Thyroid Adenocarcinoma: Correlation between gene mutation status and molecular subtypes
(primary solid tumor cohort)
Maintained by TCGA GDAC Team (Broad Institute/MD Anderson Cancer Center/Harvard Medical School)
Overview
Introduction

This pipeline computes the correlation between significantly recurrent gene mutations and molecular subtypes.

Summary

Testing the association between mutation status of 41 genes and 8 molecular subtypes across 323 patients, 20 significant findings detected with P value < 0.05 and Q value < 0.25.

  • BRAF mutation correlated to 'METHLYATION_CNMF',  'RPPA_CNMF',  'RPPA_CHIERARCHICAL',  'MRNASEQ_CNMF',  'MRNASEQ_CHIERARCHICAL',  'MIRSEQ_CNMF', and 'MIRSEQ_CHIERARCHICAL'.

  • HRAS mutation correlated to 'CN_CNMF',  'METHLYATION_CNMF',  'RPPA_CNMF',  'MRNASEQ_CNMF',  'MRNASEQ_CHIERARCHICAL',  'MIRSEQ_CNMF', and 'MIRSEQ_CHIERARCHICAL'.

  • NRAS mutation correlated to 'METHLYATION_CNMF',  'RPPA_CHIERARCHICAL',  'MRNASEQ_CNMF',  'MRNASEQ_CHIERARCHICAL',  'MIRSEQ_CNMF', and 'MIRSEQ_CHIERARCHICAL'.

Results
Overview of the results

Table 1.  Get Full Table Overview of the association between mutation status of 41 genes and 8 molecular subtypes. Shown in the table are P values (Q values). Thresholded by P value < 0.05 and Q value < 0.25, 20 significant findings detected.

