Correlation between copy number variation genes (focal events) and molecular subtypes
Uterine Carcinosarcoma (Primary solid tumor)
15 January 2014  |  analyses__2014_01_15
Maintainer Information
Citation Information
Maintained by TCGA GDAC Team (Broad Institute/MD Anderson Cancer Center/Harvard Medical School)
Cite as Broad Institute TCGA Genome Data Analysis Center (2014): Correlation between copy number variation genes (focal events) and molecular subtypes. Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard. doi:10.7908/C1K35S4K
Overview
Introduction

This pipeline computes the correlation between significant copy number variation (cnv focal) genes and molecular subtypes.

Summary

Testing the association between copy number variation 40 focal events and 8 molecular subtypes across 56 patients, one significant finding detected with P value < 0.05 and Q value < 0.25.

  • 4q cnv correlated to 'MIRSEQ_CNMF'.

Results
Overview of the results

Table 1.  Get Full Table Overview of the association between significant copy number variation of 40 focal events and 8 molecular subtypes. Shown in the table are P values (Q values). Thresholded by P value < 0.05 and Q value < 0.25, one significant finding detected.

Clinical
Features
CN
CNMF
METHLYATION
CNMF
MRNASEQ
CNMF
MRNASEQ
CHIERARCHICAL
MIRSEQ
CNMF
MIRSEQ
CHIERARCHICAL
MIRSEQ
MATURE
CNMF
MIRSEQ
MATURE
CHIERARCHICAL
nCNV (%) nWild-Type Fisher's exact test Chi-square test Fisher's exact test Chi-square test Fisher's exact test Fisher's exact test Fisher's exact test Fisher's exact test
4q 36 (64%) 20 0.0319
(1.00)
0.021
(1.00)
0.0175
(1.00)
0.0483
(1.00)
0.000546
(0.175)
0.116
(1.00)
0.0577
(1.00)
0.116
(1.00)
1p 33 (59%) 23 0.175
(1.00)
0.612
(1.00)
0.69
(1.00)
0.549
(1.00)
0.496
(1.00)
0.83
(1.00)
0.667
(1.00)
0.444
(1.00)
1q 40 (71%) 16 0.866
(1.00)
0.549
(1.00)
0.767
(1.00)
0.842
(1.00)
0.868
(1.00)
0.604
(1.00)
0.833
(1.00)
0.428
(1.00)
2p 25 (45%) 31 0.606
(1.00)
0.0432
(1.00)
0.219
(1.00)
0.144
(1.00)
0.364
(1.00)
0.0479
(1.00)
0.245
(1.00)
0.0308
(1.00)
2q 23 (41%) 33 0.758
(1.00)
0.0468
(1.00)
0.116
(1.00)
0.341
(1.00)
0.411
(1.00)
0.0395
(1.00)
0.312
(1.00)
0.0293
(1.00)
3p 32 (57%) 24 0.35
(1.00)
0.105
(1.00)
0.335
(1.00)
0.123
(1.00)
0.531
(1.00)
0.765
(1.00)
0.729
(1.00)
0.825
(1.00)
3q 37 (66%) 19 0.693
(1.00)
0.107
(1.00)
0.0669
(1.00)
0.0514
(1.00)
0.1
(1.00)
0.0828
(1.00)
0.302
(1.00)
0.0817
(1.00)
4p 40 (71%) 16 0.0507
(1.00)
0.0815
(1.00)
0.0577
(1.00)
0.09
(1.00)
0.00932
(1.00)
0.198
(1.00)
0.246
(1.00)
0.169
(1.00)
5p 32 (57%) 24 0.709
(1.00)
0.913
(1.00)
0.352
(1.00)
0.447
(1.00)
0.862
(1.00)
0.699
(1.00)
0.834
(1.00)
0.366
(1.00)
5q 26 (46%) 30 0.792
(1.00)
0.386
(1.00)
0.791
(1.00)
0.261
(1.00)
0.525
(1.00)
0.327
(1.00)
0.0666
(1.00)
0.183
(1.00)
6p 35 (62%) 21 0.0884
(1.00)
0.425
(1.00)
0.886
(1.00)
0.661
(1.00)
0.959
(1.00)
0.298
(1.00)
0.935
(1.00)
0.579
(1.00)
6q 34 (61%) 22 0.0229
(1.00)
0.248
(1.00)
0.937
(1.00)
0.57
(1.00)
0.866
(1.00)
1
(1.00)
0.509
(1.00)
0.779
(1.00)
7p 34 (61%) 22 0.248
(1.00)
0.164
(1.00)
0.323
(1.00)
0.165
(1.00)
0.959
(1.00)
0.755
(1.00)
0.935
(1.00)
0.795
(1.00)
7q 30 (54%) 26 0.428
(1.00)
0.553
