This is an overview of Glioblastoma Multiforme analysis pipelines from Firehose run "16 April 2014".
Note: These results are offered to the community as an additional reference point, enabling a wide range of cancer biologists, clinical investigators, and genome and computational scientists to easily incorporate TCGA into the backdrop of ongoing research. While every effort is made to ensure that Firehose input data and algorithms are of the highest possible quality, these analyses have not been reviewed by domain experts.
-
Sequence and Copy Number Analyses
-
CHASM 1.0.5 (Cancer-Specific High-throughput Annotation of Somatic Mutations)
View Report | There are 26406 mutations identified by MuTect and 1538 mutations with significant functional impact at BHFDR <= 0.25. -
Mutation Analysis (MutSig v1.5)
View Report | -
Mutation Analysis (MutSig v2.0 and MutSigCV v0.9 merged result)
View Report | -
Mutation Analysis (MutSig v2.0)
View Report | -
Mutation Analysis (MutSigCV v0.9)
View Report | -
Mutation Assessor
View Report | -
SNP6 Copy number analysis (GISTIC2)
View Report | There were 571 tumor samples used in this analysis: 22 significant arm-level results, 25 significant focal amplifications, and 46 significant focal deletions were found. -
Correlations to Clinical Parameters
-
Correlation between aggregated molecular cancer subtypes and selected clinical features
View Report | Testing the association between subtypes identified by 10 different clustering approaches and 6 clinical features across 581 patients, 2 significant findings detected with P value < 0.05 and Q value < 0.25. -
Correlation between copy number variation genes (focal events) and selected clinical features
View Report | Testing the association between copy number variation 71 focal events and 6 clinical features across 560 patients, 17 significant findings detected with Q value < 0.25. -
Correlation between copy number variations of arm-level result and selected clinical features
View Report | Testing the association between copy number variation 80 arm-level events and 6 clinical features across 560 patients, 10 significant findings detected with Q value < 0.25. -
Correlation between gene methylation status and clinical features
View Report | Testing the association between 20197 genes and 6 clinical features across 114 samples, statistically thresholded by Q value < 0.05, 2 clinical features related to at least one genes. -
Correlation between gene mutation status and selected clinical features
View Report | Testing the association between mutation status of 12 genes and 6 clinical features across 278 patients, 4 significant findings detected with Q value < 0.25. -
Correlation between miR expression and clinical features
View Report | Testing the association between 534 miRs and 6 clinical features across 561 samples, statistically thresholded by Q value < 0.05, 2 clinical features related to at least one miRs. -
Correlation between mRNA expression and clinical features
View Report | Testing the association between 12042 genes and 6 clinical features across 525 samples, statistically thresholded by Q value < 0.05, 4 clinical features related to at least one genes. -
Correlation between mRNAseq expression and clinical features
View Report | Testing the association between 18210 genes and 5 clinical features across 152 samples, statistically thresholded by Q value < 0.05, 2 clinical features related to at least one genes. -
Correlation between RPPA expression and clinical features
View Report | Testing the association between 171 genes and 6 clinical features across 211 samples, statistically thresholded by Q value < 0.05, 1 clinical feature related to at least one genes. -
Clustering Analyses
-
Clustering of copy number data by focal peak region with log2 ratio: consensus NMF
View Report | The most robust consensus NMF clustering of 571 samples using the 71 copy number focal regions was identified for k = 3 clusters. We computed the clustering for k = 2 to k = 8 and used the cophenetic correlation coefficient to determine the best solution. -
Clustering of copy number data by peak region with threshold value: consensus NMF
View Report | The most robust consensus NMF clustering of 571 samples using the 71 copy number focal regions was identified for k = 3 clusters. We computed the clustering for k = 2 to k = 8 and used the cophenetic correlation coefficient to determine the best solution. -
Clustering of Methylation: consensus NMF
View Report | The 8293 most variable methylated genes were selected based on variation. The variation cutoff are set for each tumor type empirically by fitting a bimodal distriution. For genes with multiple methylation probes, we chose the most variable one to represent the gene. Consensus NMF clustering of 123 samples and 8293 genes identified 3 subtypes with the stability of the clustering increasing for k = 2 to k = 8 and the average silhouette width calculation for selecting the robust clusters. -
Clustering of miR expression: consensus hierarchical
View Report | We filtered the data to 150 most variable miRs. Consensus average linkage hierarchical clustering of 565 samples and 150 miRs identified 3 subtypes with the stability of the clustering increasing for k = 2 to k = 8 and the average silhouette width calculation for selecting the robust clusters. -
Clustering of miR expression: consensus NMF
View Report | We filtered the data to 150 most variable miRs. Consensus NMF clustering of 565 samples and 150 miRs identified 4 subtypes with the stability of the clustering increasing for k = 2 to k = 8 and the average silhouette width calculation for selecting the robust clusters. -
