Mutation Analysis (MutSig 2CV v3.1)
Overview
Introduction

This report serves to describe the mutational landscape and properties of a given cohort, as well as rank genes and genesets according to mutational significance. MutSig 2CV v3.1 was used to generate the results found in this report.

  • Working with cohort: CPTAC3-BRCA-TP

  • Number of patients in cohort: 122

Input

The input for this pipeline is an annotated .maf file describing the mutations called for each individual in the given cancer cohort, and their properties.

Summary
Results
Breakdown of Mutation Rates by Category Type

Table 1.  Get Full Table A breakdown of mutation rates per category discovered for this cohort.

left from change right n N rate ci_low ci_high relrate autoname name type
CT C t ACGT 13238 3269673819 4e-06 4e-06 4.1e-06 6.5 CT[C->t]ACGT (C/T)p*C->T point
AG C t ACGT 2793 2784947873 1e-06 9.7e-07 1e-06 1.6 AG[C->t]ACGT (A/G)p*C->T point
T C fs ACGT 2060 3074552898 6.7e-07 6.4e-07 7e-07 1.1 T[C->fs]ACGT Tp*C->(G/A) point
ACG C fs ACGT 1686 9034690486 1.9e-07 1.8e-07 2e-07 0.3 ACG[C->fs]ACGT (A/C/G)p*C->(G/A) point
ACGT A tfs ACGT 2199 16943314995 1.3e-07 1.2e-07 1.4e-07 0.21 ACGT[A->tfs]ACGT A->mut point
Lego Plots

The mutation spectrum is depicted in the lego plots below in which the 96 possible mutation types are subdivided into six large blocks, color-coded to reflect the base substitution type. Each large block is further subdivided into the 16 possible pairs of 5' and 3' neighbors, as listed in the 4x4 trinucleotide context legend. The height of each block corresponds to the mutation frequency for that kind of mutation (counts of mutations normalized by the base coverage in a given bin). The shape of the spectrum is a signature for dominant mutational mechanisms in different tumor types.

Figure 1.  Get High-res Image SNV Mutation rate lego plot for entire cohort. Each bin is normalized by base coverage for that bin. Colors represent the six SNV types on the upper right. The three-base context for each mutation is labeled in the 4x4 legend on the lower right. The fractional breakdown of SNV counts is shown in the pie chart on the upper left. If this figure is blank, not enough information was provided in the MAF to generate it.

Figure 2.  Get High-res Image SNV Mutation rate lego plots for 4 slices of mutation allele fraction (0<=AF<0.1, 0.1<=AF<0.25, 0.25<=AF<0.5, & 0.5<=AF) . The color code and three-base context legends are the same as the previous figure. If this figure is blank, not enough information was provided in the MAF to generate it.

CoMut Plot

Figure 3.  Get High-res Image The matrix in the center of the figure represents individual mutations in patient samples, color-coded by type of mutation, for the significantly mutated genes. The rate of synonymous and non-synonymous mutations is displayed at the top of the matrix. The barplot on the left of the matrix shows the number of mutations in each gene. The percentages represent the fraction of tumors with at least one mutation in the specified gene. The barplot to the right of the matrix displays the q-values for the most significantly mutated genes. The purple boxplots below the matrix (only displayed if required columns are present in the provided MAF) represent the distributions of allelic fractions observed in each sample. The plot at the bottom represents the base substitution distribution of individual samples, using the same categories that were used to calculate significance.

Significantly Mutated Genes

Column Descriptions:

  • codelen = the gene's coding length

  • nncd = number of noncoding mutations in this gene across the cohort

  • nsil = number of silent mutations in this gene across the cohort

  • nmis = number of missense mutations in this gene across the cohort

  • nstp = number of readthrough mutations in this gene across the cohort

  • nspl = number of splice site mutations in this gene across the cohort

  • nind = number of indels in this gene across the cohort

  • nnon = number of (nonsilent) mutations in this gene across the cohort

  • npat = number of patients (individuals) with at least one nonsilent mutation

  • nsite = number of unique sites having a non-silent mutation

  • Abundance (pCV) = Probability that the gene's overall nonsilent mutation rate exceeds its inferred background mutation rate (BMR), which is computed based on the gene's own silent mutation rate plus silent mutation rates of genes with similar covariates. BMR calculations are normalized with respect to patient-specific and sequence context-specific mutation rates.

  • Clustering (pCL) = Probability that recurrently mutated loci in this gene have more mutations than expected by chance. While pCV assesses the gene's overall mutation burden, pCL assesses the burden of specific sites within the gene. This allows MutSig to differentiate between genes with uniformly distributed mutations and genes with localized hotspots.