(1.00)
0.286
(1.00)
0.406
(1.00)
0.924
(1.00)
0.601
(1.00)
0.854
(1.00)
0.513
(1.00)
8p 42 (75%) 14 0.449
(1.00)
0.542
(1.00)
0.094
(1.00)
0.646
(1.00)
0.204
(1.00)
0.723
(1.00)
0.309
(1.00)
0.51
(1.00)
8q 39 (70%) 17 0.116
(1.00)
0.165
(1.00)
0.0553
(1.00)
0.531
(1.00)
0.251
(1.00)
0.643
(1.00)
0.156
(1.00)
0.457
(1.00)
9p 40 (71%) 16 0.177
(1.00)
0.0407
(1.00)
0.82
(1.00)
0.849
(1.00)
0.568
(1.00)
1
(1.00)
0.833
(1.00)
0.641
(1.00)
9q 41 (73%) 15 0.166
(1.00)
0.00528
(1.00)
1
(1.00)
0.813
(1.00)
0.636
(1.00)
1
(1.00)
0.935
(1.00)
0.78
(1.00)
10p 44 (79%) 12 0.91
(1.00)
0.202
(1.00)
0.147
(1.00)
0.413
(1.00)
0.33
(1.00)
0.0957
(1.00)
0.892
(1.00)
0.165
(1.00)
10q 38 (68%) 18 1
(1.00)
0.0116
(1.00)
0.0439
(1.00)
0.21
(1.00)
0.882
(1.00)
0.333
(1.00)
0.53
(1.00)
0.481
(1.00)
11p 31 (55%) 25 0.837
(1.00)
0.0912
(1.00)
0.42
(1.00)
0.496
(1.00)
0.329
(1.00)
0.241
(1.00)
0.651
(1.00)
0.3
(1.00)
11q 31 (55%) 25 0.837
(1.00)
0.0427
(1.00)
0.304
(1.00)
0.145
(1.00)
0.329
(1.00)
0.241
(1.00)
0.568
(1.00)
0.3
(1.00)
12p 35 (62%) 21 0.409
(1.00)
0.129
(1.00)
0.0174
(1.00)
0.0306
(1.00)
0.678
(1.00)
0.269
(1.00)
0.418
(1.00)
0.666
(1.00)
12q 25 (45%) 31 0.682
(1.00)
0.947
(1.00)
0.479
(1.00)
0.578
(1.00)
0.934
(1.00)
0.73
(1.00)
0.412
(1.00)
0.455
(1.00)
13q 41 (73%) 15 0.914
(1.00)
0.484
(1.00)
1
(1.00)
0.622
(1.00)
0.958
(1.00)
0.574
(1.00)
0.967
(1.00)
1
(1.00)
14q 34 (61%) 22 0.681
(1.00)
0.377
(1.00)
0.628
(1.00)
0.0768
(1.00)
0.862
(1.00)
1
(1.00)
0.611
(1.00)
0.671
(1.00)
15q 36 (64%) 20 0.0212
(1.00)
0.535
(1.00)
0.495
(1.00)
0.54
(1.00)
1
(1.00)
1
(1.00)
0.628
(1.00)
1
(1.00)
16p 42 (75%) 14 0.356
(1.00)
0.298
(1.00)
0.795
(1.00)
0.835
(1.00)
0.645
(1.00)
0.704
(1.00)
0.188
(1.00)
1
(1.00)
16q 43 (77%) 13 0.649
(1.00)
0.814
(1.00)
0.922
(1.00)
0.831
(1.00)
0.801
(1.00)
1
(1.00)
0.278
(1.00)
1
(1.00)
17p 43 (77%) 13 0.742
(1.00)
0.0782
(1.00)
0.922
(1.00)
0.248
(1.00)
0.892
(1.00)
0.546
(1.00)
1
(1.00)
0.757
(1.00)
17q 35 (62%) 21 1
(1.00)
0.104
(1.00)
0.323
(1.00)
0.031
(1.00)
0.222
(1.00)
0.269
(1.00)
0.63
(1.00)
0.666
(1.00)
18p 36 (64%) 20 0.725
(1.00)
0.304
(1.00)
1
(1.00)
0.308
(1.00)
0.719
(1.00)
0.264
(1.00)
0.932
(1.00)
0.266
(1.00)
18q 34 (61%) 22 0.593
(1.00)
0.819
(1.00)
0.86
(1.00)
0.138
(1.00)
0.319
(1.00)
0.132
(1.00)
0.611
(1.00)
0.147
(1.00)
19p 39 (70%) 17 0.843
(1.00)
0.208
(1.00)
0.806
(1.00)
0.796
(1.00)
0.212
(1.00)
0.756
(1.00)
0.374
(1.00)
0.532
(1.00)
19q 41 (73%) 15 0.392
(1.00)
0.0702
(1.00)
0.732
(1.00)
0.338
(1.00)
0.0867
(1.00)
0.723
(1.00)
0.0687
(1.00)
0.51
(1.00)
20p 44 (79%) 12 0.49
(1.00)
0.73
(1.00)
0.271
(1.00)
0.488
(1.00)
0.801
(1.00)
0.546
(1.00)
0.783
(1.00)
0.757
(1.00)
20q 48 (86%) 8 0.604
(1.00)
0.761
(1.00)
0.0414
(1.00)
0.394
(1.00)
0.179
(1.00)
0.261
(1.00)
0.148
(1.00)
0.369
(1.00)
21q 35 (62%) 21 0.553
(1.00)
0.574
(1.00)
0.563
(1.00)
0.563
(1.00)
0.854
(1.00)
0.546
(1.00)
0.912
(1.00)
0.308
(1.00)
22q 41 (73%) 15 0.793
(1.00)
0.883
(1.00)
0.384
(1.00)
0.501
(1.00)
0.795
(1.00)
0.574
(1.00)
0.596
(1.00)
0.524
(1.00)
xq 33 (59%) 23 0.499
(1.00)
0.137
(1.00)
0.925
(1.00)
0.364
(1.00)
0.625
(1.00)
0.332
(1.00)
0.667
(1.00)
0.384
(1.00)
'4q' versus 'MIRSEQ_CNMF'