Clinical
Features
CN
CNMF
METHLYATION
CNMF
RPPA
CNMF
RPPA
CHIERARCHICAL
MRNASEQ
CNMF
MRNASEQ
CHIERARCHICAL
MIRSEQ
CNMF
MIRSEQ
CHIERARCHICAL
nMutated (%) nWild-Type Fisher's exact test Fisher's exact test Fisher's exact test Fisher's exact test Fisher's exact test Fisher's exact test Fisher's exact test Fisher's exact test
BRAF 183 (57%) 140 0.0194
(1.00)
3.62e-38
(9.99e-36)
9.4e-07
(0.000252)
2.51e-11
(6.84e-09)
4.03e-46
(1.13e-43)
1.56e-39
(4.31e-37)
9.88e-42
(2.75e-39)
1.03e-43
(2.86e-41)
HRAS 12 (4%) 311 0.000222
(0.0582)
1.48e-06
(0.000393)
9.23e-05
(0.0243)
0.00529
(1.00)
1.37e-05
(0.00362)
6.79e-06
(0.0018)
1.31e-06
(0.00035)
3.85e-07
(0.000104)
NRAS 26 (8%) 297 0.00692
(1.00)
6.06e-14
(1.67e-11)
1
(1.00)
0.000583
(0.152)
4.7e-11
(1.27e-08)
4.03e-11
(1.09e-08)
9.19e-13
(2.51e-10)
2.47e-13
(6.78e-11)
EMG1 6 (2%) 317 0.548
(1.00)
1
(1.00)
0.327
(1.00)
0.0846
(1.00)
1
(1.00)
1
(1.00)
1
(1.00)
0.778
(1.00)
PTTG1IP 4 (1%) 319 1
(1.00)
1
(1.00)
0.242
(1.00)
0.252
(1.00)
0.469
(1.00)
0.393
(1.00)
RPTN 8 (2%) 315 0.805
(1.00)
0.442
(1.00)
0.265
(1.00)
0.801
(1.00)
0.0249
(1.00)
0.415
(1.00)
0.82
(1.00)
0.666
(1.00)
EIF1AX 5 (2%) 318 0.731
(1.00)
0.0278
(1.00)
0.444
(1.00)
0.132
(1.00)
0.0621
(1.00)
0.0109
(1.00)
0.0581
(1.00)
0.236
(1.00)
CCDC15 5 (2%) 318 0.731
(1.00)
0.115
(1.00)
1
(1.00)
0.381
(1.00)
0.132
(1.00)
0.136
(1.00)
0.63
(1.00)
0.53
(1.00)
ZNF845 6 (2%) 317 0.42
(1.00)
0.637
(1.00)
0.639
(1.00)
0.125
(1.00)
0.943
(1.00)
0.166
(1.00)
0.777
(1.00)
0.328
(1.00)
ZNF878 4 (1%) 319 1
(1.00)
0.487
(1.00)
0.0454
(1.00)
0.833
(1.00)
0.691
(1.00)
1
(1.00)
TG 16 (5%) 307 1
(1.00)
0.0205
(1.00)
0.34
(1.00)
0.492
(1.00)
0.406
(1.00)
0.293
(1.00)
0.0452
(1.00)
0.0253
(1.00)
PRB2 6 (2%) 317 1
(1.00)
0.637
(1.00)
0.0801
(1.00)
0.851
(1.00)
0.474
(1.00)
0.723
(1.00)
0.522
(1.00)
0.598
(1.00)
R3HDM2 4 (1%) 319 0.0124
(1.00)
0.063
(1.00)
0.0699
(1.00)
0.0388
(1.00)
0.0191
(1.00)
0.00822
(1.00)
IL32 3 (1%) 320 1
(1.00)
0.742
(1.00)
1
(1.00)
0.78
(1.00)
0.202
(1.00)
0.645
(1.00)
TMCO2 3 (1%) 320 1
(1.00)
0.416
(1.00)
0.778
(1.00)
0.2
(1.00)
0.492
(1.00)
0.303
(1.00)
0.401
(1.00)
0.778
(1.00)
PPTC7 3 (1%) 320 0.0791
(1.00)
0.0627
(1.00)
0.172
(1.00)
0.0916
(1.00)
0.299
(1.00)
0.403
(1.00)
MUC7 5 (2%) 318 0.731
(1.00)
0.372
(1.00)
0.683
(1.00)
0.26
(1.00)
0.805
(1.00)
0.848
(1.00)
0.866
(1.00)
0.629
(1.00)
LYPD3 3 (1%) 320 0.547
(1.00)
0.416
(1.00)
0.492
(1.00)
0.303
(1.00)
0.644
(1.00)
0.778
(1.00)
TMEM90B 3 (1%) 320 0.135
(1.00)
1
(1.00)
1
(1.00)
0.78
(1.00)
1
(1.00)
1
(1.00)
ZNF799 5 (2%) 318 0.465
(1.00)
1
(1.00)
0.505
(1.00)
1
(1.00)
0.592
(1.00)
0.848
(1.00)
0.451
(1.00)
1
(1.00)
PPM1D 5 (2%) 318 1
(1.00)
1
(1.00)
0.778
(1.00)
0.125
(1.00)
0.693
(1.00)
0.848
(1.00)
0.866
(1.00)
0.329
(1.00)
MAP3K3 4 (1%) 319 0.061
(1.00)
0.224
(1.00)
0.459
(1.00)
0.0846
(1.00)
0.274
(1.00)
0.184
(1.00)
0.469
(1.00)
0.555
(1.00)
TROAP 3 (1%) 320 1
(1.00)
0.742
(1.00)
0.778
(1.00)
0.535
(1.00)
0.746
(1.00)
1
(1.00)
0.519
(1.00)
0.403
(1.00)
SYNPO2L 3 (1%) 320 0.547
(1.00)
1
(1.00)
1
(1.00)
0.78
(1.00)
1
(1.00)
1
(1.00)
ATAD2 4 (1%) 319 1
(1.00)
0.823
(1.00)
0.808
(1.00)
1
(1.00)
0.691
(1.00)
1
(1.00)
KRAS 3 (1%) 320 1
(1.00)
0.0627
(1.00)
0.172
(1.00)
0.0916
(1.00)
0.0616
(1.00)
0.0276
(1.00)
SLC5A11 3 (1%) 320 0.547
(1.00)
0.742
(1.00)
0.299
(1.00)
0.403
(1.00)
PRG4 4 (1%) 319 0.23
(1.00)
0.104
(1.00)
0.0128
(1.00)
0.142
(1.00)
0.469
(1.00)
0.555
(1.00)
SCUBE2 3 (1%) 320 1
(1.00)
0.281
(1.00)
0.314
(1.00)
0.303
(1.00)
0.644
(1.00)
0.522
(1.00)
ZNF479 3 (1%) 320 1
(1.00)
0.742
(1.00)
1
(1.00)
0.78
(1.00)
0.519
(1.00)
1
(1.00)
SREBF2 3 (1%) 320 1
(1.00)
0.742
(1.00)
0.568
(1.00)
1
(1.00)
0.401
(1.00)
0.778
(1.00)
SLC26A11 3 (1%) 320 0.0791
(1.00)
1
(1.00)
0.368
(1.00)
0.78
(1.00)
0.778
(1.00)
0.301
(1.00)
TSC22D1 3 (1%) 320 1
(1.00)
1
(1.00)
0.746
(1.00)
1
(1.00)
0.778
(1.00)
0.645
(1.00)
ANKRD30A 5 (2%) 318 0.731
(1.00)
0.462
(1.00)
0.749
(1.00)
0.507
(1.00)
0.74
(1.00)
0.865
(1.00)
FAM155A 4 (1%) 319 0.144
(1.00)
0.156
(1.00)
0.778
(1.00)
0.535
(1.00)
0.0372
(1.00)
0.555
(1.00)
SLA 3 (1%) 320 0.547
(1.00)
0.0627
(1.00)
0.286
(1.00)
0.285
(1.00)
0.172
(1.00)
0.0916
(1.00)
0.0616
(1.00)
0.0276
(1.00)
ZFHX3 10 (3%) 313 0.171
(1.00)
0.616
(1.00)
0.48
(1.00)
0.632
(1.00)
0.794
(1.00)
0.437
(1.00)
0.613
(1.00)
0.723
(1.00)
ARMCX3 3 (1%) 320 0.547
(1.00)
0.742
(1.00)
0.646
(1.00)
0.213
(1.00)
0.519
(1.00)
0.202
(1.00)
SLC25A45 3 (1%) 320 0.135
(1.00)
1
(1.00)
0.202
(1.00)
0.403
(1.00)
COL5A3 6 (2%) 317 0.752
(1.00)
0.317
(1.00)
0.778
(1.00)
0.758
(1.00)
0.044
(1.00)
0.753
(1.00)
0.877
(1.00)
0.523
(1.00)
CDC27 3 (1%) 320 1
(1.00)
1
(1.00)
0.368
(1.00)
0.0446
(1.00)
0.778
(1.00)
0.301
(1.00)
'BRAF MUTATION STATUS' versus 'METHLYATION_CNMF'