  • Conservation (pFN) = Probability that mutations within this gene occur disproportionately at evolutionarily conserved sites. Sites highly conserved across vertebrates are assumed to have greater functional impact than weakly conserved sites.

  • p = p-value (overall)

  • q = q-value, False Discovery Rate (Benjamini-Hochberg procedure)

Table 2.  Get Full Table A Ranked List of Significantly Mutated Genes. Number of significant genes found: 88. Number of genes displayed: 35. Click on a gene name to display its stick figure depicting the distribution of mutations and mutation types across the chosen gene (this feature may not be available for all significant genes).

rank gene longname codelen nnei nncd nsil nmis nstp nspl nind nnon npat nsite pCV pCL pFN p q
1 TP53 tumor protein p53 1448 100 0 1 29 13 1 12 55 52 44 1e-16 3e-05 0.0019 1e-16 9.6e-13
2 FRG1 FSHD region gene 1 813 240 0 0 7 0 2 10 19 18 14 3.2e-16 0.0003 0.51 1e-16 9.6e-13
3 PTEN phosphatase and tensin homolog (mutated in multiple advanced cancers 1) 1246 125 0 0 4 1 3 3 11 9 11 1.1e-12 0.18 0.45 6.3e-12 4e-08
4 ARID1B AT rich interactive domain 1B (SWI1-like) 6996 3 0 1 2 0 0 8 10 9 5 3.4e-07 1e-05 0.73 9.4e-11 4e-07
5 CDH1 cadherin 1, type 1, E-cadherin (epithelial) 2717 22 0 0 1 3 0 5 9 9 9 3.8e-12 1 0.96 1e-10 4e-07
6 PIK3CA phosphoinositide-3-kinase, catalytic, alpha polypeptide 3293 3 0 1 37 0 0 4 41 38 17 3e-06 1e-05 0.012 7.5e-10 2.4e-06
7 EDC4 enhancer of mRNA decapping 4 4322 35 0 2 4 0 0 6 10 8 6 0.00011 1e-05 0.98 2.3e-08 0.000063
8 SRRT serrate RNA effector molecule homolog (Arabidopsis) 2717 56 0 1 1 0 0 4 5 5 3 0.000031 4e-05 0.5 2.7e-08 0.000065
9 IL16 interleukin 16 (lymphocyte chemoattractant factor) 4083 7 0 1 3 0 0 6 9 8 4 0.00018 1e-05 0.94 3.7e-08 0.000077
10 GATA3 GATA binding protein 3 1367 146 0 0 3 0 0 5 8 8 8 8.4e-09 1 0.1 4e-08 0.000077
11 PASD1 PAS domain containing 1 2390 6 0 1 1 0 0 5 6 6 2 0.00022 1e-05 0.35 4.6e-08 8e-05
12 MIS18BP1 MIS18 binding protein 1 3471 44 0 0 2 0 0 4 6 6 4 3e-05 0.00013 0.29 9.6e-08 0.00015
13 MEX3A mex-3 homolog A (C. elegans) 1569 10 0 0 1 0 0 5 6 6 2 0.000056 2e-05 0.89 1.3e-07 0.00018
14 AMMECR1 Alport syndrome, mental retardation, midface hypoplasia and elliptocytosis chromosomal region, gene 1 1032 18 0 0 0 0 0 4 4 4 3 1.2e-07 0.047 0.88 1.3e-07 0.00018
15 SLC5A11 solute carrier family 5 (sodium/glucose cotransporter), member 11 2119 12 0 0 1 0 0 3 4 4 2 0.00021 0.0001 0.8 3.9e-07 0.00049
16 SETD1A SET domain containing 1A 5204 26 0 1 3 0 0 4 7 7 5 0.00019 0.00013 0.87 6.1e-07 0.00072
17 NCOR2 nuclear receptor co-repressor 2 7769 60 0 3 6 0 0 7 13 9 12 9.3e-06 0.0026 1 6.6e-07 0.00072
18 GIGYF1 GRB10 interacting GYF protein 1 3204 32 0 0 0 0 0 5 5 5 4 0.00054 7e-05 0.62 6.8e-07 0.00072
19 BHLHE22 basic helix-loop-helix family, member e22 1150 90 0 0 0 0 0 4 4 4 2 0.00016 0.00028 0.99 8.6e-07 0.00086
20 RSBN1L round spermatid basic protein 1-like 2581 77 0 0 1 0 0 4 5 5 3 0.0018 6e-05 0.97 2.1e-06 0.002
21 RSPH6A radial spoke head 6 homolog A (Chlamydomonas) 2186 328 0 0 1 0 0 3 4 4 3 0.0022 0.0001 0.01 3.5e-06 0.0032
22 AKT1 v-akt murine thymoma viral oncogene homolog 1 1570 11 0 0 5 0 0 0 5 5 2 0.0007 0.00055 0.014 3.7e-06 0.0032
23 NBPF1 neuroblastoma breakpoint family, member 1 3560 168 0 2 5 0 2 0 7 6 6 0.000018 0.022 0.67 5e-06 0.0041
24 EIF3J eukaryotic translation initiation factor 3, subunit J 819 171 0 0 1 0 0 3 4 4 3 2e-05 0.022 0.73 7e-06 0.0052
25 AKNA AT-hook transcription factor 4525 1 0 0 1 2 0 2 5 4 4 0.0092 4e-05 0.93 7.2e-06 0.0052
26 AL592284.1 815 65 0 0 0 0 0 4 4 4 1 7.4e-06 NaN NaN 7.4e-06 0.0052
27 COBLL1 COBL-like 1 3781 11 0 0 3 0 0 2 5 5 4 0.00047 0.012 0.02 7.4e-06 0.0052
28 HRC histidine rich calcium binding protein 2132 68 0 0 4 0 0 4 8 6 6 0.00029 0.0014 0.68 8.4e-06 0.0056
29 MED15 mediator complex subunit 15 2466 8 0 0 0 1 0 2 3 3 2 0.00018 0.0088 0.32 8.5e-06 0.0056
30 PLXNB3 plexin B3 6074 8 0 0 1 0 0 3 4 4 2 0.0059 0.0001 0.94 9.1e-06 0.0057
31 KLF17 Kruppel-like factor 17 1188 120 0 0 0 0 0 3 3 3 1 0.0006 0.001 0.87 9.2e-06 0.0057
32 FKBP11 FK506 binding protein 11, 19 kDa 860 254 0 0 0 0 0 3 3 3 1 0.00076 0.001 0.96 0.000011 0.0068
33 NCOA6 nuclear receptor coactivator 6 6268 0 0 3 2 0 0 3 5 5 3 0.078 2e-05 0.031 0.000012 0.0068
34 DLX2 distal-less homeobox 2 1066 418 0 0 0 0 0 4 4 4 2 0.00072 0.0008 0.96 0.000012 0.007
35 TSPAN4 tetraspanin 4 849 2 0 0 0 0 0 2 2 2 1 0.000085 0.01 0.92 0.000015 0.0081
TP53

