Correlation between gene mutation status and selected clinical features
Overview
Introduction

This pipeline computes the correlation between significantly recurrent gene mutations and selected clinical features.

Summary

Testing the association between mutation status of 4 genes and 3 clinical features across 61 patients, one significant finding detected with Q value < 0.25.

  • RET mutation correlated to 'RACE'.

Results
Overview of the results

Table 1.  Get Full Table Overview of the association between mutation status of 4 genes and 3 clinical features. Shown in the table are P values (Q values). Thresholded by Q value < 0.25, one significant finding detected.

Clinical
Features
AGE GENDER RACE
nMutated (%) nWild-Type Wilcoxon-test Fisher's exact test Fisher's exact test
RET 4 (7%) 57 0.726
(1.00)
1
(1.00)
0.00801
(0.0961)
HRAS 5 (8%) 56 0.572
(1.00)
0.154
(1.00)
1
(1.00)
EPAS1 4 (7%) 57 0.0778
(0.855)
0.602
(1.00)
0.307
(1.00)
NF1 7 (11%) 54 0.138
(1.00)
1
(1.00)
0.747
(1.00)
'RET MUTATION STATUS' versus 'RACE'

P value = 0.00801 (Fisher's exact test), Q value = 0.096

Table S1.  Gene #4: 'RET MUTATION STATUS' versus Clinical Feature #3: 'RACE'

nPatients AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE ASIAN BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN WHITE
ALL 1 3 7 48
RET MUTATED 1 1 1 1
RET WILD-TYPE 0 2 6 47

Figure S1.  Get High-res Image Gene #4: 'RET MUTATION STATUS' versus Clinical Feature #3: 'RACE'

Methods & Data
Input
  • Mutation data file = transformed.cor.cli.txt

  • Clinical data file = PCPG-TP.merged_data.txt

  • Number of patients = 61

  • Number of significantly mutated genes = 4

  • Number of selected clinical features = 3

  • Exclude genes that fewer than K tumors have mutations, K = 3

Fisher's exact test

For binary or multi-class clinical features (nominal or ordinal), two-tailed Fisher's exact tests (Fisher 1922) were used to estimate the P values using the 'fisher.test' function in R

Q value calculation

For multiple hypothesis correction, Q value is the False Discovery Rate (FDR) analogue of the P value (Benjamini and Hochberg 1995), defined as the minimum FDR at which the test may be called significant. We used the 'Benjamini and Hochberg' method of 'p.adjust' function in R to convert P values into Q values.

References
[1] Fisher, R.A., On the interpretation of chi-square from contingency tables, and the calculation of P, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society 85(1):87-94 (1922)
[2] Benjamini and Hochberg, Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B 59:289-300 (1995)