P value = 3.62e-38 (Fisher's exact test), Q value = 1e-35

Table S1.  Gene #1: 'BRAF MUTATION STATUS' versus Clinical Feature #2: 'METHLYATION_CNMF'

nPatients CLUS_1 CLUS_2 CLUS_3
ALL 105 52 166
BRAF MUTATED 10 30 143
BRAF WILD-TYPE 95 22 23

Figure S1.  Get High-res Image Gene #1: 'BRAF MUTATION STATUS' versus Clinical Feature #2: 'METHLYATION_CNMF'

'BRAF MUTATION STATUS' versus 'RPPA_CNMF'

P value = 9.4e-07 (Fisher's exact test), Q value = 0.00025

Table S2.  Gene #1: 'BRAF MUTATION STATUS' versus Clinical Feature #3: 'RPPA_CNMF'

nPatients CLUS_1 CLUS_2 CLUS_3
ALL 62 76 79
BRAF MUTATED 19 57 42
BRAF WILD-TYPE 43 19 37

Figure S2.  Get High-res Image Gene #1: 'BRAF MUTATION STATUS' versus Clinical Feature #3: 'RPPA_CNMF'

'BRAF MUTATION STATUS' versus 'RPPA_CHIERARCHICAL'

P value = 2.51e-11 (Fisher's exact test), Q value = 6.8e-09

Table S3.  Gene #1: 'BRAF MUTATION STATUS' versus Clinical Feature #4: 'RPPA_CHIERARCHICAL'

nPatients CLUS_1 CLUS_2 CLUS_3
ALL 96 32 89
BRAF MUTATED 30 16 72
BRAF WILD-TYPE 66 16 17

Figure S3.  Get High-res Image Gene #1: 'BRAF MUTATION STATUS' versus Clinical Feature #4: 'RPPA_CHIERARCHICAL'

