Mutation Assessor - Pheochromocytoma and Paraganglioma (Primary solid tumor)

Mutation Assessor

Pheochromocytoma and Paraganglioma (Primary solid tumor)

28 January 2016 | analyses__2016_01_28

Maintainer Information

Citation Information

Maintained by David Heiman (Broad Institute)

Cite as Broad Institute TCGA Genome Data Analysis Center (2016): Mutation Assessor. Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard. doi:10.7908/C1QN6671

Overview

Introduction

This report serves to summarize the functional impact of missense mutations in each gene as determined by Mutation Assessor[1].

Summary

High Functional Impact Missense Mutations: 110
Medium Functional Impact Missense Mutations: 615
Low Functional Impact Missense Mutations: 559
Neutral Functional Impact Mutations: 467

Results

Functional Impact by Gene

Table 1. Get Full Table A gene-level breakdown of missense mutation functional impact, ordered by MutSig rank. Includes missense mutation counts broken down by level of functional impact (high, medium, low, neutral), median functional impact score and level, and most common level(s) of functional impact (mode) per gene.

MutSig Rank	Gene	High Functional Impact Count	Medium Functional Impact Count	Low Functional Impact Count	Neutral Functional Impact Count	Median Functional Impact Score	Median Functional Impact Level	Mode Functional Impact Level
1	HRAS	3	15	0	0	3.155	medium	medium
2	NF1	0	0	1	0	1.665	low	low
3	EPAS1	0	8	0	0	2.140	medium	medium
5	RET	0	3	4	0	1.630	low	low
8	GPR128	0	0	1	3	0.620	neutral	neutral
12	FAM83D	0	0	1	1	0.795	neutral	low/neutral
13	BCAR1	0	0	1	0	1.430	low	low
16	SUSD4	0	1	1	0	1.675	low	medium/low
17	MAP3K4	0	0	0	3	0.550	neutral	neutral
18	P2RY1	0	0	0	1	0.695	neutral	neutral

Methods & Data

Input

PCPG-TP.maf.annotated
sig_genes.txt
Mutation Assessor Scores Release 2:

hg18
hg19

A lookup is done against the relevant Mutation Assessor Scores table for each missense mutation in a given MAF file, and available functional impact score and level are appended as two new columns to generate PCPG-TP.maf.annotated. These are summarized in Table 1, sorted by MutSig rank.

Download Results

In addition to the links below, the full results of the analysis summarized in this report can also be downloaded programmatically using firehose_get, or interactively from either the Broad GDAC website or TCGA Data Coordination Center Portal.

References

[1] Boris Reva, Yevgeniy Antipin, and Chris Sander, Predicting the functional impact of protein mutations: application to cancer genomics, Nucl. Acids Res. 39(17):e118 (2011)

Made with Nozzle