depicts the distribution of mutations and mutation types across the CUL3 significant gene.

BRCA2

Figure S8.  Get High-res Image This figure depicts the distribution of mutations and mutation types across the BRCA2 significant gene.

KEAP1

Figure S9.  Get High-res Image This figure depicts the distribution of mutations and mutation types across the KEAP1 significant gene.

SUZ12

Figure S10.  Get High-res Image This figure depicts the distribution of mutations and mutation types across the SUZ12 significant gene.

NF1

Figure S11.  Get High-res Image This figure depicts the distribution of mutations and mutation types across the NF1 significant gene.

Methods & Data
Methods

MutSig and its evolving algorithms have existed since the youth of clinical sequencing, with early versions used in multiple publications. [1][2][3]

"Three significance metrics [are] calculated for each gene, using the […] methods MutSigCV [4], MutSigCL, and MutSigFN [5]. These measure the significance of mutation burden, clustering, and functional impact, respectively […]. MutSigCV determines the P value for observing the given quantity of non-silent mutations in the gene, given the background model determined by silent (and noncoding) mutations in the same gene and the neighbouring genes of covariate space that form its 'bagel'. […] MutSigCL and MutSigFN measure the significance of the positional clustering of the mutations observed, as well as the significance of the tendency for mutations to occur at positions that are highly evolutionarily conserved (using conservation as a proxy for probably functional impact). MutSigCL and MutSigFN are permutation-based methods and their P values are calculated as follows: The observed nonsilent coding mutations in the gene are permuted T times (to simulate the null hypothesis, T = 108 for the most significant genes), randomly reassigning their positions, but preserving their mutational 'category', as determined by local sequence context. We [use] the following context categories: transitions at CpG dinucleotides, transitions at other C-G base pairs, transversions at C-G base pairs, mutations at A-T base pairs, and indels. Indels are unconstrained in terms of where they can move to in the permutations. For each of the random permutations, two scores are calculated: SCL and SFN, measuring the amount of clustering and function impact (measured by conservation) respectively. SCL is defined to be the fraction of mutations occurring in hotspots. A hotspot is defined as a 3-base-pair region of the gene containing many mutations: at least 2, and at least 2% of the total mutations. SFN is defined to be the mean of the base-pair-level conservation values for the position of each non-silent mutation […]. To determine a PCL, the P value for the observed degree of positional clustering, the observed value of SCL (computed for the mutations actually observed), [is] compared to the distribution of SCL obtained from the random permutations, and the P value [is] defined to be the fraction of random permutations in which SCL [is] at least as large as the observed SCL. The P value for the conservation of the mutated positions, PFN, [is] computed analogously." [6]

References
[1] Getz G, Höfling H, Mesirov JP, Golub TR, Meyerson M, Tibshirani R, Lander ES, Comment on "The Consensus Coding Sequences of Human Breast and Colorectal Cancers", Science 317(5844):1500b (2007)
[3] TCGA, Integrated genomic analyses of ovarian carcinoma, Nature 474(7353):609-615 (2011)
[4] Lawrence MS, et al., Mutational heterogeneity in cancer and the search for new cancer-associated genes, Nature 499(7457):214-218 (2013)
[6] Lawrence MS, et al., Discovery and saturation analysis of cancer genes across 21 tumour types, Nature 505(7484):495-501 (2014)