This report serves to describe the mutational landscape and properties of a given individual set, as well as rank genes and genesets according to mutational significance. MutSig 2CV v3.1 was used to generate the results found in this report.
-
Working with individual set: ACC-TP
-
Number of patients in set: 62
The input for this pipeline is a set of individuals with the following files associated for each:
-
An annotated .maf file describing the mutations called for the respective individual, and their properties.
-
A .wig file that contains information about the coverage of the sample.
-
MAF used for this analysis:ACC-TP.final_analysis_set.maf
-
Blacklist used for this analysis: pancan_mutation_blacklist.v14.hg19.txt
-
Significantly mutated genes (q ≤ 0.1): 109
The mutation spectrum is depicted in the lego plots below in which the 96 possible mutation types are subdivided into six large blocks, color-coded to reflect the base substitution type. Each large block is further subdivided into the 16 possible pairs of 5' and 3' neighbors, as listed in the 4x4 trinucleotide context legend. The height of each block corresponds to the mutation frequency for that kind of mutation (counts of mutations normalized by the base coverage in a given bin). The shape of the spectrum is a signature for dominant mutational mechanisms in different tumor types.
Column Descriptions:
-
nnon = number of (nonsilent) mutations in this gene across the individual set
-
npat = number of patients (individuals) with at least one nonsilent mutation
-
nsite = number of unique sites having a non-silent mutation
-
nsil = number of silent mutations in this gene across the individual set
-
p = p-value (overall)
-
q = q-value, False Discovery Rate (Benjamini-Hochberg procedure)
rank | gene | longname | codelen | nnei | nncd | nsil | nmis | nstp | nspl | nind | nnon | npat | nsite | pCV | pCL | pFN | p | q |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | ZFPM1 | zinc finger protein, multitype 1 | 3059 | 28 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 35 | 39 | 24 | 6 | 1.3e-16 | 1e-05 | 1 | 1e-16 | 3.7e-13 |
2 | LACTB | lactamase, beta | 1668 | 100 | 0 | 0 | 18 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 19 | 19 | 2 | 9.2e-16 | 1e-05 | 1 | 1e-16 | 3.7e-13 |
3 | CCDC102A | coiled-coil domain containing 102A | 1681 | 177 | 0 | 0 | 17 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 17 | 17 | 1 | 3.1e-16 | 1e-05 | 0.8 | 1e-16 | 3.7e-13 |
4 | ZNF517 | zinc finger protein 517 | 1495 | 326 | 0 | 0 | 14 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 14 | 13 | 2 | 2.3e-14 | 1e-05 | 0.99 | 1e-16 | 3.7e-13 |
5 | MAL2 | mal, T-cell differentiation protein 2 | 546 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 11 | 12 | 11 | 2 | 1.4e-15 | 1e-05 | 0.24 | 1e-16 | 3.7e-13 |
6 | TOR3A | torsin family 3, member A | 1214 | 169 | 0 | 0 | 12 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 12 | 12 | 1 | 1.8e-12 | 1e-05 | 1 | 6.7e-16 | 2e-12 |
7 | TP53 | tumor protein p53 | 1889 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 3 | 3 | 4 | 15 | 13 | 15 | 1e-16 | 0.78 | 0.13 | 1e-15 | 2.6e-12 |
8 | CLDN23 | claudin 23 | 879 | 36 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 10 | 1 | 1e-08 | 1e-05 | 0.99 | 3.2e-12 | 7.4e-09 |
9 | GDF1 | growth differentiation factor 1 | 1146 | 63 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5 | 1 | 2.1e-08 | 1e-05 | 0.85 | 6.2e-12 | 1.3e-08 |
10 | LZTR1 | leucine-zipper-like transcription regulator 1 | 2621 | 12 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 1 | 4.2e-08 | 1e-05 | 2e-05 | 1.2e-11 | 2.2e-08 |
11 | ANKRD43 | ankyrin repeat domain 43 | 1650 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 19 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 19 | 19 | 1 | 7.6e-09 | 1e-05 | 1 | 2.6e-11 | 4.3e-08 |
12 | KCNK17 | potassium channel, subfamily K, member 17 | 1296 | 191 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 9 | 2 | 1.4e-07 | 1e-05 | 0.97 | 4e-11 | 6e-08 |
13 | RINL | Ras and Rab interactor-like | 1569 | 72 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 8 | 1 | 3.1e-07 | 1e-05 | 0.45 | 8.5e-11 | 1.2e-07 |
14 | ZAR1 | zygote arrest 1 | 1378 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 11 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 11 | 11 | 2 | 5.4e-07 | 1e-05 | 1 | 1.5e-10 | 1.9e-07 |
15 | CTNNB1 | catenin (cadherin-associated protein), beta 1, 88kDa | 2406 | 53 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 8 | 8 | 5 | 2.9e-07 | 3e-05 | 0.54 | 2.3e-10 | 2.8e-07 |
16 | APOE | apolipoprotein E | 969 | 130 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 7 | 2 | 3.1e-07 | 1e-05 | 0.85 | 4e-10 | 4.6e-07 |
17 | GPRIN2 | G protein regulated inducer of neurite outgrowth 2 | 1381 | 174 | 0 | 1 | 8 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 8 | 1 | 1.9e-08 | 0.00053 | 0.61 | 6.6e-10 | 6.5e-07 |
18 | ASPDH | aspartate dehydrogenase domain containing | 913 | 40 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 8 | 2 | 3.2e-08 | 0.00034 | 1 | 6.6e-10 | 6.5e-07 |
19 | ERCC2 | excision repair cross-complementing rodent repair deficiency, complementation group 2 (xeroderma pigmentosum D) | 2430 | 33 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 10 | 1 | 2.7e-06 | 1e-05 | 0.0022 | 6.7e-10 | 6.5e-07 |
