Mutation Assessor - Lung Squamous Cell Carcinoma (Primary solid tumor)

Mutation Assessor

Lung Squamous Cell Carcinoma (Primary solid tumor)

28 January 2016 | analyses__2016_01_28

Maintainer Information

Citation Information

Maintained by David Heiman (Broad Institute)

Cite as Broad Institute TCGA Genome Data Analysis Center (2016): Mutation Assessor. Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard. doi:10.7908/C1HT2NSX

Overview

Introduction

This report serves to summarize the functional impact of missense mutations in each gene as determined by Mutation Assessor[1].

Summary

High Functional Impact Missense Mutations: 2569
Medium Functional Impact Missense Mutations: 12801
Low Functional Impact Missense Mutations: 13149
Neutral Functional Impact Mutations: 9085

Results

Functional Impact by Gene

Table 1. Get Full Table A gene-level breakdown of missense mutation functional impact, ordered by MutSig rank. Includes missense mutation counts broken down by level of functional impact (high, medium, low, neutral), median functional impact score and level, and most common level(s) of functional impact (mode) per gene.

MutSig Rank	Gene	High Functional Impact Count	Medium Functional Impact Count	Low Functional Impact Count	Neutral Functional Impact Count	Median Functional Impact Score	Median Functional Impact Level	Mode Functional Impact Level
1	TP53	0	92	2	0	3.1450	medium	medium
2	CDKN2A	1	0	6	1	0.8950	low	low
3	NFE2L2	0	27	0	0	2.8650	medium	medium
4	MLL2	0	6	4	11	0.5500	neutral	neutral
5	KEAP1	6	9	5	2	2.2500	medium	medium
6	PTEN	6	2	0	0	3.7775	high	high
7	PIK3CA	0	6	18	4	1.6200	low	low
8	RB1	0	1	1	0	1.6825	low	medium/low
9	CYP11B1	1	3	6	5	1.8450	low	low
10	NOTCH1	2	3	0	3	2.4275	medium	medium/neutral

Methods & Data

Input

LUSC-TP.maf.annotated
sig_genes.txt
Mutation Assessor Scores Release 2:

hg18
hg19

A lookup is done against the relevant Mutation Assessor Scores table for each missense mutation in a given MAF file, and available functional impact score and level are appended as two new columns to generate LUSC-TP.maf.annotated. These are summarized in Table 1, sorted by MutSig rank.

Download Results

In addition to the links below, the full results of the analysis summarized in this report can also be downloaded programmatically using firehose_get, or interactively from either the Broad GDAC website or TCGA Data Coordination Center Portal.

References

[1] Boris Reva, Yevgeniy Antipin, and Chris Sander, Predicting the functional impact of protein mutations: application to cancer genomics, Nucl. Acids Res. 39(17):e118 (2011)

Made with Nozzle