P value = 0.000546 (Fisher's exact test), Q value = 0.17

Table S1.  Gene #8: '4q' versus Molecular Subtype #5: 'MIRSEQ_CNMF'

nPatients CLUS_1 CLUS_2 CLUS_3 CLUS_4
ALL 10 22 4 19
4Q MUTATED 10 17 0 9
4Q WILD-TYPE 0 5 4 10

Figure S1.  Get High-res Image Gene #8: '4q' versus Molecular Subtype #5: 'MIRSEQ_CNMF'

Methods & Data
Input
  • Copy number data file = transformed.cor.cli.txt

  • Molecular subtype file = UCS-TP.transferedmergedcluster.txt

  • Number of patients = 56

  • Number of significantly focal cnvs = 40

  • Number of molecular subtypes = 8

  • Exclude genes that fewer than K tumors have alterations, K = 3

Fisher's exact test

For binary or multi-class clinical features (nominal or ordinal), two-tailed Fisher's exact tests (Fisher 1922) were used to estimate the P values using the 'fisher.test' function in R

Chi-square test

For multi-class clinical features (nominal or ordinal), Chi-square tests (Greenwood and Nikulin 1996) were used to estimate the P values using the 'chisq.test' function in R

Q value calculation

For multiple hypothesis correction, Q value is the False Discovery Rate (FDR) analogue of the P value (Benjamini and Hochberg 1995), defined as the minimum FDR at which the test may be called significant. We used the 'Benjamini and Hochberg' method of 'p.adjust' function in R to convert P values into Q values.

Download Results

In addition to the links below, the full results of the analysis summarized in this report can also be downloaded programmatically using firehose_get, or interactively from either the Broad GDAC website or TCGA Data Coordination Center Portal.

References
[1] Fisher, R.A., On the interpretation of chi-square from contingency tables, and the calculation of P, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society 85(1):87-94 (1922)
[2] Greenwood and Nikulin, A guide to chi-squared testing, Wiley, New York. ISBN 047155779X (1996)
[3] Benjamini and Hochberg, Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B 59:289-300 (1995)