Figure S1.  Get High-res Image This figure depicts the distribution of mutations and mutation types across the TP53 significant gene.

FRG1

Figure S2.  Get High-res Image This figure depicts the distribution of mutations and mutation types across the FRG1 significant gene.

PTEN

Figure S3.  Get High-res Image This figure depicts the distribution of mutations and mutation types across the PTEN significant gene.

ARID1B

Figure S4.  Get High-res Image This figure depicts the distribution of mutations and mutation types across the ARID1B significant gene.

CDH1

Figure S5.  Get High-res Image This figure depicts the distribution of mutations and mutation types across the CDH1 significant gene.

PIK3CA

Figure S6.  Get High-res Image This figure depicts the distribution of mutations and mutation types across the PIK3CA significant gene.

EDC4

Figure S7.  Get High-res Image This figure depicts the distribution of mutations and mutation types across the EDC4 significant gene.

SRRT

Figure S8.  Get High-res Image This figure depicts the distribution of mutations and mutation types across the SRRT significant gene.

IL16

Figure S9.  Get High-res Image This figure depicts the distribution of mutations and mutation types across the IL16 significant gene.

GATA3

Figure S10.  Get High-res Image This figure depicts the distribution of mutations and mutation types across the GATA3 significant gene.

PASD1

Figure S11.  Get High-res Image This figure depicts the distribution of mutations and mutation types across the PASD1 significant gene.

MIS18BP1

Figure S12.  Get High-res Image This figure depicts the distribution of mutations and mutation types across the MIS18BP1 significant gene.

MEX3A

Figure S13.  Get High-res Image This figure depicts the distribution of mutations and mutation types across the MEX3A significant gene.

AMMECR1

Figure S14.  Get High-res Image This figure depicts the distribution of mutations and mutation types across the AMMECR1 significant gene.

SLC5A11

Figure S15.  Get High-res Image This figure depicts the distribution of mutations and mutation types across the SLC5A11 significant gene.

SETD1A

Figure S16.  Get High-res Image This figure depicts the distribution of mutations and mutation types across the SETD1A significant gene.