'BRAF MUTATION STATUS' versus 'MRNASEQ_CNMF'

P value = 4.03e-46 (Fisher's exact test), Q value = 1.1e-43

Table S4.  Gene #1: 'BRAF MUTATION STATUS' versus Clinical Feature #5: 'MRNASEQ_CNMF'

nPatients CLUS_1 CLUS_2 CLUS_3 CLUS_4
ALL 102 36 70 95
BRAF MUTATED 6 20 57 90
BRAF WILD-TYPE 96 16 13 5

Figure S4.  Get High-res Image Gene #1: 'BRAF MUTATION STATUS' versus Clinical Feature #5: 'MRNASEQ_CNMF'

'BRAF MUTATION STATUS' versus 'MRNASEQ_CHIERARCHICAL'

P value = 1.56e-39 (Fisher's exact test), Q value = 4.3e-37

Table S5.  Gene #1: 'BRAF MUTATION STATUS' versus Clinical Feature #6: 'MRNASEQ_CHIERARCHICAL'

nPatients CLUS_1 CLUS_2 CLUS_3
ALL 110 136 57
BRAF MUTATED 11 120 42
BRAF WILD-TYPE 99 16 15

Figure S5.  Get High-res Image Gene #1: 'BRAF MUTATION STATUS' versus Clinical Feature #6: 'MRNASEQ_CHIERARCHICAL'

'BRAF MUTATION STATUS' versus 'MIRSEQ_CNMF'

P value = 9.88e-42 (Fisher's exact test), Q value = 2.7e-39

Table S6.  Gene #1: 'BRAF MUTATION STATUS' versus Clinical Feature #7: 'MIRSEQ_CNMF'

nPatients CLUS_1 CLUS_2 CLUS_3
ALL 105 119 98
BRAF MUTATED 6 103 73
BRAF WILD-TYPE 99 16 25

Figure S6.  Get High-res Image Gene #1: 'BRAF MUTATION STATUS' versus Clinical Feature #7: 'MIRSEQ_CNMF'

'BRAF MUTATION STATUS' versus 'MIRSEQ_CHIERARCHICAL'

P value = 1.03e-43 (Fisher's exact test), Q value = 2.9e-41

Table S7.  Gene #1: 'BRAF MUTATION STATUS' versus Clinical Feature #8: 'MIRSEQ_CHIERARCHICAL'

nPatients CLUS_1 CLUS_2 CLUS_3
ALL 118 106 98
BRAF MUTATED 94 86 2
BRAF WILD-TYPE 24 20 96

Figure S7.  Get High-res Image Gene #1: 'BRAF MUTATION STATUS' versus Clinical Feature #8: 'MIRSEQ_CHIERARCHICAL'

'HRAS MUTATION STATUS' versus 'CN_CNMF'

P value = 0.000222 (Fisher's exact test), Q value = 0.058

Table S8.  Gene #3: 'HRAS MUTATION STATUS' versus Clinical Feature #1: 'CN_CNMF'

nPatients CLUS_1 CLUS_2 CLUS_3
ALL 25 246 49
HRAS MUTATED 0 4 8
HRAS WILD-TYPE 25 242 41

Figure S8.  Get High-res Image Gene #3: 'HRAS MUTATION STATUS' versus Clinical Feature #1: 'CN_CNMF'

'HRAS MUTATION STATUS' versus 'METHLYATION_CNMF'

P value = 1.48e-06 (Fisher's exact test), Q value = 0.00039

Table S9.  Gene #3: 'HRAS MUTATION STATUS' versus Clinical Feature #2: 'METHLYATION_CNMF'

nPatients CLUS_1 CLUS_2 CLUS_3
ALL 105 52 166
HRAS MUTATED 12 0 0
HRAS WILD-TYPE 93 52 166

Figure S9.  Get High-res Image Gene #3: 'HRAS MUTATION STATUS' versus Clinical Feature #2: 'METHLYATION_CNMF'

'HRAS MUTATION STATUS' versus 'RPPA_CNMF'

