Correlation between gene methylation status and clinical features
Uterine Corpus Endometrioid Carcinoma (Primary solid tumor)
17 October 2014  |  analyses__2014_10_17
Maintainer Information
Citation Information
Maintained by Juok Cho (Broad Institute)
Cite as Broad Institute TCGA Genome Data Analysis Center (2014): Correlation between gene methylation status and clinical features. Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard. doi:10.7908/C1W094WV
Overview
Introduction

This pipeline uses various statistical tests to identify genes whose promoter methylation levels correlated to selected clinical features.

Summary

Testing the association between 20302 genes and 7 clinical features across 397 samples, statistically thresholded by P value < 0.05 and Q value < 0.3, 4 clinical features related to at least one genes.

  • 406 genes correlated to 'AGE'.

    • ANGPT4 ,  GPR158 ,  ALS2CL ,  EPB41L1 ,  SLFN14 ,  ...

  • 4098 genes correlated to 'HISTOLOGICAL.TYPE'.

    • APBB1IP ,  RASGRF1 ,  SSTR1 ,  LRRC36__1 ,  KCNA5 ,  ...

  • 69 genes correlated to 'RADIATIONS.RADIATION.REGIMENINDICATION'.

    • RMND5B ,  ZNF831 ,  GOLGA3 ,  MAP2K2 ,  SAP130 ,  ...

  • 46 genes correlated to 'RACE'.

    • C18ORF54 ,  GNB2L1 ,  SNORD95 ,  GRAPL ,  NCRNA00174 ,  ...

  • No genes correlated to 'Time to Death', 'COMPLETENESS.OF.RESECTION', and 'ETHNICITY'.

Results
Overview of the results

Complete statistical result table is provided in Supplement Table 1

Table 1.  Get Full Table This table shows the clinical features, statistical methods used, and the number of genes that are significantly associated with each clinical feature at P value < 0.05 and Q value < 0.3.

Clinical feature Statistical test Significant genes Associated with                 Associated with
Time to Death Cox regression test   N=0        
AGE Spearman correlation test N=406 older N=149 younger N=257
HISTOLOGICAL TYPE Kruskal-Wallis test N=4098        
RADIATIONS RADIATION REGIMENINDICATION Wilcoxon test N=69 yes N=69 no N=0
COMPLETENESS OF RESECTION Kruskal-Wallis test   N=0        
RACE Kruskal-Wallis test N=46        
ETHNICITY Wilcoxon test   N=0        
Clinical variable #1: 'Time to Death'

No gene related to 'Time to Death'.

Table S1.  Basic characteristics of clinical feature: 'Time to Death'

Time to Death Duration (Months) 0-191.8 (median=18.2)
  censored N = 350
  death N = 45
     
  Significant markers N = 0
Clinical variable #2: 'AGE'

406 genes related to 'AGE'.

Table S2.  Basic characteristics of clinical feature: 'AGE'

AGE Mean (SD) 64.01 (11)
  Significant markers N = 406
  pos. correlated 149
  neg. correlated 257
List of top 10 genes differentially expressed by 'AGE'

Table S3.  Get Full Table List of top 10 genes significantly correlated to 'AGE' by Spearman correlation test

SpearmanCorr corrP Q
ANGPT4 0.3493 8.294e-13 1.68e-08
GPR158 -0.3313 1.346e-11 2.73e-07
ALS2CL -0.3222 5.155e-11 1.05e-06
EPB41L1 -0.3186 8.636e-11 1.75e-06
SLFN14 0.3153 1.371e-10 2.78e-06
CTSG 0.3116 2.297e-10 4.66e-06
PLA2G15 -0.3112 2.435e-10 4.94e-06
CACNB1 -0.3111 2.477e-10 5.03e-06
ITPK1 -0.3088 3.371e-10 6.84e-06
NCRNA00203 -0.3088 3.371e-10 6.84e-06
Clinical variable #3: 'HISTOLOGICAL.TYPE'

4098 genes related to 'HISTOLOGICAL.TYPE'.

Table S4.  Basic characteristics of clinical feature: 'HISTOLOGICAL.TYPE'

HISTOLOGICAL.TYPE Labels N
  ENDOMETRIOID ENDOMETRIAL ADENOCARCINOMA 288
  MIXED SEROUS AND ENDOMETRIOID 20
  SEROUS ENDOMETRIAL ADENOCARCINOMA 89
     
  Significant markers N = 4098
List of top 10 genes differentially expressed by 'HISTOLOGICAL.TYPE'

Table S5.  Get Full Table List of top 10 genes differentially expressed by 'HISTOLOGICAL.TYPE'

ANOVA_P Q
APBB1IP 4.491e-35 9.12e-31
RASGRF1 5.691e-32 1.16e-27
SSTR1 1.065e-30 2.16e-26
LRRC36__1 2.351e-30 4.77e-26
KCNA5 3.873e-30 7.86e-26
ATP8A2 5.885e-30 1.19e-25
CARD11 5.888e-30 1.2e-25
DNAI1 8.802e-30 1.79e-25
PPIH 1.045e-29 2.12e-25
ADAMTS16 1.497e-29 3.04e-25
Clinical variable #4: 'RADIATIONS.RADIATION.REGIMENINDICATION'

69 genes related to 'RADIATIONS.RADIATION.REGIMENINDICATION'.