GIGYF1

Figure S17.  Get High-res Image This figure depicts the distribution of mutations and mutation types across the GIGYF1 significant gene.

BHLHE22

Figure S18.  Get High-res Image This figure depicts the distribution of mutations and mutation types across the BHLHE22 significant gene.

RSBN1L

Figure S19.  Get High-res Image This figure depicts the distribution of mutations and mutation types across the RSBN1L significant gene.

RSPH6A

Figure S20.  Get High-res Image This figure depicts the distribution of mutations and mutation types across the RSPH6A significant gene.

AKT1

Figure S21.  Get High-res Image This figure depicts the distribution of mutations and mutation types across the AKT1 significant gene.

EIF3J

Figure S22.  Get High-res Image This figure depicts the distribution of mutations and mutation types across the EIF3J significant gene.

AKNA

Figure S23.  Get High-res Image This figure depicts the distribution of mutations and mutation types across the AKNA significant gene.

COBLL1

Figure S24.  Get High-res Image This figure depicts the distribution of mutations and mutation types across the COBLL1 significant gene.

HRC

Figure S25.  Get High-res Image This figure depicts the distribution of mutations and mutation types across the HRC significant gene.

MED15

Figure S26.  Get High-res Image This figure depicts the distribution of mutations and mutation types across the MED15 significant gene.

PLXNB3

Figure S27.  Get High-res Image This figure depicts the distribution of mutations and mutation types across the PLXNB3 significant gene.

KLF17

Figure S28.  Get High-res Image This figure depicts the distribution of mutations and mutation types across the KLF17 significant gene.

FKBP11

Figure S29.  Get High-res Image This figure depicts the distribution of mutations and mutation types across the FKBP11 significant gene.

NCOA6

Figure S30.  Get High-res Image This figure depicts the distribution of mutations and mutation types across the NCOA6 significant gene.

DLX2

Figure S31.  Get High-res Image This figure depicts the distribution of mutations and mutation types across the DLX2 significant gene.

Methods & Data
Methods

MutSig and its evolving algorithms have existed since the youth of clinical sequencing, with early versions used in multiple publications. [1][2][3]

"Three significance metrics [are] calculated for each gene, using the […] methods MutSigCV [4], MutSigCL, and MutSigFN [5]. These measure the significance of mutation burden, clustering, and functional impact, respectively […]. MutSigCV determines the P value for observing the given quantity of non-silent mutations in the gene, given the background model determined by silent (and noncoding) mutations in the same gene and the neighbouring genes of covariate space that form its 'bagel'. […] MutSigCL and MutSigFN measure the significance of the positional clustering of the mutations observed, as well as the significance of the tendency for mutations to occur at positions that are highly evolutionarily conserved (using conservation as a proxy for probably functional impact). MutSigCL and MutSigFN are permutation-based methods and their P values are calculated as follows: The observed nonsilent coding mutations in the gene are permuted T times (to simulate the null hypothesis, T = 108 for the most significant genes), randomly reassigning their positions, but preserving their mutational 'category', as determined by local sequence context. We [use] the following context categories: transitions at CpG dinucleotides, transitions at other C-G base pairs, transversions at C-G base pairs, mutations at A-T base pairs, and indels. Indels are unconstrained in terms of where they can move to in the permutations. For each of the random permutations, two scores are calculated: SCL and SFN, measuring the amount of clustering and function impact (measured by conservation) respectively. SCL is defined to be the fraction of mutations occurring in hotspots. A hotspot is defined as a 3-base-pair region of the gene containing many mutations: at least 2, and at least 2% of the total mutations. SFN is defined to be the mean of the base-pair-level conservation values for the position of each non-silent mutation […]. To determine a PCL, the P value for the observed degree of positional clustering, the observed value of SCL (computed for the mutations actually observed), [is] compared to the distribution of SCL obtained from the random permutations, and the P value [is] defined to be the fraction of random permutations in which SCL [is] at least as large as the observed SCL. The P value for the conservation of the mutated positions, PFN, [is] computed analogously." [6]

References
[1] Getz G, Höfling H, Mesirov JP, Golub TR, Meyerson M, Tibshirani R, Lander ES, Comment on "The Consensus Coding Sequences of Human Breast and Colorectal Cancers", Science 317(5844):1500b (2007)
[3] TCGA, Integrated genomic analyses of ovarian carcinoma, Nature 474(7353):609-615 (2011)
[4] Lawrence MS, et al., Mutational heterogeneity in cancer and the search for new cancer-associated genes, Nature 499(7457):214-218 (2013)
[6] Lawrence MS, et al., Discovery and saturation analysis of cancer genes across 21 tumour types, Nature 505(7484):495-501 (2014)