P value = 9.23e-05 (Fisher's exact test), Q value = 0.024

Table S10.  Gene #3: 'HRAS MUTATION STATUS' versus Clinical Feature #3: 'RPPA_CNMF'

nPatients CLUS_1 CLUS_2 CLUS_3
ALL 62 76 79
HRAS MUTATED 9 2 0
HRAS WILD-TYPE 53 74 79

Figure S10.  Get High-res Image Gene #3: 'HRAS MUTATION STATUS' versus Clinical Feature #3: 'RPPA_CNMF'

'HRAS MUTATION STATUS' versus 'MRNASEQ_CNMF'

P value = 1.37e-05 (Fisher's exact test), Q value = 0.0036

Table S11.  Gene #3: 'HRAS MUTATION STATUS' versus Clinical Feature #5: 'MRNASEQ_CNMF'

nPatients CLUS_1 CLUS_2 CLUS_3 CLUS_4
ALL 102 36 70 95
HRAS MUTATED 12 0 0 0
HRAS WILD-TYPE 90 36 70 95

Figure S11.  Get High-res Image Gene #3: 'HRAS MUTATION STATUS' versus Clinical Feature #5: 'MRNASEQ_CNMF'

'HRAS MUTATION STATUS' versus 'MRNASEQ_CHIERARCHICAL'

P value = 6.79e-06 (Fisher's exact test), Q value = 0.0018

Table S12.  Gene #3: 'HRAS MUTATION STATUS' versus Clinical Feature #6: 'MRNASEQ_CHIERARCHICAL'

nPatients CLUS_1 CLUS_2 CLUS_3
ALL 110 136 57
HRAS MUTATED 12 0 0
HRAS WILD-TYPE 98 136 57

Figure S12.  Get High-res Image Gene #3: 'HRAS MUTATION STATUS' versus Clinical Feature #6: 'MRNASEQ_CHIERARCHICAL'

'HRAS MUTATION STATUS' versus 'MIRSEQ_CNMF'

P value = 1.31e-06 (Fisher's exact test), Q value = 0.00035

Table S13.  Gene #3: 'HRAS MUTATION STATUS' versus Clinical Feature #7: 'MIRSEQ_CNMF'

nPatients CLUS_1 CLUS_2 CLUS_3
ALL 105 119 98
HRAS MUTATED 12 0 0
HRAS WILD-TYPE 93 119 98

Figure S13.  Get High-res Image Gene #3: 'HRAS MUTATION STATUS' versus Clinical Feature #7: 'MIRSEQ_CNMF'

'HRAS MUTATION STATUS' versus 'MIRSEQ_CHIERARCHICAL'

P value = 3.85e-07 (Fisher's exact test), Q value = 1e-04

Table S14.  Gene #3: 'HRAS MUTATION STATUS' versus Clinical Feature #8: 'MIRSEQ_CHIERARCHICAL'

nPatients CLUS_1 CLUS_2 CLUS_3
ALL 118 106 98
HRAS MUTATED 0 0 12
HRAS WILD-TYPE 118 106 86

Figure S14.  Get High-res Image Gene #3: 'HRAS MUTATION STATUS' versus Clinical Feature #8: 'MIRSEQ_CHIERARCHICAL'

'NRAS MUTATION STATUS' versus 'METHLYATION_CNMF'

P value = 6.06e-14 (Fisher's exact test), Q value = 1.7e-11

Table S15.  Gene #4: 'NRAS MUTATION STATUS' versus Clinical Feature #2: 'METHLYATION_CNMF'

nPatients CLUS_1 CLUS_2 CLUS_3
ALL 105 52 166
NRAS MUTATED 26 0 0
NRAS WILD-TYPE 79 52 166

Figure S15.  Get High-res Image Gene #4: 'NRAS MUTATION STATUS' versus Clinical Feature #2: 'METHLYATION_CNMF'

'NRAS MUTATION STATUS' versus 'RPPA_CHIERARCHICAL'