20 | IDUA | iduronidase, alpha-L- | 2072 | 88 | 0 | 1 | 8 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 8 | 2 | 3.6e-06 | 1e-05 | 0.00016 | 9e-10 | 8.2e-07 |
21 | C1orf106 | chromosome 1 open reading frame 106 | 2030 | 27 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 9 | 2 | 2.3e-07 | 0.00025 | 1 | 2.4e-09 | 2e-06 |
22 | C10orf95 | chromosome 10 open reading frame 95 | 780 | 48 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 6 | 1 | 2e-07 | 0.00019 | 0.8 | 2.4e-09 | 2e-06 |
23 | RGS9BP | regulator of G protein signaling 9 binding protein | 708 | 37 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 8 | 1 | 2.2e-06 | 5e-05 | 0.79 | 6.6e-09 | 5.3e-06 |
24 | THEM4 | thioesterase superfamily member 4 | 743 | 89 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5 | 1 | 0.000039 | 1e-05 | 0.94 | 8.9e-09 | 6.8e-06 |
25 | TSC22D2 | TSC22 domain family, member 2 | 2355 | 16 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 8 | 3 | 0.000044 | 1e-05 | 1 | 9.9e-09 | 7.3e-06 |
26 | SYT8 | synaptotagmin VIII | 1240 | 46 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 8 | 3 | 8.7e-08 | 0.011 | 0.087 | 1.2e-08 | 8.6e-06 |
27 | PLIN5 | perilipin 5 | 1424 | 51 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5 | 1 | 0.000069 | 0.00031 | 1e-05 | 1.5e-08 | 1e-05 |
28 | LRIG1 | leucine-rich repeats and immunoglobulin-like domains 1 | 3356 | 28 | 0 | 0 | 26 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 26 | 16 | 2 | 0.000086 | 1e-05 | 0.94 | 1.9e-08 | 0.000012 |
29 | HHIPL1 | HHIP-like 1 | 2482 | 84 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 6 | 1 | 0.00012 | 1e-05 | 1 | 2.5e-08 | 0.000016 |
30 | CCDC105 | coiled-coil domain containing 105 | 1526 | 111 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 6 | 1 | 0.000035 | 3e-05 | 1 | 3.7e-08 | 0.000023 |
31 | C19orf10 | chromosome 19 open reading frame 10 | 544 | 53 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 7 | 1 | 4e-07 | 0.0027 | 1 | 5.6e-08 | 0.000033 |
32 | OPRD1 | opioid receptor, delta 1 | 1127 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 12 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 12 | 12 | 1 | 0.0003 | 1e-05 | 1 | 6.2e-08 | 0.000036 |
33 | ATXN1 | ataxin 1 | 2452 | 14 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 11 | 10 | 8 | 0.000031 | 4e-05 | 1 | 9.5e-08 | 0.000052 |
34 | AATK | apoptosis-associated tyrosine kinase | 4179 | 111 | 0 | 1 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 6 | 2 | 0.00012 | 1e-05 | 0.76 | 9.6e-08 | 0.000052 |
35 | ZNF628 | zinc finger protein 628 | 3172 | 24 | 0 | 1 | 8 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 7 | 3 | 0.00013 | 1e-05 | 1 | 1.3e-07 | 0.000066 |
MutSig and its evolving algorithms have existed since the youth of clinical sequencing, with early versions used in multiple publications. [1][2][3]
"Three significance metrics [are] calculated for each gene, using the […] methods MutSigCV [4], MutSigCL, and MutSigFN [5]. These measure the significance of mutation burden, clustering, and functional impact, respectively […]. MutSigCV determines the P value for observing the given quantity of non-silent mutations in the gene, given the background model determined by silent (and noncoding) mutations in the same gene and the neighbouring genes of covariate space that form its 'bagel'. […] MutSigCL and MutSigFN measure the significance of the positional clustering of the mutations observed, as well as the significance of the tendency for mutations to occur at positions that are highly evolutionarily conserved (using conservation as a proxy for probably functional impact). MutSigCL and MutSigFN are permutation-based methods and their P values are calculated as follows: The observed nonsilent coding mutations in the gene are permuted T times (to simulate the null hypothesis, T = 108 for the most significant genes), randomly reassigning their positions, but preserving their mutational 'category', as determined by local sequence context. We [use] the following context categories: transitions at CpG dinucleotides, transitions at other C-G base pairs, transversions at C-G base pairs, mutations at A-T base pairs, and indels. Indels are unconstrained in terms of where they can move to in the permutations. For each of the random permutations, two scores are calculated: SCL and SFN, measuring the amount of clustering and function impact (measured by conservation) respectively. SCL is defined to be the fraction of mutations occurring in hotspots. A hotspot is defined as a 3-base-pair region of the gene containing many mutations: at least 2, and at least 2% of the total mutations. SFN is defined to be the mean of the base-pair-level conservation values for the position of each non-silent mutation […]. To determine a PCL, the P value for the observed degree of positional clustering, the observed value of SCL (computed for the mutations actually observed), [is] compared to the distribution of SCL obtained from the random permutations, and the P value [is] defined to be the fraction of random permutations in which SCL [is] at least as large as the observed SCL. The P value for the conservation of the mutated positions, PFN, [is] computed analogously." [6]
In addition to the links below, the full results of the analysis summarized in this report can also be downloaded programmatically using firehose_get, or interactively from either the Broad GDAC website or TCGA Data Coordination Center Portal.