Table S6.  Basic characteristics of clinical feature: 'RADIATIONS.RADIATION.REGIMENINDICATION'

RADIATIONS.RADIATION.REGIMENINDICATION Labels N
  NO 87
  YES 310
     
  Significant markers N = 69
  Higher in YES 69
  Higher in NO 0
List of top 10 genes differentially expressed by 'RADIATIONS.RADIATION.REGIMENINDICATION'

Table S7.  Get Full Table List of top 10 genes differentially expressed by 'RADIATIONS.RADIATION.REGIMENINDICATION'

W(pos if higher in 'YES') wilcoxontestP Q AUC
RMND5B 18908 9.847e-09 2e-04 0.7011
ZNF831 18891 1.095e-08 0.000222 0.7004
GOLGA3 18880 1.172e-08 0.000238 0.7
MAP2K2 18773 2.263e-08 0.000459 0.6961
SAP130 18720 3.12e-08 0.000633 0.6941
C14ORF93 18639 5.067e-08 0.00103 0.6911
GIPR 18618 5.74e-08 0.00116 0.6903
TMEM125 18572 7.528e-08 0.00153 0.6886
GUSBL2 18530 9.624e-08 0.00195 0.6871
C11ORF2 18364 2.494e-07 0.00506 0.6809
Clinical variable #5: 'COMPLETENESS.OF.RESECTION'

No gene related to 'COMPLETENESS.OF.RESECTION'.

Table S8.  Basic characteristics of clinical feature: 'COMPLETENESS.OF.RESECTION'

COMPLETENESS.OF.RESECTION Labels N
  R0 265
  R1 18
  R2 13
  RX 29
     
  Significant markers N = 0
Clinical variable #6: 'RACE'

46 genes related to 'RACE'.

Table S9.  Basic characteristics of clinical feature: 'RACE'

RACE Labels N
  AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE 2
  ASIAN 7
  BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN 82
  NATIVE HAWAIIAN OR OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER 7
  WHITE 277
     
  Significant markers N = 46
List of top 10 genes differentially expressed by 'RACE'

Table S10.  Get Full Table List of top 10 genes differentially expressed by 'RACE'

ANOVA_P Q
C18ORF54 8.167e-16 1.66e-11
GNB2L1 3.074e-14 6.24e-10
SNORD95 3.074e-14 6.24e-10
GRAPL 1.605e-12 3.26e-08
NCRNA00174 3.242e-12 6.58e-08
ZNF525 1.001e-11 2.03e-07
GRAP 8.428e-11 1.71e-06
LOC253039 1.093e-10 2.22e-06
PSMD5 1.093e-10 2.22e-06
CN5H6.4 8.887e-10 1.8e-05
Clinical variable #7: 'ETHNICITY'

No gene related to 'ETHNICITY'.

Table S11.  Basic characteristics of clinical feature: 'ETHNICITY'

ETHNICITY Labels N
  HISPANIC OR LATINO 10
  NOT HISPANIC OR LATINO 287
     
  Significant markers N = 0
Methods & Data
Input
  • Expresson data file = UCEC-TP.meth.by_min_clin_corr.data.txt

  • Clinical data file = UCEC-TP.merged_data.txt

  • Number of patients = 397

  • Number of genes = 20302

  • Number of clinical features = 7

Survival analysis

For survival clinical features, Wald's test in univariate Cox regression analysis with proportional hazards model (Andersen and Gill 1982) was used to estimate the P values using the 'coxph' function in R. Kaplan-Meier survival curves were plot using the four quartile subgroups of patients based on expression levels

Correlation analysis

For continuous numerical clinical features, Spearman's rank correlation coefficients (Spearman 1904) and two-tailed P values were estimated using 'cor.test' function in R

ANOVA analysis

For multi-class clinical features (ordinal or nominal), one-way analysis of variance (Howell 2002) was applied to compare the log2-expression levels between different clinical classes using 'anova' function in R

Student's t-test analysis

For two-class clinical features, two-tailed Student's t test with unequal variance (Lehmann and Romano 2005) was applied to compare the log2-expression levels between the two clinical classes using 't.test' function in R

Q value calculation

For multiple hypothesis correction, Q value is the False Discovery Rate (FDR) analogue of the P value (Benjamini and Hochberg 1995), defined as the minimum FDR at which the test may be called significant. We used the 'Benjamini and Hochberg' method of 'p.adjust' function in R to convert P values into Q values.

Download Results

In addition to the links below, the full results of the analysis summarized in this report can also be downloaded programmatically using firehose_get, or interactively from either the Broad GDAC website or TCGA Data Coordination Center Portal.

References
[1] Andersen and Gill, Cox's regression model for counting processes, a large sample study, Annals of Statistics 10(4):1100-1120 (1982)
[2] Spearman, C, The proof and measurement of association between two things, Amer. J. Psychol 15:72-101 (1904)
[3] Howell, D, Statistical Methods for Psychology. (5th ed.), Duxbury Press:324-5 (2002)
[4] Lehmann and Romano, Testing Statistical Hypotheses (3E ed.), New York: Springer. ISBN 0387988645 (2005)
[5] Benjamini and Hochberg, Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B 59:289-300 (1995)