P value = 0.000583 (Fisher's exact test), Q value = 0.15

Table S16.  Gene #4: 'NRAS MUTATION STATUS' versus Clinical Feature #4: 'RPPA_CHIERARCHICAL'

nPatients CLUS_1 CLUS_2 CLUS_3
ALL 96 32 89
NRAS MUTATED 9 5 0
NRAS WILD-TYPE 87 27 89

Figure S16.  Get High-res Image Gene #4: 'NRAS MUTATION STATUS' versus Clinical Feature #4: 'RPPA_CHIERARCHICAL'

'NRAS MUTATION STATUS' versus 'MRNASEQ_CNMF'

P value = 4.7e-11 (Fisher's exact test), Q value = 1.3e-08

Table S17.  Gene #4: 'NRAS MUTATION STATUS' versus Clinical Feature #5: 'MRNASEQ_CNMF'

nPatients CLUS_1 CLUS_2 CLUS_3 CLUS_4
ALL 102 36 70 95
NRAS MUTATED 23 0 0 0
NRAS WILD-TYPE 79 36 70 95

Figure S17.  Get High-res Image Gene #4: 'NRAS MUTATION STATUS' versus Clinical Feature #5: 'MRNASEQ_CNMF'

'NRAS MUTATION STATUS' versus 'MRNASEQ_CHIERARCHICAL'

P value = 4.03e-11 (Fisher's exact test), Q value = 1.1e-08

Table S18.  Gene #4: 'NRAS MUTATION STATUS' versus Clinical Feature #6: 'MRNASEQ_CHIERARCHICAL'

nPatients CLUS_1 CLUS_2 CLUS_3
ALL 110 136 57
NRAS MUTATED 23 0 0
NRAS WILD-TYPE 87 136 57

Figure S18.  Get High-res Image Gene #4: 'NRAS MUTATION STATUS' versus Clinical Feature #6: 'MRNASEQ_CHIERARCHICAL'

'NRAS MUTATION STATUS' versus 'MIRSEQ_CNMF'

P value = 9.19e-13 (Fisher's exact test), Q value = 2.5e-10

Table S19.  Gene #4: 'NRAS MUTATION STATUS' versus Clinical Feature #7: 'MIRSEQ_CNMF'

nPatients CLUS_1 CLUS_2 CLUS_3
ALL 105 119 98
NRAS MUTATED 25 0 1
NRAS WILD-TYPE 80 119 97

Figure S19.  Get High-res Image Gene #4: 'NRAS MUTATION STATUS' versus Clinical Feature #7: 'MIRSEQ_CNMF'

'NRAS MUTATION STATUS' versus 'MIRSEQ_CHIERARCHICAL'

P value = 2.47e-13 (Fisher's exact test), Q value = 6.8e-11

Table S20.  Gene #4: 'NRAS MUTATION STATUS' versus Clinical Feature #8: 'MIRSEQ_CHIERARCHICAL'

nPatients CLUS_1 CLUS_2 CLUS_3
ALL 118 106 98
NRAS MUTATED 1 0 25
NRAS WILD-TYPE 117 106 73

Figure S20.  Get High-res Image Gene #4: 'NRAS MUTATION STATUS' versus Clinical Feature #8: 'MIRSEQ_CHIERARCHICAL'

Methods & Data
Input
  • Mutation data file = THCA-TP.mutsig.cluster.txt

  • Molecular subtypes file = THCA-TP.transferedmergedcluster.txt

  • Number of patients = 323

  • Number of significantly mutated genes = 41

  • Number of Molecular subtypes = 8

  • Exclude genes that fewer than K tumors have mutations, K = 3

Fisher's exact test

For binary or multi-class clinical features (nominal or ordinal), two-tailed Fisher's exact tests (Fisher 1922) were used to estimate the P values using the 'fisher.test' function in R

Q value calculation

For multiple hypothesis correction, Q value is the False Discovery Rate (FDR) analogue of the P value (Benjamini and Hochberg 1995), defined as the minimum FDR at which the test may be called significant. We used the 'Benjamini and Hochberg' method of 'p.adjust' function in R to convert P values into Q values.

Download Results

This is an experimental feature. The full results of the analysis summarized in this report can be downloaded from the TCGA Data Coordination Center.

References
[1] Fisher, R.A., On the interpretation of chi-square from contingency tables, and the calculation of P, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society 85(1):87-94 (1922)
[2] Benjamini and Hochberg, Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B 59:289-300 (1995)