Clustering of mRNA expression: consensus hierarchical
View Report | The 1500 most variable genes were selected. Consensus average linkage hierarchical clustering of 528 samples and 1500 genes identified 3 subtypes with the stability of the clustering increasing for k = 2 to k = 8 and the average silhouette width calculation for selecting the robust clusters. -
Clustering of mRNA expression: consensus NMF
View Report | The most robust consensus NMF clustering of 528 samples using the 1500 most variable genes was identified for k = 4 clusters. We computed the clustering for k = 2 to k = 8 and used the cophenetic correlation coefficient to determine the best solution. -
Clustering of mRNAseq gene expression: consensus hierarchical
View Report | The 1500 most variable genes were selected. Consensus average linkage hierarchical clustering of 153 samples and 1500 genes identified 3 subtypes with the stability of the clustering increasing for k = 2 to k = 8 and the average silhouette width calculation for selecting the robust clusters. -
Clustering of mRNAseq gene expression: consensus NMF
View Report | The most robust consensus NMF clustering of 153 samples using the 1500 most variable genes was identified for k = 3 clusters. We computed the clustering for k = 2 to k = 8 and used the cophenetic correlation coefficient to determine the best solution. -
Clustering of RPPA data: consensus hierarchical
View Report | 171 proteins were selected. Consensus average linkage hierarchical clustering of 214 samples and 171 proteins identified 3 subtypes with the stability of the clustering increasing for k = 2 to k = 8 and the average silhouette width calculation for selecting the robust clusters. -
Clustering of RPPA data: consensus NMF
View Report | The most robust consensus NMF clustering of 214 samples using 171 proteins was identified for k = 4 clusters. We computed the clustering for k = 2 to k = 8 and used the cophenetic correlation coefficient to determine the best solution. -
Other Analyses
-
Identification of putative miR direct targets
View Report | This pipeline use a relevance network approach to infer putative miR:mRNA regulatory connections. All miR:mRNA pairs that have correlations < -0.3 and have predicted interactions in three sequence prediction databases (Miranda, Pictar, Targetscan) define the final network. -
Pathway Analyses
-
Association of mutation, copy number alteration, and subtype markers with pathways
View Report | There are 10 genes with significant mutation (Q value <= 0.1) and 166 genes with significant copy number alteration (Q value <= 0.25). The identified marker genes (Q value <= 0.01 or within top 2000) are 2000 for subtype 1, 2000 for subtype 2, 2000 for subtype 3. Pathways significantly enriched with these genes (Q value <= 0.01) are identified : -
HotNet pathway analysis of mutation and copy number data
View Report | There were 11 significant subnetworks identified in HotNet analysis. -
PARADIGM pathway analysis of mRNA expression and copy number data
View Report | There were 36 significant pathways identified in this analysis. -
PARADIGM pathway analysis of mRNA expression data
View Report | There were 47 significant pathways identified in this analysis. -
PARADIGM pathway analysis of mRNASeq expression and copy number data
View Report | There were 37 significant pathways identified in this analysis. -
PARADIGM pathway analysis of mRNASeq expression data
View Report | There were 52 significant pathways identified in this analysis. -
Other Correlation Analyses
-
Correlation between copy number variation genes (focal events) and molecular subtypes
View Report | Testing the association between copy number variation 71 focal events and 10 molecular subtypes across 571 patients, 113 significant findings detected with P value < 0.05 and Q value < 0.25. -
Correlation between copy number variations of arm-level result and molecular subtypes
View Report | Testing the association between copy number variation 80 arm-level events and 10 molecular subtypes across 571 patients, 95 significant findings detected with P value < 0.05 and Q value < 0.25. -
Correlation between gene mutation status and molecular subtypes
View Report | Testing the association between mutation status of 12 genes and 10 molecular subtypes across 283 patients, 20 significant findings detected with P value < 0.05 and Q value < 0.25. -
Correlation between mRNA expression and DNA methylation
View Report | The top 25 correlated methylation probes per gene are displayed. Total number of matched samples = 47. Number of gene expression samples = 153. Number of methylation samples = 123. -
Correlations between copy number and miR expression
View Report | The correlation coefficients in 10, 20, 30, 40, 50, 60, 70, 80, 90 percentiles are -0.04604, -0.01616, 8e-04, 0.01952, 0.0398, 0.06564, 0.10438, 0.16666, 0.2461, respectively. -
Correlations between copy number and mRNA expression
View Report | The correlation coefficients in 10, 20, 30, 40, 50, 60, 70, 80, 90 percentiles are -0.0125, 0.0243, 0.06015, 0.0979, 0.1384, 0.1801, 0.22165, 0.2686, 0.3384, respectively. -
Correlations between copy number and mRNAseq expression
View Report | The correlation coefficients in 10, 20, 30, 40, 50, 60, 70, 80, 90 percentiles are 900.4, 1816, 2377, 2901, 3413, 3973, 4563, 5243.2, 6101.6, respectively.
-
Summary Report Date = Sat May 10 10:20:54 2014
-
Protection = FALSE